{"id":1232794,"date":"2026-07-02T16:49:40","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T14:49:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\/"},"modified":"2026-07-02T16:49:40","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T14:49:40","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/04664"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-une-opposition-recevable-fondee-sur-le-respect-strict-du-delai-legal\">I. Une opposition recevable fond\u00e9e sur le respect strict du d\u00e9lai l\u00e9gal<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-le-respect-du-delai-de-quinze-jours-a-compter-de-la-signification-de-la-contra\">A. Le respect du d\u00e9lai de quinze jours \u00e0 compter de la signification de la contrainte<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-labsence-de-contestation-sur-la-regularite-de-la-notification-et-de-la-signifi\">B. L\u2019absence de contestation sur la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la notification et de la signification<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-un-debiteur-defaillant-dans-la-preuve-de-son-absence-dassujettissement-au-reg\">II. Un d\u00e9biteur d\u00e9faillant dans la preuve de son absence d\u2019assujettissement au r\u00e9gime compl\u00e9mentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-laffiliation-obligatoire-des-artistes-auteurs-au-regime-complementaire\">A. L\u2019affiliation obligatoire des artistes-auteurs au r\u00e9gime compl\u00e9mentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-charge-de-la-preuve-pesant-sur-lopposant-et-labsence-delements-probants\">B. La charge de la preuve pesant sur l\u2019opposant et l\u2019absence d\u2019\u00e9l\u00e9ments probants<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Par un jugement rendu le 30 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille (n\u00b024\/04664) a statu\u00e9 sur une opposition \u00e0 contrainte form\u00e9e par un d\u00e9biteur \u00e0 l\u2019encontre d\u2019une contrainte d\u00e9cern\u00e9e par le directeur d\u2019un organisme de retraite compl\u00e9mentaire des artistes-auteurs. Le litige portait sur le recouvrement de cotisations de retraite compl\u00e9mentaire. Les faits sont les suivants : l\u2019organisme cr\u00e9ancier a notifi\u00e9 une contrainte au d\u00e9biteur le 18 octobre 2024, et celui-ci a form\u00e9 opposition le 29 octobre 2024, soit dans le d\u00e9lai de quinze jours pr\u00e9vu par l\u2019article R.133-3 du code de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale. Le tribunal a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 l\u2019opposition recevable mais mal fond\u00e9e, condamnant le d\u00e9biteur au paiement de la somme de 774,35 euros et aux d\u00e9pens. La question de droit centrale \u00e9tait double : d\u2019une part, le respect du d\u00e9lai d\u2019opposition et la recevabilit\u00e9 de celle-ci, d\u2019autre part, le bien-fond\u00e9 de la cr\u00e9ance au regard de l\u2019obligation d\u2019affiliation au r\u00e9gime compl\u00e9mentaire des artistes-auteurs. La solution retenue par le tribunal confirme que le d\u00e9lai de quinze jours a \u00e9t\u00e9 respect\u00e9, mais que le d\u00e9biteur n\u2019a pas rapport\u00e9 la preuve de son absence d\u2019assujettissement. Il conviendra d\u2019examiner successivement la recevabilit\u00e9 de l\u2019opposition et le respect des formes (I), puis le bien-fond\u00e9 de la contrainte et la charge de la preuve (II).<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-une-opposition-recevable-fondee-sur-le-respect-strict-du-delai-legal\">I. Une opposition recevable fond\u00e9e sur le respect strict du d\u00e9lai l\u00e9gal<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-le-respect-du-delai-de-quinze-jours-a-compter-de-la-signification-de-la-contra\">A. Le respect du d\u00e9lai de quinze jours \u00e0 compter de la signification de la contrainte<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal a constat\u00e9 que l\u2019opposition avait \u00e9t\u00e9 form\u00e9e le 29 octobre 2024, soit onze jours apr\u00e8s la signification de la contrainte intervenue le 18 octobre 2024. Il en a d\u00e9duit que le d\u00e9lai de quinze jours imparti par l\u2019article R.133-3 du code de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale \u00e9tait respect\u00e9. Cette solution s\u2019inscrit dans une application litt\u00e9rale des textes. La Cour d\u2019appel d\u2019Aix-en-Provence, dans un arr\u00eat du 25 avril 2025 (n\u00b023\/07180), a rappel\u00e9 que pour d\u00e9clarer irrecevable un recours, le premier juge avait retenu que la signification comportait toutes les mentions obligatoires et que le d\u00e9lai de quinze jours n\u2019avait pas \u00e9t\u00e9 respect\u00e9. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, aucun vice de forme n\u2019a \u00e9t\u00e9 invoqu\u00e9 et le d\u00e9lai a \u00e9t\u00e9 scrupuleusement observ\u00e9. Le tribunal a donc logiquement d\u00e9clar\u00e9 l\u2019opposition recevable, \u00e9cartant toute forclusion.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-labsence-de-contestation-sur-la-regularite-de-la-notification-et-de-la-signifi\">B. L\u2019absence de contestation sur la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la notification et de la signification<\/h3>\n<p>Le jugement ne mentionne aucune contestation relative \u00e0 la validit\u00e9 de l\u2019acte d\u2019huissier ou \u00e0 la connaissance effective de la contrainte par le d\u00e9biteur. L\u2019article R.133-3 exige que la contrainte soit notifi\u00e9e par tout moyen permettant de rapporter la preuve de sa date de r\u00e9ception ou signifi\u00e9e par acte d\u2019huissier. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, la signification a \u00e9t\u00e9 effectu\u00e9e le 18 octobre 2024, et le d\u00e9biteur a form\u00e9 opposition dans le d\u00e9lai. Cela d\u00e9montre qu\u2019il a eu connaissance de la contrainte et qu\u2019il a pu exercer son droit de contestation. La Cour d\u2019appel de Lyon, dans un arr\u00eat du 14 janvier 2025 (n\u00b022\/02465), a jug\u00e9 que le d\u00e9lai de quinze jours \u00e9tait d\u00e9pass\u00e9 et que l\u2019opposition \u00e9tait irrecevable pour cause de forclusion. Ici, le tribunal valide au contraire la recevabilit\u00e9, confirmant que les formes ont \u00e9t\u00e9 respect\u00e9es. Cette solution est conforme \u00e0 l\u2019exigence de protection du d\u00e9biteur, qui doit disposer d\u2019un d\u00e9lai utile pour contester la contrainte.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-un-debiteur-defaillant-dans-la-preuve-de-son-absence-dassujettissement-au-reg\">II. Un d\u00e9biteur d\u00e9faillant dans la preuve de son absence d\u2019assujettissement au r\u00e9gime compl\u00e9mentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-laffiliation-obligatoire-des-artistes-auteurs-au-regime-complementaire\">A. L\u2019affiliation obligatoire des artistes-auteurs au r\u00e9gime compl\u00e9mentaire<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal a rappel\u00e9 le cadre l\u00e9gal : l\u2019article L.382-1 du code de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale soumet les artistes-auteurs au r\u00e9gime g\u00e9n\u00e9ral pour les assurances sociales, et l\u2019article L.382-12 pr\u00e9voit qu\u2019ils rel\u00e8vent de r\u00e9gimes compl\u00e9mentaires g\u00e9r\u00e9s par des caisses comme l\u2019organisme cr\u00e9ancier. L\u2019article 3 du r\u00e8glement du r\u00e9gime des artistes-auteurs professionnels pr\u00e9cise que cette affiliation est obligatoire. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le d\u00e9biteur contestait devoir les sommes r\u00e9clam\u00e9es en affirmant exercer une activit\u00e9 de journaliste d\u2019investigation et non d\u2019artiste-auteur. Cependant, le tribunal a relev\u00e9 que l\u2019organisme produisait un courrier du d\u00e9biteur sollicitant la liquidation de son <em>&#8220;r\u00e9gime de retraite compl\u00e9mentaire auteur&#8221;<\/em> \u00e0 compter du 1er mai 2024, ainsi qu\u2019un courriel de r\u00e9ponse mentionnant un num\u00e9ro d\u2019adh\u00e9rent. Ces \u00e9l\u00e9ments \u00e9tablissent que le d\u00e9biteur \u00e9tait bien affili\u00e9 volontairement ou obligatoirement \u00e0 ce r\u00e9gime.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-charge-de-la-preuve-pesant-sur-lopposant-et-labsence-delements-probants\">B. La charge de la preuve pesant sur l\u2019opposant et l\u2019absence d\u2019\u00e9l\u00e9ments probants<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal a rappel\u00e9 le principe selon lequel la charge de la preuve repose sur l\u2019opposant \u00e0 contrainte. Ce principe est constant en mati\u00e8re de contentieux de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale. Le d\u00e9biteur n\u2019a vers\u00e9 aucun \u00e9l\u00e9ment d\u00e9montrant la nature exacte de son activit\u00e9 et l\u2019absence d\u2019obligation d\u2019affiliation. Ses all\u00e9gations g\u00e9n\u00e9rales n\u2019ont pas \u00e9t\u00e9 corrobor\u00e9es. En cons\u00e9quence, il \u00e9choue \u00e0 renverser la pr\u00e9somption de bien-fond\u00e9 de la contrainte. Le tribunal a donc d\u00e9bout\u00e9 le d\u00e9biteur de l\u2019ensemble de ses demandes et l\u2019a condamn\u00e9 au paiement des sommes dues et aux d\u00e9pens. Cette solution est conforme \u00e0 la jurisprudence ant\u00e9rieure qui fait peser sur l\u2019opposant la preuve du caract\u00e8re infond\u00e9 de la cr\u00e9ance. Le jugement du Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille constitue ainsi une application classique des r\u00e8gles de proc\u00e9dure et de preuve en mati\u00e8re de recouvrement de cotisations sociales.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/680c6dc0fe1a38d696f20f6e\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel d\u2019Aix-en-Provence, le 25 avril 2025, n\u00b023\/07180<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6787524efc8e837eda8a61dc\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Lyon, le 14 janvier 2025, n\u00b022\/02465<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000035651060\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 2314-23 du Code du travail<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Pour les salari\u00e9s mis \u00e0 disposition qui remplissent les conditions mentionn\u00e9es au 2\u00b0 de l&#8217;article L. 1111-2, la condition de pr\u00e9sence dans l&#8217;entreprise utilisatrice est de douze mois continus pour y \u00eatre \u00e9lecteur. Les salari\u00e9s mis \u00e0 disposition ne sont pas \u00e9ligibles dans l&#8217;entreprise utilisatrice. <\/p>\n<p>Les salari\u00e9s mis \u00e0 disposition qui remplissent les conditions mentionn\u00e9es au premier alin\u00e9a choisissent s&#8217;ils exercent leur droit de vote dans l&#8217;entreprise qui les emploie ou l&#8217;entreprise utilisatrice.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000046176941\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article R. 133-3 du Code de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Si la mise en demeure ou l&#8217;avertissement reste sans effet au terme du d\u00e9lai d&#8217;un mois \u00e0 compter de sa notification, les directeurs des organismes cr\u00e9anciers peuvent d\u00e9cerner, dans les domaines mentionn\u00e9s aux articles L. 133-8-7, L. 161-1-5 ou L. 244-9, une contrainte comportant les effets mentionn\u00e9s \u00e0 ces articles. La contrainte est notifi\u00e9e au d\u00e9biteur par tout moyen permettant de rapporter la preuve de sa date de r\u00e9ception ou lui est signifi\u00e9e par acte d&#8217;huissier de justice. La contrainte est signifi\u00e9e au d\u00e9biteur par acte d&#8217;huissier de justice ou par lettre recommand\u00e9e avec demande d&#8217;avis de r\u00e9ception. A peine de nullit\u00e9, l&#8217;acte d&#8217;huissier ou la notification mentionne la r\u00e9f\u00e9rence de la contrainte et son montant, le d\u00e9lai dans lequel l&#8217;opposition doit \u00eatre form\u00e9e, l&#8217;adresse du tribunal comp\u00e9tent et les formes requises pour sa saisine. <\/p>\n<p>L&#8217;huissier de justice avise dans les huit jours l&#8217;organisme cr\u00e9ancier de la date de signification. <\/p>\n<p>Le d\u00e9biteur peut former opposition par inscription au secr\u00e9tariat du tribunal comp\u00e9tent dans le ressort duquel il est domicili\u00e9 ou pour les d\u00e9biteurs domicili\u00e9s \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9tranger, au secr\u00e9tariat du tribunal comp\u00e9tent dans le ressort de l&#8217;organisme cr\u00e9ancier par lettre recommand\u00e9e avec demande d&#8217;avis de r\u00e9ception adress\u00e9e au secr\u00e9tariat dudit tribunal dans les quinze jours \u00e0 compter de la notification ou de la signification. L&#8217;opposition doit \u00eatre motiv\u00e9e ; une copie de la contrainte contest\u00e9e doit lui \u00eatre jointe. Le secr\u00e9tariat du tribunal informe l&#8217;organisme cr\u00e9ancier dans les huit jours de la r\u00e9ception de l&#8217;opposition. <\/p>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision du tribunal, statuant sur opposition, est ex\u00e9cutoire de droit \u00e0 titre provisoire.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000053282091\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 382-1 du Code de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Les artistes auteurs d&#8217;\u0153uvres litt\u00e9raires et dramatiques, musicales et chor\u00e9graphiques, audiovisuelles et cin\u00e9matographiques, graphiques et plastiques, ainsi que photographiques, sous r\u00e9serve des dispositions suivantes, sont affili\u00e9s obligatoirement au r\u00e9gime g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale pour les assurances sociales et b\u00e9n\u00e9ficient des prestations familiales dans les m\u00eames conditions que les salari\u00e9s.<\/p>\n<p>B\u00e9n\u00e9ficient du pr\u00e9sent r\u00e9gime :<\/p>\n<p>-les auteurs d&#8217;\u0153uvres photographiques journalistes professionnels au sens des articles L. 761-2 et suivants du code du travail, au titre des revenus tir\u00e9s de l&#8217;exploitation de leurs oeuvres photographiques en dehors de la presse et, dans des conditions \u00e0 pr\u00e9voir par des accords professionnels distincts dans le secteur des agences de presse et dans celui des publications de presse ou, \u00e0 l&#8217;issue d&#8217;une p\u00e9riode de deux ans \u00e0 compter de la date de promulgation de la loi n\u00b0 2006-961 du 1er ao\u00fbt 2006 relative au droit d&#8217;auteur et aux droits voisins dans la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 de l&#8217;information, par d\u00e9cret en Conseil d&#8217;Etat, pour leurs revenus compl\u00e9mentaires tir\u00e9s de l&#8217;exploitation de leurs oeuvres photographiques dans la presse ;<\/p>\n<p>-les auteurs d&#8217;\u0153uvres photographiques non journalistes professionnels qui tirent de leur activit\u00e9, directement ou par l&#8217;interm\u00e9diaire d&#8217;agences de quelque nature qu&#8217;elles soient, des droits d&#8217;auteurs soumis au r\u00e9gime fiscal des b\u00e9n\u00e9fices non commerciaux et qui exercent leur activit\u00e9 depuis au moins trois ann\u00e9es civiles.<\/p>\n<p>Les dispositions pr\u00e9vues aux deuxi\u00e8me \u00e0 quatri\u00e8me alin\u00e9as du pr\u00e9sent article s&#8217;entendent sans pr\u00e9judice des dispositions de l&#8217;article L. 311-2 du pr\u00e9sent code.<\/p>\n<p>L&#8217;affiliation est prononc\u00e9e par l&#8217;organisme mentionn\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 213-1 d\u00e9sign\u00e9 par le directeur de l&#8217;Agence centrale des organismes de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale. Une commission professionnelle peut \u00eatre saisie par le demandeur dont l&#8217;affiliation a \u00e9t\u00e9 refus\u00e9e. Cette commission comprend des repr\u00e9sentants des artistes auteurs de chacune des branches professionnelles, d\u00e9sign\u00e9s par le conseil d&#8217;administration de l&#8217;association mentionn\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 382-2. Elle donne un avis sur l&#8217;affiliation du demandeur.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Par un jugement rendu le 30 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille (n\u00b024\/04664) a statu\u00e9 sur une opposition \u00e0 contrainte form\u00e9e par un d\u00e9biteur \u00e0&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":4782,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cacd7dcdc6046d478bc6a2","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cacd7dcdc6046d478bc6a2","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cacd7dcdc6046d478bc6a2","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Marseille","_kj_chambre":"GNAL SEC SOC: RD\/CARSAT","_kj_rg":"24\/04664","_kj_date":"2026-03-30","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1232794","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/04664 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Par un jugement rendu le 30 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille (n\u00b024\/04664) a statu\u00e9 sur une opposition \u00e0 contrainte form\u00e9e par un d\u00e9biteur \u00e0...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/04664\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Par un jugement rendu le 30 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille (n\u00b024\/04664) a statu\u00e9 sur une opposition \u00e0 contrainte form\u00e9e par un d\u00e9biteur \u00e0...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-02T14:49:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/patrick-robert-doyle-OvXht_wi5Ew-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"5938\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3711\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b024\\\/04664\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T14:49:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1907,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/patrick-robert-doyle-OvXht_wi5Ew-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b024\\\/04664\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-02T14:49:40+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b024\\\/04664 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/patrick-robert-doyle-OvXht_wi5Ew-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T14:49:40+00:00\",\"description\":\"Par un jugement rendu le 30 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille (n\u00b024\\\/04664) a statu\u00e9 sur une opposition \u00e0 contrainte form\u00e9e par un d\u00e9biteur \u00e0...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/patrick-robert-doyle-OvXht_wi5Ew-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/patrick-robert-doyle-OvXht_wi5Ew-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":5938,\"height\":3711},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b024\\\/04664\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/04664 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Par un jugement rendu le 30 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille (n\u00b024\/04664) a statu\u00e9 sur une opposition \u00e0 contrainte form\u00e9e par un d\u00e9biteur \u00e0...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/04664","og_description":"Par un jugement rendu le 30 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille (n\u00b024\/04664) a statu\u00e9 sur une opposition \u00e0 contrainte form\u00e9e par un d\u00e9biteur \u00e0...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-02T14:49:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":5938,"height":3711,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/patrick-robert-doyle-OvXht_wi5Ew-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/04664","datePublished":"2026-07-02T14:49:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\/"},"wordCount":1907,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/patrick-robert-doyle-OvXht_wi5Ew-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/04664","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-02T14:49:40+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/04664 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/patrick-robert-doyle-OvXht_wi5Ew-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-02T14:49:40+00:00","description":"Par un jugement rendu le 30 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille (n\u00b024\/04664) a statu\u00e9 sur une opposition \u00e0 contrainte form\u00e9e par un d\u00e9biteur \u00e0...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/patrick-robert-doyle-OvXht_wi5Ew-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/patrick-robert-doyle-OvXht_wi5Ew-unsplash.webp","width":5938,"height":3711},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n24-04664\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/04664"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/patrick-robert-doyle-OvXht_wi5Ew-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-5aHM","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":441565,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-le-6-novembre-2025-n22-04664\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232794,"position":0},"title":"Cour d&#8217;appel, le 6 novembre 2025, n\u00b022\/04664","author":"","date":"4 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"L\u2019arr\u00eat rendu par la Cour d\u2019appel de Paris le 6 novembre 2025 statue sur un litige n\u00e9 du licenciement d\u2019une salari\u00e9e. Employ\u00e9e depuis 2007, celle-ci avait...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour d'appel&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour d'appel","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-dappel\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-xD4-IJN1DF8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-xD4-IJN1DF8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-xD4-IJN1DF8-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-xD4-IJN1DF8-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-xD4-IJN1DF8-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-xD4-IJN1DF8-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":447248,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-le-18-aout-2025-n24-04664\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232794,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire, le 18 ao\u00fbt 2025, n\u00b024\/04664","author":"","date":"5 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg, statuant en mati\u00e8re de divorce, a rendu un jugement le 18 ao\u00fbt 2025 aux torts exclusifs du mari. Les \u00e9poux, mari\u00e9s...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-2UZMc83XJ8I-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-2UZMc83XJ8I-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-2UZMc83XJ8I-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-2UZMc83XJ8I-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-2UZMc83XJ8I-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-2UZMc83XJ8I-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":492360,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-13-novembre-2025-n25-02521\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232794,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 13 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/02521","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Paris, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 10 mars 2026, examine une demande indemnitaire li\u00e9e \u00e0 un trouble de jouissance locative. Suite \u00e0 un...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":463139,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-marseille-28-05-2025-n-24ma01172\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232794,"position":3},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de MARSEILLE \u2013 28\/05\/2025 \u2013 n\u00b0 24MA01172","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La d\u00e9cision rendue par la cour administrative d'appel de Marseille le 3 janvier 2026 traite de la l\u00e9galit\u00e9 d'une mesure d'\u00e9loignement assortie d'une...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-LQw7fIchK-o-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-LQw7fIchK-o-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-LQw7fIchK-o-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-LQw7fIchK-o-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-LQw7fIchK-o-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-LQw7fIchK-o-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":488977,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-24-novembre-2025-n24-06061\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232794,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 24 novembre 2025, n\u00b024\/06061","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Paris, par jugement du 16 f\u00e9vrier 2026, statue sur une demande en paiement d\u2019arri\u00e9r\u00e9s de charges de copropri\u00e9t\u00e9. Le syndicat des...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-5TTaPKNAuHU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-5TTaPKNAuHU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-5TTaPKNAuHU-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-5TTaPKNAuHU-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-5TTaPKNAuHU-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-5TTaPKNAuHU-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1203375,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-3-avril-2026-n2022f00550\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232794,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Marseille, le 3 avril 2026, n\u00b02022F00550","author":"Kohen","date":"27 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Marseille, chambre 16, a rendu le 3 avril 2026 une d\u00e9cision (n\u00b02022F00550) relative aux effets d\u2019un d\u00e9sistement...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1232794","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1232794"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1232794\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4782"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1232794"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1232794"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1232794"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}