{"id":1232785,"date":"2026-07-02T16:48:16","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T14:48:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\/"},"modified":"2026-07-02T16:48:16","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T14:48:16","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/05370"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-laffirmation-des-pouvoirs-du-juge-des-referes-en-presence-dun-droit-non-serieu\">I. L\u2019affirmation des pouvoirs du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s en pr\u00e9sence d\u2019un droit non s\u00e9rieusement contestable<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-le-motif-legitime-de-lexpertise-medicale-au-cur-de-la-mesure-dinstruction\">A. Le motif l\u00e9gitime de l\u2019expertise m\u00e9dicale au c\u0153ur de la mesure d\u2019instruction<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-loctroi-dune-provision-fonde-sur-labsence-de-contestation-serieuse-du-droit-a-\">B. L\u2019octroi d\u2019une provision fond\u00e9 sur l\u2019absence de contestation s\u00e9rieuse du droit \u00e0 indemnisation<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-la-mesure-des-limites-de-lintervention-du-juge-des-referes-dans-lindemnisatio\">II. La mesure des limites de l\u2019intervention du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s dans l\u2019indemnisation du dommage corporel<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-distinction-entre-provision-et-evaluation-definitive-du-prejudice\">A. La distinction entre provision et \u00e9valuation d\u00e9finitive du pr\u00e9judice<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-portee-de-la-decision-face-a-lalea-et-aux-pouvoirs-du-juge-du-fond\">B. La port\u00e9e de la d\u00e9cision face \u00e0 l\u2019al\u00e9a et aux pouvoirs du juge du fond<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p><h2 id=\"i-laffirmation-des-pouvoirs-du-juge-des-referes-en-presence-dun-droit-non-serieu\">I. L\u2019affirmation des pouvoirs du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s en pr\u00e9sence d\u2019un droit non s\u00e9rieusement contestable<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-le-motif-legitime-de-lexpertise-medicale-au-cur-de-la-mesure-dinstruction\">A. Le motif l\u00e9gitime de l\u2019expertise m\u00e9dicale au c\u0153ur de la mesure d\u2019instruction<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s a ordonn\u00e9 une expertise m\u00e9dicale sur le fondement de l\u2019article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. Il appartenait au demandeur de d\u00e9montrer l\u2019existence d\u2019un motif l\u00e9gitime, c\u2019est-\u00e0-dire un fait cr\u00e9dible et plausible pr\u00e9sentant un lien utile avec un litige potentiel. La d\u00e9cision comment\u00e9e retient que le droit \u00e0 indemnisation n\u2019est pas contest\u00e9 par la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d\u2019assurances, ce qui suffit \u00e0 \u00e9tablir la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 d\u2019un litige futur. L\u2019expertise doit permettre de d\u00e9terminer l\u2019\u00e9tendue des pr\u00e9judices subis et d\u2019\u00e9clairer le juge du fond. Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s a ainsi appliqu\u00e9 la condition pos\u00e9e par la jurisprudence, selon laquelle <em>&#8221; ces dispositions requi\u00e8rent l\u2019existence d\u2019un motif l\u00e9gitime, c\u2019est-\u00e0-dire un fait cr\u00e9dible et plausible, ne relevant pas de la simple hypoth\u00e8se &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67b819e30f66d9c033b922ab\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Paris, 20 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b024\/10306)<\/a><\/strong>. Il a jug\u00e9 que cette condition \u00e9tait remplie malgr\u00e9 l\u2019invocation par l\u2019assureur d\u2019une possible faute de la victime. La mesure d\u2019instruction appara\u00eet donc pertinente et utile pour d\u00e9terminer les cons\u00e9quences corporelles de l\u2019accident. Le juge ne tranche pas le fond mais se limite \u00e0 ordonner une mesure conservatoire.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-loctroi-dune-provision-fonde-sur-labsence-de-contestation-serieuse-du-droit-a-\">B. L\u2019octroi d\u2019une provision fond\u00e9 sur l\u2019absence de contestation s\u00e9rieuse du droit \u00e0 indemnisation<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s a accord\u00e9 au demandeur une provision de 40 000 euros \u00e0 valoir sur la r\u00e9paration de son pr\u00e9judice, sur le fondement de l\u2019article 835 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. Il a constat\u00e9 que le droit \u00e0 indemnisation n\u2019\u00e9tait pas contest\u00e9, mais que le montant de la provision ne devait pas exc\u00e9der <em>&#8221; le montant d\u2019indemnisation au-del\u00e0 duquel celui-ci devient al\u00e9atoire ou incertain compte tenu de l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation du juge du fond &#8220;<\/em>. L\u2019assureur invoquait une possible faute de la victime, mais cette circonstance ne rendait pas le droit \u00e0 indemnisation s\u00e9rieusement contestable. Le juge a donc fix\u00e9 la provision \u00e0 un niveau qu\u2019il a estim\u00e9 justifi\u00e9 au regard des pi\u00e8ces m\u00e9dicales d\u00e9j\u00e0 produites. Il a \u00e9galement allou\u00e9 une provision ad litem de 1 000 euros destin\u00e9e \u00e0 financer les honoraires d\u2019expert. Cette double provision t\u00e9moigne de la volont\u00e9 du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s d\u2019assurer une indemnisation provisoire imm\u00e9diate, sans pr\u00e9judice de l\u2019\u00e9valuation d\u00e9finitive. Le droit \u00e0 indemnisation n\u2019\u00e9tant pas s\u00e9rieusement contestable, le juge a pu user de son pouvoir d\u2019accorder une provision.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-la-mesure-des-limites-de-lintervention-du-juge-des-referes-dans-lindemnisatio\">II. La mesure des limites de l\u2019intervention du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s dans l\u2019indemnisation du dommage corporel<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-distinction-entre-provision-et-evaluation-definitive-du-prejudice\">A. La distinction entre provision et \u00e9valuation d\u00e9finitive du pr\u00e9judice<\/h3>\n<p>La provision allou\u00e9e par le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s ne pr\u00e9juge pas de l\u2019indemnisation d\u00e9finitive qui sera fix\u00e9e par le juge du fond. Le montant de 40 000 euros a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9termin\u00e9 en fonction des \u00e9l\u00e9ments m\u00e9dicaux dont disposait le juge, mais il ne constitue qu\u2019une avance. L\u2019expertise m\u00e9dicale ordonn\u00e9e devra permettre d\u2019\u00e9valuer tous les postes de pr\u00e9judice : d\u00e9ficit fonctionnel temporaire et permanent, souffrances endur\u00e9es, pr\u00e9judice esth\u00e9tique, etc. Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s a express\u00e9ment limit\u00e9 la provision \u00e0 ce qui n\u2019est pas al\u00e9atoire. Cela signifie que toute somme suppl\u00e9mentaire d\u00e9pendra des conclusions de l\u2019expert et de l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation du juge du fond. La d\u00e9cision comment\u00e9e illustre ainsi la fonction provisoire du r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 provision. Elle s\u2019inscrit dans la continuit\u00e9 de la jurisprudence qui exige que le droit ne soit pas s\u00e9rieusement contestable pour que la provision soit accord\u00e9e. L\u2019assureur n\u2019a pas contest\u00e9 le principe de l\u2019indemnisation, mais uniquement le montant. Le juge a donc pu trancher cette contestation partielle en fixant un montant non contestable.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-portee-de-la-decision-face-a-lalea-et-aux-pouvoirs-du-juge-du-fond\">B. La port\u00e9e de la d\u00e9cision face \u00e0 l\u2019al\u00e9a et aux pouvoirs du juge du fond<\/h3>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision comment\u00e9e rappelle que le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s ne peut pas se substituer au juge du fond pour \u00e9valuer d\u00e9finitivement le pr\u00e9judice. L\u2019al\u00e9a demeure sur plusieurs points, notamment sur l\u2019existence \u00e9ventuelle d\u2019une faute de la victime qui pourrait r\u00e9duire son droit \u00e0 indemnisation. Mais cette faute potentielle n\u2019a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme suffisamment s\u00e9rieuse pour rendre le droit contestable. Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s a donc estim\u00e9 que l\u2019obligation de l\u2019assureur n\u2019\u00e9tait pas s\u00e9rieusement contestable dans son principe. La port\u00e9e de cette ordonnance est donc de permettre une indemnisation rapide de la victime, tout en laissant au juge du fond la pleine appr\u00e9ciation des circonstances de l\u2019accident et de l\u2019\u00e9tendue des pr\u00e9judices. L\u2019expertise constitue un outil essentiel pour \u00e9clairer cette appr\u00e9ciation. En ordonnant une expertise tr\u00e8s d\u00e9taill\u00e9e, le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s a \u00e9galement circonscrit le cadre du futur d\u00e9bat. La d\u00e9cision illustre ainsi l\u2019articulation entre le r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 et le fond, le premier apportant une solution provisoire et conservatoire, le second tranchant d\u00e9finitivement le litige.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67ef6b0266129746fdd69d4b\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Paris, le 3 avril 2025, n\u00b024\/20370<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67b819e30f66d9c033b922ab\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Paris, le 20 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b024\/10306<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000051869339\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 145 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>S&#8217;il existe un motif l\u00e9gitime de conserver ou d&#8217;\u00e9tablir avant tout proc\u00e8s la preuve de faits dont pourrait d\u00e9pendre la solution d&#8217;un litige, les mesures d&#8217;instruction l\u00e9galement admissibles peuvent \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9es \u00e0 la demande de tout int\u00e9ress\u00e9, sur requ\u00eate ou en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>La juridiction territorialement comp\u00e9tente pour statuer sur une demande form\u00e9e en application du premier alin\u00e9a est, au choix du demandeur, celle susceptible de conna\u00eetre de l&#8217;affaire au fond ou, s&#8217;il y a lieu, celle dans le ressort de laquelle la mesure d&#8217;instruction doit \u00eatre ex\u00e9cut\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<p>Par d\u00e9rogation au deuxi\u00e8me alin\u00e9a, lorsque la mesure d&#8217;instruction porte sur un immeuble, la juridiction du lieu o\u00f9 est situ\u00e9 l&#8217;immeuble est seule comp\u00e9tente.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000042597284\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 835 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Le pr\u00e9sident du tribunal judiciaire ou le juge des contentieux de la protection dans les limites de sa comp\u00e9tence peuvent toujours, m\u00eame en pr\u00e9sence d&#8217;une contestation s\u00e9rieuse, prescrire en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 les mesures conservatoires ou de remise en \u00e9tat qui s&#8217;imposent, soit pour pr\u00e9venir un dommage imminent, soit pour faire cesser un trouble manifestement illicite.<\/p>\n<p>Dans les cas o\u00f9 l&#8217;existence de l&#8217;obligation n&#8217;est pas s\u00e9rieusement contestable, ils peuvent accorder une provision au cr\u00e9ancier, ou ordonner l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution de l&#8217;obligation m\u00eame s&#8217;il s&#8217;agit d&#8217;une obligation de faire.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I. L\u2019affirmation des pouvoirs du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s en pr\u00e9sence d\u2019un droit non s\u00e9rieusement contestable A. Le motif l\u00e9gitime de l\u2019expertise m\u00e9dicale au c\u0153ur&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":4766,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cace06cdc6046d478bd012","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cace06cdc6046d478bd012","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cace06cdc6046d478bd012","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Marseille","_kj_chambre":"R\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s Cabinet 1","_kj_rg":"25\/05370","_kj_date":"2026-03-30","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1232785","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/05370 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"I. L\u2019affirmation des pouvoirs du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s en pr\u00e9sence d\u2019un droit non s\u00e9rieusement contestable A. Le motif l\u00e9gitime de l\u2019expertise m\u00e9dicale au c\u0153ur...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/05370\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"I. L\u2019affirmation des pouvoirs du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s en pr\u00e9sence d\u2019un droit non s\u00e9rieusement contestable A. Le motif l\u00e9gitime de l\u2019expertise m\u00e9dicale au c\u0153ur...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-02T14:48:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pavan-trikutam-poNsj-vya34-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"4504\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3003\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/05370\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T14:48:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1343,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/pavan-trikutam-poNsj-vya34-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/05370\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-02T14:48:16+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/05370 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/pavan-trikutam-poNsj-vya34-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T14:48:16+00:00\",\"description\":\"I. L\u2019affirmation des pouvoirs du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s en pr\u00e9sence d\u2019un droit non s\u00e9rieusement contestable A. Le motif l\u00e9gitime de l\u2019expertise m\u00e9dicale au c\u0153ur...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/pavan-trikutam-poNsj-vya34-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/pavan-trikutam-poNsj-vya34-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":4504,\"height\":3003},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/05370\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/05370 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"I. L\u2019affirmation des pouvoirs du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s en pr\u00e9sence d\u2019un droit non s\u00e9rieusement contestable A. Le motif l\u00e9gitime de l\u2019expertise m\u00e9dicale au c\u0153ur...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/05370","og_description":"I. L\u2019affirmation des pouvoirs du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s en pr\u00e9sence d\u2019un droit non s\u00e9rieusement contestable A. Le motif l\u00e9gitime de l\u2019expertise m\u00e9dicale au c\u0153ur...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-02T14:48:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":4504,"height":3003,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pavan-trikutam-poNsj-vya34-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/05370","datePublished":"2026-07-02T14:48:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\/"},"wordCount":1343,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pavan-trikutam-poNsj-vya34-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/05370","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-02T14:48:16+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/05370 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pavan-trikutam-poNsj-vya34-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-02T14:48:16+00:00","description":"I. L\u2019affirmation des pouvoirs du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s en pr\u00e9sence d\u2019un droit non s\u00e9rieusement contestable A. Le motif l\u00e9gitime de l\u2019expertise m\u00e9dicale au c\u0153ur...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pavan-trikutam-poNsj-vya34-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pavan-trikutam-poNsj-vya34-unsplash.webp","width":4504,"height":3003},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-05370\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/05370"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pavan-trikutam-poNsj-vya34-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-5aHD","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":489164,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-24-novembre-2025-n25-56631\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232785,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 24 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/56631","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, le 24 novembre 2025, se prononce sur une demande de restitution d'un tableau et d'une provision. Le d\u00e9fendeur,...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/peter-ivey-hansen-K3qrgjT7N2M-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/peter-ivey-hansen-K3qrgjT7N2M-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/peter-ivey-hansen-K3qrgjT7N2M-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/peter-ivey-hansen-K3qrgjT7N2M-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/peter-ivey-hansen-K3qrgjT7N2M-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/peter-ivey-hansen-K3qrgjT7N2M-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":494084,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-29-octobre-2025-n24-00150\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232785,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Dijon, le 29 octobre 2025, n\u00b024\/00150","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le pr\u00e9sident du tribunal judiciaire, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, rejette l\u2019ensemble des demandes form\u00e9es par des membres d\u2019une association cultuelle. Ces derniers...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-naEd2MpzkNU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-naEd2MpzkNU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-naEd2MpzkNU-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-naEd2MpzkNU-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-naEd2MpzkNU-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-naEd2MpzkNU-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":494982,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lisieux-le-16-octobre-2025-n25-00211\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232785,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lisieux, le 16 octobre 2025, n\u00b025\/00211","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s du tribunal judiciaire, statuant le 26 juillet 2025, examine une demande en constatation de r\u00e9siliation de bail pour d\u00e9faut de...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-Hpw4nI_QUWQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-Hpw4nI_QUWQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-Hpw4nI_QUWQ-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-Hpw4nI_QUWQ-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-Hpw4nI_QUWQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-Hpw4nI_QUWQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":490109,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-privas-le-20-novembre-2025-n25-00224\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232785,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Privas, le 20 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/00224","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Privas, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 20 novembre 2025, se prononce sur une demande de r\u00e9solution de bail commercial. Le bailleur...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/toa-heftiba-BUG3Exlsdko-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/toa-heftiba-BUG3Exlsdko-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/toa-heftiba-BUG3Exlsdko-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/toa-heftiba-BUG3Exlsdko-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/toa-heftiba-BUG3Exlsdko-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/toa-heftiba-BUG3Exlsdko-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":494974,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-vienne-le-16-octobre-2025-n25-00122\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232785,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Vienne, le 16 octobre 2025, n\u00b025\/00122","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Vienne, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 16 octobre 2025, \u00e9tait saisi d'une demande de paiement formul\u00e9e par une bailleur contre la caution...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-oAaj82io-2k-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-oAaj82io-2k-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-oAaj82io-2k-unsplash-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-oAaj82io-2k-unsplash-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-oAaj82io-2k-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-oAaj82io-2k-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":495241,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-reims-le-3-decembre-2025-n25-00406\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232785,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Reims, le 3 d\u00e9cembre 2025, n\u00b025\/00406","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Reims, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 3 d\u00e9cembre 2025, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 civile immobili\u00e8re. Cette derni\u00e8re sollicitait la...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/valeria-m-zgvMPH83znI-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/valeria-m-zgvMPH83znI-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/valeria-m-zgvMPH83znI-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/valeria-m-zgvMPH83znI-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/valeria-m-zgvMPH83znI-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/valeria-m-zgvMPH83znI-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1232785","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1232785"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1232785\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4766"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1232785"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1232785"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1232785"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}