{"id":1232774,"date":"2026-07-02T16:46:33","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T14:46:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\/"},"modified":"2026-07-02T16:46:33","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T14:46:33","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00808"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-les-conditions-de-perfection-du-desistement-unilateral\">I. Les conditions de perfection du d\u00e9sistement unilat\u00e9ral<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-labsence-de-defense-au-fond-comme-condition-prealable\">A. L\u2019absence de d\u00e9fense au fond comme condition pr\u00e9alable<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-lacceptation-implicite-des-defendeurs\">B. L\u2019acceptation implicite des d\u00e9fendeurs<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-les-effets-du-desistement-sur-linstance-et-la-charge-des-depens\">II. Les effets du d\u00e9sistement sur l\u2019instance et la charge des d\u00e9pens<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-lextinction-de-linstance-et-de-laction\">A. L\u2019extinction de l\u2019instance et de l\u2019action<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-charge-des-depens-mise-a-la-partie-qui-se-desiste\">B. La charge des d\u00e9pens mise \u00e0 la partie qui se d\u00e9siste<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 30 mars 2026, \u00e9tait saisi d\u2019une demande form\u00e9e par une personne physique \u00e0 l\u2019encontre de deux soci\u00e9t\u00e9s d\u2019assurance et d\u2019un organisme social. La demanderesse avait assign\u00e9 ces parties devant la juridiction des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s. \u00c0 l\u2019audience du 19 janvier 2026, celle-ci a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 se d\u00e9sister de son instance et de son action. Les d\u00e9fenderesses, pr\u00e9sentes ou non, n\u2019ont formul\u00e9 aucune opposition \u00e0 ce d\u00e9sistement. La question juridique centrale \u00e9tait celle de savoir si le d\u00e9sistement ainsi op\u00e9r\u00e9 devait \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme parfait, et quelles en \u00e9taient les cons\u00e9quences sur les d\u00e9pens. Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s a r\u00e9pondu par l\u2019affirmative, constatant le d\u00e9sistement et le d\u00e9clarant parfait, tout en mettant les d\u00e9pens \u00e0 la charge de la partie demanderesse.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-les-conditions-de-perfection-du-desistement-unilateral\">I. Les conditions de perfection du d\u00e9sistement unilat\u00e9ral<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-labsence-de-defense-au-fond-comme-condition-prealable\">A. L\u2019absence de d\u00e9fense au fond comme condition pr\u00e9alable<\/h3>\n<p>L\u2019article 395 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile \u00e9nonce que le d\u00e9sistement n\u2019est parfait que par l\u2019acceptation du d\u00e9fendeur, mais il ajoute un temp\u00e9rament : <em>&#8221; Toutefois, l\u2019acceptation n\u2019est pas n\u00e9cessaire si le d\u00e9fendeur n\u2019a pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 aucune d\u00e9fense au fond ou fin de non-recevoir au moment o\u00f9 le demandeur se d\u00e9siste &#8220;<\/em>. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, \u00e0 l\u2019audience du 19 janvier 2026, la demanderesse a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 se d\u00e9sister. \u00c0 cet instant, aucun des d\u00e9fendeurs n\u2019avait pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 de d\u00e9fense au fond. La Cour d\u2019appel d\u2019Aix-en-Provence, dans une affaire similaire, a rappel\u00e9 que <em>&#8221; l&#8217;acceptation n&#8217;est pas n\u00e9cessaire si le d\u00e9fendeur n&#8217;a pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 aucune d\u00e9fense au fond ou fin de non-recevoir au moment o\u00f9 le demandeur se d\u00e9siste &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67ef715b8d5c08d4a262e572\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel d\u2019Aix-en-Provence, le 3 avril 2025, n\u00b025\/00080)<\/a><\/strong>. Cette r\u00e8gle vise \u00e0 faciliter le d\u00e9sistement lorsque le proc\u00e8s n\u2019a pas encore v\u00e9ritablement d\u00e9but\u00e9 sur le fond. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s a implicitement v\u00e9rifi\u00e9 cette condition en constatant l\u2019absence d\u2019opposition des adversaires. La demande \u00e9tant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, la proc\u00e9dure est rapide et il est fr\u00e9quent qu\u2019aucune d\u00e9fense \u00e9crite n\u2019ait \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9pos\u00e9e avant l\u2019audience. La condition de l\u2019absence de d\u00e9fense au fond \u00e9tait donc remplie.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-lacceptation-implicite-des-defendeurs\">B. L\u2019acceptation implicite des d\u00e9fendeurs<\/h3>\n<p>Si l\u2019absence de d\u00e9fense au fond dispense d\u2019une acceptation formelle, il n\u2019en demeure pas moins que le d\u00e9sistement doit \u00eatre notifi\u00e9 ou port\u00e9 \u00e0 la connaissance du d\u00e9fendeur. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le d\u00e9sistement a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9clar\u00e9 oralement \u00e0 l\u2019audience, en pr\u00e9sence des avocats des deux assureurs, la CPAM et une autre personne physique \u00e9tant non comparants. Les d\u00e9fendeurs pr\u00e9sents n\u2019ont formul\u00e9 aucune opposition. Le juge a estim\u00e9 qu\u2019ils <em>&#8221; doivent donc \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9s comme ayant accept\u00e9 ce d\u00e9sistement implicitement &#8220;<\/em>. Cette analyse est conforme \u00e0 la jurisprudence, qui admet l\u2019acceptation tacite par d\u00e9faut d\u2019opposition. La Cour d\u2019appel de Toulouse a pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 que <em>&#8221; les d\u00e9pens de l&#8217;instance sont mis en vertu des dispositions combin\u00e9es des articles 399 et 405 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile \u00e0 la charge de la partie qui se d\u00e9siste, sauf accord contraire entre les parties &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6974748ecdc6046d478684e6\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Toulouse, le 28 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b024\/04068)<\/a><\/strong>. L\u2019acceptation implicite r\u00e9sulte de l\u2019absence de contestation, ce qui rend le d\u00e9sistement parfait d\u00e8s l\u2019audience. Le juge a donc pu constater le d\u00e9sistement et le d\u00e9clarer parfait.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-les-effets-du-desistement-sur-linstance-et-la-charge-des-depens\">II. Les effets du d\u00e9sistement sur l\u2019instance et la charge des d\u00e9pens<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-lextinction-de-linstance-et-de-laction\">A. L\u2019extinction de l\u2019instance et de l\u2019action<\/h3>\n<p>Le d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance met fin \u00e0 la proc\u00e9dure engag\u00e9e. Il emporte renonciation \u00e0 l\u2019instance, mais pas n\u00e9cessairement \u00e0 l\u2019action elle-m\u00eame, sauf si le d\u00e9sistement est \u00e9galement d\u2019action, comme en l\u2019esp\u00e8ce o\u00f9 la demanderesse s\u2019est d\u00e9sist\u00e9e <em>&#8221; de son instance et de son action &#8220;<\/em>. Le juge a constat\u00e9 ce double d\u00e9sistement. L\u2019extinction de l\u2019instance est alors d\u00e9finitive : les parties sont remises dans l\u2019\u00e9tat o\u00f9 elles se trouvaient avant l\u2019assignation. La d\u00e9cision qualifie l\u2019ordonnance de <em>&#8221; r\u00e9put\u00e9e contradictoire &#8220;<\/em>, car certains d\u00e9fendeurs n\u2019\u00e9taient pas comparants. Le d\u00e9sistement, une fois constat\u00e9, rend l\u2019instance sans objet. Il n\u2019y a donc pas de d\u00e9cision au fond, et le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s n\u2019a plus \u00e0 statuer sur la demande initiale. Cette solution est classique et conforme au droit processuel.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-charge-des-depens-mise-a-la-partie-qui-se-desiste\">B. La charge des d\u00e9pens mise \u00e0 la partie qui se d\u00e9siste<\/h3>\n<p>L\u2019article 399 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile dispose que le d\u00e9sistement emporte, sauf convention contraire, soumission de payer les frais de l\u2019instance \u00e9teinte. Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s a appliqu\u00e9 cette r\u00e8gle en disant que la demanderesse <em>&#8221; conservera la charge des d\u00e9pens &#8220;<\/em>. Cette solution est automatique, le d\u00e9sistement ne pouvant \u00eatre conditionn\u00e9 par une autre r\u00e9partition des d\u00e9pens, sauf accord pr\u00e9alable entre les parties. La demanderesse, en se d\u00e9sistant, s\u2019expose \u00e0 supporter les frais de justice engag\u00e9s par les d\u00e9fendeurs, y compris les d\u00e9pens de l\u2019instance. La Cour d\u2019appel de Toulouse a rappel\u00e9 ce principe : <em>&#8221; les d\u00e9pens de l&#8217;instance sont mis en vertu des dispositions combin\u00e9es des articles 399 et 405 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile \u00e0 la charge de la partie qui se d\u00e9siste &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6974748ecdc6046d478684e6\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Toulouse, le 28 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b024\/04068)<\/a><\/strong>. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, aucun accord contraire n\u2019a \u00e9t\u00e9 invoqu\u00e9. La d\u00e9cision est donc conforme au droit positif. Elle assure une certaine \u00e9quit\u00e9 proc\u00e9durale, le demandeur qui renonce \u00e0 son action devant assumer les frais qu\u2019il a g\u00e9n\u00e9r\u00e9s. Cette solution est d\u2019autant plus justifi\u00e9e en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, o\u00f9 la proc\u00e9dure est rapide et les frais limit\u00e9s.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6974748ecdc6046d478684e6\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Toulouse, le 28 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b024\/04068<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67ef715b8d5c08d4a262e572\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel d\u2019Aix-en-Provence, le 3 avril 2025, n\u00b025\/00080<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410629\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 399 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   Le d\u00e9sistement emporte, sauf convention contraire, soumission de payer les frais de l&#8217;instance \u00e9teinte.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410635\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 405 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Les articles 396,397 et 399 sont applicables au d\u00e9sistement de l&#8217;appel ou de l&#8217;opposition.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410620\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 395 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">   Le d\u00e9sistement n&#8217;est parfait que par l&#8217;acceptation du d\u00e9fendeur.<\/p>\n<p>    Toutefois, l&#8217;acceptation n&#8217;est pas n\u00e9cessaire si le d\u00e9fendeur n&#8217;a pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 aucune d\u00e9fense au fond ou fin de non-recevoir au moment o\u00f9 le demandeur se d\u00e9siste.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 30 mars 2026, \u00e9tait saisi d\u2019une demande form\u00e9e par une personne physique \u00e0 l\u2019encontre de deux&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9530,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cacdf4cdc6046d478bceb2","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cacdf4cdc6046d478bceb2","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cacdf4cdc6046d478bceb2","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Marseille","_kj_chambre":"R\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s Cabinet 1","_kj_rg":"25\/00808","_kj_date":"2026-03-30","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1232774","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00808 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 30 mars 2026, \u00e9tait saisi d\u2019une demande form\u00e9e par une personne physique \u00e0 l\u2019encontre de deux...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00808\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 30 mars 2026, \u00e9tait saisi d\u2019une demande form\u00e9e par une personne physique \u00e0 l\u2019encontre de deux...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-02T14:46:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/toa-heftiba-BUG3Exlsdko-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"5663\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3775\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/00808\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T14:46:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1244,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/toa-heftiba-BUG3Exlsdko-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/00808\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-02T14:46:33+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/00808 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/toa-heftiba-BUG3Exlsdko-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T14:46:33+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 30 mars 2026, \u00e9tait saisi d\u2019une demande form\u00e9e par une personne physique \u00e0 l\u2019encontre de deux...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/toa-heftiba-BUG3Exlsdko-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/toa-heftiba-BUG3Exlsdko-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":5663,\"height\":3775},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/00808\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00808 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 30 mars 2026, \u00e9tait saisi d\u2019une demande form\u00e9e par une personne physique \u00e0 l\u2019encontre de deux...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00808","og_description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 30 mars 2026, \u00e9tait saisi d\u2019une demande form\u00e9e par une personne physique \u00e0 l\u2019encontre de deux...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-02T14:46:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":5663,"height":3775,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/toa-heftiba-BUG3Exlsdko-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00808","datePublished":"2026-07-02T14:46:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\/"},"wordCount":1244,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/toa-heftiba-BUG3Exlsdko-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00808","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-02T14:46:33+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00808 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/toa-heftiba-BUG3Exlsdko-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-02T14:46:33+00:00","description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 30 mars 2026, \u00e9tait saisi d\u2019une demande form\u00e9e par une personne physique \u00e0 l\u2019encontre de deux...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/toa-heftiba-BUG3Exlsdko-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/toa-heftiba-BUG3Exlsdko-unsplash.webp","width":5663,"height":3775},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-00808\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00808"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/toa-heftiba-BUG3Exlsdko-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-5aHs","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":492360,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-13-novembre-2025-n25-02521\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232774,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 13 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/02521","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Paris, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 10 mars 2026, examine une demande indemnitaire li\u00e9e \u00e0 un trouble de jouissance locative. Suite \u00e0 un...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":463139,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-marseille-28-05-2025-n-24ma01172\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232774,"position":1},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de MARSEILLE \u2013 28\/05\/2025 \u2013 n\u00b0 24MA01172","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La d\u00e9cision rendue par la cour administrative d'appel de Marseille le 3 janvier 2026 traite de la l\u00e9galit\u00e9 d'une mesure d'\u00e9loignement assortie d'une...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-LQw7fIchK-o-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-LQw7fIchK-o-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-LQw7fIchK-o-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-LQw7fIchK-o-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-LQw7fIchK-o-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-LQw7fIchK-o-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":488977,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-24-novembre-2025-n24-06061\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232774,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 24 novembre 2025, n\u00b024\/06061","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Paris, par jugement du 16 f\u00e9vrier 2026, statue sur une demande en paiement d\u2019arri\u00e9r\u00e9s de charges de copropri\u00e9t\u00e9. Le syndicat des...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-5TTaPKNAuHU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-5TTaPKNAuHU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-5TTaPKNAuHU-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-5TTaPKNAuHU-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-5TTaPKNAuHU-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-5TTaPKNAuHU-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1203375,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-3-avril-2026-n2022f00550\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232774,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Marseille, le 3 avril 2026, n\u00b02022F00550","author":"Kohen","date":"27 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Marseille, chambre 16, a rendu le 3 avril 2026 une d\u00e9cision (n\u00b02022F00550) relative aux effets d\u2019un d\u00e9sistement...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":491081,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-18-novembre-2025-n24-02890\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232774,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 18 novembre 2025, n\u00b024\/02890","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le p\u00f4le social du tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, par jugement du 18 novembre 2025, statue sur un recours concernant l'attribution de l'allocation aux...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/venus-major-dRu-1z24xCw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/venus-major-dRu-1z24xCw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/venus-major-dRu-1z24xCw-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/venus-major-dRu-1z24xCw-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/venus-major-dRu-1z24xCw-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/venus-major-dRu-1z24xCw-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":490878,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-18-novembre-2025-n2025f01163\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232774,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Marseille, le 18 novembre 2025, n\u00b02025F01163","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal des Activit\u00e9s \u00c9conomiques de Marseille, le 18 novembre 2025, ordonne une conciliation pr\u00e9alable dans un litige commercial. Saisi d\u2019un...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-x5-AOGEbv3c-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-x5-AOGEbv3c-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-x5-AOGEbv3c-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-x5-AOGEbv3c-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-x5-AOGEbv3c-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-x5-AOGEbv3c-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1232774","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1232774"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1232774\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9530"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1232774"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1232774"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1232774"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}