{"id":1232864,"date":"2026-07-02T16:59:27","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T14:59:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\/"},"modified":"2026-07-02T16:59:27","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T14:59:27","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01145"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-le-controle-rigoureux-du-juge-sur-les-conditions-de-forme-et-de-delai-de-la-me\">I. Le contr\u00f4le rigoureux du juge sur les conditions de forme et de d\u00e9lai de la mesure d\u2019isolement<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-lexigence-dune-saisine-dans-les-delais-legaux\">A. L\u2019exigence d\u2019une saisine dans les d\u00e9lais l\u00e9gaux<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-lobligation-de-continuite-des-decisions-de-renouvellement\">B. L\u2019obligation de continuit\u00e9 des d\u00e9cisions de renouvellement<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-la-portee-de-la-mainlevee-ordonnee-par-le-juge\">II. La port\u00e9e de la mainlev\u00e9e ordonn\u00e9e par le juge<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-sanction-de-lirregularite-procedurale\">A. La sanction de l\u2019irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9 proc\u00e9durale<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-les-limites-du-controle-judiciaire-sur-le-fond-medical\">B. Les limites du contr\u00f4le judiciaire sur le fond m\u00e9dical<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Par une ordonnance rendue le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Lyon a ordonn\u00e9 la mainlev\u00e9e d\u2019une mesure d\u2019isolement prise \u00e0 l\u2019encontre d\u2019un patient hospitalis\u00e9 sans consentement. Cette d\u00e9cision, rendue dans le cadre du contr\u00f4le juridictionnel pr\u00e9vu \u00e0 l\u2019article L3222\u20115\u20111 du code de la sant\u00e9 publique, illustre les exigences proc\u00e9durales entourant le maintien de telles mesures privatives de libert\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>Les faits de l\u2019esp\u00e8ce sont les suivants. Le patient a \u00e9t\u00e9 plac\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019isolement le 22 mars 2026 \u00e0 10h01. La mesure a fait l\u2019objet de renouvellements successifs. Le 30 mars 2026, le directeur de l\u2019\u00e9tablissement a saisi le juge d\u2019une demande d\u2019autorisation de maintien au\u2011del\u00e0 de la cent\u2011soixante\u2011huiti\u00e8me heure. Cette saisine, enregistr\u00e9e \u00e0 07h45, \u00e9tait tardive : le d\u00e9lai de cent\u2011soixante\u2011huit heures expirait le 29 mars 2026 \u00e0 10h01. Par ailleurs, le juge a constat\u00e9 qu\u2019aucune d\u00e9cision de renouvellement n\u2019avait \u00e9t\u00e9 prise entre 00h00 et 20h48 le 28 mars 2026, soit une p\u00e9riode de plus de vingt heures durant laquelle la surveillance stricte exig\u00e9e par la loi n\u2019\u00e9tait pas assur\u00e9ment garantie.<\/p>\n<p>La question de droit qui se posait au juge \u00e9tait de savoir si le non\u2011respect des d\u00e9lais de saisine et l\u2019absence de d\u00e9cision de renouvellement pendant une p\u00e9riode significative constituent des irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9s justifiant la mainlev\u00e9e d\u2019une mesure d\u2019isolement. Le juge a r\u00e9pondu par l\u2019affirmative en ordonnant la mainlev\u00e9e, estimant que la saisine tardive et l\u2019interruption du suivi m\u00e9dical violaient les prescriptions l\u00e9gales.<\/p>\n<p>L\u2019ordonnance comment\u00e9e offre l\u2019occasion d\u2019\u00e9tudier le contr\u00f4le exerc\u00e9 par le juge sur la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 proc\u00e9durale des mesures d\u2019isolement (I) avant d\u2019en appr\u00e9cier la port\u00e9e au regard des exigences de protection des droits fondamentaux des patients (II).<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-le-controle-rigoureux-du-juge-sur-les-conditions-de-forme-et-de-delai-de-la-me\">I. Le contr\u00f4le rigoureux du juge sur les conditions de forme et de d\u00e9lai de la mesure d\u2019isolement<\/h2>\n<p>Le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention examine scrupuleusement le respect des d\u00e9lais impos\u00e9s par l\u2019article L3222\u20115\u20111 du code de la sant\u00e9 publique. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, deux irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9s distinctes ont \u00e9t\u00e9 relev\u00e9es.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-lexigence-dune-saisine-dans-les-delais-legaux\">A. L\u2019exigence d\u2019une saisine dans les d\u00e9lais l\u00e9gaux<\/h3>\n<p>La loi pr\u00e9voit que le juge doit \u00eatre saisi avant l\u2019expiration de la cent\u2011soixante\u2011huiti\u00e8me heure d\u2019isolement. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, la saisine enregistr\u00e9e le 30 mars 2026 \u00e0 07h45 intervenait apr\u00e8s le terme fix\u00e9 au 29 mars 2026 \u00e0 10h01. Le juge a qualifi\u00e9 cette saisine de <em>&#8221; tardive &#8220;<\/em>, ce qui constitue une violation manifeste des prescriptions l\u00e9gales. Cette rigueur s\u2019explique par la nature restrictive de libert\u00e9 de la mesure. La Cour d\u2019appel de Rennes a d\u2019ailleurs rappel\u00e9 que les d\u00e9lais doivent \u00eatre strictement respect\u00e9s, jugeant que <em>&#8221; le premier renouvellement de la mesure, intervenu plus de 19 heures apr\u00e8s son placement en isolement, contrevient aux dispositions de l\u2019article L3222\u20115\u20111 du code de la sant\u00e9 publique &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67777da937d114ca7b85150e\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Rennes, 1er janvier 2025, n\u00b025\/00004)<\/a><\/strong>. Bien que cet arr\u00eat concerne un d\u00e9lai de douze heures, il illustre l\u2019exigence de c\u00e9l\u00e9rit\u00e9 impos\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019autorit\u00e9 m\u00e9dicale.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-lobligation-de-continuite-des-decisions-de-renouvellement\">B. L\u2019obligation de continuit\u00e9 des d\u00e9cisions de renouvellement<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge a \u00e9galement relev\u00e9 une absence de toute d\u00e9cision de renouvellement pendant plus de vingt heures le 28 mars 2026. Il a soulign\u00e9 que les \u00e9l\u00e9ments fournis ne permettaient pas de s\u2019assurer que la mesure d\u2019isolement n\u2019\u00e9tait pas effective durant cette p\u00e9riode, malgr\u00e9 d\u2019\u00e9ventuels temps de sortie. Cette lacune contredit l\u2019obligation l\u00e9gale de <em>&#8221; surveillance stricte, somatique et psychiatrique &#8220;<\/em> trac\u00e9e dans le dossier m\u00e9dical. Le silence de l\u2019administration sur cette p\u00e9riode constitue une carence grave. La Cour d\u2019appel de Paris, dans une affaire proche, a jug\u00e9 que l\u2019exigence de deux \u00e9valuations par p\u00e9riode de vingt\u2011quatre heures est satisfaite d\u00e8s lors que celles-ci sont r\u00e9alis\u00e9es, sans imposer une \u00e9valuation toutes les douze heures <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67b4223b2a362987b205fe1d\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Paris, 16 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b025\/00091)<\/a><\/strong>. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, ce n\u2019est pas le nombre d\u2019\u00e9valuations qui est en cause, mais l\u2019absence de toute d\u00e9cision de renouvellement, ce qui prive le contr\u00f4le judiciaire de tout fondement.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-la-portee-de-la-mainlevee-ordonnee-par-le-juge\">II. La port\u00e9e de la mainlev\u00e9e ordonn\u00e9e par le juge<\/h2>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision de mainlev\u00e9e, bien que motiv\u00e9e par des vices de proc\u00e9dure, a des cons\u00e9quences importantes sur l\u2019\u00e9tendue du contr\u00f4le juridictionnel.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-sanction-de-lirregularite-procedurale\">A. La sanction de l\u2019irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9 proc\u00e9durale<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge n\u2019a pas examin\u00e9 l\u2019opportunit\u00e9 m\u00e9dicale du maintien de l\u2019isolement. Il a fond\u00e9 sa d\u00e9cision exclusivement sur le non\u2011respect des obligations l\u00e9gales de saisine et de tra\u00e7abilit\u00e9. Cette approche est conforme \u00e0 la lettre de l\u2019article L3222\u20115\u20111, qui dispose que le juge ne peut <em>&#8221; se substituer \u00e0 l\u2019autorit\u00e9 m\u00e9dicale s\u2019agissant de l\u2019\u00e9valuation du consentement du patient, du diagnostic pos\u00e9 ou des soins &#8220;<\/em>. La mainlev\u00e9e prononc\u00e9e constitue donc une sanction proc\u00e9durale stricte. Elle rappelle que le respect des formes est une garantie essentielle pour les patients priv\u00e9s de libert\u00e9, et que toute entorse, m\u00eame ind\u00e9pendante d\u2019une remise en cause du bien\u2011fond\u00e9 m\u00e9dical, entra\u00eene la cessation de la mesure.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-les-limites-du-controle-judiciaire-sur-le-fond-medical\">B. Les limites du contr\u00f4le judiciaire sur le fond m\u00e9dical<\/h3>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision ne remet pas en cause l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation clinique ayant conduit \u00e0 l\u2019isolement. Le juge s\u2019est content\u00e9 de v\u00e9rifier le respect des d\u00e9lais et de la continuit\u00e9 des actes m\u00e9dicaux. Cette retenue est logique : le magistrat n\u2019a pas comp\u00e9tence pour \u00e9valuer la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 th\u00e9rapeutique de l\u2019isolement. N\u00e9anmoins, la port\u00e9e de l\u2019ordonnance d\u00e9passe le simple constat d\u2019irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9. En exigeant une tra\u00e7abilit\u00e9 continue des d\u00e9cisions de renouvellement, le juge impose aux \u00e9tablissements de sant\u00e9 un standard de rigueur documentaire \u00e9lev\u00e9. Cette jurisprudence s\u2019inscrit dans un mouvement plus large de renforcement du contr\u00f4le des mesures privatives de libert\u00e9 en psychiatrie, o\u00f9 la proc\u00e9dure devient un outil de protection des droits fondamentaux. La mainlev\u00e9e ordonn\u00e9e en l\u2019esp\u00e8ce illustre ainsi que le juge, sans sortir de son r\u00f4le, peut efficacement sanctionner les n\u00e9gligences proc\u00e9durales et inciter \u00e0 une meilleure gestion des mesures d\u2019isolement.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67777da937d114ca7b85150e\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Rennes, le 1 janvier 2025, n\u00b025\/00004<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67b4223b2a362987b205fe1d\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Paris, le 16 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b025\/00091<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000037667139\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 145-4 du Code de commerce<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>La dur\u00e9e du contrat de location ne peut \u00eatre inf\u00e9rieure \u00e0 neuf ans.<\/p>\n<p>Toutefois, le preneur a la facult\u00e9 de donner cong\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;expiration d&#8217;une p\u00e9riode triennale, au moins six mois \u00e0 l&#8217;avance, par lettre recommand\u00e9e avec demande d&#8217;avis de r\u00e9ception ou par acte extrajudiciaire. Les baux conclus pour une dur\u00e9e sup\u00e9rieure \u00e0 neuf ans, les baux des locaux construits en vue d&#8217;une seule utilisation, les baux des locaux \u00e0 usage exclusif de bureaux et ceux des locaux de stockage mentionn\u00e9s au 3\u00b0 du III de l&#8217;article 231 ter du code g\u00e9n\u00e9ral des imp\u00f4ts peuvent comporter des stipulations contraires.<\/p>\n<p>Le bailleur a la m\u00eame facult\u00e9, dans les formes et d\u00e9lai de l&#8217;article L. 145-9, s&#8217;il entend invoquer les dispositions des articles L. 145-18, L. 145-21, L. 145-23-1 et L. 145-24 afin de construire, de reconstruire ou de sur\u00e9lever l&#8217;immeuble existant, de r\u00e9affecter le local d&#8217;habitation accessoire \u00e0 cet usage, de transformer \u00e0 usage principal d&#8217;habitation un immeuble existant par reconstruction, r\u00e9novation ou r\u00e9habilitation ou d&#8217;ex\u00e9cuter des travaux prescrits ou autoris\u00e9s dans le cadre d&#8217;une op\u00e9ration de restauration immobili\u00e8re et en cas de d\u00e9molition de l&#8217;immeuble dans le cadre d&#8217;un projet de renouvellement urbain.<\/p>\n<p>Le preneur ayant demand\u00e9 \u00e0 b\u00e9n\u00e9ficier de ses droits \u00e0 la retraite du r\u00e9gime social auquel il est affili\u00e9 ou ayant \u00e9t\u00e9 admis au b\u00e9n\u00e9fice d&#8217;une pension d&#8217;invalidit\u00e9 attribu\u00e9e dans le cadre de ce r\u00e9gime social a la facult\u00e9 de donner cong\u00e9 dans les formes et d\u00e9lais pr\u00e9vus au deuxi\u00e8me alin\u00e9a du pr\u00e9sent article. Il en est de m\u00eame pour ses ayants droit en cas de d\u00e9c\u00e8s du preneur.<\/p>\n<p>Les dispositions de l&#8217;alin\u00e9a pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent sont applicables \u00e0 l&#8217;associ\u00e9 unique d&#8217;une entreprise unipersonnelle \u00e0 responsabilit\u00e9 limit\u00e9e, ou au g\u00e9rant majoritaire depuis au moins deux ans d&#8217;une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 responsabilit\u00e9 limit\u00e9e, lorsque celle-ci est titulaire du bail.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000031012840\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 145-9 du Code de commerce<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Par d\u00e9rogation aux articles 1736 et 1737 du code civil, les baux de locaux soumis au pr\u00e9sent chapitre ne cessent que par l&#8217;effet d&#8217;un cong\u00e9 donn\u00e9 six mois \u00e0 l&#8217;avance ou d&#8217;une demande de renouvellement. <\/p>\n<p>A d\u00e9faut de cong\u00e9 ou de demande de renouvellement, le bail fait par \u00e9crit se prolonge tacitement au-del\u00e0 du terme fix\u00e9 par le contrat. Au cours de la tacite prolongation, le cong\u00e9 doit \u00eatre donn\u00e9 au moins six mois \u00e0 l&#8217;avance et pour le dernier jour du trimestre civil. <\/p>\n<p>Le bail dont la dur\u00e9e est subordonn\u00e9e \u00e0 un \u00e9v\u00e9nement dont la r\u00e9alisation autorise le bailleur \u00e0 demander la r\u00e9siliation ne cesse, au-del\u00e0 de la dur\u00e9e de neuf ans, que par l&#8217;effet d&#8217;une notification faite six mois \u00e0 l&#8217;avance et pour le dernier jour du trimestre civil. Cette notification doit mentionner la r\u00e9alisation de l&#8217;\u00e9v\u00e9nement pr\u00e9vu au contrat. <\/p>\n<p>S&#8217;agissant d&#8217;un bail comportant plusieurs p\u00e9riodes, si le bailleur d\u00e9nonce le bail \u00e0 la fin des neuf premi\u00e8res ann\u00e9es ou \u00e0 l&#8217;expiration de l&#8217;une des p\u00e9riodes suivantes, le cong\u00e9 doit \u00eatre donn\u00e9 dans les d\u00e9lais pr\u00e9vus \u00e0 l&#8217;alin\u00e9a premier ci-dessus. <\/p>\n<p>Le cong\u00e9 doit \u00eatre donn\u00e9 par acte extrajudiciaire. Il doit, \u00e0 peine de nullit\u00e9, pr\u00e9ciser les motifs pour lesquels il est donn\u00e9 et indiquer que le locataire qui entend, soit contester le cong\u00e9, soit demander le paiement d&#8217;une indemnit\u00e9 d&#8217;\u00e9viction, doit saisir le tribunal avant l&#8217;expiration d&#8217;un d\u00e9lai de deux ans \u00e0 compter de la date pour laquelle le cong\u00e9 a \u00e9t\u00e9 donn\u00e9.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000032041008\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 1134 du Code civil<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">L&#8217;erreur sur les qualit\u00e9s essentielles du cocontractant n&#8217;est une cause de nullit\u00e9 que dans les contrats conclus en consid\u00e9ration de la personne. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Par une ordonnance rendue le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Lyon a ordonn\u00e9 la mainlev\u00e9e d\u2019une mesure&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":4910,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cac8eccdc6046d478b742e","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cac8eccdc6046d478b742e","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cac8eccdc6046d478b742e","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Lyon","_kj_chambre":"J.L.D.","_kj_rg":"26\/01145","_kj_date":"2026-03-30","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1232864","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01145 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Par une ordonnance rendue le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Lyon a ordonn\u00e9 la mainlev\u00e9e d\u2019une mesure...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01145\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Par une ordonnance rendue le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Lyon a ordonn\u00e9 la mainlev\u00e9e d\u2019une mesure...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-02T14:59:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/chris-karidis-QSRSgWlAFCQ-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"5858\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3295\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/01145\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T14:59:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1891,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/chris-karidis-QSRSgWlAFCQ-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/01145\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-02T14:59:27+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/01145 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/chris-karidis-QSRSgWlAFCQ-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T14:59:27+00:00\",\"description\":\"Par une ordonnance rendue le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Lyon a ordonn\u00e9 la mainlev\u00e9e d\u2019une mesure...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/chris-karidis-QSRSgWlAFCQ-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/chris-karidis-QSRSgWlAFCQ-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":5858,\"height\":3295},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/01145\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01145 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Par une ordonnance rendue le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Lyon a ordonn\u00e9 la mainlev\u00e9e d\u2019une mesure...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01145","og_description":"Par une ordonnance rendue le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Lyon a ordonn\u00e9 la mainlev\u00e9e d\u2019une mesure...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-02T14:59:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":5858,"height":3295,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/chris-karidis-QSRSgWlAFCQ-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01145","datePublished":"2026-07-02T14:59:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\/"},"wordCount":1891,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/chris-karidis-QSRSgWlAFCQ-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01145","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-02T14:59:27+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01145 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/chris-karidis-QSRSgWlAFCQ-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-02T14:59:27+00:00","description":"Par une ordonnance rendue le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Lyon a ordonn\u00e9 la mainlev\u00e9e d\u2019une mesure...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/chris-karidis-QSRSgWlAFCQ-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/chris-karidis-QSRSgWlAFCQ-unsplash.webp","width":5858,"height":3295},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-30-mars-2026-n26-01145\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01145"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/chris-karidis-QSRSgWlAFCQ-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-5aIU","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":441271,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-de-cassation-le-28-janvier-2026-n24-17-532\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232864,"position":0},"title":"Cour de cassation, le 28 janvier 2026, n\u00b024-17.532","author":"","date":"4 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La d\u00e9cision du 28 janvier 2026 illustre le contr\u00f4le exerc\u00e9 par la Cour de cassation sur les d\u00e9cisions de rejet non sp\u00e9cialement motiv\u00e9. Elle rappelle les...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour de cassation&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour de cassation","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-de-cassation\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":441512,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-de-cassation-le-27-janvier-2026-n25-85-427\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232864,"position":1},"title":"Cour de cassation, le 27 janvier 2026, n\u00b025-85.427","author":"","date":"4 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La chambre criminelle se prononce sur une question prioritaire de constitutionnalit\u00e9 incidente. Elle estime qu\u2019il n\u2019y a pas lieu \u00e0 renvoi au Conseil...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour de cassation&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour de cassation","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-de-cassation\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456885,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-toulouse-27-01-2026-n-25tl01037\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232864,"position":2},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de TOULOUSE \u2013 27\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25TL01037","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La pr\u00e9sente ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, rendue par une cour administrative d\u2019appel, statue sur un appel form\u00e9 contre le rejet d\u2019une demande de provision. Le...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456735,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-paris-28-01-2026-n-24pa01905\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232864,"position":3},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de PARIS \u2013 28\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 24PA01905","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La cour administrative d'appel a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisie d'un pourvoi contre un jugement ayant rejet\u00e9 une demande d'annulation partielle d'une mise en demeure. Cette...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456773,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-nantes-29-01-2026-n-25nt03225\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232864,"position":4},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de NANTES \u2013 29\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25NT03225","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La pr\u00e9sente ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9-suspension intervient dans le cadre d\u2019un contentieux fiscal relatif \u00e0 des compl\u00e9ments d\u2019imposition sur le revenu. Le...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":441191,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-de-cassation-le-28-janvier-2026-n23-21-317\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232864,"position":5},"title":"Cour de cassation, le 28 janvier 2026, n\u00b023-21.317","author":"","date":"4 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La Cour de cassation rejette le pourvoi par une d\u00e9cision non sp\u00e9cialement motiv\u00e9e. Elle applique l\u2019article 1014 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. Le rejet sans...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour de cassation&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour de cassation","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-de-cassation\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-WVPJ3ISFRZs-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-WVPJ3ISFRZs-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-WVPJ3ISFRZs-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-WVPJ3ISFRZs-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-WVPJ3ISFRZs-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-WVPJ3ISFRZs-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1232864","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1232864"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1232864\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4910"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1232864"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1232864"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1232864"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}