{"id":1233750,"date":"2026-07-02T23:12:15","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T21:12:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\/"},"modified":"2026-07-02T23:12:15","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T21:12:15","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/04733"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-les-conditions-de-recevabilite-de-la-demande-dexpertise-emin-futurumem\">I. Les conditions de recevabilit\u00e9 de la demande d&#8217;expertise <em>in futurum<\/em><\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-lexistence-dun-motif-legitime-au-sens-de-larticle-145-du-code-de-procedure-civ\">A. L&#8217;existence d&#8217;un motif l\u00e9gitime au sens de l&#8217;article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-labsence-de-contestation-serieuse-sur-le-principe-de-lexpertise\">B. L&#8217;absence de contestation s\u00e9rieuse sur le principe de l&#8217;expertise<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-la-portee-procedurale-et-les-charges-financieres-de-la-mesure-ordonnee\">II. La port\u00e9e proc\u00e9durale et les charges financi\u00e8res de la mesure ordonn\u00e9e<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-jonction-dinstances-pour-une-bonne-administration-de-la-justice\">A. La jonction d&#8217;instances pour une bonne administration de la justice<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-le-sort-des-depens-et-labsence-de-condamnation-au-titre-de-larticle-700\">B. Le sort des d\u00e9pens et l&#8217;absence de condamnation au titre de l&#8217;article 700<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 30 mars 2026, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande d\u2019expertise m\u00e9dicale pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par une personne physique bless\u00e9e dans un accident, repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par sa m\u00e8re. La partie adverse, une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d\u2019assurance, ne contestait ni le principe du droit \u00e0 indemnisation ni le principe m\u00eame de la mesure d\u2019expertise. Le juge a ordonn\u00e9 la jonction de deux instances enregistr\u00e9es sous les num\u00e9ros RG25\/4733 et RG25\/5487, a fait droit \u00e0 la demande d\u2019expertise et a condamn\u00e9 la demanderesse aux d\u00e9pens, sans application de l\u2019article 700 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile.<\/p>\n<p>En proc\u00e9dure, la demanderesse, agissant en qualit\u00e9 de repr\u00e9sentante l\u00e9gale de la victime, a saisi le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s pour obtenir une mesure d\u2019instruction fond\u00e9e sur l\u2019article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. Elle produit des pi\u00e8ces m\u00e9dicales attestant des blessures subies. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9fenderesse ne conteste pas le droit \u00e0 indemnisation ni l\u2019utilit\u00e9 de l\u2019expertise. Le juge ordonne la jonction des deux instances, constatant qu\u2019elles pr\u00e9sentent un lien suffisant, puis d\u00e9signe un expert m\u00e9dical avec une mission d\u00e9taill\u00e9e. Il fixe une provision de 825 euros \u00e0 la charge de la demanderesse et dit n\u2019y avoir lieu \u00e0 condamnation sur le fondement de l\u2019article 700.<\/p>\n<p>La question de droit centrale porte sur les conditions d\u2019octroi d\u2019une mesure d\u2019instruction <em>in futurum<\/em> : le demandeur doit justifier d\u2019un motif l\u00e9gitime, c\u2019est-\u00e0-dire un proc\u00e8s possible, dont l\u2019objet et le fondement sont suffisamment d\u00e9termin\u00e9s, et pour lequel la mesure sollicit\u00e9e est utile et ne porte pas atteinte aux droits d\u2019autrui. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le juge retient que le principe du droit \u00e0 indemnisation n\u2019est pas contest\u00e9, que la pr\u00e9sence de la victime dans le v\u00e9hicule n\u2019est pas formellement \u00e9tablie mais que le droit \u00e0 r\u00e9paration n\u2019est pas s\u00e9rieusement discut\u00e9. Il en d\u00e9duit qu\u2019un motif l\u00e9gitime existe, que la mesure est n\u00e9cessaire et qu\u2019elle ne l\u00e8se aucun int\u00e9r\u00eat prot\u00e9g\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>La solution retenue ordonne l\u2019expertise, la jonction des instances, condamne la demanderesse aux d\u00e9pens et \u00e9carte toute condamnation au titre de l\u2019article 700. Cette d\u00e9cision illustre la souplesse du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s dans l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation du motif l\u00e9gitime et la rigueur dans la r\u00e9partition des charges financi\u00e8res de la proc\u00e9dure.<\/p>\n<p>La premi\u00e8re partie examinera les conditions de recevabilit\u00e9 de la demande d\u2019expertise <em>in futurum<\/em>. La seconde partie analysera la port\u00e9e proc\u00e9durale et les charges financi\u00e8res de la mesure ordonn\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-les-conditions-de-recevabilite-de-la-demande-dexpertise-emin-futurumem\">I. Les conditions de recevabilit\u00e9 de la demande d&#8217;expertise <em>in futurum<\/em><\/h2>\n<p>Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s v\u00e9rifie l\u2019existence d\u2019un motif l\u00e9gitime avant d\u2019ordonner une mesure d\u2019instruction. Il s\u2019assure \u00e9galement que la mesure ne se heurte \u00e0 aucune contestation s\u00e9rieuse sur son principe.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-lexistence-dun-motif-legitime-au-sens-de-larticle-145-du-code-de-procedure-civ\">A. L&#8217;existence d&#8217;un motif l\u00e9gitime au sens de l&#8217;article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/h3>\n<p>L\u2019article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile permet d\u2019ordonner une mesure d\u2019instruction d\u00e8s lors qu\u2019il existe un motif l\u00e9gitime de conserver ou d\u2019\u00e9tablir la preuve de faits dont pourrait d\u00e9pendre la solution d\u2019un litige. Le motif l\u00e9gitime ne suppose pas que le droit invoqu\u00e9 soit certain, mais seulement que le proc\u00e8s \u00e0 venir soit plausible. Le juge appr\u00e9cie souverainement l\u2019existence de ce motif. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, la demanderesse produit des pi\u00e8ces m\u00e9dicales \u00e9tablissant des blessures. Le juge rel\u00e8ve que <em>&#8220;le principe de son droit \u00e0 indemnisation n\u2019est manifestement pas contest\u00e9 par la SA&#8221;<\/em>. Il constate aussi que rien ne d\u00e9montre la pr\u00e9sence de la victime dans le v\u00e9hicule, mais que cette absence de preuve n\u2019\u00f4te pas tout fondement \u00e0 la demande. La Cour d\u2019appel de Besan\u00e7on a rappel\u00e9 que <em>&#8220;D\u00e8s lors ainsi que le pr\u00e9judice de perte d&#8217;exploitation a \u00e9t\u00e9 contradictoirement d\u00e9termin\u00e9 par les experts des parties, la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 ACTH ne justifie pas d&#8217;un int\u00e9r\u00eat l\u00e9gitime \u00e0 voir ordonner une expertise judiciaire&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/677f67b38c38f76f783033cf\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Besan\u00e7on, 8 janvier 2025, n\u00b024\/00843)<\/a><\/strong>. Dans notre affaire, au contraire, l\u2019existence m\u00eame des l\u00e9sions et leur lien potentiel avec l\u2019accident justifient pleinement le recours \u00e0 une expertise. Le juge retient donc un motif l\u00e9gitime.<\/p>\n<p>La mesure d\u2019instruction est indispensable pour d\u00e9terminer l\u2019\u00e9tendue des pr\u00e9judices et permettre une \u00e9valuation ult\u00e9rieure de l\u2019indemnisation. Le juge \u00e9tend la mission de l\u2019expert \u00e0 tous les postes de pr\u00e9judice corporel. Le motif l\u00e9gitime est caract\u00e9ris\u00e9 par l\u2019utilit\u00e9 concr\u00e8te de l\u2019expertise pour le futur proc\u00e8s en r\u00e9paration.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-labsence-de-contestation-serieuse-sur-le-principe-de-lexpertise\">B. L&#8217;absence de contestation s\u00e9rieuse sur le principe de l&#8217;expertise<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s peut ordonner une expertise m\u00eame en pr\u00e9sence d\u2019une contestation s\u00e9rieuse, \u00e0 condition que la mesure soit utile. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, il constate que <em>&#8220;le principe de l&#8217;expertise n&#8217;est pas contest\u00e9&#8221;<\/em> par la partie adverse. Cette absence de contestation simplifie la d\u00e9cision. Le juge rel\u00e8ve \u00e9galement que la solution du litige <em>&#8220;peut d\u00e9pendre de la mesure d&#8217;instruction sollicit\u00e9e et que celle-ci ne porte aucune atteinte ill\u00e9gitime aux droits et libert\u00e9s fondamentaux d&#8217;autrui&#8221;<\/em>. La mesure est donc proportionn\u00e9e. La demanderesse justifie d\u2019un int\u00e9r\u00eat l\u00e9gitime \u00e0 voir \u00e9tablir les cons\u00e9quences m\u00e9dicales de l\u2019accident. Le juge ne se prononce pas sur le fond du droit \u00e0 indemnisation, mais constate seulement que la preuve des pr\u00e9judices n\u00e9cessite une investigation technique. La jonction des instances ordonn\u00e9e simultan\u00e9ment renforce la coh\u00e9rence de la proc\u00e9dure.<\/p>\n<p>L\u2019expertise constitue ainsi une mesure conservatoire utile. Le juge a rempli son office en v\u00e9rifiant que la demande ne visait pas \u00e0 contourner une contestation d\u00e9j\u00e0 jug\u00e9e. La d\u00e9cision s\u2019inscrit dans la pratique constante des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s en mati\u00e8re de dommages corporels.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-la-portee-procedurale-et-les-charges-financieres-de-la-mesure-ordonnee\">II. La port\u00e9e proc\u00e9durale et les charges financi\u00e8res de la mesure ordonn\u00e9e<\/h2>\n<p>Le juge tire les cons\u00e9quences de sa d\u00e9cision en ordonnant la jonction d\u2019instances et en fixant le sort des d\u00e9pens. Il \u00e9carte l\u2019application de l\u2019article 700 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-jonction-dinstances-pour-une-bonne-administration-de-la-justice\">A. La jonction d&#8217;instances pour une bonne administration de la justice<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge ordonne <em>&#8220;la jonction des instances RG25\/4733 et RG25\/5487 sous le num\u00e9ro RG25\/4733&#8221;<\/em>. Cette mesure, pr\u00e9vue \u00e0 l\u2019article 367 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, permet d\u2019instruire et de juger ensemble des litiges connexes. La Cour d\u2019appel de Grenoble a pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 que <em>&#8220;Le juge peut, \u00e0 la demande des parties ou d&#8217;office, ordonner la jonction de plusieurs instances pendantes devant lui s&#8217;il existe entre les litiges un lien tel qu&#8217;il soit de l&#8217;int\u00e9r\u00eat d&#8217;une bonne justice de les faire instruire ou juger ensemble&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67ff3d306d3290e00e0e7976\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Grenoble, 15 avril 2025, n\u00b024\/00223)<\/a><\/strong>. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, les deux instances concernent le m\u00eame accident, la m\u00eame victime et le m\u00eame assureur. La jonction \u00e9vite des expertises redondantes et des d\u00e9cisions contradictoires. Elle permet une gestion unique de la proc\u00e9dure d\u2019expertise. L\u2019expert d\u00e9sign\u00e9 pourra ainsi appr\u00e9hender l\u2019ensemble des demandes. Cette d\u00e9cision illustre la recherche d\u2019efficacit\u00e9 proc\u00e9durale propre au juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-le-sort-des-depens-et-labsence-de-condamnation-au-titre-de-larticle-700\">B. Le sort des d\u00e9pens et l&#8217;absence de condamnation au titre de l&#8217;article 700<\/h3>\n<p>Aux termes de l\u2019article 696 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, la partie perdante est condamn\u00e9e aux d\u00e9pens. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le juge condamne la demanderesse aux d\u00e9pens du r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9. Il motive cette d\u00e9cision en indiquant qu\u2019elle <em>&#8220;ayant int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 l\u2019expertise, conservera la charge des d\u00e9pens de l&#8217;instance en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9&#8221;<\/em>. La demanderesse a obtenu la mesure qu\u2019elle sollicitait, mais elle supporte les frais de l\u2019instance car l\u2019expertise est ordonn\u00e9e dans son int\u00e9r\u00eat propre. Le juge \u00e9carte l\u2019application de l\u2019article 700 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, estimant qu\u2019il n\u2019y a pas lieu \u00e0 condamnation de ce chef. Cette solution est conforme \u00e0 la pratique des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s o\u00f9 chaque partie conserve souvent ses frais non compris dans les d\u00e9pens. La provision de 825 euros mise \u00e0 la charge de la demanderesse est fix\u00e9e pour financer l\u2019expertise. Le juge pr\u00e9voit m\u00eame les modalit\u00e9s en cas d\u2019aide juridictionnelle, d\u00e9montrant une attention aux situations \u00e9conomiques. La condamnation aux d\u00e9pens sanctionne le fait que la demanderesse a initi\u00e9 la proc\u00e9dure. Le juge \u00e9quilibre ainsi l\u2019acc\u00e8s \u00e0 la preuve et la charge financi\u00e8re.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/677f67b38c38f76f783033cf\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Besan\u00e7on, le 8 janvier 2025, n\u00b024\/00843<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67ff3d306d3290e00e0e7976\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Grenoble, le 15 avril 2025, n\u00b024\/00223<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000045268436\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 700 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Le juge condamne la partie tenue aux d\u00e9pens ou qui perd son proc\u00e8s \u00e0 payer :<\/p>\n<p>1\u00b0 A l&#8217;autre partie la somme qu&#8217;il d\u00e9termine, au titre des frais expos\u00e9s et non compris dans les d\u00e9pens ;<\/p>\n<p>2\u00b0 Et, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, \u00e0 l&#8217;avocat du b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de l&#8217;aide juridictionnelle partielle ou totale une somme au titre des honoraires et frais, non compris dans les d\u00e9pens, que le b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de l&#8217;aide aurait expos\u00e9s s&#8217;il n&#8217;avait pas eu cette aide. Dans ce cas, il est proc\u00e9d\u00e9 comme il est dit aux  alin\u00e9as 3 et 4 de l&#8217;article 37 de la loi n\u00b0 91-647 du 10 juillet 1991 .<\/p>\n<p>Dans tous les cas, le juge tient compte de l&#8217;\u00e9quit\u00e9 ou de la situation \u00e9conomique de la partie condamn\u00e9e. Il peut, m\u00eame d&#8217;office, pour des raisons tir\u00e9es des m\u00eames consid\u00e9rations, dire qu&#8217;il n&#8217;y a pas lieu \u00e0 ces condamnations.<\/p>\n<p>Les parties peuvent produire les justificatifs des sommes qu&#8217;elles demandent.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> La somme allou\u00e9e au titre du 2\u00b0 ne peut \u00eatre inf\u00e9rieure \u00e0 la part contributive de l&#8217;Etat major\u00e9e de 50 %.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000051869339\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 145 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>S&#8217;il existe un motif l\u00e9gitime de conserver ou d&#8217;\u00e9tablir avant tout proc\u00e8s la preuve de faits dont pourrait d\u00e9pendre la solution d&#8217;un litige, les mesures d&#8217;instruction l\u00e9galement admissibles peuvent \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9es \u00e0 la demande de tout int\u00e9ress\u00e9, sur requ\u00eate ou en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>La juridiction territorialement comp\u00e9tente pour statuer sur une demande form\u00e9e en application du premier alin\u00e9a est, au choix du demandeur, celle susceptible de conna\u00eetre de l&#8217;affaire au fond ou, s&#8217;il y a lieu, celle dans le ressort de laquelle la mesure d&#8217;instruction doit \u00eatre ex\u00e9cut\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<p>Par d\u00e9rogation au deuxi\u00e8me alin\u00e9a, lorsque la mesure d&#8217;instruction porte sur un immeuble, la juridiction du lieu o\u00f9 est situ\u00e9 l&#8217;immeuble est seule comp\u00e9tente.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410585\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 367 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   Le juge peut, \u00e0 la demande des parties ou d&#8217;office, ordonner la jonction de plusieurs instances pendantes devant lui s&#8217;il existe entre les litiges un lien tel qu&#8217;il soit de l&#8217;int\u00e9r\u00eat d&#8217;une bonne justice de les faire instruire ou juger ensemble.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>   Il peut \u00e9galement ordonner la disjonction d&#8217;une instance en plusieurs.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000042941174\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 696 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>La partie perdante est condamn\u00e9e aux d\u00e9pens, \u00e0 moins que le juge, par d\u00e9cision motiv\u00e9e, n&#8217;en mette la totalit\u00e9 ou une fraction \u00e0 la charge d&#8217;une autre partie.<\/p>\n<p>Les conditions dans lesquelles il peut \u00eatre mis \u00e0 la charge d&#8217;une partie qui b\u00e9n\u00e9ficie de l&#8217;aide juridictionnelle tout ou partie des d\u00e9pens de l&#8217;instance sont fix\u00e9es par les dispositions de la loi n\u00b0 91-647 du 10 juillet 1991 et du d\u00e9cret n\u00b0 2020-1717 du 28 d\u00e9cembre 2020.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 30 mars 2026, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande d\u2019expertise m\u00e9dicale pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par une personne&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9593,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cacddacdc6046d478bcd02","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cacddacdc6046d478bcd02","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cacddacdc6046d478bcd02","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Marseille","_kj_chambre":"R\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s Cabinet 1","_kj_rg":"25\/04733","_kj_date":"2026-03-30","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1233750","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/04733 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 30 mars 2026, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande d\u2019expertise m\u00e9dicale pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par une personne...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/04733\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 30 mars 2026, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande d\u2019expertise m\u00e9dicale pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par une personne...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-02T21:12:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-YGEIDE-iUi8-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/04733\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T21:12:15+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2162,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/planet-volumes-YGEIDE-iUi8-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/04733\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-02T21:12:15+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/04733 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/planet-volumes-YGEIDE-iUi8-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T21:12:15+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 30 mars 2026, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande d\u2019expertise m\u00e9dicale pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par une personne...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/planet-volumes-YGEIDE-iUi8-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/planet-volumes-YGEIDE-iUi8-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":2500,\"height\":3500},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/04733\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/04733 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 30 mars 2026, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande d\u2019expertise m\u00e9dicale pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par une personne...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/04733","og_description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 30 mars 2026, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande d\u2019expertise m\u00e9dicale pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par une personne...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-02T21:12:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2500,"height":3500,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-YGEIDE-iUi8-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/04733","datePublished":"2026-07-02T21:12:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\/"},"wordCount":2162,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-YGEIDE-iUi8-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/04733","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-02T21:12:15+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/04733 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-YGEIDE-iUi8-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-02T21:12:15+00:00","description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 30 mars 2026, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande d\u2019expertise m\u00e9dicale pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par une personne...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-YGEIDE-iUi8-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-YGEIDE-iUi8-unsplash.webp","width":2500,"height":3500},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-30-mars-2026-n25-04733\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/04733"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-YGEIDE-iUi8-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-5aXc","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":492360,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-13-novembre-2025-n25-02521\/","url_meta":{"origin":1233750,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 13 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/02521","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Paris, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 10 mars 2026, examine une demande indemnitaire li\u00e9e \u00e0 un trouble de jouissance locative. Suite \u00e0 un...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":463139,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-marseille-28-05-2025-n-24ma01172\/","url_meta":{"origin":1233750,"position":1},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de MARSEILLE \u2013 28\/05\/2025 \u2013 n\u00b0 24MA01172","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La d\u00e9cision rendue par la cour administrative d'appel de Marseille le 3 janvier 2026 traite de la l\u00e9galit\u00e9 d'une mesure d'\u00e9loignement assortie d'une...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-LQw7fIchK-o-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-LQw7fIchK-o-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-LQw7fIchK-o-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-LQw7fIchK-o-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-LQw7fIchK-o-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-LQw7fIchK-o-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1203375,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-3-avril-2026-n2022f00550\/","url_meta":{"origin":1233750,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Marseille, le 3 avril 2026, n\u00b02022F00550","author":"Kohen","date":"27 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Marseille, chambre 16, a rendu le 3 avril 2026 une d\u00e9cision (n\u00b02022F00550) relative aux effets d\u2019un d\u00e9sistement...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":488977,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-24-novembre-2025-n24-06061\/","url_meta":{"origin":1233750,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 24 novembre 2025, n\u00b024\/06061","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Paris, par jugement du 16 f\u00e9vrier 2026, statue sur une demande en paiement d\u2019arri\u00e9r\u00e9s de charges de copropri\u00e9t\u00e9. Le syndicat des...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-5TTaPKNAuHU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-5TTaPKNAuHU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-5TTaPKNAuHU-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-5TTaPKNAuHU-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-5TTaPKNAuHU-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-5TTaPKNAuHU-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":494682,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-28-octobre-2025-n25-00129\/","url_meta":{"origin":1233750,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 28 octobre 2025, n\u00b025\/00129","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, juge de l\u2019ex\u00e9cution, statue par jugement du 28 octobre 2025. Le cr\u00e9ancier, titulaire de titres ex\u00e9cutoires fiscaux,...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/sofia-vila-flor-iX4r2YviN8E-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/sofia-vila-flor-iX4r2YviN8E-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/sofia-vila-flor-iX4r2YviN8E-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/sofia-vila-flor-iX4r2YviN8E-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/sofia-vila-flor-iX4r2YviN8E-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/sofia-vila-flor-iX4r2YviN8E-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":455927,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-marseille-03-02-2026-n-24ma02886\/","url_meta":{"origin":1233750,"position":5},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de MARSEILLE \u2013 03\/02\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 24MA02886","author":"Kohen","date":"6 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le litige concerne la demande d\u2019un fonctionnaire de police en retraite relative au versement d\u2019indemnit\u00e9s compensatrices pour heures suppl\u00e9mentaires,...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/maximilian-zahn-SKf_POUVJnQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/maximilian-zahn-SKf_POUVJnQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/maximilian-zahn-SKf_POUVJnQ-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/maximilian-zahn-SKf_POUVJnQ-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/maximilian-zahn-SKf_POUVJnQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/maximilian-zahn-SKf_POUVJnQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1233750","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1233750"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1233750\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9593"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1233750"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1233750"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1233750"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}