{"id":1233747,"date":"2026-07-02T23:11:51","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T21:11:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\/"},"modified":"2026-07-02T23:11:51","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T21:11:51","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00461"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-les-conditions-strictes-de-la-troisieme-prolongation-de-la-retention-administr\">I. Les conditions strictes de la troisi\u00e8me prolongation de la r\u00e9tention administrative<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-lexigence-dun-cas-legal-de-prolongation-au-titre-de-larticle-l-742-4-du-ceseda\">A. L\u2019exigence d\u2019un cas l\u00e9gal de prolongation au titre de l\u2019article L. 742-4 du CESEDA<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-loffice-du-juge-dans-le-controle-de-limpossibilite-dexecuter-la-mesure-deloign\">B. L\u2019office du juge dans le contr\u00f4le de l\u2019impossibilit\u00e9 d\u2019ex\u00e9cuter la mesure d\u2019\u00e9loignement<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-la-protection-des-droits-fondamentaux-de-letranger-retenu-face-aux-prolongati\">II. La protection des droits fondamentaux de l\u2019\u00e9tranger retenu face aux prolongations successives<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-garantie-de-linformation-effective-des-droits-par-le-juge\">A. La garantie de l\u2019information effective des droits par le juge<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-portee-des-prolongations-successives-sur-le-controle-de-la-menace-pour-lord\">B. La port\u00e9e des prolongations successives sur le contr\u00f4le de la menace pour l\u2019ordre public<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s du tribunal judiciaire de Marseille a rendu une ordonnance sur une troisi\u00e8me demande de prolongation de r\u00e9tention administrative. La question centrale porte sur les conditions de mise en \u0153uvre de l\u2019article L. 742-4 du CESEDA. Les faits sont les suivants : un ressortissant alg\u00e9rien a fait l\u2019objet d\u2019une obligation de quitter le territoire fran\u00e7ais le 7 f\u00e9vrier 2025, notifi\u00e9e le m\u00eame jour. Plac\u00e9 en r\u00e9tention le 30 janvier 2026, sa r\u00e9tention a \u00e9t\u00e9 prolong\u00e9e une premi\u00e8re fois le 3 f\u00e9vrier 2026 pour vingt-six jours, puis une seconde fois le 28 f\u00e9vrier 2026 pour trente jours. Le 29 mars 2026, le pr\u00e9fet a saisi le juge d\u2019une troisi\u00e8me demande de prolongation de trente jours, en invoquant le d\u00e9faut de d\u00e9livrance des documents de voyage par les autorit\u00e9s consulaires alg\u00e9riennes. Lors de l\u2019audience, l\u2019avocat de l\u2019\u00e9tranger a fait valoir qu\u2019aucune perspective de retour n\u2019existait, le consulat n\u2019ayant donn\u00e9 aucune suite aux demandes de laisser-passer. Le juge a fait droit \u00e0 la requ\u00eate pr\u00e9fectorale et ordonn\u00e9 le maintien en r\u00e9tention pour une dur\u00e9e maximale de trente jours. La question de droit soumise au juge \u00e9tait de savoir si les conditions l\u00e9gales d\u2019une troisi\u00e8me prolongation de la r\u00e9tention \u00e9taient r\u00e9unies, notamment l\u2019existence d\u2019un obstacle \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9loignement r\u00e9sultant du d\u00e9faut de d\u00e9livrance des documents de voyage par le consulat. Le juge a r\u00e9pondu par l\u2019affirmative, estimant que la d\u00e9cision d\u2019\u00e9loignement n\u2019avait pu \u00eatre ex\u00e9cut\u00e9e en raison de ce d\u00e9faut de d\u00e9livrance.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-les-conditions-strictes-de-la-troisieme-prolongation-de-la-retention-administr\">I. Les conditions strictes de la troisi\u00e8me prolongation de la r\u00e9tention administrative<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-lexigence-dun-cas-legal-de-prolongation-au-titre-de-larticle-l-742-4-du-ceseda\">A. L\u2019exigence d\u2019un cas l\u00e9gal de prolongation au titre de l\u2019article L. 742-4 du CESEDA<\/h3>\n<p>L\u2019article L. 742-4 du CESEDA \u00e9num\u00e8re limitativement les cas dans lesquels le juge peut ordonner une troisi\u00e8me prolongation de la r\u00e9tention. Parmi ces cas figure notamment le d\u00e9faut de d\u00e9livrance des documents de voyage par le consulat dont rel\u00e8ve l\u2019\u00e9tranger. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le juge a constat\u00e9 que la d\u00e9cision d\u2019\u00e9loignement n\u2019avait pu \u00eatre ex\u00e9cut\u00e9e en raison du d\u00e9faut de d\u00e9livrance des documents de voyage par le consulat alg\u00e9rien, qui avait \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi et relanc\u00e9. Il a ajout\u00e9 que la pr\u00e9fecture ne dispose d\u2019aucun pouvoir de contrainte sur les autorit\u00e9s consulaires. Cette motivation semble conforme \u00e0 la lettre de l\u2019article L. 742-4, 3\u00b0 a), qui vise express\u00e9ment cette hypoth\u00e8se. Toutefois, le juge ne s\u2019est pas prononc\u00e9 sur la menace pour l\u2019ordre public, pourtant \u00e9galement invoqu\u00e9e par le pr\u00e9fet dans sa requ\u00eate. Il a choisi de fonder sa d\u00e9cision uniquement sur l\u2019obstacle consulaire, ce qui \u00e9carte tout d\u00e9bat sur la qualification de la menace. Cette approche est juridiquement plus s\u00fbre car elle repose sur un fait objectif et v\u00e9rifiable : l\u2019absence de r\u00e9ponse consulaire. La Cour de cassation a d\u2019ailleurs pr\u00e9cis\u00e9, dans un arr\u00eat du 9 avril 2025, que la troisi\u00e8me prolongation n\u2019est pas soumise \u00e0 l\u2019exigence que la menace \u00e0 l\u2019ordre public soit apparue dans les quinze derniers jours. Ce faisant, la haute juridiction a assoupli les conditions de cette prolongation lorsqu\u2019elle est fond\u00e9e sur un autre motif que la menace. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le juge a donc pu se contenter de constater l\u2019obstacle \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9loignement sans avoir \u00e0 caract\u00e9riser une menace distincte.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-loffice-du-juge-dans-le-controle-de-limpossibilite-dexecuter-la-mesure-deloign\">B. L\u2019office du juge dans le contr\u00f4le de l\u2019impossibilit\u00e9 d\u2019ex\u00e9cuter la mesure d\u2019\u00e9loignement<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge ne se contente pas de constater un d\u00e9faut de documents de voyage ; il doit s\u2019assurer que l\u2019administration a accompli les diligences n\u00e9cessaires pour obtenir ces documents. Dans la d\u00e9cision comment\u00e9e, le juge rel\u00e8ve que le consulat a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi et relanc\u00e9, sans pr\u00e9ciser les dates ni le nombre de relances. Cette motivation est particuli\u00e8rement concise. Elle ne permet pas de v\u00e9rifier si l\u2019administration a r\u00e9ellement mis en \u0153uvre tous les moyens \u00e0 sa disposition. En effet, la simple saisine d\u2019un consulat ne suffit pas \u00e0 caract\u00e9riser une diligence suffisante si elle n\u2019est pas accompagn\u00e9e d\u2019un suivi r\u00e9gulier. La Cour d\u2019appel de Paris, dans un arr\u00eat du 16 janvier 2025, a rappel\u00e9 que le juge doit s\u2019assurer que l\u2019\u00e9tranger est pleinement inform\u00e9 de ses droits et plac\u00e9 en \u00e9tat de les faire valoir. Cette exigence de vigilance s\u2019\u00e9tend \u00e0 la v\u00e9rification des diligences de l\u2019administration. Or, en l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le juge n\u2019a pas examin\u00e9 les d\u00e9marches concr\u00e8tes de la pr\u00e9fecture pour obtenir un laissez-passer consulaire. Il s\u2019est born\u00e9 \u00e0 constater un \u00e9chec sans s\u2019interroger sur sa cause. Cette attitude pourrait \u00eatre critiqu\u00e9e comme une forme de passivit\u00e9 judiciaire, alors m\u00eame que la prolongation de la r\u00e9tention constitue une atteinte grave \u00e0 la libert\u00e9 individuelle. Le juge aurait d\u00fb exiger des \u00e9l\u00e9ments pr\u00e9cis sur les relances effectu\u00e9es, leur date et leur contenu, pour v\u00e9rifier que l\u2019obstacle n\u2019\u00e9tait pas imputable \u00e0 une carence de l\u2019administration.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-la-protection-des-droits-fondamentaux-de-letranger-retenu-face-aux-prolongati\">II. La protection des droits fondamentaux de l\u2019\u00e9tranger retenu face aux prolongations successives<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-garantie-de-linformation-effective-des-droits-par-le-juge\">A. La garantie de l\u2019information effective des droits par le juge<\/h3>\n<p>L\u2019article L. 743-9 du CESEDA impose au juge de rappeler \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9tranger ses droits et de v\u00e9rifier, d\u2019apr\u00e8s les mentions du registre de r\u00e9tention, qu\u2019il en a \u00e9t\u00e9 pleinement inform\u00e9 d\u00e8s son arriv\u00e9e au lieu de r\u00e9tention. Dans la d\u00e9cision comment\u00e9e, le juge mentionne un rappel des droits dans le dispositif, mais il ne proc\u00e8de \u00e0 aucune v\u00e9rification concr\u00e8te des mentions du registre. Il ne fait pas \u00e9tat d\u2019un quelconque contr\u00f4le de l\u2019\u00e9margement par l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9, ni des circonstances particuli\u00e8res qui auraient pu retarder cette information. La Cour d\u2019appel de Paris, le 16 janvier 2025, a pourtant rappel\u00e9 que le juge doit s\u2019assurer que l\u2019\u00e9tranger a \u00e9t\u00e9, dans les meilleurs d\u00e9lais, <em>&#8221; pleinement inform\u00e9 de ses droits et plac\u00e9 en \u00e9tat de les faire valoir lorsqu\u2019il se trouve plac\u00e9 en r\u00e9tention administrative &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6789f3c4c2a5bdff97030016\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Paris, 16 janvier 2025, n\u00b025\/00245)<\/a><\/strong>. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le juge se contente d\u2019une simple mention de principe, sans aucun \u00e9l\u00e9ment factuel. Cette lacune est d\u2019autant plus pr\u00e9occupante que la r\u00e9tention dure depuis deux mois. L\u2019effectivit\u00e9 des droits, notamment le droit \u00e0 l\u2019assistance d\u2019un avocat et \u00e0 la communication avec le consulat, est pourtant essentielle pour permettre \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9tranger de contester sa situation. En l\u2019absence de v\u00e9rification r\u00e9elle, le risque est que la proc\u00e9dure soit purement formelle. Le juge aurait d\u00fb, \u00e0 tout le moins, consulter le registre ou interroger l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9 sur les informations re\u00e7ues \u00e0 son arriv\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-portee-des-prolongations-successives-sur-le-controle-de-la-menace-pour-lord\">B. La port\u00e9e des prolongations successives sur le contr\u00f4le de la menace pour l\u2019ordre public<\/h3>\n<p>La troisi\u00e8me prolongation de la r\u00e9tention intervient apr\u00e8s deux pr\u00e9c\u00e9dentes, pour une dur\u00e9e totale qui peut atteindre soixante jours avant cette troisi\u00e8me demande. L\u2019article L. 742-4 pr\u00e9voit que la prolongation peut \u00eatre renouvel\u00e9e une fois dans les m\u00eames conditions, portant la dur\u00e9e maximale \u00e0 quatre-vingt-dix jours. Dans cette affaire, le juge a accord\u00e9 une troisi\u00e8me p\u00e9riode de trente jours, portant la r\u00e9tention \u00e0 soixante-dix jours au total. La Cour de cassation, le 9 avril 2025, a pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 que la troisi\u00e8me prolongation n\u2019est pas soumise \u00e0 l\u2019exigence que la menace \u00e0 l\u2019ordre public soit apparue dans les quinze derniers jours et que la quatri\u00e8me prolongation n\u2019est soumise qu\u2019\u00e0 la persistance de cette menace au regard de faits ant\u00e9rieurs au placement en r\u00e9tention. Cette interpr\u00e9tation lib\u00e9rale facilite les prolongations successives d\u00e8s lors que l\u2019obstacle consulaire est av\u00e9r\u00e9. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le juge n\u2019a pas eu \u00e0 caract\u00e9riser une menace pour l\u2019ordre public, ce qui simplifie consid\u00e9rablement son office. Toutefois, cette jurisprudence peut conduire \u00e0 une prolongation quasi automatique de la r\u00e9tention lorsque le consulat ne r\u00e9pond pas. Si cette solution est conforme \u00e0 la lettre des textes, elle interroge sur l\u2019\u00e9quilibre entre l\u2019efficacit\u00e9 de l\u2019\u00e9loignement et la protection de la libert\u00e9 individuelle. Le juge doit veiller \u00e0 ce que l\u2019administration ne se retranche pas derri\u00e8re la passivit\u00e9 consulaire pour maintenir ind\u00e9finiment une r\u00e9tention. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, faute de v\u00e9rification approfondie des diligences, la d\u00e9cision ouvre la voie \u00e0 un allongement de la r\u00e9tention sans limite claire.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6789f3c4c2a5bdff97030016\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Paris, le 16 janvier 2025, n\u00b025\/00245<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67f615a43b0cdae54cf3d7e8\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cass. Premi\u00e8re chambre civile, le 9 avril 2025, n\u00b024-50.023<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000052086319\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 742-4 du Code de l&#8217;entr\u00e9e et du s\u00e9jour des \u00e9trangers et du droit d&#8217;asile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Le magistrat du si\u00e8ge du tribunal judiciaire peut, dans les m\u00eames conditions qu&#8217;\u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 742-1, \u00eatre \u00e0 nouveau saisi aux fins de prolongation du maintien en r\u00e9tention au-del\u00e0 de trente jours, dans les cas suivants :<\/p>\n<p>1\u00b0 En cas d&#8217;urgence absolue ou de menace pour l&#8217;ordre public ;<\/p>\n<p>2\u00b0 Lorsque l&#8217;impossibilit\u00e9 d&#8217;ex\u00e9cuter la d\u00e9cision d&#8217;\u00e9loignement r\u00e9sulte de la perte ou de la destruction des documents de voyage de l&#8217;int\u00e9ress\u00e9, de la dissimulation par celui-ci de son identit\u00e9 ou de l&#8217;obstruction volontaire faite \u00e0 son \u00e9loignement ;<\/p>\n<p>3\u00b0 Lorsque la d\u00e9cision d&#8217;\u00e9loignement n&#8217;a pu \u00eatre ex\u00e9cut\u00e9e en raison :<\/p>\n<p>a) du d\u00e9faut de d\u00e9livrance des documents de voyage par le consulat dont rel\u00e8ve l&#8217;int\u00e9ress\u00e9 ou lorsque la d\u00e9livrance des documents de voyage est intervenue trop tardivement pour proc\u00e9der \u00e0 l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution de la d\u00e9cision d&#8217;\u00e9loignement ;<\/p>\n<p>b) de l&#8217;absence de moyens de transport.<\/p>\n<p>L&#8217;\u00e9tranger peut \u00eatre maintenu \u00e0 disposition de la justice dans les conditions pr\u00e9vues \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 742-2.<\/p>\n<p>Si le juge ordonne la prolongation de la r\u00e9tention, celle-ci court \u00e0 compter de l&#8217;expiration de la pr\u00e9c\u00e9dente p\u00e9riode de r\u00e9tention et pour une nouvelle p\u00e9riode d&#8217;une dur\u00e9e maximale de trente jours. La dur\u00e9e maximale de la r\u00e9tention n&#8217;exc\u00e8de alors pas soixante jours.<\/p>\n<p>La prolongation de la r\u00e9tention peut \u00eatre renouvel\u00e9e une fois, dans les m\u00eames conditions. La dur\u00e9e maximale de la r\u00e9tention n&#8217;exc\u00e8de alors pas quatre-vingt-dix jours.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000048446974\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 743-9 du Code de l&#8217;entr\u00e9e et du s\u00e9jour des \u00e9trangers et du droit d&#8217;asile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Le magistrat du si\u00e8ge du tribunal judiciaire, saisi aux fins de prolongation de la r\u00e9tention, rappelle \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9tranger les droits qui lui sont reconnus et s&#8217;assure, d&#8217;apr\u00e8s les mentions figurant au registre pr\u00e9vu \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 744-2 \u00e9marg\u00e9 par l&#8217;int\u00e9ress\u00e9, que celui-ci a \u00e9t\u00e9, dans les meilleurs d\u00e9lais suivant la notification de la d\u00e9cision de placement en r\u00e9tention, pleinement inform\u00e9 de ses droits et plac\u00e9 en \u00e9tat de les faire valoir \u00e0 compter de son arriv\u00e9e au lieu de r\u00e9tention.<\/p>\n<p>Le juge tient compte des circonstances particuli\u00e8res li\u00e9es notamment au placement en r\u00e9tention simultan\u00e9 d&#8217;un nombre important d&#8217;\u00e9trangers pour l&#8217;appr\u00e9ciation des d\u00e9lais relatifs \u00e0 la notification de la d\u00e9cision, \u00e0 l&#8217;information des droits et \u00e0 leur prise d&#8217;effet.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s du tribunal judiciaire de Marseille a rendu une ordonnance sur une troisi\u00e8me demande de prolongation de r\u00e9tention&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":4759,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cacd65cdc6046d478bc53e","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cacd65cdc6046d478bc53e","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cacd65cdc6046d478bc53e","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Marseille","_kj_chambre":"Juge des libert\u00e9s","_kj_rg":"26\/00461","_kj_date":"2026-03-30","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1233747","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00461 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s du tribunal judiciaire de Marseille a rendu une ordonnance sur une troisi\u00e8me demande de prolongation de r\u00e9tention...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00461\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s du tribunal judiciaire de Marseille a rendu une ordonnance sur une troisi\u00e8me demande de prolongation de r\u00e9tention...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-02T21:11:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tom-gainor-TRALLodRQE0-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"4800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00461\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T21:11:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2074,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/tom-gainor-TRALLodRQE0-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00461\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-02T21:11:51+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00461 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/tom-gainor-TRALLodRQE0-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T21:11:51+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s du tribunal judiciaire de Marseille a rendu une ordonnance sur une troisi\u00e8me demande de prolongation de r\u00e9tention...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/tom-gainor-TRALLodRQE0-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/tom-gainor-TRALLodRQE0-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":4800,\"height\":3000},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00461\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00461 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s du tribunal judiciaire de Marseille a rendu une ordonnance sur une troisi\u00e8me demande de prolongation de r\u00e9tention...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00461","og_description":"Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s du tribunal judiciaire de Marseille a rendu une ordonnance sur une troisi\u00e8me demande de prolongation de r\u00e9tention...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-02T21:11:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":4800,"height":3000,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tom-gainor-TRALLodRQE0-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00461","datePublished":"2026-07-02T21:11:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\/"},"wordCount":2074,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tom-gainor-TRALLodRQE0-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00461","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-02T21:11:51+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00461 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tom-gainor-TRALLodRQE0-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-02T21:11:51+00:00","description":"Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s du tribunal judiciaire de Marseille a rendu une ordonnance sur une troisi\u00e8me demande de prolongation de r\u00e9tention...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tom-gainor-TRALLodRQE0-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tom-gainor-TRALLodRQE0-unsplash.webp","width":4800,"height":3000},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00461\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00461"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tom-gainor-TRALLodRQE0-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-5aX9","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":493073,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-10-novembre-2025-n2024f01386\/","url_meta":{"origin":1233747,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Marseille, le 10 novembre 2025, n\u00b02024F01386","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal des Activit\u00e9s \u00c9conomiques de Marseille, statuant le 10 novembre 2025, a examin\u00e9 une action en responsabilit\u00e9 contractuelle relative \u00e0 des...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-D22VPXUIm0o-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-D22VPXUIm0o-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-D22VPXUIm0o-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-D22VPXUIm0o-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-D22VPXUIm0o-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-D22VPXUIm0o-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":459905,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-marseille-18-11-2025-n-24ma01668\/","url_meta":{"origin":1233747,"position":1},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de MARSEILLE \u2013 18\/11\/2025 \u2013 n\u00b0 24MA01668","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0La Cour administrative d'appel de Marseille, le 18 novembre 2025, a pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 les modalit\u00e9s d'urbanisation en zone de...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1228947,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-29-mars-2026-n26-00455\/","url_meta":{"origin":1233747,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00455","author":"Kohen","date":"2 July 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le 29 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s du tribunal judiciaire de Marseille a rendu une ordonnance statuant sur une deuxi\u00e8me demande de prolongation de...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-vGTXy8FS7b0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-vGTXy8FS7b0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-vGTXy8FS7b0-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-vGTXy8FS7b0-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-vGTXy8FS7b0-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-vGTXy8FS7b0-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":492656,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-13-novembre-2025-n20-02597\/","url_meta":{"origin":1233747,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 13 novembre 2025, n\u00b020\/02597","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le p\u00f4le social du tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, par jugement du 14 mars 2024, statue sur un litige relatif \u00e0 un accident du travail survenu le 1er...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luis-cortes-m92ge4NGDIM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luis-cortes-m92ge4NGDIM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luis-cortes-m92ge4NGDIM-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luis-cortes-m92ge4NGDIM-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luis-cortes-m92ge4NGDIM-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luis-cortes-m92ge4NGDIM-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":455928,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-marseille-03-02-2026-n-25ma00380\/","url_meta":{"origin":1233747,"position":4},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de MARSEILLE \u2013 03\/02\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25MA00380","author":"Kohen","date":"6 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La juridiction administrative \u00e9tait saisie d\u2019un litige relatif \u00e0 la rupture anticip\u00e9e du stage d\u2019une adjointe territoriale d\u2019animation. L\u2019agent contestait...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mateus-campos-felipe-rgnkCd4rF1A-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mateus-campos-felipe-rgnkCd4rF1A-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mateus-campos-felipe-rgnkCd4rF1A-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mateus-campos-felipe-rgnkCd4rF1A-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mateus-campos-felipe-rgnkCd4rF1A-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mateus-campos-felipe-rgnkCd4rF1A-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1232820,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00464\/","url_meta":{"origin":1233747,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00464","author":"Kohen","date":"2 July 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, statuant en la personne du juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention, a rendu le 30 mars 2026 une ordonnance (n\u00b026\/00464)...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-ZIgIJuMcKZI-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-ZIgIJuMcKZI-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-ZIgIJuMcKZI-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-ZIgIJuMcKZI-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-ZIgIJuMcKZI-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-ZIgIJuMcKZI-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1233747","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1233747"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1233747\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4759"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1233747"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1233747"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1233747"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}