{"id":1236104,"date":"2026-07-03T07:53:30","date_gmt":"2026-07-03T05:53:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\/"},"modified":"2026-07-03T07:53:30","modified_gmt":"2026-07-03T05:53:30","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Dijon, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b020\/00174"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-la-recevabilite-des-contestations-et-loffice-du-juge-dans-le-partage-judiciair\">I. La recevabilit\u00e9 des contestations et l\u2019office du juge dans le partage judiciaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-leffet-des-contestations-emises-avant-le-rapport-du-juge-commis\">A. L\u2019effet des contestations \u00e9mises avant le rapport du juge commis<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-le-rejet-des-demandes-non-etayees-par-des-elements-de-preuve\">B. Le rejet des demandes non \u00e9tay\u00e9es par des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de preuve<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-les-exigences-probatoires-face-aux-contestations-portant-sur-les-liberalites\">II. Les exigences probatoires face aux contestations portant sur les lib\u00e9ralit\u00e9s<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-charge-de-la-preuve-de-linsanite-desprit-pour-lannulation-du-testament\">A. La charge de la preuve de l\u2019insanit\u00e9 d\u2019esprit pour l\u2019annulation du testament<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-preuve-de-lintention-liberale-pour-le-rapport-successoral\">B. La preuve de l\u2019intention lib\u00e9rale pour le rapport successoral<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Par un jugement du 30 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Dijon, premi\u00e8re chambre (n\u00b020\/00174), a statu\u00e9 sur les contestations \u00e9lev\u00e9es \u00e0 l\u2019encontre d\u2019un projet d\u2019\u00e9tat liquidatif dans le cadre d\u2019un partage judiciaire. Une succession avait \u00e9t\u00e9 ouverte au d\u00e9c\u00e8s de la m\u00e8re de six enfants. Deux testaments olographes des 19 f\u00e9vrier et 11 juin 2016 instituaient un legs de la quotit\u00e9 disponible au profit de l\u2019une des filles. Une autre fille, contestataire, a saisi le tribunal pour voir annuler ces testaments, obtenir la communication du testament du p\u00e8re, un inventaire des meubles, la restitution de bijoux, la prise en compte de loyers, une nouvelle \u00e9valuation des biens immobiliers, le rapport d\u2019une somme par un fr\u00e8re, et la d\u00e9signation d\u2019un nouveau notaire. Le notaire commis avait dress\u00e9 un projet d\u2019\u00e9tat liquidatif le 30 juin 2023. La contestataire avait adress\u00e9 des courriers de contestation les 20 f\u00e9vrier et 30 mai 2023, avant l\u2019\u00e9tablissement du rapport du juge commis. Le tribunal a d\u2019abord d\u00fb se prononcer sur la recevabilit\u00e9 de ces contestations, puis sur le fond de chaque demande. Il a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 les contestations recevables, mais a d\u00e9bout\u00e9 la demanderesse de l\u2019ensemble de ses pr\u00e9tentions et a homologu\u00e9 le projet de partage. La question de droit centrale porte sur la charge et l\u2019administration de la preuve dans le contentieux successoral, tant en ce qui concerne l\u2019insanit\u00e9 d\u2019esprit du testateur que l\u2019existence de donations rapportables. Il convient d\u2019examiner la solution retenue quant \u00e0 la recevabilit\u00e9 des contestations et \u00e0 l\u2019office du juge (I), puis les exigences probatoires appliqu\u00e9es aux diff\u00e9rentes demandes (II).<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-la-recevabilite-des-contestations-et-loffice-du-juge-dans-le-partage-judiciair\">I. La recevabilit\u00e9 des contestations et l\u2019office du juge dans le partage judiciaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-leffet-des-contestations-emises-avant-le-rapport-du-juge-commis\">A. L\u2019effet des contestations \u00e9mises avant le rapport du juge commis<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal rappelle que l\u2019article 1374 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile impose que les demandes entre les m\u00eames parties dans le cadre d\u2019une instance de partage ne constituent qu\u2019une seule instance, et que toute demande distincte est irrecevable si le fondement n\u2019est n\u00e9 ou r\u00e9v\u00e9l\u00e9 qu\u2019apr\u00e8s l\u2019\u00e9tablissement du rapport du juge commis. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, la contestataire avait adress\u00e9 un courrier recommand\u00e9 le 20 f\u00e9vrier 2023 et une lettre de son conseil le 30 mai 2023 au notaire, avant que le juge commis n\u2019ait \u00e9tabli son rapport. Le projet d\u2019\u00e9tat liquidatif mentionnait \u00e0 tort sa pr\u00e9sence. Le tribunal constate que ces contestations pr\u00e9alables sont suffisantes pour satisfaire aux conditions de l\u2019article 1374. Il d\u00e9clare donc la demanderesse recevable en ses contestations. Cette solution assure un \u00e9quilibre proc\u00e9dural : elle \u00e9vite que des contestations tardives ne paralysent le partage, tout en pr\u00e9servant le droit des parties \u00e0 faire valoir leurs griefs d\u00e8s qu\u2019ils apparaissent.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-le-rejet-des-demandes-non-etayees-par-des-elements-de-preuve\">B. Le rejet des demandes non \u00e9tay\u00e9es par des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de preuve<\/h3>\n<p>Malgr\u00e9 cette recevabilit\u00e9, le tribunal \u00e9carte la plupart des demandes faute de preuves suffisantes. S\u2019agissant de l\u2019inventaire des meubles, la demanderesse invoquait l\u2019existence de tonneaux, alambics, cuves et un v\u00e9hicule, mais sans d\u00e9montrer leur valeur \u00e0 la date de jouissance divise. Le tribunal rel\u00e8ve que le projet d\u2019\u00e9tat liquidatif ne mentionne aucun bien meuble, mais que la preuve d\u2019une valorisation modificatrice des droits n\u2019est pas rapport\u00e9e. De m\u00eame, pour la restitution des bijoux donn\u00e9s \u00e0 la m\u00e8re, le tribunal applique l\u2019article 894 du Code civil : la donation entre vifs \u00e9tant irr\u00e9vocable, la demanderesse ne peut en r\u00e9clamer la restitution. Quant aux loyers, aucune preuve de perception apr\u00e8s le d\u00e9c\u00e8s n\u2019est fournie ; les ch\u00e8ques datent de 2002. Enfin, la demande de r\u00e9\u00e9valuation des biens immobiliers est rejet\u00e9e car les estimations produites sont anciennes et la date de jouissance divise (30 juin 2023) n\u2019est pas contest\u00e9e. Le tribunal exerce ainsi un strict contr\u00f4le du principe selon lequel la partie qui all\u00e8gue un fait doit le prouver, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019adage <em>actori incumbit probatio<\/em>.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-les-exigences-probatoires-face-aux-contestations-portant-sur-les-liberalites\">II. Les exigences probatoires face aux contestations portant sur les lib\u00e9ralit\u00e9s<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-charge-de-la-preuve-de-linsanite-desprit-pour-lannulation-du-testament\">A. La charge de la preuve de l\u2019insanit\u00e9 d\u2019esprit pour l\u2019annulation du testament<\/h3>\n<p>La demanderesse sollicitait l\u2019annulation des testaments des 19 f\u00e9vrier et 11 juin 2016 sur le fondement de l\u2019article 901 du Code civil. Elle soutenait que la testatrice, alors \u00e2g\u00e9e de 96 ans, n\u2019\u00e9tait pas saine d\u2019esprit et que les conditions de r\u00e9daction \u00e9taient opaques. Le tribunal rappelle que la preuve du trouble mental au moment de l\u2019acte incombe \u00e0 celui qui agit en nullit\u00e9. Il cite implicitement la r\u00e8gle jurisprudentielle constante selon laquelle <em>&#8221; l\u2019insanit\u00e9 d\u2019esprit s\u2019entend du trouble mental, dont l\u2019existence au moment de l\u2019acte peut \u00eatre \u00e9tablie par tous moyens &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67820ab9d30fbdc4c17b9d37\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Douai, 9 janvier 2025, n\u00b021\/05409)<\/a><\/strong>. Or, la demanderesse ne produit aucun \u00e9l\u00e9ment m\u00e9dical ni t\u00e9moignage direct ; la seule contrari\u00e9t\u00e9 entre une volont\u00e9 ant\u00e9rieure de partage \u00e9galitaire et les testaments litigieux ne suffit pas \u00e0 vicier le consentement. Au contraire, la similitude des deux testaments \u00e0 quelques mois d\u2019intervalle d\u00e9montre une volont\u00e9 constante. Le tribunal applique \u00e9galement la r\u00e8gle de l\u2019<em>&#8221; intervalle de lucidit\u00e9 &#8220;<\/em> : si l\u2019\u00e9tat habituel du testateur \u00e9tait alt\u00e9r\u00e9, il appartient au b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de prouver que le testateur \u00e9tait lucide au moment de l\u2019acte <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67ca921cac6d12802acb1881\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Montpellier, 6 mars 2025, n\u00b022\/01227)<\/a><\/strong>. Mais ici, la demanderesse n\u2019\u00e9tablit m\u00eame pas l\u2019alt\u00e9ration habituelle. Le rejet de la demande est donc conforme \u00e0 la r\u00e9partition l\u00e9gale de la charge de la preuve.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-preuve-de-lintention-liberale-pour-le-rapport-successoral\">B. La preuve de l\u2019intention lib\u00e9rale pour le rapport successoral<\/h3>\n<p>La demanderesse demandait le rapport \u00e0 la masse active d\u2019une somme de 54 809,18 euros per\u00e7ue par un fr\u00e8re, qu\u2019elle qualifiait de donation. Le tribunal applique l\u2019article 843 du Code civil, qui impose au gratifi\u00e9 de rapporter les donations, \u00e0 moins qu\u2019elles n\u2019aient \u00e9t\u00e9 faites express\u00e9ment hors part. Il rappelle que la preuve de la donation suppose d\u2019\u00e9tablir l\u2019appauvrissement du d\u00e9funt, l\u2019enrichissement du gratifi\u00e9 et surtout l\u2019intention lib\u00e9rale. Or, si les copies de ch\u00e8ques d\u00e9montrent un transfert de fonds, l\u2019intention lib\u00e9rale ne se pr\u00e9sume pas. La demanderesse se contente d\u2019affirmations sans produire d\u2019\u00e9l\u00e9ment objectif (absence de contrepartie, disproportion, contexte familial). Le tribunal, reprenant la distinction classique entre le paiement d\u2019une dette et la lib\u00e9ralit\u00e9, estime que la simple remise de fonds ne caract\u00e9rise pas une donation. Il rejette donc la demande de rapport. Cette solution est coh\u00e9rente avec la rigueur probatoire exig\u00e9e en mati\u00e8re de lib\u00e9ralit\u00e9s. Elle \u00e9vite que tout transfert de fonds entre un ascendant et un descendant soit automatiquement requalifi\u00e9 en donation, ce qui perturberait les r\u00e8gles successorales. La d\u00e9cision homologue d\u00e8s lors le projet d\u2019\u00e9tat liquidatif, faute de contestations fond\u00e9es.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67ca921cac6d12802acb1881\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Montpellier, le 6 mars 2025, n\u00b022\/01227<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67820ab9d30fbdc4c17b9d37\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Douai, le 9 janvier 2025, n\u00b021\/05409<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006412541\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 1374 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Toutes les demandes faites en application de l&#8217;article 1373 entre les m\u00eames parties, qu&#8217;elles \u00e9manent du demandeur ou du d\u00e9fendeur, ne constituent qu&#8217;une seule instance. Toute demande distincte est irrecevable \u00e0 moins que le fondement des pr\u00e9tentions ne soit n\u00e9 ou ne soit r\u00e9v\u00e9l\u00e9 que post\u00e9rieurement \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement du rapport par le juge commis.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006433497\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 894 du Code civil<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   La donation entre vifs est un acte par lequel le donateur se d\u00e9pouille actuellement et irr\u00e9vocablement de la chose donn\u00e9e en faveur du donataire qui l&#8217;accepte.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006433635\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 901 du Code civil<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   Pour faire une lib\u00e9ralit\u00e9, il faut \u00eatre sain d&#8217;esprit. La lib\u00e9ralit\u00e9 est nulle lorsque le consentement a \u00e9t\u00e9 vici\u00e9 par l&#8217;erreur, le dol ou la violence.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006432755\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 843 du Code civil<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   Tout h\u00e9ritier, m\u00eame ayant accept\u00e9 \u00e0 concurrence de l&#8217;actif, venant \u00e0 une succession, doit rapporter \u00e0 ses coh\u00e9ritiers tout ce qu&#8217;il a re\u00e7u du d\u00e9funt, par donations entre vifs, directement ou indirectement ; il ne peut retenir les dons \u00e0 lui faits par le d\u00e9funt, \u00e0 moins qu&#8217;ils ne lui aient \u00e9t\u00e9 faits express\u00e9ment hors part successorale.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>   Les legs faits \u00e0 un h\u00e9ritier sont r\u00e9put\u00e9s faits hors part successorale, \u00e0 moins que le testateur n&#8217;ait exprim\u00e9 la volont\u00e9 contraire, auquel cas le l\u00e9gataire ne peut r\u00e9clamer son legs qu&#8217;en moins prenant.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Par un jugement du 30 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Dijon, premi\u00e8re chambre (n\u00b020\/00174), a statu\u00e9 sur les contestations \u00e9lev\u00e9es \u00e0 l\u2019encontre d\u2019un&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9585,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cae35ccdc6046d478d50cb","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cae35ccdc6046d478d50cb","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cae35ccdc6046d478d50cb","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Dijon","_kj_chambre":"1\u00e8re Chambre","_kj_rg":"20\/00174","_kj_date":"2026-03-30","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1236104","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Dijon, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b020\/00174 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Par un jugement du 30 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Dijon, premi\u00e8re chambre (n\u00b020\/00174), a statu\u00e9 sur les contestations \u00e9lev\u00e9es \u00e0 l\u2019encontre d\u2019un...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Dijon, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b020\/00174\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Par un jugement du 30 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Dijon, premi\u00e8re chambre (n\u00b020\/00174), a statu\u00e9 sur les contestations \u00e9lev\u00e9es \u00e0 l\u2019encontre d\u2019un...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-03T05:53:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-SjE4Eirl2ro-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2100\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Dijon, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b020\\\/00174\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-03T05:53:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1540,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-SjE4Eirl2ro-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Dijon, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b020\\\/00174\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-03T05:53:30+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Dijon, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b020\\\/00174 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-SjE4Eirl2ro-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-03T05:53:30+00:00\",\"description\":\"Par un jugement du 30 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Dijon, premi\u00e8re chambre (n\u00b020\\\/00174), a statu\u00e9 sur les contestations \u00e9lev\u00e9es \u00e0 l\u2019encontre d\u2019un...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-SjE4Eirl2ro-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-SjE4Eirl2ro-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":2800,\"height\":2100},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Dijon, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b020\\\/00174\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Dijon, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b020\/00174 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Par un jugement du 30 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Dijon, premi\u00e8re chambre (n\u00b020\/00174), a statu\u00e9 sur les contestations \u00e9lev\u00e9es \u00e0 l\u2019encontre d\u2019un...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Dijon, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b020\/00174","og_description":"Par un jugement du 30 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Dijon, premi\u00e8re chambre (n\u00b020\/00174), a statu\u00e9 sur les contestations \u00e9lev\u00e9es \u00e0 l\u2019encontre d\u2019un...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-03T05:53:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2800,"height":2100,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-SjE4Eirl2ro-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Dijon, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b020\/00174","datePublished":"2026-07-03T05:53:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\/"},"wordCount":1540,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-SjE4Eirl2ro-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Dijon, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b020\/00174","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-03T05:53:30+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Dijon, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b020\/00174 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-SjE4Eirl2ro-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-03T05:53:30+00:00","description":"Par un jugement du 30 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Dijon, premi\u00e8re chambre (n\u00b020\/00174), a statu\u00e9 sur les contestations \u00e9lev\u00e9es \u00e0 l\u2019encontre d\u2019un...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-SjE4Eirl2ro-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-SjE4Eirl2ro-unsplash.webp","width":2800,"height":2100},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-30-mars-2026-n20-00174\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Dijon, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b020\/00174"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-SjE4Eirl2ro-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-5bza","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1095030,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00174\/","url_meta":{"origin":1236104,"position":0},"title":"Cour d&#8217;appel de Douai, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00174","author":"Kohen","date":"14 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La Cour d'appel de Douai, dans son arr\u00eat du 27 mars 2026 (n\u00b026\/00174), statuant en chambre sociale, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisie d'une requ\u00eate en rectification d'une...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Code des assurances&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Code des assurances","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/code-des-assurances\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2IQXr2ZqAdY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2IQXr2ZqAdY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2IQXr2ZqAdY-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2IQXr2ZqAdY-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2IQXr2ZqAdY-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2IQXr2ZqAdY-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":493581,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-7-novembre-2025-n25-00174\/","url_meta":{"origin":1236104,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00e0-Pitre, le 7 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/00174","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00e0-Pitre, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a rendu une ordonnance le 16 mai 2025. Un indivisaire a assign\u00e9 un autre devant le juge des...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/andre-benz-AiORnUT6sC0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/andre-benz-AiORnUT6sC0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/andre-benz-AiORnUT6sC0-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/andre-benz-AiORnUT6sC0-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/andre-benz-AiORnUT6sC0-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/andre-benz-AiORnUT6sC0-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":447283,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-le-21-aout-2025-n25-00174\/","url_meta":{"origin":1236104,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire, le 21 ao\u00fbt 2025, n\u00b025\/00174","author":"","date":"5 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La pr\u00e9sente ordonnance rendue le 21 ao\u00fbt 2025 par le Tribunal judiciaire de Clermont-Ferrand, statuant en la formation des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s du p\u00f4le social, tranche...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-8bn59-WwQyk-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-8bn59-WwQyk-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-8bn59-WwQyk-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-8bn59-WwQyk-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-8bn59-WwQyk-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-8bn59-WwQyk-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":446095,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-le-18-aout-2025-n25-00174\/","url_meta":{"origin":1236104,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire, le 18 ao\u00fbt 2025, n\u00b025\/00174","author":"","date":"4 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Saint-Nazaire, statuant en mati\u00e8re de divorce par acceptation du principe de la rupture du mariage, a rendu un jugement le 18...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/adam-wood-IDVIKdf8JYw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/adam-wood-IDVIKdf8JYw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/adam-wood-IDVIKdf8JYw-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/adam-wood-IDVIKdf8JYw-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/adam-wood-IDVIKdf8JYw-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/adam-wood-IDVIKdf8JYw-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":493987,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-dijon-le-5-novembre-2025-n24-00030\/","url_meta":{"origin":1236104,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Dijon, le 5 novembre 2025, n\u00b024\/00030","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Dijon, juge de l'ex\u00e9cution, statue le 5 novembre 2025 sur une demande de d\u00e9lai suppl\u00e9mentaire dans le cadre d'une saisie...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1211553,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-troyes-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00174\/","url_meta":{"origin":1236104,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Troyes, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00174","author":"Kohen","date":"28 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Introduction sans titre. Le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Troyes, statuant en sa chambre du surendettement, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019un recours form\u00e9 par...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-IixEkPUt3kU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-IixEkPUt3kU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-IixEkPUt3kU-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-IixEkPUt3kU-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-IixEkPUt3kU-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-IixEkPUt3kU-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1236104","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1236104"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1236104\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9585"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1236104"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1236104"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1236104"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}