{"id":1232828,"date":"2026-07-02T16:54:09","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T14:54:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\/"},"modified":"2026-07-02T16:54:09","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T14:54:09","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b021\/07580"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-laffirmation-de-la-responsabilite-de-plein-droit-du-centre-medical-pour-infect\">I. L\u2019affirmation de la responsabilit\u00e9 de plein droit du centre m\u00e9dical pour infection nosocomiale<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-qualification-detablissement-de-sante-appliquee-au-centre-medical\">A. La qualification d\u2019\u00e9tablissement de sant\u00e9 appliqu\u00e9e au centre m\u00e9dical<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-caracterisation-de-linfection-nosocomiale-et-lechec-de-la-preuve-de-la-caus\">B. La caract\u00e9risation de l\u2019infection nosocomiale et l\u2019\u00e9chec de la preuve de la cause \u00e9trang\u00e8re<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-la-liquidation-du-prejudice-corporel-entre-reparation-integrale-et-limites-pr\">II. La liquidation du pr\u00e9judice corporel entre r\u00e9paration int\u00e9grale et limites probatoires<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-lindemnisation-des-prejudices-patrimoniaux-et-extrapatrimoniaux-retenus\">A. L\u2019indemnisation des pr\u00e9judices patrimoniaux et extrapatrimoniaux retenus<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-le-rejet-de-la-demande-de-prejudice-moral-pour-insuffisance-de-preuve\">B. Le rejet de la demande de pr\u00e9judice moral pour insuffisance de preuve<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, dans sa 19\u00e8me chambre contentieux m\u00e9dical, a rendu le 30 mars 2026 un jugement appel\u00e9 \u00e0 clarifier le r\u00e9gime de responsabilit\u00e9 des structures de soins ambulatoires pour infection nosocomiale. Une patiente, victime d\u2019une arthrite septique apr\u00e8s une biopsie du palais r\u00e9alis\u00e9e dans un centre m\u00e9dical et dentaire, recherchait la responsabilit\u00e9 de cette association sur le fondement de l\u2019article L.1142\u20111 I du code de la sant\u00e9 publique. Le centre contestait sa qualit\u00e9 d\u2019\u00e9tablissement de sant\u00e9 et niait tout lien entre l\u2019infection et la prise en charge. Apr\u00e8s expertise, le tribunal devait trancher deux questions essentielles : un centre de sant\u00e9 r\u00e9unissant des professionnels lib\u00e9raux peut\u2011il \u00eatre assimil\u00e9 \u00e0 un \u00e9tablissement de sant\u00e9 au sens du texte pr\u00e9cit\u00e9 ? L\u2019infection, d\u2019origine endog\u00e8ne, peut\u2011elle \u00eatre qualifi\u00e9e de nosocomiale et engager la responsabilit\u00e9 de plein droit de la structure ? Le tribunal a r\u00e9pondu par l\u2019affirmative sur ces deux points, engageant la responsabilit\u00e9 du centre et proc\u00e9dant \u00e0 une \u00e9valuation d\u00e9taill\u00e9e des pr\u00e9judices. Il a rejet\u00e9 la demande de pr\u00e9judice moral faute de preuve suffisante. Cette d\u00e9cision m\u00e9rite une analyse approfondie, tant sur le terrain de la responsabilit\u00e9 que sur celui de la r\u00e9paration.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-laffirmation-de-la-responsabilite-de-plein-droit-du-centre-medical-pour-infect\">I. L\u2019affirmation de la responsabilit\u00e9 de plein droit du centre m\u00e9dical pour infection nosocomiale<\/h2>\n<p>Le tribunal a d\u00fb, en premier lieu, d\u00e9terminer si le centre m\u00e9dical et dentaire relevait du champ d\u2019application de l\u2019article L.1142\u20111 I du code de la sant\u00e9 publique, puis caract\u00e9riser l\u2019infection nosocomiale et \u00e9carter la cause \u00e9trang\u00e8re invoqu\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-qualification-detablissement-de-sante-appliquee-au-centre-medical\">A. La qualification d\u2019\u00e9tablissement de sant\u00e9 appliqu\u00e9e au centre m\u00e9dical<\/h3>\n<p>Le centre m\u00e9dical soutenait que la seule r\u00e9alisation d\u2019actes individuels de soins au sein d\u2019une structure ne suffisait pas \u00e0 en faire un \u00e9tablissement de sant\u00e9. Il se pr\u00e9valait de la jurisprudence exigeant, selon lui, un plateau technique cons\u00e9quent et une certification. Le tribunal a \u00e9cart\u00e9 cette argumentation en rappelant que le code de la sant\u00e9 publique ne d\u00e9finit pas strictement la notion d\u2019\u00e9tablissement, service ou organisme vis\u00e9 par l\u2019article L.1142\u20111 I. Il a estim\u00e9 que le juge doit s\u2019attacher aux caract\u00e9ristiques de la structure, ind\u00e9pendamment de sa forme juridique ou de l\u2019absence de certification. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, les statuts du centre avaient pour objet <em>&#8221; l\u2019accueil et la prise en charge m\u00e9dicale (m\u00e9decine g\u00e9n\u00e9rale et sp\u00e9cialis\u00e9s, soin dentaire), des patients &#8220;<\/em>. Le personnel m\u00e9dical pratiquait des soins ambulatoires en utilisant le mat\u00e9riel mis \u00e0 disposition. Le tribunal en a d\u00e9duit que cette association devait \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme un \u00e9tablissement de sant\u00e9 soumis \u00e0 la responsabilit\u00e9 de plein droit pour infection nosocomiale. Cette solution s\u2019inscrit dans une lecture fonctionnelle de la loi, favorisant la protection des patients. Elle \u00e9carte toute distinction artificielle entre centres de sant\u00e9 et \u00e9tablissements de sant\u00e9 traditionnels, d\u00e8s lors que la structure dispense effectivement des actes de pr\u00e9vention, de diagnostic ou de soins.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-caracterisation-de-linfection-nosocomiale-et-lechec-de-la-preuve-de-la-caus\">B. La caract\u00e9risation de l\u2019infection nosocomiale et l\u2019\u00e9chec de la preuve de la cause \u00e9trang\u00e8re<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal a ensuite v\u00e9rifi\u00e9 si l\u2019infection contract\u00e9e par la patiente pouvait \u00eatre qualifi\u00e9e de nosocomiale. Il a rappel\u00e9 la d\u00e9finition classique : une infection survenant au cours ou au d\u00e9cours de la prise en charge, qui n\u2019\u00e9tait ni pr\u00e9sente ni en incubation au d\u00e9but de celle-ci. Il a constat\u00e9 que l\u2019expert avait retenu un lien probable entre la biopsie et l\u2019arthrite septique, tout en soulignant le caract\u00e8re endog\u00e8ne du germe, pr\u00e9sent naturellement dans l\u2019oropharynx. Le tribunal a consid\u00e9r\u00e9 que ce seul caract\u00e8re endog\u00e8ne n\u2019excluait pas la qualification nosocomiale, d\u00e8s lors que la patiente ne pr\u00e9sentait pas d\u2019infection avant l\u2019acte et que la biopsie avait constitu\u00e9 une porte d\u2019entr\u00e9e. Il a relev\u00e9 un faisceau d\u2019indices graves, pr\u00e9cis et concordants : l\u2019absence d\u2019infection pr\u00e9existante, la rapidit\u00e9 de survenue, la localisation articulaire inhabituelle et l\u2019avis de l\u2019expert. Le centre, qui devait prouver une cause \u00e9trang\u00e8re, n\u2019a rapport\u00e9 aucune preuve que l\u2019infection avait une autre origine. La position du tribunal rejoint celle de la Cour de cassation rappelant que <em>&#8221; dans le cas d\u2019une infection consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme nosocomiale, c\u2019est \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9tablissement de sant\u00e9 qu\u2019il incombe d\u2019apporter la preuve que la contamination ne s\u2019est pas produite lors des soins qu\u2019il a prodigu\u00e9s au patient et proc\u00e8de ainsi d\u2019une cause \u00e9trang\u00e8re &#8220;<\/em> <strong>(Cass. Premi\u00e8re chambre civile, 7 janvier 2026, n\u00b024\u201120.829)<\/strong>. Cette solution est conforme \u00e0 la lettre et \u00e0 l\u2019esprit du texte, qui instaure une pr\u00e9somption de responsabilit\u00e9 pesant sur l\u2019\u00e9tablissement.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-la-liquidation-du-prejudice-corporel-entre-reparation-integrale-et-limites-pr\">II. La liquidation du pr\u00e9judice corporel entre r\u00e9paration int\u00e9grale et limites probatoires<\/h2>\n<p>Le tribunal a ensuite proc\u00e9d\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9valuation des diff\u00e9rents chefs de pr\u00e9judice, en respectant le principe de r\u00e9paration int\u00e9grale, tout en rejetant la demande de pr\u00e9judice moral pour insuffisance de preuve.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-lindemnisation-des-prejudices-patrimoniaux-et-extrapatrimoniaux-retenus\">A. L\u2019indemnisation des pr\u00e9judices patrimoniaux et extrapatrimoniaux retenus<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal a indemnis\u00e9 la patiente pour l\u2019ensemble des pr\u00e9judices \u00e9tablis par l\u2019expertise. Au titre des pr\u00e9judices patrimoniaux, il a allou\u00e9 384 euros de d\u00e9penses de sant\u00e9 rest\u00e9es \u00e0 charge, 2 880 euros d\u2019assistance par tierce personne provisoire sur la base d\u2019un taux horaire de 20 euros, et 1 768,72 euros au titre des pertes de gains professionnels actuels, apr\u00e8s imputation des indemnit\u00e9s journali\u00e8res vers\u00e9es par la caisse. Le recours subrogatoire de la caisse a \u00e9t\u00e9 exerc\u00e9 poste par poste, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la r\u00e8gle rappel\u00e9e par la jurisprudence : <em>&#8221; les recours subrogatoires des tiers payeurs s\u2019exercent poste par poste sur les seules indemnit\u00e9s qui r\u00e9parent des pr\u00e9judices qu\u2019ils ont pris en charge &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67ca922bac6d12802acb191d\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Douai, 6 mars 2025, n\u00b024\/01307)<\/a><\/strong>. Sur le plan extrapatrimonial, le d\u00e9ficit fonctionnel temporaire a \u00e9t\u00e9 indemnis\u00e9 \u00e0 hauteur de 1 281,25 euros, les souffrances endur\u00e9es cot\u00e9es 2,5\/7 \u00e0 3 000 euros, et le pr\u00e9judice esth\u00e9tique temporaire \u00e0 300 euros. Ces montants, non contest\u00e9s par le centre pour la plupart, t\u00e9moignent d\u2019une \u00e9valuation mesur\u00e9e et conforme aux pratiques judiciaires.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-le-rejet-de-la-demande-de-prejudice-moral-pour-insuffisance-de-preuve\">B. Le rejet de la demande de pr\u00e9judice moral pour insuffisance de preuve<\/h3>\n<p>La patiente sollicitait 3 000 euros de pr\u00e9judice moral, soutenant que l\u2019infection l\u2019avait emp\u00each\u00e9e de se rendre aux obs\u00e8ques de sa m\u00e8re en Colombie. Le tribunal a \u00e9cart\u00e9 cette demande en relevant deux insuffisances probatoires. D\u2019une part, l\u2019acte d\u2019\u00e9tat civil produit n\u2019\u00e9tait pas traduit et ne permettait pas d\u2019\u00e9tablir avec certitude le lien de parent\u00e9 entre la patiente et la d\u00e9funte. D\u2019autre part, la patiente n\u2019a pas d\u00e9montr\u00e9 que son \u00e9tat de sant\u00e9 l\u2019avait effectivement emp\u00each\u00e9e de voyager, le d\u00e9ficit fonctionnel temporaire \u00e9tant limit\u00e9 \u00e0 15 % durant la p\u00e9riode concern\u00e9e. Le tribunal a estim\u00e9 que ce pr\u00e9judice, s\u2019il existait, \u00e9tait d\u00e9j\u00e0 indemnis\u00e9 au titre du d\u00e9ficit fonctionnel temporaire et des souffrances endur\u00e9es. Cette position est juridiquement fond\u00e9e : le pr\u00e9judice moral li\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019impossibilit\u00e9 d\u2019assister \u00e0 des obs\u00e8ques ne constitue pas un poste autonome lorsque la g\u00eane fonctionnelle et les souffrances sont d\u00e9j\u00e0 r\u00e9par\u00e9es. En exigeant des preuves tangibles, le tribunal rappelle que la r\u00e9paration ne saurait reposer sur de simples all\u00e9gations. La solution, bien que s\u00e9v\u00e8re pour la victime, s\u2019inscrit dans un souci de rigueur probatoire propre \u00e0 \u00e9viter des indemnisations abusives.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67ca922bac6d12802acb191d\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Douai, le 6 mars 2025, n\u00b024\/01307<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/695f68bacdc6046d479868b5\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cass. Premi\u00e8re chambre civile, le 7 janvier 2026, n\u00b024-20.829<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000034757135\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 542 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>L&#8217;appel tend, par la critique du jugement rendu par une juridiction du premier degr\u00e9, \u00e0 sa r\u00e9formation ou \u00e0 son annulation par la cour d&#8217;appel.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000048869062\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 954 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Les conclusions d&#8217;appel contiennent, en en-t\u00eate, les indications pr\u00e9vues aux deuxi\u00e8me \u00e0 quatri\u00e8me alin\u00e9as de l&#8217;article 960. Elles formulent express\u00e9ment les pr\u00e9tentions des parties et les moyens de fait et de droit sur lesquels chacune de ces pr\u00e9tentions est fond\u00e9e avec indication pour chaque pr\u00e9tention des pi\u00e8ces invoqu\u00e9es et de leur num\u00e9rotation. Un bordereau r\u00e9capitulatif des pi\u00e8ces est annex\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>Les conclusions comprennent distinctement un expos\u00e9 des faits et de la proc\u00e9dure, une discussion des pr\u00e9tentions et des moyens et un dispositif dans lequel l&#8217;appelant indique s&#8217;il demande l&#8217;annulation ou l&#8217;infirmation du jugement et \u00e9nonce, s&#8217;il conclut \u00e0 l&#8217;infirmation, les chefs du dispositif du jugement critiqu\u00e9s, et dans lequel l&#8217;ensemble des parties r\u00e9capitule leurs pr\u00e9tentions. Si, dans la discussion, des moyens nouveaux par rapport aux pr\u00e9c\u00e9dentes conclusions sont invoqu\u00e9s au soutien des pr\u00e9tentions, ils sont pr\u00e9sent\u00e9s de mani\u00e8re formellement distincte.<\/p>\n<p>La cour ne statue que sur les pr\u00e9tentions \u00e9nonc\u00e9es au dispositif et n&#8217;examine les moyens au soutien de ces pr\u00e9tentions que s&#8217;ils sont invoqu\u00e9s dans la discussion.<\/p>\n<p>Les parties reprennent, dans leurs derni\u00e8res conclusions, les pr\u00e9tentions et moyens pr\u00e9c\u00e9demment pr\u00e9sent\u00e9s ou invoqu\u00e9s dans leurs conclusions ant\u00e9rieures. A d\u00e9faut, elles sont r\u00e9put\u00e9es les avoir abandonn\u00e9s et la cour ne statue que sur les derni\u00e8res conclusions d\u00e9pos\u00e9es.<\/p>\n<p>La partie qui conclut \u00e0 l&#8217;infirmation du jugement doit express\u00e9ment \u00e9noncer les moyens qu&#8217;elle invoque sans pouvoir proc\u00e9der par voie de r\u00e9f\u00e9rence \u00e0 ses conclusions de premi\u00e8re instance.<\/p>\n<p>La partie qui ne conclut pas ou qui, sans \u00e9noncer de nouveaux moyens, demande la confirmation du jugement est r\u00e9put\u00e9e s&#8217;en approprier les motifs.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, dans sa 19\u00e8me chambre contentieux m\u00e9dical, a rendu le 30 mars 2026 un jugement appel\u00e9 \u00e0 clarifier le r\u00e9gime de&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9463,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cac99dcdc6046d478b7ff2","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cac99dcdc6046d478b7ff2","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cac99dcdc6046d478b7ff2","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Paris","_kj_chambre":"19eme contentieux m\u00e9dical","_kj_rg":"21\/07580","_kj_date":"2026-03-30","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1232828","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b021\/07580 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, dans sa 19\u00e8me chambre contentieux m\u00e9dical, a rendu le 30 mars 2026 un jugement appel\u00e9 \u00e0 clarifier le r\u00e9gime de...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b021\/07580\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, dans sa 19\u00e8me chambre contentieux m\u00e9dical, a rendu le 30 mars 2026 un jugement appel\u00e9 \u00e0 clarifier le r\u00e9gime de...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-02T14:54:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alexander-mils-LH6ZMdmq_9Y-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"3240\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"5760\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b021\\\/07580\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T14:54:09+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1789,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/alexander-mils-LH6ZMdmq_9Y-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b021\\\/07580\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-02T14:54:09+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b021\\\/07580 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/alexander-mils-LH6ZMdmq_9Y-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T14:54:09+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, dans sa 19\u00e8me chambre contentieux m\u00e9dical, a rendu le 30 mars 2026 un jugement appel\u00e9 \u00e0 clarifier le r\u00e9gime de...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/alexander-mils-LH6ZMdmq_9Y-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/alexander-mils-LH6ZMdmq_9Y-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":3240,\"height\":5760},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b021\\\/07580\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b021\/07580 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, dans sa 19\u00e8me chambre contentieux m\u00e9dical, a rendu le 30 mars 2026 un jugement appel\u00e9 \u00e0 clarifier le r\u00e9gime de...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b021\/07580","og_description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, dans sa 19\u00e8me chambre contentieux m\u00e9dical, a rendu le 30 mars 2026 un jugement appel\u00e9 \u00e0 clarifier le r\u00e9gime de...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-02T14:54:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":3240,"height":5760,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alexander-mils-LH6ZMdmq_9Y-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b021\/07580","datePublished":"2026-07-02T14:54:09+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\/"},"wordCount":1789,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alexander-mils-LH6ZMdmq_9Y-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b021\/07580","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-02T14:54:09+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b021\/07580 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alexander-mils-LH6ZMdmq_9Y-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-02T14:54:09+00:00","description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, dans sa 19\u00e8me chambre contentieux m\u00e9dical, a rendu le 30 mars 2026 un jugement appel\u00e9 \u00e0 clarifier le r\u00e9gime de...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alexander-mils-LH6ZMdmq_9Y-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alexander-mils-LH6ZMdmq_9Y-unsplash.webp","width":3240,"height":5760},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-30-mars-2026-n21-07580\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b021\/07580"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alexander-mils-LH6ZMdmq_9Y-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-5aIk","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":491042,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nancy-le-18-novembre-2025-n25-00322\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232828,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Nancy, le 18 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/00322","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Nancy, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 30 mai 2025, examine deux demandes distinctes. La premi\u00e8re sollicite une expertise m\u00e9dicale avant...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mourad-saadi-tgP7H6LH4OU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mourad-saadi-tgP7H6LH4OU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mourad-saadi-tgP7H6LH4OU-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mourad-saadi-tgP7H6LH4OU-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mourad-saadi-tgP7H6LH4OU-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mourad-saadi-tgP7H6LH4OU-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":449574,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-le-7-aout-2025-n25-01068\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232828,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire, le 7 ao\u00fbt 2025, n\u00b025\/01068","author":"","date":"5 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La Cour d\u2019appel de Paris, dans un arr\u00eat du 7 ao\u00fbt 2025, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisie d\u2019une demande de maintien d\u2019une mesure d\u2019isolement prononc\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019encontre d\u2019un...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/leandra-rieger-LrXNGasPQ2M-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/leandra-rieger-LrXNGasPQ2M-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/leandra-rieger-LrXNGasPQ2M-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/leandra-rieger-LrXNGasPQ2M-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/leandra-rieger-LrXNGasPQ2M-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/leandra-rieger-LrXNGasPQ2M-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":495786,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-2-decembre-2025-n25-04913\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232828,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 2 d\u00e9cembre 2025, n\u00b025\/04913","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire du Mesnil-Amelot, statuant le 2 d\u00e9cembre 2025, se prononce sur la l\u00e9galit\u00e9 d\u2019un placement en r\u00e9tention administrative et sur sa...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-U7YRxXgIqmo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-U7YRxXgIqmo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-U7YRxXgIqmo-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-U7YRxXgIqmo-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-U7YRxXgIqmo-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-U7YRxXgIqmo-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":492780,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-10-novembre-2025-n22-01375\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232828,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 10 novembre 2025, n\u00b022\/01375","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Paris, statuant le 10 novembre 2025, a examin\u00e9 un litige relatif \u00e0 la reconnaissance d'une maladie professionnelle. L'employeur...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-GQ7ejmoWJUY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-GQ7ejmoWJUY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-GQ7ejmoWJUY-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-GQ7ejmoWJUY-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-GQ7ejmoWJUY-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-GQ7ejmoWJUY-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":499604,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-26-novembre-2025-n19-10631\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232828,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 26 novembre 2025, n\u00b019\/10631","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Paris, statuant le 26 novembre 2025, a examin\u00e9 un recours contre le rejet d\u2019une demande d\u2019allocation adulte handicap\u00e9. Les...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-TVMKiNPHZTE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-TVMKiNPHZTE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-TVMKiNPHZTE-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-TVMKiNPHZTE-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-TVMKiNPHZTE-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-TVMKiNPHZTE-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":496149,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-2-decembre-2025-n19-01675\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232828,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 2 d\u00e9cembre 2025, n\u00b019\/01675","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Paris, statuant en mati\u00e8re sociale, rend un jugement avant dire droit le 2 d\u00e9cembre 2025. Un employeur conteste le taux...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/daniele-d-andreti-mGH4FxehE2s-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/daniele-d-andreti-mGH4FxehE2s-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/daniele-d-andreti-mGH4FxehE2s-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/daniele-d-andreti-mGH4FxehE2s-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/daniele-d-andreti-mGH4FxehE2s-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/daniele-d-andreti-mGH4FxehE2s-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1232828","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1232828"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1232828\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9463"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1232828"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1232828"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1232828"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}