{"id":1232823,"date":"2026-07-02T16:53:22","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T14:53:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\/"},"modified":"2026-07-02T16:53:22","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T14:53:22","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00459"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-la-confirmation-des-conditions-legales-de-la-prolongation-de-la-retention-admi\">I. La confirmation des conditions l\u00e9gales de la prolongation de la r\u00e9tention administrative<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-regularite-de-la-procedure-et-le-respect-effectif-des-droits-de-la-personne\">A. La r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure et le respect effectif des droits de la personne retenue<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-labsence-de-garanties-de-representation-justifiant-le-recours-a-la-retention\">B. L\u2019absence de garanties de repr\u00e9sentation justifiant le recours \u00e0 la r\u00e9tention<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-lappreciation-des-diligences-de-ladministration-et-la-portee-de-la-decision\">II. L\u2019appr\u00e9ciation des diligences de l\u2019administration et la port\u00e9e de la d\u00e9cision<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-caracterisation-de-diligences-suffisantes-malgre-labsence-didentification-c\">A. La caract\u00e9risation de diligences suffisantes malgr\u00e9 l\u2019absence d\u2019identification certaine<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-consecration-dune-obligation-de-moyen-adaptee-aux-comportements-obstructifs\">B. La cons\u00e9cration d\u2019une obligation de moyen adapt\u00e9e aux comportements obstructifs<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Marseille a rendu une ordonnance (n\u00b026\/00459) statuant sur une requ\u00eate du pr\u00e9fet tendant \u00e0 la prolongation de la r\u00e9tention administrative d\u2019un \u00e9tranger. Les faits sont les suivants : cet \u00e9tranger, plac\u00e9 en r\u00e9tention le 26 mars 2026 \u00e0 sa lev\u00e9e d\u2019\u00e9crou, fait l\u2019objet d\u2019une obligation de quitter le territoire fran\u00e7ais notifi\u00e9e le 11 juillet 2023. L\u2019administration n\u2019a pu ex\u00e9cuter la mesure d\u2019\u00e9loignement dans le d\u00e9lai de quatre-vingt-seize heures. Le pr\u00e9fet a saisi le consulat de Gambie le 26 mars 2026 pour obtenir un laissez-passer consulaire. Lors de l\u2019audience, l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9 conteste le bien-fond\u00e9 de la prolongation, invoquant implicitement l\u2019absence de diligences suffisantes de l\u2019administration. Le juge examine la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure, l\u2019information des droits, les garanties de repr\u00e9sentation, et les diligences accomplies. La question de droit est de savoir si les conditions l\u00e9gales de la prolongation de la r\u00e9tention sont r\u00e9unies, notamment au regard de l\u2019obligation de l\u2019administration de mettre en \u0153uvre les diligences n\u00e9cessaires \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9loignement. Le juge fait droit \u00e0 la requ\u00eate et ordonne le maintien en r\u00e9tention pour une dur\u00e9e maximale de vingt-six jours \u00e0 compter de l\u2019expiration du d\u00e9lai initial de quatre-vingt-seize heures.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-la-confirmation-des-conditions-legales-de-la-prolongation-de-la-retention-admi\">I. La confirmation des conditions l\u00e9gales de la prolongation de la r\u00e9tention administrative<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-regularite-de-la-procedure-et-le-respect-effectif-des-droits-de-la-personne\">A. La r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure et le respect effectif des droits de la personne retenue<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge des libert\u00e9s constate d\u2019abord que la proc\u00e9dure est r\u00e9guli\u00e8re et que la personne retenue a \u00e9t\u00e9, dans les meilleurs d\u00e9lais suivant la notification du placement, pleinement inform\u00e9e de ses droits et mise en \u00e9tat de les exercer. Cette v\u00e9rification initiale est conforme aux exigences des articles L. 741-1 et suivants du code de l\u2019entr\u00e9e et du s\u00e9jour des \u00e9trangers et du droit d\u2019asile. En s\u2019assurant que l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9 a \u00e9t\u00e9 inform\u00e9 de ses droits \u00e0 l\u2019assistance d\u2019un interpr\u00e8te, d\u2019un conseil, d\u2019un m\u00e9decin, ainsi que de la possibilit\u00e9 de communiquer avec son consulat et une personne de son choix, le magistrat garantit le respect du contradictoire et des libert\u00e9s individuelles. Ce contr\u00f4le liminaire est indispensable avant d\u2019examiner le fond de la demande de prolongation. Il s\u2019inscrit dans la jurisprudence constante qui exige une vigilance particuli\u00e8re sur la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure d\u00e8s lors que la privation de libert\u00e9 est en cause. La d\u00e9cision comment\u00e9e souligne ainsi que la phase initiale de la r\u00e9tention s\u2019est d\u00e9roul\u00e9e sans vice de forme.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-labsence-de-garanties-de-representation-justifiant-le-recours-a-la-retention\">B. L\u2019absence de garanties de repr\u00e9sentation justifiant le recours \u00e0 la r\u00e9tention<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge rel\u00e8ve ensuite que la personne retenue ne remplit pas les conditions d\u2019une assignation \u00e0 r\u00e9sidence pr\u00e9vues \u00e0 l\u2019article L. 743-13 du code pr\u00e9cit\u00e9. Cette mesure alternative suppose la remise pr\u00e9alable d\u2019un passeport en cours de validit\u00e9 et des garanties de repr\u00e9sentation effectives, telles qu\u2019un domicile fixe et certain. Or, l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9 ne justifie d\u2019aucun de ces \u00e9l\u00e9ments : il ne poss\u00e8de pas de passeport valide, ne dispose pas d\u2019un domicile stable et s\u2019est soustrait aux obligations d\u2019une pr\u00e9c\u00e9dente assignation \u00e0 r\u00e9sidence. L\u2019absence de garanties de repr\u00e9sentation constitue un obstacle dirimant \u00e0 toute mesure moins coercitive. Le juge en tire logiquement la cons\u00e9quence que le maintien en r\u00e9tention est la seule mesure adapt\u00e9e pour pr\u00e9venir un risque de fuite. En cela, la d\u00e9cision s\u2019inscrit dans une appr\u00e9ciation concr\u00e8te des circonstances individuelles, conforme \u00e0 l\u2019esprit des textes qui subordonnent la privation de libert\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019impossibilit\u00e9 de recourir \u00e0 des mesures alternatives.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-lappreciation-des-diligences-de-ladministration-et-la-portee-de-la-decision\">II. L\u2019appr\u00e9ciation des diligences de l\u2019administration et la port\u00e9e de la d\u00e9cision<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-caracterisation-de-diligences-suffisantes-malgre-labsence-didentification-c\">A. La caract\u00e9risation de diligences suffisantes malgr\u00e9 l\u2019absence d\u2019identification certaine<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge consid\u00e8re que la pr\u00e9fecture justifie de ses diligences en ayant saisi le consulat de Gambie d\u00e8s le 26 mars 2026 d\u2019une demande de laissez-passer consulaire. Il ne s\u2019agit pas d\u2019une simple formalit\u00e9 : l\u2019administration a entrepris les d\u00e9marches n\u00e9cessaires \u00e0 l\u2019obtention du document de voyage indispensable \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9loignement. La d\u00e9cision ne pr\u00e9cise pas si une r\u00e9ponse a \u00e9t\u00e9 obtenue, mais le juge estime que ces d\u00e9marches, intervenues le jour m\u00eame du placement en r\u00e9tention, constituent des diligences suffisantes au sens de l\u2019article L. 741-3 du code. Cette appr\u00e9ciation rejoint la solution retenue par la cour d\u2019appel d\u2019Orl\u00e9ans le 4 mars 2025, selon laquelle <em>&#8220;l&#8217;autorit\u00e9 administrative, qui a saisi les autorit\u00e9s tunisiennes en leur transmettant les \u00e9l\u00e9ments qu&#8217;elle avait en sa possession, a effectu\u00e9 des diligences n\u00e9cessaires et suffisantes, dans le respect de l&#8217;obligation de moyen qui s&#8217;impose \u00e0 elle&#8221;<\/em> (n\u00b025\/00691). Le juge marseillais applique ainsi une obligation de moyen, et non de r\u00e9sultat, \u00e0 la charge de l\u2019administration.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-consecration-dune-obligation-de-moyen-adaptee-aux-comportements-obstructifs\">B. La cons\u00e9cration d\u2019une obligation de moyen adapt\u00e9e aux comportements obstructifs<\/h3>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision comment\u00e9e prend acte de ce que la personne retenue a fourni des identit\u00e9s diverses lors de ses interpellations, rendant incertaine sa nationalit\u00e9 et son identification. Elle ne remet pas en cause les diligences de la pr\u00e9fecture, alors m\u00eame que l\u2019identification exacte n\u2019est pas acquise. Ce faisant, le juge adopte un raisonnement similaire \u00e0 celui de la cour d\u2019appel de Rouen du 4 avril 2025, qui avait estim\u00e9 que <em>&#8220;s&#8217;il existe des doutes sur la nationalit\u00e9 de l&#8217;int\u00e9ress\u00e9, cette situation lui est imputable dans la mesure o\u00f9 il r\u00e9sulte de la consultation de son casier judiciaire qu&#8217;il a communiqu\u00e9 diff\u00e9rents nationalit\u00e9 et identit\u00e9s lors de ses interpellations successives&#8221;<\/em> (n\u00b025\/01284). En imputant \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9tranger l\u2019impossibilit\u00e9 de son identification, la d\u00e9cision prot\u00e8ge l\u2019administration contre les cons\u00e9quences de comportements dilatoires. Elle s\u2019inscrit dans une tendance jurisprudentielle \u00e0 ne pas exiger de l\u2019autorit\u00e9 pr\u00e9fectorale des d\u00e9marches impossibles lorsque l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9 fait lui-m\u00eame obstacle \u00e0 la connaissance de son identit\u00e9 r\u00e9elle.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67c7ebe5b8022373e2336a72\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel d\u2019Orl\u00e9ans, le 4 mars 2025, n\u00b025\/00691<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67f0ba48ea6533065f551dae\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Rouen, le 4 avril 2025, n\u00b025\/01284<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000037667139\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 145-4 du Code de commerce<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>La dur\u00e9e du contrat de location ne peut \u00eatre inf\u00e9rieure \u00e0 neuf ans.<\/p>\n<p>Toutefois, le preneur a la facult\u00e9 de donner cong\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;expiration d&#8217;une p\u00e9riode triennale, au moins six mois \u00e0 l&#8217;avance, par lettre recommand\u00e9e avec demande d&#8217;avis de r\u00e9ception ou par acte extrajudiciaire. Les baux conclus pour une dur\u00e9e sup\u00e9rieure \u00e0 neuf ans, les baux des locaux construits en vue d&#8217;une seule utilisation, les baux des locaux \u00e0 usage exclusif de bureaux et ceux des locaux de stockage mentionn\u00e9s au 3\u00b0 du III de l&#8217;article 231 ter du code g\u00e9n\u00e9ral des imp\u00f4ts peuvent comporter des stipulations contraires.<\/p>\n<p>Le bailleur a la m\u00eame facult\u00e9, dans les formes et d\u00e9lai de l&#8217;article L. 145-9, s&#8217;il entend invoquer les dispositions des articles L. 145-18, L. 145-21, L. 145-23-1 et L. 145-24 afin de construire, de reconstruire ou de sur\u00e9lever l&#8217;immeuble existant, de r\u00e9affecter le local d&#8217;habitation accessoire \u00e0 cet usage, de transformer \u00e0 usage principal d&#8217;habitation un immeuble existant par reconstruction, r\u00e9novation ou r\u00e9habilitation ou d&#8217;ex\u00e9cuter des travaux prescrits ou autoris\u00e9s dans le cadre d&#8217;une op\u00e9ration de restauration immobili\u00e8re et en cas de d\u00e9molition de l&#8217;immeuble dans le cadre d&#8217;un projet de renouvellement urbain.<\/p>\n<p>Le preneur ayant demand\u00e9 \u00e0 b\u00e9n\u00e9ficier de ses droits \u00e0 la retraite du r\u00e9gime social auquel il est affili\u00e9 ou ayant \u00e9t\u00e9 admis au b\u00e9n\u00e9fice d&#8217;une pension d&#8217;invalidit\u00e9 attribu\u00e9e dans le cadre de ce r\u00e9gime social a la facult\u00e9 de donner cong\u00e9 dans les formes et d\u00e9lais pr\u00e9vus au deuxi\u00e8me alin\u00e9a du pr\u00e9sent article. Il en est de m\u00eame pour ses ayants droit en cas de d\u00e9c\u00e8s du preneur.<\/p>\n<p>Les dispositions de l&#8217;alin\u00e9a pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent sont applicables \u00e0 l&#8217;associ\u00e9 unique d&#8217;une entreprise unipersonnelle \u00e0 responsabilit\u00e9 limit\u00e9e, ou au g\u00e9rant majoritaire depuis au moins deux ans d&#8217;une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 responsabilit\u00e9 limit\u00e9e, lorsque celle-ci est titulaire du bail.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000031012840\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 145-9 du Code de commerce<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Par d\u00e9rogation aux articles 1736 et 1737 du code civil, les baux de locaux soumis au pr\u00e9sent chapitre ne cessent que par l&#8217;effet d&#8217;un cong\u00e9 donn\u00e9 six mois \u00e0 l&#8217;avance ou d&#8217;une demande de renouvellement. <\/p>\n<p>A d\u00e9faut de cong\u00e9 ou de demande de renouvellement, le bail fait par \u00e9crit se prolonge tacitement au-del\u00e0 du terme fix\u00e9 par le contrat. Au cours de la tacite prolongation, le cong\u00e9 doit \u00eatre donn\u00e9 au moins six mois \u00e0 l&#8217;avance et pour le dernier jour du trimestre civil. <\/p>\n<p>Le bail dont la dur\u00e9e est subordonn\u00e9e \u00e0 un \u00e9v\u00e9nement dont la r\u00e9alisation autorise le bailleur \u00e0 demander la r\u00e9siliation ne cesse, au-del\u00e0 de la dur\u00e9e de neuf ans, que par l&#8217;effet d&#8217;une notification faite six mois \u00e0 l&#8217;avance et pour le dernier jour du trimestre civil. Cette notification doit mentionner la r\u00e9alisation de l&#8217;\u00e9v\u00e9nement pr\u00e9vu au contrat. <\/p>\n<p>S&#8217;agissant d&#8217;un bail comportant plusieurs p\u00e9riodes, si le bailleur d\u00e9nonce le bail \u00e0 la fin des neuf premi\u00e8res ann\u00e9es ou \u00e0 l&#8217;expiration de l&#8217;une des p\u00e9riodes suivantes, le cong\u00e9 doit \u00eatre donn\u00e9 dans les d\u00e9lais pr\u00e9vus \u00e0 l&#8217;alin\u00e9a premier ci-dessus. <\/p>\n<p>Le cong\u00e9 doit \u00eatre donn\u00e9 par acte extrajudiciaire. Il doit, \u00e0 peine de nullit\u00e9, pr\u00e9ciser les motifs pour lesquels il est donn\u00e9 et indiquer que le locataire qui entend, soit contester le cong\u00e9, soit demander le paiement d&#8217;une indemnit\u00e9 d&#8217;\u00e9viction, doit saisir le tribunal avant l&#8217;expiration d&#8217;un d\u00e9lai de deux ans \u00e0 compter de la date pour laquelle le cong\u00e9 a \u00e9t\u00e9 donn\u00e9.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000032041008\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 1134 du Code civil<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">L&#8217;erreur sur les qualit\u00e9s essentielles du cocontractant n&#8217;est une cause de nullit\u00e9 que dans les contrats conclus en consid\u00e9ration de la personne. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Marseille a rendu une ordonnance (n\u00b026\/00459) statuant sur une requ\u00eate&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":4903,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cacd4bcdc6046d478bc300","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cacd4bcdc6046d478bc300","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cacd4bcdc6046d478bc300","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Marseille","_kj_chambre":"Juge des libert\u00e9s","_kj_rg":"26\/00459","_kj_date":"2026-03-30","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1232823","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00459 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Marseille a rendu une ordonnance (n\u00b026\/00459) statuant sur une requ\u00eate...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00459\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Marseille a rendu une ordonnance (n\u00b026\/00459) statuant sur une requ\u00eate...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-02T14:53:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/philippe-oursel-pWhx6q22d_I-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"4813\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3209\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00459\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T14:53:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1868,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/philippe-oursel-pWhx6q22d_I-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00459\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-02T14:53:22+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00459 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/philippe-oursel-pWhx6q22d_I-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T14:53:22+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Marseille a rendu une ordonnance (n\u00b026\\\/00459) statuant sur une requ\u00eate...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/philippe-oursel-pWhx6q22d_I-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/philippe-oursel-pWhx6q22d_I-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":4813,\"height\":3209},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00459\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00459 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Marseille a rendu une ordonnance (n\u00b026\/00459) statuant sur une requ\u00eate...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00459","og_description":"Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Marseille a rendu une ordonnance (n\u00b026\/00459) statuant sur une requ\u00eate...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-02T14:53:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":4813,"height":3209,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/philippe-oursel-pWhx6q22d_I-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00459","datePublished":"2026-07-02T14:53:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\/"},"wordCount":1868,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/philippe-oursel-pWhx6q22d_I-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00459","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-02T14:53:22+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00459 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/philippe-oursel-pWhx6q22d_I-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-02T14:53:22+00:00","description":"Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Marseille a rendu une ordonnance (n\u00b026\/00459) statuant sur une requ\u00eate...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/philippe-oursel-pWhx6q22d_I-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/philippe-oursel-pWhx6q22d_I-unsplash.webp","width":4813,"height":3209},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00459\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00459"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/philippe-oursel-pWhx6q22d_I-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-5aIf","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":441271,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-de-cassation-le-28-janvier-2026-n24-17-532\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232823,"position":0},"title":"Cour de cassation, le 28 janvier 2026, n\u00b024-17.532","author":"","date":"4 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La d\u00e9cision du 28 janvier 2026 illustre le contr\u00f4le exerc\u00e9 par la Cour de cassation sur les d\u00e9cisions de rejet non sp\u00e9cialement motiv\u00e9. Elle rappelle les...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour de cassation&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour de cassation","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-de-cassation\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":441512,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-de-cassation-le-27-janvier-2026-n25-85-427\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232823,"position":1},"title":"Cour de cassation, le 27 janvier 2026, n\u00b025-85.427","author":"","date":"4 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La chambre criminelle se prononce sur une question prioritaire de constitutionnalit\u00e9 incidente. Elle estime qu\u2019il n\u2019y a pas lieu \u00e0 renvoi au Conseil...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour de cassation&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour de cassation","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-de-cassation\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456885,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-toulouse-27-01-2026-n-25tl01037\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232823,"position":2},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de TOULOUSE \u2013 27\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25TL01037","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La pr\u00e9sente ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, rendue par une cour administrative d\u2019appel, statue sur un appel form\u00e9 contre le rejet d\u2019une demande de provision. Le...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456735,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-paris-28-01-2026-n-24pa01905\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232823,"position":3},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de PARIS \u2013 28\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 24PA01905","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La cour administrative d'appel a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisie d'un pourvoi contre un jugement ayant rejet\u00e9 une demande d'annulation partielle d'une mise en demeure. Cette...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456773,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-nantes-29-01-2026-n-25nt03225\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232823,"position":4},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de NANTES \u2013 29\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25NT03225","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La pr\u00e9sente ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9-suspension intervient dans le cadre d\u2019un contentieux fiscal relatif \u00e0 des compl\u00e9ments d\u2019imposition sur le revenu. Le...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":441191,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-de-cassation-le-28-janvier-2026-n23-21-317\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232823,"position":5},"title":"Cour de cassation, le 28 janvier 2026, n\u00b023-21.317","author":"","date":"4 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La Cour de cassation rejette le pourvoi par une d\u00e9cision non sp\u00e9cialement motiv\u00e9e. Elle applique l\u2019article 1014 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. Le rejet sans...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour de cassation&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour de cassation","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-de-cassation\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-WVPJ3ISFRZs-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-WVPJ3ISFRZs-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-WVPJ3ISFRZs-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-WVPJ3ISFRZs-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-WVPJ3ISFRZs-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-WVPJ3ISFRZs-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1232823","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1232823"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1232823\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4903"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1232823"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1232823"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1232823"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}