{"id":1232791,"date":"2026-07-02T16:49:10","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T14:49:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\/"},"modified":"2026-07-02T16:49:10","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T14:49:10","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/04757"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-la-confirmation-du-pouvoir-du-juge-des-referes-dordonner-une-mesure-dinstructi\">I. La confirmation du pouvoir du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s d\u2019ordonner une mesure d\u2019instruction nonobstant l\u2019existence d\u2019une contestation s\u00e9rieuse<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-lautonomie-de-larticle-145-du-code-de-procedure-civile-a-legard-de-la-contesta\">A. L\u2019autonomie de l\u2019article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9gard de la contestation s\u00e9rieuse<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-mission-dexpertise-comme-preparation-necessaire-du-proces-au-fond\">B. La mission d\u2019expertise comme pr\u00e9paration n\u00e9cessaire du proc\u00e8s au fond<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-le-rejet-des-demandes-de-provision-fonde-sur-labsence-dobligation-non-serieus\">II. Le rejet des demandes de provision fond\u00e9 sur l\u2019absence d\u2019obligation non s\u00e9rieusement contestable<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-lappreciation-de-la-contestation-serieuse-au-regard-des-circonstances-de-lacci\">A. L\u2019appr\u00e9ciation de la contestation s\u00e9rieuse au regard des circonstances de l\u2019accident<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-les-consequences-procedurales-du-rejet-de-la-provision-sur-les-demandes-access\">B. Les cons\u00e9quences proc\u00e9durales du rejet de la provision sur les demandes accessoires<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Par une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 du 30 mars 2026 (n\u00b025\/04757), le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par une victime d\u2019un accident de la circulation afin d\u2019obtenir une expertise m\u00e9dicale et le versement d\u2019une provision \u00e0 valoir sur son pr\u00e9judice corporel. La partie adverse a contest\u00e9 le droit \u00e0 indemnisation de la demanderesse, en arguant de sa propre faute de conduite lors de la survenance de l\u2019accident.<\/p>\n<p>Le constat amiable vers\u00e9 aux d\u00e9bats r\u00e9v\u00e9lait que la d\u00e9fenderesse \u00e9tait d\u00e9j\u00e0 engag\u00e9e sur le rond-point lorsque la requ\u00e9rante s\u2019y \u00e9tait pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e, ce qui \u00e9tait susceptible de caract\u00e9riser une faute de cette derni\u00e8re. En premi\u00e8re instance, le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s a ordonn\u00e9 une expertise m\u00e9dicale sur le fondement de l\u2019article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. En revanche, il a rejet\u00e9 la demande de provision form\u00e9e par la demanderesse, estimant que son droit \u00e0 indemnisation \u00e9tait s\u00e9rieusement contestable, ainsi que la demande de provision <em>ad litem<\/em> et celle fond\u00e9e sur l\u2019article 700 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. La question de droit pos\u00e9e au juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s \u00e9tait de savoir si, en pr\u00e9sence d\u2019une contestation s\u00e9rieuse affectant le principe m\u00eame de la cr\u00e9ance d\u2019indemnisation, il pouvait n\u00e9anmoins ordonner une mesure d\u2019instruction et, dans le m\u00eame temps, refuser toute provision. Le tribunal a r\u00e9pondu par l\u2019affirmative, distinguant nettement le r\u00e9gime de l\u2019expertise, qui \u00e9chappe \u00e0 la condition de l\u2019absence de contestation s\u00e9rieuse, de celui de la provision, qui y est soumis.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-la-confirmation-du-pouvoir-du-juge-des-referes-dordonner-une-mesure-dinstructi\">I. La confirmation du pouvoir du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s d\u2019ordonner une mesure d\u2019instruction nonobstant l\u2019existence d\u2019une contestation s\u00e9rieuse<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-lautonomie-de-larticle-145-du-code-de-procedure-civile-a-legard-de-la-contesta\">A. L\u2019autonomie de l\u2019article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9gard de la contestation s\u00e9rieuse<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s a fait application de l\u2019article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, lequel permet d\u2019ordonner toute mesure d\u2019instruction l\u00e9galement admissible d\u00e8s lors qu\u2019il existe un motif l\u00e9gitime de conserver ou d\u2019\u00e9tablir la preuve de faits dont pourrait d\u00e9pendre la solution d\u2019un litige. Contrairement \u00e0 la provision sollicit\u00e9e sur le fondement de l\u2019article 835, alin\u00e9a 2, du m\u00eame code, la mesure d\u2019expertise n\u2019est pas subordonn\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019absence de contestation s\u00e9rieuse. Le tribunal a donc ordonn\u00e9 une expertise m\u00e9dicale en d\u00e9pit des contestations soulev\u00e9es par la partie adverse sur le droit \u00e0 indemnisation. Cette solution est conforme \u00e0 la jurisprudence constante : la demande fond\u00e9e sur l\u2019article 145 n\u2019exige pas que la cr\u00e9ance soit non s\u00e9rieusement contestable, mais seulement que le demandeur justifie d\u2019un int\u00e9r\u00eat l\u00e9gitime \u00e0 la mesure probatoire.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-mission-dexpertise-comme-preparation-necessaire-du-proces-au-fond\">B. La mission d\u2019expertise comme pr\u00e9paration n\u00e9cessaire du proc\u00e8s au fond<\/h3>\n<p>La mission confi\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019expert est particuli\u00e8rement d\u00e9taill\u00e9e : elle vise \u00e0 \u00e9valuer l\u2019ensemble des postes de pr\u00e9judice corporel de la demanderesse, du d\u00e9ficit fonctionnel temporaire au pr\u00e9judice d\u2019agr\u00e9ment, en passant par les souffrances endur\u00e9es. En d\u00e9pit de l\u2019incertitude sur le principe de l\u2019indemnisation, li\u00e9e \u00e0 une possible faute de conduite, le juge a estim\u00e9 que l\u2019expertise \u00e9tait utile pour permettre \u00e0 la future juridiction du fond de statuer en connaissance de cause. Cette approche traduit la finalit\u00e9 m\u00eame de l\u2019article 145 : permettre la conservation des preuves avant tout proc\u00e8s. Le tribunal a ainsi disjoint le sort de la mesure d\u2019instruction, qu\u2019il a accord\u00e9e, de celui des demandes provisionnelles, qu\u2019il a rejet\u00e9es.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-le-rejet-des-demandes-de-provision-fonde-sur-labsence-dobligation-non-serieus\">II. Le rejet des demandes de provision fond\u00e9 sur l\u2019absence d\u2019obligation non s\u00e9rieusement contestable<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-lappreciation-de-la-contestation-serieuse-au-regard-des-circonstances-de-lacci\">A. L\u2019appr\u00e9ciation de la contestation s\u00e9rieuse au regard des circonstances de l\u2019accident<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s a examin\u00e9 le constat amiable et en a d\u00e9duit qu\u2019une faute de conduite de la requ\u00e9rante \u00e9tait susceptible d\u2019\u00eatre retenue, la d\u00e9fenderesse \u00e9tant d\u00e9j\u00e0 engag\u00e9e sur le rond-point. D\u00e8s lors, le droit \u00e0 indemnisation n\u2019\u00e9tait pas \u00e9vident. Le tribunal a ainsi fait application de la d\u00e9finition classique de la contestation s\u00e9rieuse, qui, comme le rappellent les juridictions d\u2019appel, <em>&#8221; survient lorsque l\u2019un des moyens de d\u00e9fense oppos\u00e9 aux pr\u00e9tentions du demandeur n\u2019appara\u00eet pas imm\u00e9diatement vain et laisse subsister un doute sur le sens de la d\u00e9cision au fond &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67e641b6391a7e1509473ae5\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Montpellier, 27 mars 2025, n\u00b024\/02622)<\/a><\/strong>. Il a estim\u00e9 que cette contestation n\u2019\u00e9tait pas vain et justifiait le rejet de la provision. Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s n\u2019a pas tranch\u00e9 le fond du litige, mais a simplement constat\u00e9 que l\u2019obligation n\u2019\u00e9tait pas suffisamment certaine pour \u00eatre qualifi\u00e9e de non s\u00e9rieusement contestable.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-les-consequences-procedurales-du-rejet-de-la-provision-sur-les-demandes-access\">B. Les cons\u00e9quences proc\u00e9durales du rejet de la provision sur les demandes accessoires<\/h3>\n<p>Le rejet de la provision a entra\u00een\u00e9 logiquement celui de la provision <em>ad litem<\/em>, laquelle n\u2019est que le compl\u00e9ment indemnitaire de la premi\u00e8re. De m\u00eame, le tribunal a dit n\u2019y avoir lieu \u00e0 application de l\u2019article 700 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, aucune des parties n\u2019ayant obtenu gain de cause sur l\u2019objet principal du r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 indemnitaire. Enfin, la demanderesse a \u00e9t\u00e9 condamn\u00e9e aux d\u00e9pens de l\u2019instance en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, le juge consid\u00e9rant qu\u2019elle avait int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 l\u2019expertise ordonn\u00e9e, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article 696 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. Cette r\u00e9partition des frais est coh\u00e9rente avec la logique de la d\u00e9cision : la demanderesse, bien qu\u2019obtenant la mesure d\u2019instruction, n\u2019a pas vu sa cr\u00e9ance reconnue comme certaine, ce qui justifie qu\u2019elle supporte les frais de l\u2019instance.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67e641b6391a7e1509473ae5\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Montpellier, le 27 mars 2025, n\u00b024\/02622<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67d3ce4cbce84faca44cd7d4\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Douai, le 13 mars 2025, n\u00b024\/02803<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000051869339\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 145 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>S&#8217;il existe un motif l\u00e9gitime de conserver ou d&#8217;\u00e9tablir avant tout proc\u00e8s la preuve de faits dont pourrait d\u00e9pendre la solution d&#8217;un litige, les mesures d&#8217;instruction l\u00e9galement admissibles peuvent \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9es \u00e0 la demande de tout int\u00e9ress\u00e9, sur requ\u00eate ou en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>La juridiction territorialement comp\u00e9tente pour statuer sur une demande form\u00e9e en application du premier alin\u00e9a est, au choix du demandeur, celle susceptible de conna\u00eetre de l&#8217;affaire au fond ou, s&#8217;il y a lieu, celle dans le ressort de laquelle la mesure d&#8217;instruction doit \u00eatre ex\u00e9cut\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<p>Par d\u00e9rogation au deuxi\u00e8me alin\u00e9a, lorsque la mesure d&#8217;instruction porte sur un immeuble, la juridiction du lieu o\u00f9 est situ\u00e9 l&#8217;immeuble est seule comp\u00e9tente.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000045268436\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 700 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Le juge condamne la partie tenue aux d\u00e9pens ou qui perd son proc\u00e8s \u00e0 payer :<\/p>\n<p>1\u00b0 A l&#8217;autre partie la somme qu&#8217;il d\u00e9termine, au titre des frais expos\u00e9s et non compris dans les d\u00e9pens ;<\/p>\n<p>2\u00b0 Et, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, \u00e0 l&#8217;avocat du b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de l&#8217;aide juridictionnelle partielle ou totale une somme au titre des honoraires et frais, non compris dans les d\u00e9pens, que le b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de l&#8217;aide aurait expos\u00e9s s&#8217;il n&#8217;avait pas eu cette aide. Dans ce cas, il est proc\u00e9d\u00e9 comme il est dit aux  alin\u00e9as 3 et 4 de l&#8217;article 37 de la loi n\u00b0 91-647 du 10 juillet 1991 .<\/p>\n<p>Dans tous les cas, le juge tient compte de l&#8217;\u00e9quit\u00e9 ou de la situation \u00e9conomique de la partie condamn\u00e9e. Il peut, m\u00eame d&#8217;office, pour des raisons tir\u00e9es des m\u00eames consid\u00e9rations, dire qu&#8217;il n&#8217;y a pas lieu \u00e0 ces condamnations.<\/p>\n<p>Les parties peuvent produire les justificatifs des sommes qu&#8217;elles demandent.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> La somme allou\u00e9e au titre du 2\u00b0 ne peut \u00eatre inf\u00e9rieure \u00e0 la part contributive de l&#8217;Etat major\u00e9e de 50 %.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000042941174\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 696 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>La partie perdante est condamn\u00e9e aux d\u00e9pens, \u00e0 moins que le juge, par d\u00e9cision motiv\u00e9e, n&#8217;en mette la totalit\u00e9 ou une fraction \u00e0 la charge d&#8217;une autre partie.<\/p>\n<p>Les conditions dans lesquelles il peut \u00eatre mis \u00e0 la charge d&#8217;une partie qui b\u00e9n\u00e9ficie de l&#8217;aide juridictionnelle tout ou partie des d\u00e9pens de l&#8217;instance sont fix\u00e9es par les dispositions de la loi n\u00b0 91-647 du 10 juillet 1991 et du d\u00e9cret n\u00b0 2020-1717 du 28 d\u00e9cembre 2020.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Par une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 du 30 mars 2026 (n\u00b025\/04757), le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par une victime d\u2019un&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9525,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cacdfecdc6046d478bcf58","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cacdfecdc6046d478bcf58","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cacdfecdc6046d478bcf58","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Marseille","_kj_chambre":"R\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s Cabinet 1","_kj_rg":"25\/04757","_kj_date":"2026-03-30","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1232791","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/04757 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Par une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 du 30 mars 2026 (n\u00b025\/04757), le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par une victime d\u2019un...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/04757\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Par une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 du 30 mars 2026 (n\u00b025\/04757), le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par une victime d\u2019un...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-02T14:49:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2IQXr2ZqAdY-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"6000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"4000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/04757\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T14:49:10+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1599,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-2IQXr2ZqAdY-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/04757\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-02T14:49:10+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/04757 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-2IQXr2ZqAdY-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T14:49:10+00:00\",\"description\":\"Par une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 du 30 mars 2026 (n\u00b025\\\/04757), le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par une victime d\u2019un...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-2IQXr2ZqAdY-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-2IQXr2ZqAdY-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":6000,\"height\":4000},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/04757\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/04757 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Par une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 du 30 mars 2026 (n\u00b025\/04757), le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par une victime d\u2019un...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/04757","og_description":"Par une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 du 30 mars 2026 (n\u00b025\/04757), le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par une victime d\u2019un...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-02T14:49:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":6000,"height":4000,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2IQXr2ZqAdY-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/04757","datePublished":"2026-07-02T14:49:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\/"},"wordCount":1599,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2IQXr2ZqAdY-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/04757","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-02T14:49:10+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/04757 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2IQXr2ZqAdY-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-02T14:49:10+00:00","description":"Par une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 du 30 mars 2026 (n\u00b025\/04757), le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par une victime d\u2019un...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2IQXr2ZqAdY-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2IQXr2ZqAdY-unsplash.webp","width":6000,"height":4000},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04757\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/04757"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2IQXr2ZqAdY-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-5aHJ","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":456773,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-nantes-29-01-2026-n-25nt03225\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232791,"position":0},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de NANTES \u2013 29\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25NT03225","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La pr\u00e9sente ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9-suspension intervient dans le cadre d\u2019un contentieux fiscal relatif \u00e0 des compl\u00e9ments d\u2019imposition sur le revenu. Le...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456885,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-toulouse-27-01-2026-n-25tl01037\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232791,"position":1},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de TOULOUSE \u2013 27\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25TL01037","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La pr\u00e9sente ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, rendue par une cour administrative d\u2019appel, statue sur un appel form\u00e9 contre le rejet d\u2019une demande de provision. Le...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456782,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-nancy-28-01-2026-n-25nc02625\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232791,"position":2},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de NANCY \u2013 28\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25NC02625","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"L\u2019ordonnance rendue par la cour administrative d\u2019appel statue sur un recours dirig\u00e9 contre une mesure d\u2019expertise ordonn\u00e9e en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9. Un incendie ayant...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-qhFXS18P2OQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-qhFXS18P2OQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-qhFXS18P2OQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-qhFXS18P2OQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-qhFXS18P2OQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-qhFXS18P2OQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456946,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-nantes-27-01-2026-n-26nt00167\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232791,"position":3},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de NANTES \u2013 27\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 26NT00167","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La pr\u00e9sente ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9-suspension rejette la demande de suspension d\u2019un arr\u00eat\u00e9 compl\u00e9mentaire modifiant les prescriptions d\u2019une autorisation...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-4fJHeKyHyX8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-4fJHeKyHyX8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-4fJHeKyHyX8-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-4fJHeKyHyX8-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-4fJHeKyHyX8-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-4fJHeKyHyX8-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456835,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-bordeaux-28-01-2026-n-25bx02697\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232791,"position":4},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de BORDEAUX \u2013 28\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25BX02697","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La pr\u00e9sente ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 provision rendue par une cour administrative d\u2019appel intervient dans un contentieux contractuel complexe. Elle statue sur...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/valentin-kremer-zqipptjLLJc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/valentin-kremer-zqipptjLLJc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/valentin-kremer-zqipptjLLJc-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/valentin-kremer-zqipptjLLJc-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/valentin-kremer-zqipptjLLJc-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/valentin-kremer-zqipptjLLJc-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456901,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-nantes-27-01-2026-n-25nt02005\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232791,"position":5},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de NANTES \u2013 27\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25NT02005","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La pr\u00e9sente ordonnance de la cour administrative d'appel statue sur un appel form\u00e9 contre une suspension prononc\u00e9e en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9. L\u2019affaire concerne une...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/clay-banks-5JQAKBU0vG8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/clay-banks-5JQAKBU0vG8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/clay-banks-5JQAKBU0vG8-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/clay-banks-5JQAKBU0vG8-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/clay-banks-5JQAKBU0vG8-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/clay-banks-5JQAKBU0vG8-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1232791","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1232791"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1232791\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9525"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1232791"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1232791"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1232791"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}