{"id":1234160,"date":"2026-07-02T23:49:50","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T21:49:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\/"},"modified":"2026-07-02T23:49:50","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T21:49:50","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00542"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-la-confirmation-de-la-mesure-dhospitalisation-complete-sur-le-fondement-de-la-\">I. La confirmation de la mesure d&#8217;hospitalisation compl\u00e8te sur le fondement de la compromission de la s\u00fbret\u00e9 des personnes<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-recevabilite-de-la-requete-prefectorale-au-regard-de-larticle-l-3213-1-du-c\">A. La recevabilit\u00e9 de la requ\u00eate pr\u00e9fectorale au regard de l&#8217;article L. 3213-1 du code de la sant\u00e9 publique<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-lappreciation-des-certificats-medicaux-comme-preuve-de-la-necessite-des-soins\">B. L&#8217;appr\u00e9ciation des certificats m\u00e9dicaux comme preuve de la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 des soins<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-les-limites-dun-controle-juridictionnel-restreint-face-a-lexigence-de-protect\">II. Les limites d&#8217;un contr\u00f4le juridictionnel restreint face \u00e0 l&#8217;exigence de protection des libert\u00e9s individuelles<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-labsence-de-caracterisation-concrete-du-trouble-a-lordre-public\">A. L&#8217;absence de caract\u00e9risation concr\u00e8te du trouble \u00e0 l&#8217;ordre public<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-portee-dune-decision-fondee-sur-une-appreciation-medicale-non-discutee\">B. La port\u00e9e d&#8217;une d\u00e9cision fond\u00e9e sur une appr\u00e9ciation m\u00e9dicale non discut\u00e9e<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise a autoris\u00e9 le maintien de l&#8217;hospitalisation compl\u00e8te d&#8217;un patient plac\u00e9 sous soins psychiatriques contraints depuis le 26 mars 2024. Le pr\u00e9fet du Val-d&#8217;Oise avait saisi le juge par requ\u00eate du 25 mars 2026 afin de statuer sur la mesure. Le patient faisait l&#8217;objet d&#8217;une r\u00e9int\u00e9gration le 23 mars 2026, apr\u00e8s une p\u00e9riode ant\u00e9rieure. Le minist\u00e8re public a \u00e9mis un avis favorable \u00e9crit. Les certificats m\u00e9dicaux des vingt-quatre et soixante-douze heures ainsi que l&#8217;avis motiv\u00e9 du 26 mars 2026 \u00e9tablissaient l&#8217;existence de troubles mentaux n\u00e9cessitant des soins et compromettant la s\u00fbret\u00e9 des personnes. Le juge a donc fait droit \u00e0 la requ\u00eate pr\u00e9fectorale et autoris\u00e9 la poursuite de l&#8217;hospitalisation compl\u00e8te. La question de droit pos\u00e9e \u00e9tait celle des conditions dans lesquelles le juge des libert\u00e9s peut autoriser le maintien d&#8217;une hospitalisation compl\u00e8te ordonn\u00e9e par le pr\u00e9fet sur le fondement de l&#8217;article L. 3213\u20111 du code de la sant\u00e9 publique. La solution retenue est que les certificats m\u00e9dicaux suffisent \u00e0 caract\u00e9riser la compromission de la s\u00fbret\u00e9 des personnes, justifiant ainsi la mesure.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-la-confirmation-de-la-mesure-dhospitalisation-complete-sur-le-fondement-de-la-\">I. La confirmation de la mesure d&#8217;hospitalisation compl\u00e8te sur le fondement de la compromission de la s\u00fbret\u00e9 des personnes<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-recevabilite-de-la-requete-prefectorale-au-regard-de-larticle-l-3213-1-du-c\">A. La recevabilit\u00e9 de la requ\u00eate pr\u00e9fectorale au regard de l&#8217;article L. 3213-1 du code de la sant\u00e9 publique<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge a rappel\u00e9 le texte applicable selon lequel le repr\u00e9sentant de l&#8217;\u00c9tat prononce l&#8217;admission en soins psychiatriques des personnes dont les troubles mentaux n\u00e9cessitent des soins et compromettent la s\u00fbret\u00e9 des personnes ou portent une atteinte grave \u00e0 l&#8217;ordre public. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, la requ\u00eate pr\u00e9fectorale \u00e9tait fond\u00e9e sur l&#8217;existence de troubles mentaux compromettant la s\u00fbret\u00e9 des personnes. Le juge n&#8217;a pas exig\u00e9 une d\u00e9monstration suppl\u00e9mentaire d&#8217;une atteinte grave \u00e0 l&#8217;ordre public. Il s&#8217;est content\u00e9 de constater que les certificats m\u00e9dicaux indiquaient que les troubles compromettaient la s\u00fbret\u00e9 des personnes. Cette interpr\u00e9tation est conforme \u00e0 la lettre du texte, qui distingue deux branches alternatives : la compromission de la s\u00fbret\u00e9 des personnes ou l&#8217;atteinte grave \u00e0 l&#8217;ordre public. L&#8217;existence de l&#8217;une suffit.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-lappreciation-des-certificats-medicaux-comme-preuve-de-la-necessite-des-soins\">B. L&#8217;appr\u00e9ciation des certificats m\u00e9dicaux comme preuve de la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 des soins<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge a fond\u00e9 sa d\u00e9cision sur les certificats m\u00e9dicaux des vingt-quatre et soixante-douze heures ainsi que sur l&#8217;avis motiv\u00e9 du 26 mars 2026. Il n&#8217;a pas proc\u00e9d\u00e9 \u00e0 une v\u00e9rification personnelle de l&#8217;\u00e9tat du patient, ni ordonn\u00e9 d&#8217;expertise ou d&#8217;audition. La motivation se limite \u00e0 une simple mention du contenu des pi\u00e8ces m\u00e9dicales. Cette attitude s&#8217;explique par la nature de la proc\u00e9dure : le juge contr\u00f4le la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la mesure et non son opportunit\u00e9 m\u00e9dicale. Toutefois, il aurait pu s&#8217;interroger sur la pertinence des certificats lorsqu&#8217;ils ne pr\u00e9cisent pas en quoi la s\u00fbret\u00e9 des personnes est compromise. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, le juge a estim\u00e9 que les documents \u00e9taient suffisants pour autoriser le maintien de l&#8217;hospitalisation compl\u00e8te.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-les-limites-dun-controle-juridictionnel-restreint-face-a-lexigence-de-protect\">II. Les limites d&#8217;un contr\u00f4le juridictionnel restreint face \u00e0 l&#8217;exigence de protection des libert\u00e9s individuelles<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-labsence-de-caracterisation-concrete-du-trouble-a-lordre-public\">A. L&#8217;absence de caract\u00e9risation concr\u00e8te du trouble \u00e0 l&#8217;ordre public<\/h3>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision comment\u00e9e ne fait \u00e9tat d&#8217;aucun \u00e9l\u00e9ment factuel pr\u00e9cis d\u00e9montrant que le patient compromettait la s\u00fbret\u00e9 des personnes. Les certificats m\u00e9dicaux se contentent d&#8217;une affirmation g\u00e9n\u00e9rale. En comparaison, la cour d&#8217;appel de Paris a jug\u00e9 que <em>&#8221; le trouble \u00e0 l&#8217;ordre public est ainsi caract\u00e9ris\u00e9 et les soins en mode ambulatoire ne sont pas envisageables en l&#8217;\u00e9tat &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67f9f3a8a6be9c926c7caa09\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel de Paris, 11 avril 2025, n\u00b025\/00211)<\/a><\/strong>, en se fondant sur des \u00e9l\u00e9ments concrets. De m\u00eame, la cour d&#8217;appel de Douai a estim\u00e9 que <em>&#8221; les conditions d&#8217;application de l&#8217;article L. 3213-1 ne se trouvent plus r\u00e9unies d\u00e8s lors que [la patiente] ne pr\u00e9sente plus des troubles importants du comportement de nature \u00e0 porter une atteinte grave \u00e0 l&#8217;ordre public ou \u00e0 la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 des personnes &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67eb76a99221139931b8b986\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel de Douai, 31 mars 2025, n\u00b025\/00017)<\/a><\/strong>. Ces arr\u00eats montrent que le juge doit v\u00e9rifier mat\u00e9riellement la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 du trouble. Le juge de Pontoise n&#8217;a pas effectu\u00e9 cette v\u00e9rification et s&#8217;est content\u00e9 d&#8217;une mention m\u00e9dicale abstraite.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-portee-dune-decision-fondee-sur-une-appreciation-medicale-non-discutee\">B. La port\u00e9e d&#8217;une d\u00e9cision fond\u00e9e sur une appr\u00e9ciation m\u00e9dicale non discut\u00e9e<\/h3>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision du 30 mars 2026 illustre une pratique o\u00f9 le juge des libert\u00e9s se borne \u00e0 ent\u00e9riner l&#8217;avis m\u00e9dical sans exercer un contr\u00f4le effectif. Or, en mati\u00e8re de privation de libert\u00e9, le juge doit garantir un \u00e9quilibre entre les exigences de sant\u00e9 publique et la protection des droits fondamentaux. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, aucune contradiction n&#8217;a \u00e9t\u00e9 soulev\u00e9e par le patient, qui n&#8217;\u00e9tait pas assist\u00e9 d&#8217;un avocat \u00e0 l&#8217;audience. Le juge n&#8217;a pas examin\u00e9 si des soins ambulatoires \u00e9taient envisageables. La port\u00e9e de cette ordonnance est donc limit\u00e9e : elle confirme une approche purement formelle de la proc\u00e9dure, sans \u00e9valuation substantielle de la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de l&#8217;hospitalisation compl\u00e8te. \u00c0 l&#8217;avenir, ce type de d\u00e9cision pourrait \u00eatre contest\u00e9 au regard de l&#8217;exigence d&#8217;un contr\u00f4le concret, comme le sugg\u00e8rent les juridictions d&#8217;appel pr\u00e9cit\u00e9es.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67f9f3a8a6be9c926c7caa09\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Paris, le 11 avril 2025, n\u00b025\/00211<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67eb76a99221139931b8b986\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Douai, le 31 mars 2025, n\u00b025\/00017<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000028016871\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 3213-1 du Code de la sant\u00e9 publique<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>I.-Le repr\u00e9sentant de l&#8217;Etat dans le d\u00e9partement prononce par arr\u00eat\u00e9, au vu d&#8217;un certificat m\u00e9dical circonstanci\u00e9 ne pouvant \u00e9maner d&#8217;un psychiatre exer\u00e7ant dans l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement d&#8217;accueil, l&#8217;admission en soins psychiatriques des personnes dont les troubles mentaux n\u00e9cessitent des soins et compromettent la s\u00fbret\u00e9 des personnes ou portent atteinte, de fa\u00e7on grave, \u00e0 l&#8217;ordre public. Les arr\u00eat\u00e9s pr\u00e9fectoraux sont motiv\u00e9s et \u00e9noncent avec pr\u00e9cision les circonstances qui ont rendu l&#8217;admission en soins n\u00e9cessaire. Ils d\u00e9signent l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement mentionn\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 3222-1 qui assure la prise en charge de la personne malade. <\/p>\n<p>Le directeur de l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement d&#8217;accueil transmet sans d\u00e9lai au repr\u00e9sentant de l&#8217;Etat dans le d\u00e9partement et \u00e0 la commission d\u00e9partementale des soins psychiatriques mentionn\u00e9e \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 3222-5 : <\/p>\n<p>1\u00b0 Le certificat m\u00e9dical mentionn\u00e9 au deuxi\u00e8me alin\u00e9a de l&#8217;article L. 3211-2-2 ; <\/p>\n<p>2\u00b0 Le certificat m\u00e9dical et, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, la proposition mentionn\u00e9s aux deux derniers alin\u00e9as du m\u00eame article L. 3211-2-2. <\/p>\n<p>II.-Dans un d\u00e9lai de trois jours francs suivant la r\u00e9ception du certificat m\u00e9dical mentionn\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;avant-dernier alin\u00e9a de l&#8217;article L. 3211-2-2, le repr\u00e9sentant de l&#8217;Etat dans le d\u00e9partement d\u00e9cide de la forme de prise en charge pr\u00e9vue \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 3211-2-1, en tenant compte de la proposition \u00e9tablie, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, par le psychiatre en application du dernier alin\u00e9a de l&#8217;article L. 3211-2-2 et des exigences li\u00e9es \u00e0 la s\u00fbret\u00e9 des personnes et \u00e0 l&#8217;ordre public. Il joint \u00e0 sa d\u00e9cision, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, le programme de soins \u00e9tabli par le psychiatre. <\/p>\n<p>Dans l&#8217;attente de la d\u00e9cision du repr\u00e9sentant de l&#8217;Etat, la personne malade est prise en charge sous la forme d&#8217;une hospitalisation compl\u00e8te. <\/p>\n<p>III.-Lorsque la proposition \u00e9tablie par le psychiatre en application de l&#8217;article L. 3211-2-2 recommande une prise en charge sous une autre forme que l&#8217;hospitalisation compl\u00e8te, le repr\u00e9sentant de l&#8217;Etat ne peut modifier la forme de prise en charge des personnes mentionn\u00e9es au II de l&#8217;article L. 3211-12 qu&#8217;apr\u00e8s avoir recueilli l&#8217;avis du coll\u00e8ge mentionn\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 3211-9. <\/p>\n<p>IV.-Les mesures provisoires, les d\u00e9cisions, les avis et les certificats m\u00e9dicaux mentionn\u00e9s au pr\u00e9sent chapitre figurent sur le registre mentionn\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 3212-11.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise a autoris\u00e9 le maintien de l&#8217;hospitalisation compl\u00e8te d&#8217;un&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":3912,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cadcb3cdc6046d478cd1f4","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cadcb3cdc6046d478cd1f4","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cadcb3cdc6046d478cd1f4","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Pontoise","_kj_chambre":"JLD","_kj_rg":"26\/00542","_kj_date":"2026-03-30","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1234160","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00542 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise a autoris\u00e9 le maintien de l&#039;hospitalisation compl\u00e8te d&#039;un...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00542\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise a autoris\u00e9 le maintien de l&#039;hospitalisation compl\u00e8te d&#039;un...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-02T21:49:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"6000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"4000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00542\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T21:49:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1533,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00542\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-02T21:49:50+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00542 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T21:49:50+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise a autoris\u00e9 le maintien de l'hospitalisation compl\u00e8te d'un...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":6000,\"height\":4000},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00542\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00542 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise a autoris\u00e9 le maintien de l'hospitalisation compl\u00e8te d'un...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00542","og_description":"Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise a autoris\u00e9 le maintien de l'hospitalisation compl\u00e8te d'un...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-02T21:49:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":6000,"height":4000,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00542","datePublished":"2026-07-02T21:49:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\/"},"wordCount":1533,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00542","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-02T21:49:50+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00542 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-02T21:49:50+00:00","description":"Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise a autoris\u00e9 le maintien de l'hospitalisation compl\u00e8te d'un...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp","width":6000,"height":4000},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00542\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00542"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-5b3O","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1211617,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\/","url_meta":{"origin":1234160,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Versailles, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00206","author":"Kohen","date":"28 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Introduction sans titre. I. Les conditions de l'homologation de l'accord transactionnel A. L'interdiction pour le juge de modifier les termes de l'accord...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/haut-risque-JoyJpFZM-ZE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/haut-risque-JoyJpFZM-ZE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/haut-risque-JoyJpFZM-ZE-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/haut-risque-JoyJpFZM-ZE-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/haut-risque-JoyJpFZM-ZE-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/haut-risque-JoyJpFZM-ZE-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1205136,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n25-09273\/","url_meta":{"origin":1234160,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/09273","author":"Kohen","date":"27 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg (11\u00e8me civ. S1) a rendu une d\u00e9cision sur une demande en paiement form\u00e9e par une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 de location...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/lisa-IfngoxB5ORA-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/lisa-IfngoxB5ORA-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/lisa-IfngoxB5ORA-unsplash-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/lisa-IfngoxB5ORA-unsplash-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/lisa-IfngoxB5ORA-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/lisa-IfngoxB5ORA-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1218826,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00395\/","url_meta":{"origin":1234160,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00395","author":"Kohen","date":"30 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, statuant en qualit\u00e9 de juge de l'ex\u00e9cution le 27 mars 2026 (n\u00b025\/00395), \u00e9tait saisi d'une demande de d\u00e9lais pour quitter...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/aakash-dhage-nARm1vWkl1I-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/aakash-dhage-nARm1vWkl1I-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/aakash-dhage-nARm1vWkl1I-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/aakash-dhage-nARm1vWkl1I-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/aakash-dhage-nARm1vWkl1I-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/aakash-dhage-nARm1vWkl1I-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":441807,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-de-cassation-le-28-janvier-2026-n23-20-245\/","url_meta":{"origin":1234160,"position":3},"title":"Cour de cassation, le 28 janvier 2026, n\u00b023-20.245","author":"","date":"4 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Il r\u00e9sulte de la loi des 2-17 mars 1791, des principes de la libert\u00e9 du commerce et de l'industrie et de la libre concurrence ainsi que de l'article 1382,...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour de cassation&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour de cassation","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-de-cassation\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/daniele-d-andreti-mGH4FxehE2s-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/daniele-d-andreti-mGH4FxehE2s-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/daniele-d-andreti-mGH4FxehE2s-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/daniele-d-andreti-mGH4FxehE2s-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/daniele-d-andreti-mGH4FxehE2s-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/daniele-d-andreti-mGH4FxehE2s-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":441271,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-de-cassation-le-28-janvier-2026-n24-17-532\/","url_meta":{"origin":1234160,"position":4},"title":"Cour de cassation, le 28 janvier 2026, n\u00b024-17.532","author":"","date":"4 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La d\u00e9cision du 28 janvier 2026 illustre le contr\u00f4le exerc\u00e9 par la Cour de cassation sur les d\u00e9cisions de rejet non sp\u00e9cialement motiv\u00e9. Elle rappelle les...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour de cassation&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour de cassation","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-de-cassation\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":492360,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-13-novembre-2025-n25-02521\/","url_meta":{"origin":1234160,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 13 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/02521","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Paris, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 10 mars 2026, examine une demande indemnitaire li\u00e9e \u00e0 un trouble de jouissance locative. Suite \u00e0 un...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1234160","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1234160"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1234160\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3912"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1234160"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1234160"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1234160"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}