{"id":1232761,"date":"2026-07-02T16:34:27","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T14:34:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\/"},"modified":"2026-07-02T16:34:27","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T14:34:27","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Versailles, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00662"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-lexigence-renforcee-de-perspective-deloignement-pour-la-troisieme-prolongation\">I. L\u2019exigence renforc\u00e9e de perspective d\u2019\u00e9loignement pour la troisi\u00e8me prolongation<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-le-controle-des-diligences-effectives-et-utiles\">A. Le contr\u00f4le des diligences effectives et utiles<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-lappreciation-concrete-de-la-perspective-raisonnable-a-bref-delai\">B. L\u2019appr\u00e9ciation concr\u00e8te de la perspective raisonnable \u00e0 bref d\u00e9lai<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-la-neutralisation-des-considerations-dordre-public-dans-le-controle-de-la-pro\">II. La neutralisation des consid\u00e9rations d\u2019ordre public dans le contr\u00f4le de la prolongation<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-le-rappel-de-la-finalite-exclusive-de-la-retention\">A. Le rappel de la finalit\u00e9 exclusive de la r\u00e9tention<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-consequence-la-privation-de-base-legale-de-la-mesure\">B. La cons\u00e9quence : la privation de base l\u00e9gale de la mesure<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Par ordonnance du 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Versailles a rejet\u00e9 la requ\u00eate de l\u2019administration pr\u00e9fectorale tendant \u00e0 la troisi\u00e8me prolongation de la r\u00e9tention administrative d\u2019un \u00e9tranger titulaire d\u2019un titre de s\u00e9jour italien et faisant l\u2019objet d\u2019une interdiction d\u00e9finitive du territoire fran\u00e7ais. L\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9 avait \u00e9t\u00e9 plac\u00e9 en r\u00e9tention en vue de son \u00e9loignement. Les autorit\u00e9s italiennes ayant refus\u00e9 sa r\u00e9admission et les vols \u00e0 destination de son pays d\u2019origine \u00e9tant suspendus, la pr\u00e9fecture invoquait des d\u00e9marches via l\u2019\u00c9thiopie et l\u2019obtention d\u2019un laisser-passer consulaire. Le juge a estim\u00e9 que l\u2019administration ne produisait aucun \u00e9l\u00e9ment concret et actualis\u00e9 \u00e9tablissant une perspective raisonnable d\u2019\u00e9loignement \u00e0 bref d\u00e9lai, et que la finalit\u00e9 exclusive de la r\u00e9tention \u2013 l\u2019\u00e9loignement \u2013 n\u2019\u00e9tait pas assur\u00e9e. Il a ordonn\u00e9 la mainlev\u00e9e de la mesure. La d\u00e9cision pose la question des conditions dans lesquelles une troisi\u00e8me prolongation de r\u00e9tention peut \u00eatre accord\u00e9e, plus pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment de l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation de la perspective raisonnable d\u2019\u00e9loignement exig\u00e9e par l\u2019article L.743-12 du CESEDA et de la port\u00e9e des consid\u00e9rations d\u2019ordre public \u00e0 ce stade. La solution retenue manifeste un contr\u00f4le rigoureux des diligences de l\u2019administration et neutralise toute justification \u00e9trang\u00e8re \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9loignement.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-lexigence-renforcee-de-perspective-deloignement-pour-la-troisieme-prolongation\">I. L\u2019exigence renforc\u00e9e de perspective d\u2019\u00e9loignement pour la troisi\u00e8me prolongation<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-le-controle-des-diligences-effectives-et-utiles\">A. Le contr\u00f4le des diligences effectives et utiles<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge rappelle qu\u2019il appartient \u00e0 l\u2019administration de justifier de diligences effectives et utiles en vue de l\u2019\u00e9loignement, lequel doit constituer une perspective raisonnable \u00e0 bref d\u00e9lai. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, la pr\u00e9fecture se borne \u00e0 faire \u00e9tat de d\u00e9marches en vue d\u2019un acheminement via l\u2019\u00c9thiopie et de l\u2019obtention d\u2019un laisser-passer consulaire. Le juge constate qu\u2019elle ne produit aucun \u00e9l\u00e9ment concret et actualis\u00e9 permettant d\u2019\u00e9tablir l\u2019existence d\u2019un itin\u00e9raire effectif ni la possibilit\u00e9 d\u2019un d\u00e9part \u00e0 bref d\u00e9lai. Ce contr\u00f4le s\u2019inscrit dans le prolongement de la jurisprudence de la cour d\u2019appel de Paris, qui avait d\u00e9j\u00e0 jug\u00e9 que <em>&#8221; la seule saisine des autorit\u00e9s consulaires figurant \u00e0 la proc\u00e9dure sans, par exemple, aucune r\u00e9f\u00e9rence aux pr\u00e9c\u00e9dentes saisines &#8211; et donc de mani\u00e8re identique \u00e0 la situation de d\u00e9cembre 2024, pr\u00e9alable \u00e0 la d\u00e9cision du 21 f\u00e9vrier 2025 &#8211; ne permet pas de retenir que la d\u00e9monstration exig\u00e9e est op\u00e9r\u00e9e &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67d51ae42ecfdaf7720ec52d\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Paris, 14 mars 2025, n\u00b025\/01377)<\/a><\/strong>. Ici, les indications fournies sont trop g\u00e9n\u00e9rales pour caract\u00e9riser une d\u00e9marche effective. L\u2019administration ne d\u00e9taille pas les contacts pris avec les autorit\u00e9s \u00e9thiopiennes, ni les d\u00e9lais escompt\u00e9s, ni les assurances obtenues. Le juge en d\u00e9duit que les diligences accomplies ne peuvent \u00eatre regard\u00e9es comme suffisantes.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-lappreciation-concrete-de-la-perspective-raisonnable-a-bref-delai\">B. L\u2019appr\u00e9ciation concr\u00e8te de la perspective raisonnable \u00e0 bref d\u00e9lai<\/h3>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision \u00e9carte toute appr\u00e9ciation abstraite des diligences. Le juge exige une d\u00e9monstration concr\u00e8te que l\u2019\u00e9loignement peut intervenir dans un d\u00e9lai proche. L\u2019absence d\u2019itin\u00e9raire effectif et de date pr\u00e9visible de d\u00e9part prive la r\u00e9tention de sa finalit\u00e9. La solution rejoint la position de la cour d\u2019appel de Paris, qui avait retenu que <em>&#8221; l\u2019impossibilit\u00e9 fix\u00e9e par l\u2019administration elle-m\u00eame \u00e0 l\u2019ex\u00e9cution de la mesure d\u2019\u00e9loignement &#8220;<\/em> entra\u00eene l\u2019absence de finalit\u00e9 de la r\u00e9tention <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67da60df6523985016911675\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Paris, 18 mars 2025, n\u00b025\/01440)<\/a><\/strong>. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, l\u2019administration n\u2019a pas d\u00e9montr\u00e9 que les obstacles \u2013 refus italien, suspension des vols \u2013 \u00e9taient surmontables \u00e0 bref d\u00e9lai. La seule \u00e9vocation de pistes non concr\u00e9tis\u00e9es ne suffit pas. Le juge applique ainsi strictement l\u2019article L.743-12 du CESEDA, qui conditionne la troisi\u00e8me prolongation \u00e0 l\u2019existence d\u2019une perspective raisonnable d\u2019\u00e9loignement. Cette exigence, renforc\u00e9e \u00e0 ce stade de la proc\u00e9dure, prot\u00e8ge la libert\u00e9 individuelle en \u00e9vitant une d\u00e9tention sans issue.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-la-neutralisation-des-considerations-dordre-public-dans-le-controle-de-la-pro\">II. La neutralisation des consid\u00e9rations d\u2019ordre public dans le contr\u00f4le de la prolongation<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-le-rappel-de-la-finalite-exclusive-de-la-retention\">A. Le rappel de la finalit\u00e9 exclusive de la r\u00e9tention<\/h3>\n<p>L\u2019administration pr\u00e9fectorale invoquait la menace \u00e0 l\u2019ordre public r\u00e9sultant de la condamnation p\u00e9nale de l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9, assortie d\u2019une interdiction d\u00e9finitive du territoire fran\u00e7ais. Le juge \u00e9carte explicitement cet argument : <em>&#8221; cette circonstance est sans incidence sur la l\u00e9galit\u00e9 du maintien en r\u00e9tention, laquelle ne peut \u00eatre justifi\u00e9e qu\u2019au regard de la seule finalit\u00e9 d\u2019\u00e9loignement &#8220;<\/em>. Il rappelle ainsi que la r\u00e9tention administrative n\u2019est pas une mesure privative de libert\u00e9 \u00e0 caract\u00e8re punitif, mais une mesure destin\u00e9e \u00e0 permettre l\u2019ex\u00e9cution d\u2019une obligation de quitter le territoire. L\u2019article L.743-12 du CESEDA ne subordonne la prolongation \u00e0 aucune condition li\u00e9e \u00e0 la dangerosit\u00e9 de l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9. Le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention n\u2019est pas comp\u00e9tent pour appr\u00e9cier la menace \u00e0 l\u2019ordre public, qui rel\u00e8ve du contr\u00f4le de l\u2019administration et, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, du juge administratif. En neutralisant cette consid\u00e9ration, le juge judiciaire cantonne son office \u00e0 la garantie de la libert\u00e9 individuelle et \u00e0 la v\u00e9rification des conditions l\u00e9gales de la r\u00e9tention.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-consequence-la-privation-de-base-legale-de-la-mesure\">B. La cons\u00e9quence : la privation de base l\u00e9gale de la mesure<\/h3>\n<p>En l\u2019absence de perspective raisonnable d\u2019\u00e9loignement, la r\u00e9tention se trouve priv\u00e9e de base l\u00e9gale. Le juge tire les cons\u00e9quences de l\u2019absence de finalit\u00e9 de la mesure en ordonnant la mainlev\u00e9e. Il ne se contente pas de rejeter la demande de prolongation ; il ordonne la remise en libert\u00e9 imm\u00e9diate. Cette solution est logique : maintenir une r\u00e9tention qui n\u2019a plus d\u2019objet serait contraire \u00e0 l\u2019article 66 de la Constitution, qui fait de l\u2019autorit\u00e9 judiciaire la gardienne de la libert\u00e9 individuelle. La d\u00e9cision rappelle que la prolongation exceptionnelle n\u2019est pas une mesure de s\u00fbret\u00e9 d\u00e9tachable de l\u2019\u00e9loignement. En cela, elle s\u2019inscrit dans une jurisprudence protectrice des droits fondamentaux, exigeant que chaque jour de r\u00e9tention soit justifi\u00e9 par une perspective s\u00e9rieuse d\u2019ex\u00e9cution de la mesure d\u2019\u00e9loignement. La port\u00e9e de l\u2019ordonnance est double : elle sanctionne l\u2019insuffisance des diligences et affirme que la gravit\u00e9 des faits reproch\u00e9s \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9tranger ne peut pallier l\u2019absence de perspective d\u2019\u00e9loignement.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67d51ae42ecfdaf7720ec52d\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Paris, le 14 mars 2025, n\u00b025\/01377<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67da60df6523985016911675\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Paris, le 18 mars 2025, n\u00b025\/01440<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000048446968\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 743-12 du Code de l&#8217;entr\u00e9e et du s\u00e9jour des \u00e9trangers et du droit d&#8217;asile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>En cas de violation des formes prescrites par la loi \u00e0 peine de nullit\u00e9 ou d&#8217;inobservation des formalit\u00e9s substantielles, le magistrat du si\u00e8ge du tribunal judiciaire saisi d&#8217;une demande sur ce motif ou qui rel\u00e8ve d&#8217;office une telle irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9 ne peut prononcer la mainlev\u00e9e du placement ou du maintien en r\u00e9tention que lorsque celle-ci a eu pour effet de porter substantiellement atteinte aux droits de l&#8217;\u00e9tranger dont l&#8217;effectivit\u00e9 n&#8217;a pu \u00eatre r\u00e9tablie par une r\u00e9gularisation intervenue avant la cl\u00f4ture des d\u00e9bats.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Par ordonnance du 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Versailles a rejet\u00e9 la requ\u00eate de l\u2019administration&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":4870,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cad3fdcdc6046d478c2f93","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cad3fdcdc6046d478c2f93","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cad3fdcdc6046d478c2f93","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Versailles","_kj_chambre":"Jld","_kj_rg":"26\/00662","_kj_date":"2026-03-30","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1232761","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Versailles, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00662 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Par ordonnance du 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Versailles a rejet\u00e9 la requ\u00eate de l\u2019administration...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Versailles, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00662\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Par ordonnance du 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Versailles a rejet\u00e9 la requ\u00eate de l\u2019administration...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-02T14:34:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mathieu-gauzy-4CVs3VcCR6k-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"3000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Versailles, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00662\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T14:34:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1344,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/mathieu-gauzy-4CVs3VcCR6k-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Versailles, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00662\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-02T14:34:27+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Versailles, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00662 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/mathieu-gauzy-4CVs3VcCR6k-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T14:34:27+00:00\",\"description\":\"Par ordonnance du 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Versailles a rejet\u00e9 la requ\u00eate de l\u2019administration...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/mathieu-gauzy-4CVs3VcCR6k-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/mathieu-gauzy-4CVs3VcCR6k-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":3000,\"height\":2000},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Versailles, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00662\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Versailles, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00662 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Par ordonnance du 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Versailles a rejet\u00e9 la requ\u00eate de l\u2019administration...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Versailles, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00662","og_description":"Par ordonnance du 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Versailles a rejet\u00e9 la requ\u00eate de l\u2019administration...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-02T14:34:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":3000,"height":2000,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mathieu-gauzy-4CVs3VcCR6k-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Versailles, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00662","datePublished":"2026-07-02T14:34:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\/"},"wordCount":1344,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mathieu-gauzy-4CVs3VcCR6k-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Versailles, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00662","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-02T14:34:27+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Versailles, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00662 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mathieu-gauzy-4CVs3VcCR6k-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-02T14:34:27+00:00","description":"Par ordonnance du 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Versailles a rejet\u00e9 la requ\u00eate de l\u2019administration...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mathieu-gauzy-4CVs3VcCR6k-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mathieu-gauzy-4CVs3VcCR6k-unsplash.webp","width":3000,"height":2000},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00662\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Versailles, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00662"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mathieu-gauzy-4CVs3VcCR6k-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-5aHf","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1211617,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232761,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Versailles, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00206","author":"Kohen","date":"28 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Introduction sans titre. I. Les conditions de l'homologation de l'accord transactionnel A. L'interdiction pour le juge de modifier les termes de l'accord...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/haut-risque-JoyJpFZM-ZE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/haut-risque-JoyJpFZM-ZE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/haut-risque-JoyJpFZM-ZE-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/haut-risque-JoyJpFZM-ZE-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/haut-risque-JoyJpFZM-ZE-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/haut-risque-JoyJpFZM-ZE-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":440383,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-2025-09-17-n22-00008\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232761,"position":1},"title":"Cour d&#8217;appel, 2025-09-17, n\u00b022\/00008","author":"","date":"28 March 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La Cour d'appel de Rennes, huiti\u00e8me chambre prud'homale, le 17 septembre 2025, statue sur un appel d'un jugement du conseil de prud'hommes. Les parties...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour d'appel&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour d'appel","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-dappel\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/gloria-villa-ByP0PtBXpi0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/gloria-villa-ByP0PtBXpi0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/gloria-villa-ByP0PtBXpi0-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/gloria-villa-ByP0PtBXpi0-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/gloria-villa-ByP0PtBXpi0-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/gloria-villa-ByP0PtBXpi0-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1225911,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00140\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232761,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire d&#8217;Orl\u00e9ans, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00140","author":"Kohen","date":"1 July 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal judiciaire d\u2019Orl\u00e9ans, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 27 mars 2026, a rendu une ordonnance de d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance. Par exploit du 19 mars 2026, une...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/roman-kraft-X1exjxxBho4-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/roman-kraft-X1exjxxBho4-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/roman-kraft-X1exjxxBho4-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/roman-kraft-X1exjxxBho4-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/roman-kraft-X1exjxxBho4-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/roman-kraft-X1exjxxBho4-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1209492,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-creteil-le-7-avril-2026-n2025f01179\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232761,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Cr\u00e9teil, le 7 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F01179","author":"Kohen","date":"28 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"I. L'EXTINCTION DE L'INSTANCE PAR L'EFFET DU D\u00c9SISTEMENT DU DEMANDEUR A. La manifestation non \u00e9quivoque de la volont\u00e9 de renoncer \u00e0 l'instance et \u00e0...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-qhFXS18P2OQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-qhFXS18P2OQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-qhFXS18P2OQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-qhFXS18P2OQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-qhFXS18P2OQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-qhFXS18P2OQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1203175,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-damiens-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00547\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232761,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire d&#8217;Amiens, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00547","author":"Kohen","date":"27 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"I. Le strict encadrement des conditions de recevabilit\u00e9 de l'action en r\u00e9siliation A. L'obligation de respecter les d\u00e9lais de notification et de saisine...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-uIEL3NE30xk-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-uIEL3NE30xk-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-uIEL3NE30xk-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-uIEL3NE30xk-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-uIEL3NE30xk-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-uIEL3NE30xk-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1209527,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00627\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232761,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Versailles, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00627","author":"Kohen","date":"28 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Versailles, par un jugement du 27 mars 2026, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande du bailleur personne morale en constat de r\u00e9siliation de...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/umpholphat-dangam-le9eON7OAXo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/umpholphat-dangam-le9eON7OAXo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/umpholphat-dangam-le9eON7OAXo-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/umpholphat-dangam-le9eON7OAXo-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/umpholphat-dangam-le9eON7OAXo-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/umpholphat-dangam-le9eON7OAXo-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1232761","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1232761"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1232761\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4870"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1232761"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1232761"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1232761"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}