{"id":1232824,"date":"2026-07-02T16:53:31","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T14:53:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\/"},"modified":"2026-07-02T16:53:31","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T14:53:31","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b021\/10652"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-la-reconnaissance-des-carences-de-lexpertise-initiale-justifiant-une-mesure-di\">I. La reconnaissance des carences de l&#8217;expertise initiale justifiant une mesure d&#8217;instruction compl\u00e9mentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-les-contradictions-internes-du-rapport-dexpertise-sur-la-qualification-de-linc\">A. Les contradictions internes du rapport d&#8217;expertise sur la qualification de l&#8217;incident<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-linsuffisance-des-explications-sur-la-causalite-medicale-de-la-perforation\">B. L&#8217;insuffisance des explications sur la causalit\u00e9 m\u00e9dicale de la perforation<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-la-portee-de-lordonnance-une-articulation-renouvelee-entre-faute-et-alea-ther\">II. La port\u00e9e de l&#8217;ordonnance : une articulation renouvel\u00e9e entre faute et al\u00e9a th\u00e9rapeutique<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-le-fondement-legal-et-procedural-de-la-nouvelle-expertise\">A. Le fondement l\u00e9gal et proc\u00e9dural de la nouvelle expertise<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-les-implications-de-la-decision-pour-la-distinction-entre-faute-et-alea-therap\">B. Les implications de la d\u00e9cision pour la distinction entre faute et al\u00e9a th\u00e9rapeutique<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, dans sa 19\u00e8me chambre contentieux m\u00e9dical, a rendu le 30 mars 2026 une ordonnance avant dire droit (n\u00b021\/10652). Cette d\u00e9cision intervient dans un litige opposant une patiente \u00e0 son chirurgien-dentiste, \u00e0 la suite d&#8217;un traitement radiculaire r\u00e9alis\u00e9 le 18 f\u00e9vrier 2019 sur la dent 27. La patiente avait souffert d&#8217;une perforation radiculaire par un c\u00f4ne de gutta, conduisant \u00e0 l&#8217;extraction de la dent. Une expertise judiciaise avait \u00e9t\u00e9 ordonn\u00e9e, mais son rapport pr\u00e9sentait des contradictions sur la qualification de l&#8217;incident : l&#8217;expert \u00e9voquait \u00e0 la fois un acte <em>&#8220;non-conforme&#8221;<\/em> et un <em>&#8220;al\u00e9a th\u00e9rapeutique&#8221;<\/em>. La demanderesse sollicitait une nouvelle expertise pour clarifier l&#8217;imputabilit\u00e9, tandis que le praticien d\u00e9fendeur estimait le rapport suffisant et d\u00e9nu\u00e9 d&#8217;ambigu\u00eft\u00e9. Le tribunal a fait droit \u00e0 la demande subsidiaire de la patiente en ordonnant une nouvelle mesure d&#8217;instruction.<\/p>\n<p>La question de droit centrale est celle des conditions dans lesquelles le juge peut ordonner une nouvelle expertise m\u00e9dicale lorsque l&#8217;expertise initiale se r\u00e9v\u00e8le lacunaire et contradictoire, ne permettant pas de trancher le litige. Le tribunal a r\u00e9pondu en rappelant que l&#8217;article 146 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile interdit de suppl\u00e9er la carence d&#8217;une partie dans l&#8217;administration de la preuve, mais que cette disposition ne fait pas obstacle \u00e0 une mesure d&#8217;instruction compl\u00e9mentaire lorsque le juge ne dispose pas d&#8217;\u00e9l\u00e9ments suffisants pour statuer. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, l&#8217;expertise judiciaire ne r\u00e9pondait pas exhaustivement \u00e0 la mission, et son caract\u00e8re contradictoire emp\u00eachait le tribunal de d\u00e9terminer s&#8217;il y avait eu faute ou al\u00e9a th\u00e9rapeutique. La d\u00e9cision ordonne donc une nouvelle expertise, confi\u00e9e \u00e0 un nouveau praticien, avec une mission \u00e9largie visant \u00e0 lever toute ambigu\u00eft\u00e9 sur la causalit\u00e9 m\u00e9dicale de la perforation.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-la-reconnaissance-des-carences-de-lexpertise-initiale-justifiant-une-mesure-di\">I. La reconnaissance des carences de l&#8217;expertise initiale justifiant une mesure d&#8217;instruction compl\u00e9mentaire<\/h2>\n<p>Le tribunal a relev\u00e9 que le rapport d&#8217;expertise judiciaire comportait des contradictions internes et des insuffisances r\u00e9dhibitoires. Ces lacunes, en privant le juge de tout \u00e9l\u00e9ment d\u00e9cisif pour qualifier juridiquement le dommage, rendaient n\u00e9cessaire une nouvelle mesure d&#8217;instruction.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-les-contradictions-internes-du-rapport-dexpertise-sur-la-qualification-de-linc\">A. Les contradictions internes du rapport d&#8217;expertise sur la qualification de l&#8217;incident<\/h3>\n<p>L&#8217;ordonnance rel\u00e8ve que le rapport d&#8217;expertise contient une contradiction centrale : il qualifie l&#8217;acte litigieux \u00e0 la fois de <em>&#8220;non conforme aux donn\u00e9es acquises de la science&#8221;<\/em> et d&#8217;<em>&#8220;al\u00e9a th\u00e9rapeutique&#8221;<\/em> pouvant \u00eatre rencontr\u00e9 <em>&#8220;compte-tenu des difficult\u00e9s techniques&#8221;<\/em>. Cette dualit\u00e9 est insoluble en l&#8217;\u00e9tat. Le tribunal souligne que <em>&#8220;le tribunal n&#8217;est pas en capacit\u00e9 de proposer des motifs tir\u00e9s de sa propre analyse en l&#8217;absence des pr\u00e9cisions attendues quant \u00e0 la causalit\u00e9 m\u00e9dicale&#8221;<\/em>. En effet, la notion d&#8217;al\u00e9a th\u00e9rapeutique suppose un risque inh\u00e9rent \u00e0 l&#8217;acte m\u00e9dical, connu mais non ma\u00eetrisable, tandis que la <em>&#8220;non-conformit\u00e9&#8221;<\/em> \u00e9voque un geste fautif relevant de la responsabilit\u00e9 du praticien. Le rapport ne permet pas de d\u00e9partager ces deux hypoth\u00e8ses, pourtant d\u00e9terminantes pour l&#8217;issue du litige. La jurisprudence de la Cour d&#8217;appel de Toulouse, dans un arr\u00eat du 29 janvier 2025, rappelle que lorsqu&#8217;un acte <em>&#8220;n&#8217;a ni respect\u00e9 le protocole \u00e9crit ni pris toutes les pr\u00e9cautions n\u00e9cessaires&#8221;<\/em>, la pr\u00e9somption de faute peut \u00eatre \u00e9cart\u00e9e si le praticien rapporte la preuve d&#8217;un al\u00e9a th\u00e9rapeutique. Ici, l&#8217;expert n&#8217;a pas fourni les \u00e9l\u00e9ments n\u00e9cessaires \u00e0 cette appr\u00e9ciation.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-linsuffisance-des-explications-sur-la-causalite-medicale-de-la-perforation\">B. L&#8217;insuffisance des explications sur la causalit\u00e9 m\u00e9dicale de la perforation<\/h3>\n<p>Au-del\u00e0 de la contradiction sur la qualification, l&#8217;expertise n&#8217;a pas r\u00e9pondu de mani\u00e8re exhaustive \u00e0 toutes les questions de sa mission. Le tribunal constate que <em>&#8220;les causes de la perforation du c\u00f4ne de gutta au niveau du plancher radiculaire ne sont pas clairement explicit\u00e9es&#8221;<\/em>. La mission initiale \u00e9tait pourtant centr\u00e9e sur la recherche des causes pr\u00e9cises de l&#8217;accident. L&#8217;expert s&#8217;est content\u00e9 d&#8217;une formule g\u00e9n\u00e9rale sur les difficult\u00e9s techniques, sans pr\u00e9ciser si la perforation r\u00e9sultait d&#8217;une maladresse \u00e9vitable ou d&#8217;une anomalie anatomique impr\u00e9visible. Or, comme le rappelle la Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Aix-en-Provence le 25 mars 2025, <em>&#8220;les mesures d&#8217;instruction peuvent \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9es en tout \u00e9tat de cause, d\u00e8s lors que le juge ne dispose pas d&#8217;\u00e9l\u00e9ments suffisants pour statuer&#8221;<\/em>. Le tribunal applique ce principe de mani\u00e8re directe : face \u00e0 une expertise qui laisse subsister un doute s\u00e9rieux sur le lien de causalit\u00e9, il est fond\u00e9 \u00e0 ordonner une nouvelle mesure.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-la-portee-de-lordonnance-une-articulation-renouvelee-entre-faute-et-alea-ther\">II. La port\u00e9e de l&#8217;ordonnance : une articulation renouvel\u00e9e entre faute et al\u00e9a th\u00e9rapeutique<\/h2>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision ne se contente pas de pallier les lacunes de l&#8217;expertise initiale. Elle red\u00e9finit les contours de la mission du nouvel expert en imposant une clarification conceptuelle entre le geste fautif et l&#8217;al\u00e9a th\u00e9rapeutique.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-le-fondement-legal-et-procedural-de-la-nouvelle-expertise\">A. Le fondement l\u00e9gal et proc\u00e9dural de la nouvelle expertise<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal fonde sa d\u00e9cision sur l&#8217;article 146 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, qui prohibe les mesures d&#8217;instruction destin\u00e9es \u00e0 suppl\u00e9er la carence d&#8217;une partie dans la preuve. Cependant, il \u00e9carte l&#8217;argument du praticien d\u00e9fendeur selon lequel la demanderesse serait en situation de carence. En effet, la patiente a produit un rapport critique unilat\u00e9ral du docteur [I] affirmant que <em>&#8220;la perforation d&#8217;une racine constitue un acte non conforme, cons\u00e9quence d&#8217;une maladresse, qui engage la responsabilit\u00e9 du praticien&#8221;<\/em>. Mais ce document n&#8217;a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 soumis au contradictoire et ne peut donc \u00eatre retenu comme preuve d\u00e9finitive. Le tribunal estime que la contradiction entre l&#8217;expertise judiciaire et ce rapport unilat\u00e9ral, jointe \u00e0 l&#8217;insuffisance de l&#8217;expertise, l&#8217;emp\u00eache de trancher. Il ordonne donc une nouvelle expertise sur le fondement de l&#8217;article 144 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, qui permet au juge d&#8217;ordonner toute mesure d&#8217;instruction utile. La provision \u00e0 valoir sur les honoraires de l&#8217;expert est mise \u00e0 la charge de la demanderesse, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l&#8217;article 269 du m\u00eame code, ce qui confirme que la demande de nouvelle expertise \u00e9mane de la partie qui en supporte l&#8217;avance des frais.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-les-implications-de-la-decision-pour-la-distinction-entre-faute-et-alea-therap\">B. Les implications de la d\u00e9cision pour la distinction entre faute et al\u00e9a th\u00e9rapeutique<\/h3>\n<p>La mission confi\u00e9e au nouvel expert est particuli\u00e8rement r\u00e9v\u00e9latrice de la volont\u00e9 du tribunal de clarifier la fronti\u00e8re entre la responsabilit\u00e9 pour faute et l&#8217;indemnisation au titre de la solidarit\u00e9 nationale. Le juge demande \u00e0 l&#8217;expert de dire si, <em>&#8220;en pr\u00e9sence d&#8217;un al\u00e9a th\u00e9rapeutique, le risque connu, inh\u00e9rent \u00e0 l&#8217;intervention, ne pouvait \u00eatre ma\u00eetris\u00e9 ou l&#8217;existence d&#8217;une anomalie rendait l&#8217;atteinte in\u00e9vitable&#8221;<\/em>, et \u00e0 l&#8217;inverse, <em>&#8220;si, en pr\u00e9sence d&#8217;un geste non fautif, la perforation aurait pu \u00eatre \u00e9vit\u00e9e&#8221;<\/em>. Cette formulation, qui semble paradoxale (elle distingue geste non fautif et al\u00e9a), r\u00e9v\u00e8le la difficult\u00e9 conceptuelle \u00e0 qualifier un incident technique qui n&#8217;est ni une faute caract\u00e9ris\u00e9e ni un pur al\u00e9a. L&#8217;ordonnance impose \u00e9galement de prendre en compte l&#8217;\u00e9tat ant\u00e9rieur de la patiente, ce qui est conforme \u00e0 la jurisprudence constante sur l&#8217;incidence d&#8217;un \u00e9tat pathologique pr\u00e9existant. En ordonnant une nouvelle expertise avant dire droit, le tribunal fait preuve de prudence : il refuse de trancher pr\u00e9matur\u00e9ment une question m\u00e9dicale complexe, tout en fixant un cadre pr\u00e9cis qui permettra, in fine, de d\u00e9terminer si le pr\u00e9judice rel\u00e8ve de la responsabilit\u00e9 civile ou de l&#8217;al\u00e9a th\u00e9rapeutique non indemnisable. La port\u00e9e de cette d\u00e9cision est donc double : elle rappelle l&#8217;obligation pour l&#8217;expert de r\u00e9pondre exhaustivement \u00e0 sa mission, et elle pr\u00e9cise les crit\u00e8res de distinction entre faute et al\u00e9a, en exigeant que chaque hypoth\u00e8se soit examin\u00e9e de mani\u00e8re autonome et motiv\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67e39d102b19620bb73a2373\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel d\u2019Aix-en-Provence, le 25 mars 2025, n\u00b024\/04156<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/679b172991bdc4437536542e\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Toulouse, le 29 janvier 2025, n\u00b022\/02083<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000019353709\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 2142-1 du Code du travail<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>D\u00e8s lors qu&#8217;ils ont plusieurs adh\u00e9rents dans l&#8217;entreprise ou dans l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement, chaque syndicat qui y est repr\u00e9sentatif, chaque syndicat affili\u00e9 \u00e0 une organisation syndicale repr\u00e9sentative au niveau national et interprofessionnel ou chaque organisation syndicale qui satisfait aux crit\u00e8res de respect des valeurs r\u00e9publicaines et d&#8217;ind\u00e9pendance et est l\u00e9galement constitu\u00e9e depuis au moins deux ans et dont le champ professionnel et g\u00e9ographique couvre l&#8217;entreprise concern\u00e9e peut constituer au sein de l&#8217;entreprise ou de l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement une section syndicale qui assure la repr\u00e9sentation des int\u00e9r\u00eats mat\u00e9riels et moraux de ses membres conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 2131-1.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000025578817\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 2142-1-1 du Code du travail<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Chaque syndicat qui constitue, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 2142-1, une section syndicale au sein de l&#8217;entreprise ou de l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement  d&#8217;au moins cinquante salari\u00e9s peut, s&#8217;il n&#8217;est pas repr\u00e9sentatif dans l&#8217;entreprise ou l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement, d\u00e9signer un repr\u00e9sentant de la section pour le repr\u00e9senter au sein de l&#8217;entreprise ou de l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement. <\/p>\n<p>Le repr\u00e9sentant de la section syndicale exerce ses fonctions dans le cadre des dispositions du pr\u00e9sent chapitre. Il b\u00e9n\u00e9ficie des m\u00eames pr\u00e9rogatives que le d\u00e9l\u00e9gu\u00e9 syndical, \u00e0 l&#8217;exception du pouvoir de n\u00e9gocier des accords collectifs. <\/p>\n<p>Le mandat du repr\u00e9sentant de la section syndicale prend fin, \u00e0 l&#8217;issue des premi\u00e8res \u00e9lections professionnelles suivant sa d\u00e9signation, d\u00e8s lors que le syndicat qui l&#8217;a d\u00e9sign\u00e9 n&#8217;est pas reconnu repr\u00e9sentatif dans l&#8217;entreprise. Le salari\u00e9 qui perd ainsi son mandat de repr\u00e9sentant syndical ne peut pas \u00eatre d\u00e9sign\u00e9 \u00e0 nouveau comme repr\u00e9sentant syndical au titre d&#8217;une section jusqu&#8217;aux six mois pr\u00e9c\u00e9dant la date des \u00e9lections professionnelles suivantes dans l&#8217;entreprise.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410269\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 146 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">   Une mesure d&#8217;instruction ne peut \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9e sur un fait que si la partie qui l&#8217;all\u00e8gue ne dispose pas d&#8217;\u00e9l\u00e9ments suffisants pour le prouver.<\/p>\n<p>    En aucun cas une mesure d&#8217;instruction ne peut \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9e en vue de suppl\u00e9er la carence de la partie dans l&#8217;administration de la preuve.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410267\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 144 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   Les mesures d&#8217;instruction peuvent \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9es en tout \u00e9tat de cause, d\u00e8s lors que le juge ne dispose pas d&#8217;\u00e9l\u00e9ments suffisants pour statuer.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, dans sa 19\u00e8me chambre contentieux m\u00e9dical, a rendu le 30 mars 2026 une ordonnance avant dire droit (n\u00b021\/10652). Cette&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9644,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cac9a5cdc6046d478b8081","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cac9a5cdc6046d478b8081","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cac9a5cdc6046d478b8081","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Paris","_kj_chambre":"19eme contentieux m\u00e9dical","_kj_rg":"21\/10652","_kj_date":"2026-03-30","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1232824","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b021\/10652 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, dans sa 19\u00e8me chambre contentieux m\u00e9dical, a rendu le 30 mars 2026 une ordonnance avant dire droit (n\u00b021\/10652). Cette...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b021\/10652\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, dans sa 19\u00e8me chambre contentieux m\u00e9dical, a rendu le 30 mars 2026 une ordonnance avant dire droit (n\u00b021\/10652). Cette...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-02T14:53:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-8bn59-WwQyk-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"3000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b021\\\/10652\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T14:53:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1914,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/allison-saeng-8bn59-WwQyk-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b021\\\/10652\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-02T14:53:31+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b021\\\/10652 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/allison-saeng-8bn59-WwQyk-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T14:53:31+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, dans sa 19\u00e8me chambre contentieux m\u00e9dical, a rendu le 30 mars 2026 une ordonnance avant dire droit (n\u00b021\\\/10652). Cette...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/allison-saeng-8bn59-WwQyk-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/allison-saeng-8bn59-WwQyk-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":3000,\"height\":3600},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b021\\\/10652\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b021\/10652 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, dans sa 19\u00e8me chambre contentieux m\u00e9dical, a rendu le 30 mars 2026 une ordonnance avant dire droit (n\u00b021\/10652). Cette...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b021\/10652","og_description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, dans sa 19\u00e8me chambre contentieux m\u00e9dical, a rendu le 30 mars 2026 une ordonnance avant dire droit (n\u00b021\/10652). Cette...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-02T14:53:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":3000,"height":3600,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-8bn59-WwQyk-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b021\/10652","datePublished":"2026-07-02T14:53:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\/"},"wordCount":1914,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-8bn59-WwQyk-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b021\/10652","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-02T14:53:31+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b021\/10652 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-8bn59-WwQyk-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-02T14:53:31+00:00","description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, dans sa 19\u00e8me chambre contentieux m\u00e9dical, a rendu le 30 mars 2026 une ordonnance avant dire droit (n\u00b021\/10652). Cette...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-8bn59-WwQyk-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-8bn59-WwQyk-unsplash.webp","width":3000,"height":3600},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-10652\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b021\/10652"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-8bn59-WwQyk-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-5aIg","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":492578,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-13-novembre-2025-n24-02302\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232824,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 13 novembre 2025, n\u00b024\/02302","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Paris, statuant en la forme des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s, a rendu une ordonnance le 13 novembre 2025. Cette d\u00e9cision intervient dans un litige...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":492780,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-10-novembre-2025-n22-01375\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232824,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 10 novembre 2025, n\u00b022\/01375","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Paris, statuant le 10 novembre 2025, a examin\u00e9 un litige relatif \u00e0 la reconnaissance d'une maladie professionnelle. L'employeur...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-GQ7ejmoWJUY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-GQ7ejmoWJUY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-GQ7ejmoWJUY-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-GQ7ejmoWJUY-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-GQ7ejmoWJUY-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-GQ7ejmoWJUY-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":499604,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-26-novembre-2025-n19-10631\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232824,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 26 novembre 2025, n\u00b019\/10631","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Paris, statuant le 26 novembre 2025, a examin\u00e9 un recours contre le rejet d\u2019une demande d\u2019allocation adulte handicap\u00e9. Les...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-TVMKiNPHZTE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-TVMKiNPHZTE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-TVMKiNPHZTE-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-TVMKiNPHZTE-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-TVMKiNPHZTE-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-TVMKiNPHZTE-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":496149,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-2-decembre-2025-n19-01675\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232824,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 2 d\u00e9cembre 2025, n\u00b019\/01675","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Paris, statuant en mati\u00e8re sociale, rend un jugement avant dire droit le 2 d\u00e9cembre 2025. Un employeur conteste le taux...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/daniele-d-andreti-mGH4FxehE2s-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/daniele-d-andreti-mGH4FxehE2s-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/daniele-d-andreti-mGH4FxehE2s-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/daniele-d-andreti-mGH4FxehE2s-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/daniele-d-andreti-mGH4FxehE2s-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/daniele-d-andreti-mGH4FxehE2s-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":491481,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-brive-la-gaillarde-le-17-novembre-2025-n2025r00017\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232824,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Brive-la-Gaillarde, le 17 novembre 2025, n\u00b02025R00017","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s du Tribunal de commerce de Brive, le 3 novembre 2025, ordonne une expertise judiciaire. La d\u00e9cision intervient dans un litige relatif...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kristijan-arsov-C8ilked7AJ8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kristijan-arsov-C8ilked7AJ8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kristijan-arsov-C8ilked7AJ8-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kristijan-arsov-C8ilked7AJ8-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kristijan-arsov-C8ilked7AJ8-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kristijan-arsov-C8ilked7AJ8-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":492782,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-10-novembre-2025-n22-00474\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232824,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 10 novembre 2025, n\u00b022\/00474","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Paris, statuant le 10 novembre 2025, a examin\u00e9 le recours d\u2019une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 contre la prise en charge d\u2019une maladie professionnelle....","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-3RB8kCN90q8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-3RB8kCN90q8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-3RB8kCN90q8-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-3RB8kCN90q8-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-3RB8kCN90q8-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-3RB8kCN90q8-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1232824","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1232824"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1232824\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9644"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1232824"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1232824"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1232824"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}