{"id":1234159,"date":"2026-07-02T23:49:43","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T21:49:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\/"},"modified":"2026-07-02T23:49:43","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T21:49:43","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/01507"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-loffice-du-juge-dans-le-prononce-du-divorce-pour-alteration-definitive-du-lien\">I. L\u2019office du juge dans le prononc\u00e9 du divorce pour alt\u00e9ration d\u00e9finitive du lien conjugal<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-verification-prealable-de-la-competence-et-de-la-recevabilite-de-la-demande\">A. La v\u00e9rification pr\u00e9alable de la comp\u00e9tence et de la recevabilit\u00e9 de la demande<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-le-choix-du-fondement-juridique-du-divorce-et-lexigence-de-separation-de-fait\">B. Le choix du fondement juridique du divorce et l\u2019exigence de s\u00e9paration de fait<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-les-mesures-accessoires-et-leur-articulation-avec-linteret-des-enfants\">II. Les mesures accessoires et leur articulation avec l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat des enfants<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-fixation-de-la-contribution-a-lentretien-et-a-leducation-des-enfants\">A. La fixation de la contribution \u00e0 l\u2019entretien et \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9ducation des enfants<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-lattribution-de-lautorite-parentale-exclusive-et-la-reserve-des-droits-du-pere\">B. L\u2019attribution de l\u2019autorit\u00e9 parentale exclusive et la r\u00e9serve des droits du p\u00e8re<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Par un jugement rendu le 30 mars 2026, le juge aux affaires familiales du tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre a prononc\u00e9 le divorce pour alt\u00e9ration d\u00e9finitive du lien conjugal entre les \u00e9poux. La demanderesse avait saisi la juridiction d\u2019une requ\u00eate en divorce, tandis que le d\u00e9fendeur, r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement assign\u00e9, ne s\u2019est pas pr\u00e9sent\u00e9. Une ordonnance de mesures provisoires avait \u00e9t\u00e9 rendue le 6 mai 2024. Le juge a constat\u00e9 la recevabilit\u00e9 de la demande au regard de la proposition de r\u00e8glement des int\u00e9r\u00eats p\u00e9cuniaires et patrimoniaux, v\u00e9rifi\u00e9 sa comp\u00e9tence et l\u2019application de la loi fran\u00e7aise, puis prononc\u00e9 le divorce sur le fondement de l\u2019alt\u00e9ration d\u00e9finitive du lien conjugal. Il a en outre fix\u00e9 la r\u00e9sidence des enfants chez la m\u00e8re, attribu\u00e9 \u00e0 celle\u2011ci l\u2019exercice exclusif de l\u2019autorit\u00e9 parentale, r\u00e9serv\u00e9 les droits de visite et d\u2019h\u00e9bergement du p\u00e8re, et condamn\u00e9 ce dernier au versement d\u2019une pension alimentaire de 750 euros par mois pour les trois enfants. La question juridique centrale \u00e9tait celle des conditions dans lesquelles le divorce peut \u00eatre prononc\u00e9 pour alt\u00e9ration d\u00e9finitive du lien conjugal lorsque l\u2019un des \u00e9poux est d\u00e9faillant et que la s\u00e9paration de fait est \u00e9tablie. Le tribunal a r\u00e9pondu en faisant droit \u00e0 la demande, apr\u00e8s avoir effectu\u00e9 les v\u00e9rifications pr\u00e9vues aux articles 1072\u20111 et 1187\u20111 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. La solution retenue appelle une analyse de son sens quant au prononc\u00e9 du divorce, puis une appr\u00e9ciation des mesures qui en d\u00e9coulent.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-loffice-du-juge-dans-le-prononce-du-divorce-pour-alteration-definitive-du-lien\">I. L\u2019office du juge dans le prononc\u00e9 du divorce pour alt\u00e9ration d\u00e9finitive du lien conjugal<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-verification-prealable-de-la-competence-et-de-la-recevabilite-de-la-demande\">A. La v\u00e9rification pr\u00e9alable de la comp\u00e9tence et de la recevabilit\u00e9 de la demande<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge aux affaires familiales a, dans un premier temps, dit que le juge fran\u00e7ais \u00e9tait comp\u00e9tent et la loi fran\u00e7aise applicable. Cette affirmation r\u00e9sulte de l\u2019examen des crit\u00e8res de comp\u00e9tence internationale et interne, ainsi que de la r\u00e9sidence habituelle des \u00e9poux. Il a \u00e9galement constat\u00e9 la recevabilit\u00e9 de la demande en divorce, eu \u00e9gard \u00e0 la proposition de r\u00e8glement des int\u00e9r\u00eats p\u00e9cuniaires et patrimoniaux exig\u00e9e par l\u2019article 251 du code civil. Le jugement pr\u00e9cise que les v\u00e9rifications pr\u00e9vues aux articles 1072\u20111 et 1187\u20111 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile ont \u00e9t\u00e9 effectu\u00e9es et se sont r\u00e9v\u00e9l\u00e9es n\u00e9gatives. Ces dispositions imposent au juge de s\u2019assurer que la demande n\u2019est pas frauduleuse et que les conditions de fond du divorce sont r\u00e9unies. En pr\u00e9sence d\u2019un d\u00e9fendeur d\u00e9faillant, cette double v\u00e9rification garantit la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure. Le tribunal a ainsi respect\u00e9 son office en contr\u00f4lant d\u2019office les \u00e9l\u00e9ments de comp\u00e9tence et de recevabilit\u00e9, sans que la carence du d\u00e9fendeur ne fasse obstacle \u00e0 l\u2019examen de la demande. La solution s\u2019inscrit dans la ligne de la jurisprudence qui exige du juge une vigilance particuli\u00e8re lorsque l\u2019une des parties ne compara\u00eet pas.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-le-choix-du-fondement-juridique-du-divorce-et-lexigence-de-separation-de-fait\">B. Le choix du fondement juridique du divorce et l\u2019exigence de s\u00e9paration de fait<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge a prononc\u00e9 le divorce pour alt\u00e9ration d\u00e9finitive du lien conjugal, sur le fondement de l\u2019article 237 du code civil, qui impose une s\u00e9paration de fait de deux ans. Le jugement ne mentionne pas de demande subsidiaire de la part de la demanderesse, ce qui \u00e9carte tout d\u00e9bat sur la recevabilit\u00e9 d\u2019une double qualification. La Cour d\u2019appel d\u2019Aix\u2011en\u2011Provence a r\u00e9cemment rappel\u00e9 qu\u2019<em>&#8221; une demande en divorce ne peut, en principe, \u00eatre fond\u00e9e que sur un seul des cas pr\u00e9vus \u00e0 l\u2019article 229 du code civil et que toute demande form\u00e9e \u00e0 titre subsidiaire sur un autre cas est irrecevable &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67e39d142b19620bb73a239b\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel d\u2019Aix\u2011en\u2011Provence, 25 mars 2025, n\u00b022\/03071)<\/a><\/strong>. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, la demanderesse n\u2019a invoqu\u00e9 qu\u2019un seul fondement, ce qui satisfait \u00e0 cette r\u00e8gle. Par ailleurs, la Cour de cassation a jug\u00e9 que le divorce pour alt\u00e9ration d\u00e9finitive peut \u00eatre prononc\u00e9 m\u00eame si l\u2019autre \u00e9poux all\u00e8gue des faits de faute, d\u00e8s lors que la s\u00e9paration de fait dure depuis plus de deux ans et que ces faits <em>&#8221; n\u2019ont pas rendu intol\u00e9rable le maintien de la vie commune &#8220;<\/em> <strong>(Cass. 1re civ., 1er octobre 2025, n\u00b024\u201115.793)<\/strong>. En l\u2019absence de contestation du d\u00e9fendeur, le juge n\u2019a eu qu\u2019\u00e0 constater la s\u00e9paration de fait effective depuis le 1er avril 2024, date fix\u00e9e dans le jugement. La solution appara\u00eet conforme \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9tat du droit positif et \u00e0 la volont\u00e9 des \u00e9poux de divorcer.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-les-mesures-accessoires-et-leur-articulation-avec-linteret-des-enfants\">II. Les mesures accessoires et leur articulation avec l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat des enfants<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-fixation-de-la-contribution-a-lentretien-et-a-leducation-des-enfants\">A. La fixation de la contribution \u00e0 l\u2019entretien et \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9ducation des enfants<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge a condamn\u00e9 le p\u00e8re au versement d\u2019une pension alimentaire de 750 euros par mois, soit 250 euros par enfant, et a ordonn\u00e9 l\u2019interm\u00e9diation financi\u00e8re par l\u2019organisme d\u00e9biteur des prestations familiales. Cette mesure est conforme \u00e0 l\u2019article 373\u20112\u20112 du code civil, qui impose \u00e0 chaque parent de contribuer \u00e0 l\u2019entretien et \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9ducation des enfants \u00e0 proportion de ses ressources et des besoins de l\u2019enfant. Le jugement pr\u00e9cise que la pension est due au\u2011del\u00e0 de la majorit\u00e9 en cas d\u2019\u00e9tudes poursuivies, et qu\u2019elle est r\u00e9\u00e9valu\u00e9e annuellement selon l\u2019indice INSEE. L\u2019ex\u00e9cution provisoire a \u00e9t\u00e9 ordonn\u00e9e pour cette contribution, garantissant ainsi une protection imm\u00e9diate des enfants. En l\u2019absence de d\u00e9bat contradictoire, le juge a d\u00fb appr\u00e9cier souverainement le montant, en se fondant vraisemblablement sur les \u00e9l\u00e9ments fournis par la demanderesse. La solution assure la continuit\u00e9 de la prise en charge des enfants, malgr\u00e9 l\u2019absence du p\u00e8re \u00e0 l\u2019instance.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-lattribution-de-lautorite-parentale-exclusive-et-la-reserve-des-droits-du-pere\">B. L\u2019attribution de l\u2019autorit\u00e9 parentale exclusive et la r\u00e9serve des droits du p\u00e8re<\/h3>\n<p>Le jugement attribue l\u2019exercice exclusif de l\u2019autorit\u00e9 parentale \u00e0 la m\u00e8re, fixe la r\u00e9sidence des enfants \u00e0 son domicile et r\u00e9serve les droits de visite et d\u2019h\u00e9bergement du p\u00e8re. Cette d\u00e9cision est fond\u00e9e sur l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat des enfants, principe cardinal en mati\u00e8re familiale. L\u2019article 373\u20112\u20111 du code civil permet au juge de confier l\u2019autorit\u00e9 parentale \u00e0 un seul parent lorsque l\u2019autre est hors d\u2019\u00e9tat de manifester sa volont\u00e9 ou lorsque l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat de l\u2019enfant l\u2019exige. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, la d\u00e9faillance du p\u00e8re et l\u2019absence de tout lien apparent avec les enfants ont conduit le juge \u00e0 cette solution. Le tribunal a \u00e9galement constat\u00e9 que les enfants n\u2019ont pas demand\u00e9 \u00e0 \u00eatre entendus, ce qui est conforme \u00e0 l\u2019article 388\u20111 du code civil. La r\u00e9serve des droits de visite et d\u2019h\u00e9bergement n\u2019est pas une privation d\u00e9finitive, mais une mesure conservatoire permettant au p\u00e8re de solliciter ult\u00e9rieurement un droit de voir ses enfants s\u2019il le souhaite. Cette solution \u00e9quilibr\u00e9e respecte \u00e0 la fois l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat des enfants et le principe de coparentalit\u00e9, tout en s\u2019adaptant aux circonstances concr\u00e8tes de l\u2019esp\u00e8ce.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/68dce23dbc55f2c6aba501db\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cass. Premi\u00e8re chambre civile, le 1 octobre 2025, n\u00b024-15.793<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67e39d142b19620bb73a239b\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel d\u2019Aix-en-Provence, le 25 mars 2025, n\u00b022\/03071<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000032042060\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 1338 du Code civil<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">Lorsque le d\u00e9l\u00e9gant est d\u00e9biteur du d\u00e9l\u00e9gataire mais que celui-ci ne l&#8217;a pas d\u00e9charg\u00e9 de sa dette, la d\u00e9l\u00e9gation donne au d\u00e9l\u00e9gataire un second d\u00e9biteur. <\/p>\n<p> Le paiement fait par l&#8217;un des deux d\u00e9biteurs lib\u00e8re l&#8217;autre, \u00e0 due concurrence. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000038310945\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 251 du Code civil<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>L&#8217;\u00e9poux qui introduit l&#8217;instance en divorce peut indiquer les motifs de sa demande si celle-ci est fond\u00e9e sur l&#8217;acceptation du principe de la rupture du mariage ou l&#8217;alt\u00e9ration d\u00e9finitive du lien conjugal. Hors ces deux cas, le fondement de la demande doit \u00eatre expos\u00e9 dans les premi\u00e8res conclusions au fond.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006423071\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 237 du Code civil<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   Le divorce peut \u00eatre demand\u00e9 par l&#8217;un des \u00e9poux lorsque le lien conjugal est d\u00e9finitivement alt\u00e9r\u00e9.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000033460854\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 229 du Code civil<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Les \u00e9poux peuvent consentir mutuellement \u00e0 leur divorce par acte sous signature priv\u00e9e contresign\u00e9 par avocats, d\u00e9pos\u00e9 au rang des minutes d&#8217;un notaire. <\/p>\n<p>Le divorce peut \u00eatre prononc\u00e9 en cas :<\/p>\n<p>-soit de consentement mutuel, dans le cas pr\u00e9vu au 1\u00b0 de l&#8217;article 229-2 ;<\/p>\n<p>-soit d&#8217;acceptation du principe de la rupture du mariage ;<\/p>\n<p>-soit d&#8217;alt\u00e9ration d\u00e9finitive du lien conjugal ;<\/p>\n<p>-soit de faute.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Par un jugement rendu le 30 mars 2026, le juge aux affaires familiales du tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre a prononc\u00e9 le divorce pour alt\u00e9ration d\u00e9finitive&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9535,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cadc3bcdc6046d478cc8ca","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cadc3bcdc6046d478cc8ca","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cadc3bcdc6046d478cc8ca","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Nanterre","_kj_chambre":"Cabinet 1A","_kj_rg":"24\/01507","_kj_date":"2026-03-30","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1234159","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/01507 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Par un jugement rendu le 30 mars 2026, le juge aux affaires familiales du tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre a prononc\u00e9 le divorce pour alt\u00e9ration d\u00e9finitive...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/01507\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Par un jugement rendu le 30 mars 2026, le juge aux affaires familiales du tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre a prononc\u00e9 le divorce pour alt\u00e9ration d\u00e9finitive...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-02T21:49:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-AofcIDFaraI-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"3020\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2013\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b024\\\/01507\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T21:49:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1584,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-AofcIDFaraI-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b024\\\/01507\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-02T21:49:43+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b024\\\/01507 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-AofcIDFaraI-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T21:49:43+00:00\",\"description\":\"Par un jugement rendu le 30 mars 2026, le juge aux affaires familiales du tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre a prononc\u00e9 le divorce pour alt\u00e9ration d\u00e9finitive...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-AofcIDFaraI-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-AofcIDFaraI-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":3020,\"height\":2013},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b024\\\/01507\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/01507 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Par un jugement rendu le 30 mars 2026, le juge aux affaires familiales du tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre a prononc\u00e9 le divorce pour alt\u00e9ration d\u00e9finitive...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/01507","og_description":"Par un jugement rendu le 30 mars 2026, le juge aux affaires familiales du tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre a prononc\u00e9 le divorce pour alt\u00e9ration d\u00e9finitive...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-02T21:49:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":3020,"height":2013,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-AofcIDFaraI-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/01507","datePublished":"2026-07-02T21:49:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\/"},"wordCount":1584,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-AofcIDFaraI-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/01507","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-02T21:49:43+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/01507 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-AofcIDFaraI-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-02T21:49:43+00:00","description":"Par un jugement rendu le 30 mars 2026, le juge aux affaires familiales du tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre a prononc\u00e9 le divorce pour alt\u00e9ration d\u00e9finitive...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-AofcIDFaraI-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-AofcIDFaraI-unsplash.webp","width":3020,"height":2013},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-30-mars-2026-n24-01507\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/01507"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-AofcIDFaraI-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-5b3N","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":441271,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-de-cassation-le-28-janvier-2026-n24-17-532\/","url_meta":{"origin":1234159,"position":0},"title":"Cour de cassation, le 28 janvier 2026, n\u00b024-17.532","author":"","date":"4 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La d\u00e9cision du 28 janvier 2026 illustre le contr\u00f4le exerc\u00e9 par la Cour de cassation sur les d\u00e9cisions de rejet non sp\u00e9cialement motiv\u00e9. Elle rappelle les...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour de cassation&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour de cassation","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-de-cassation\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":441512,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-de-cassation-le-27-janvier-2026-n25-85-427\/","url_meta":{"origin":1234159,"position":1},"title":"Cour de cassation, le 27 janvier 2026, n\u00b025-85.427","author":"","date":"4 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La chambre criminelle se prononce sur une question prioritaire de constitutionnalit\u00e9 incidente. Elle estime qu\u2019il n\u2019y a pas lieu \u00e0 renvoi au Conseil...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour de cassation&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour de cassation","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-de-cassation\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456773,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-nantes-29-01-2026-n-25nt03225\/","url_meta":{"origin":1234159,"position":2},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de NANTES \u2013 29\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25NT03225","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La pr\u00e9sente ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9-suspension intervient dans le cadre d\u2019un contentieux fiscal relatif \u00e0 des compl\u00e9ments d\u2019imposition sur le revenu. Le...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":441191,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-de-cassation-le-28-janvier-2026-n23-21-317\/","url_meta":{"origin":1234159,"position":3},"title":"Cour de cassation, le 28 janvier 2026, n\u00b023-21.317","author":"","date":"4 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La Cour de cassation rejette le pourvoi par une d\u00e9cision non sp\u00e9cialement motiv\u00e9e. Elle applique l\u2019article 1014 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. Le rejet sans...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour de cassation&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour de cassation","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-de-cassation\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-WVPJ3ISFRZs-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-WVPJ3ISFRZs-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-WVPJ3ISFRZs-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-WVPJ3ISFRZs-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-WVPJ3ISFRZs-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-WVPJ3ISFRZs-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456735,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-paris-28-01-2026-n-24pa01905\/","url_meta":{"origin":1234159,"position":4},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de PARIS \u2013 28\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 24PA01905","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La cour administrative d'appel a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisie d'un pourvoi contre un jugement ayant rejet\u00e9 une demande d'annulation partielle d'une mise en demeure. Cette...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456885,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-toulouse-27-01-2026-n-25tl01037\/","url_meta":{"origin":1234159,"position":5},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de TOULOUSE \u2013 27\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25TL01037","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La pr\u00e9sente ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, rendue par une cour administrative d\u2019appel, statue sur un appel form\u00e9 contre le rejet d\u2019une demande de provision. Le...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1234159","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1234159"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1234159\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9535"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1234159"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1234159"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1234159"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}