{"id":1236292,"date":"2026-07-03T08:05:25","date_gmt":"2026-07-03T06:05:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\/"},"modified":"2026-07-03T08:05:25","modified_gmt":"2026-07-03T06:05:25","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00559"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-la-verification-rigoureuse-des-conditions-de-la-mesure-dhospitalisation-contra\">I. La v\u00e9rification rigoureuse des conditions de la mesure d\u2019hospitalisation contrainte<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-caracterisation-des-troubles-mentaux-compromettant-la-surete-des-personnes\">A. La caract\u00e9risation des troubles mentaux compromettant la s\u00fbret\u00e9 des personnes<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-lappreciation-judiciaire-de-la-necessite-des-soins-sous-contrainte\">B. L\u2019appr\u00e9ciation judiciaire de la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 des soins sous contrainte<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-la-portee-de-lordonnance-dans-le-controle-des-mesures-privatives-de-liberte\">II. La port\u00e9e de l\u2019ordonnance dans le contr\u00f4le des mesures privatives de libert\u00e9<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-conformite-de-la-decision-aux-principes-du-contentieux-des-soins-psychiatri\">A. La conformit\u00e9 de la d\u00e9cision aux principes du contentieux des soins psychiatriques<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-les-perspectives-ouvertes-par-la-motivation-de-lordonnance\">B. Les perspectives ouvertes par la motivation de l\u2019ordonnance<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise a rendu une ordonnance autorisant le maintien de l\u2019hospitalisation compl\u00e8te d\u2019une personne faisant l\u2019objet d\u2019une mesure de soins psychiatriques contraints, prononc\u00e9e par le repr\u00e9sentant de l\u2019\u00c9tat. Les faits sont les suivants. Le 27 mars 2026, une personne a \u00e9t\u00e9 admise en soins contraints sous forme d\u2019hospitalisation compl\u00e8te en application de l\u2019article L. 3213-1 du code de la sant\u00e9 publique. Le pr\u00e9fet a saisi le juge par requ\u00eate du m\u00eame jour afin qu\u2019il statue sur la poursuite de la mesure. Le patient, le pr\u00e9fet et le directeur de l\u2019\u00e9tablissement ont \u00e9t\u00e9 convoqu\u00e9s. Le minist\u00e8re public a \u00e9mis un avis favorable \u00e9crit. \u00c0 l\u2019appui de sa demande, le pr\u00e9fet a produit un certificat m\u00e9dical initial, un certificat de vingt-quatre heures, un certificat de soixante-douze heures et un avis motiv\u00e9 du 30 mars 2026. Ces documents \u00e9tablissent que les troubles mentaux dont souffre la personne hospitalis\u00e9e compromettent la s\u00fbret\u00e9 des personnes. Le juge a donc autoris\u00e9 la poursuite de l\u2019hospitalisation compl\u00e8te. La question de droit soumise au juge \u00e9tait de savoir si les conditions l\u00e9gales de l\u2019article L. 3213-1 du code de la sant\u00e9 publique \u00e9taient r\u00e9unies pour justifier le maintien d\u2019une mesure privative de libert\u00e9. Le juge a r\u00e9pondu par l\u2019affirmative, en retenant que les troubles mentaux compromettent effectivement la s\u00fbret\u00e9 des personnes.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-la-verification-rigoureuse-des-conditions-de-la-mesure-dhospitalisation-contra\">I. La v\u00e9rification rigoureuse des conditions de la mesure d\u2019hospitalisation contrainte<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-caracterisation-des-troubles-mentaux-compromettant-la-surete-des-personnes\">A. La caract\u00e9risation des troubles mentaux compromettant la s\u00fbret\u00e9 des personnes<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention a fond\u00e9 sa d\u00e9cision sur l\u2019article L. 3213-1 du code de la sant\u00e9 publique, qui subordonne l\u2019admission en soins psychiatriques \u00e0 la d\u00e9monstration que les troubles mentaux <em>&#8221; n\u00e9cessitent des soins et compromettent la s\u00fbret\u00e9 des personnes ou portent atteinte, de fa\u00e7on grave, \u00e0 l\u2019ordre public &#8220;<\/em>. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, il a relev\u00e9 que les certificats m\u00e9dicaux de vingt-quatre heures et de soixante-douze heures, ainsi que l\u2019avis motiv\u00e9 du 30 mars 2026, \u00e9tablissaient l\u2019existence de tels troubles. Cette appr\u00e9ciation est conforme \u00e0 la jurisprudence constante, selon laquelle la simple existence d\u2019une pathologie psychiatrique ne suffit pas ; il faut un risque actuel pour autrui. La Cour d\u2019appel d\u2019Aix-en-Provence a pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 que <em>&#8221; les troubles mentaux dont le patient n\u2019a que partiellement conscience compromettent la s\u00fbret\u00e9 des personnes, r\u00e9pondant aux conditions de l\u2019article L. 3213-1 I du code de la sant\u00e9 publique &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67cbe2698eed828b9952e79f\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel d\u2019Aix-en-Provence, 6 mars 2025, n\u00b025\/00021)<\/a><\/strong>. En l\u2019occurrence, le juge a pu se convaincre du lien entre les troubles et le danger, ce qui l\u00e9gitime l\u2019autorisation du maintien.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-lappreciation-judiciaire-de-la-necessite-des-soins-sous-contrainte\">B. L\u2019appr\u00e9ciation judiciaire de la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 des soins sous contrainte<\/h3>\n<p>Au-del\u00e0 de la seule existence des troubles, le juge doit v\u00e9rifier que les soins contraints sont indispensables \u00e0 la protection des personnes. La d\u00e9cision comment\u00e9e insiste sur le fait que les certificats m\u00e9dicaux successifs confirment la persistance des troubles et l\u2019absence de consentement \u00e9clair\u00e9. La Cour d\u2019appel de Reims a soulign\u00e9 que <em>&#8221; jusqu\u2019\u00e0 pr\u00e9sent hors les mesures de contrainte il a toujours arr\u00eat\u00e9 \u00e0 plus ou moins br\u00e8ve \u00e9ch\u00e9ance le suivi et son traitement, entra\u00eenant des d\u00e9compensations se manifestant par de l\u2019h\u00e9t\u00e9ro-agressivit\u00e9 &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67a5a4ea16ab82b8b724057b\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Reims, 6 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b025\/00006)<\/a><\/strong>. Cette logique est reprise ici : le maintien de l\u2019hospitalisation compl\u00e8te appara\u00eet comme le seul moyen d\u2019assurer la continuit\u00e9 des soins et d\u2019\u00e9viter un danger imm\u00e9diat. La motivation de l\u2019ordonnance, bien que concise, satisfait ainsi \u00e0 l\u2019exigence de proportionnalit\u00e9.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-la-portee-de-lordonnance-dans-le-controle-des-mesures-privatives-de-liberte\">II. La port\u00e9e de l\u2019ordonnance dans le contr\u00f4le des mesures privatives de libert\u00e9<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-conformite-de-la-decision-aux-principes-du-contentieux-des-soins-psychiatri\">A. La conformit\u00e9 de la d\u00e9cision aux principes du contentieux des soins psychiatriques<\/h3>\n<p>L\u2019ordonnance s\u2019inscrit dans le cadre proc\u00e9dural fix\u00e9 par les articles L. 3211-12 et suivants du code de la sant\u00e9 publique. Le juge a respect\u00e9 les obligations de convocation du patient, du pr\u00e9fet et du directeur d\u2019\u00e9tablissement. Il a \u00e9galement recueilli l\u2019avis du minist\u00e8re public. Cette r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 formelle est essentielle pour garantir les droits de la personne hospitalis\u00e9e. Sur le fond, le juge s\u2019est appuy\u00e9 sur des \u00e9l\u00e9ments m\u00e9dicaux r\u00e9cents et concordants, ce qui d\u00e9montre une appr\u00e9ciation concr\u00e8te de la situation. La d\u00e9cision ne se contente pas de reprendre les termes de la requ\u00eate, mais op\u00e8re un contr\u00f4le de r\u00e9alit\u00e9. Elle contribue ainsi \u00e0 la jurisprudence selon laquelle le juge judiciaire est le gardien des libert\u00e9s individuelles en mati\u00e8re de soins psychiatriques contraints.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-les-perspectives-ouvertes-par-la-motivation-de-lordonnance\">B. Les perspectives ouvertes par la motivation de l\u2019ordonnance<\/h3>\n<p>La bri\u00e8vet\u00e9 de la motivation pourrait interroger quant \u00e0 son caract\u00e8re suffisant au regard de l\u2019article 5 de la Convention europ\u00e9enne des droits de l\u2019homme. Cependant, la d\u00e9cision mentionne explicitement les certificats m\u00e9dicaux et l\u2019avis motiv\u00e9. Cette motivation, bien que synth\u00e9tique, permet de comprendre le raisonnement du juge. \u00c0 l\u2019avenir, les juridictions pourraient \u00eatre amen\u00e9es \u00e0 pr\u00e9ciser davantage le lien entre les troubles et la compromission de la s\u00fbret\u00e9, notamment lorsque les certificats m\u00e9dicaux ne d\u00e9crivent pas d\u2019actes violents pr\u00e9cis. L\u2019ordonnance du 30 mars 2026 confirme n\u00e9anmoins que le juge dispose d\u2019une marge d\u2019appr\u00e9ciation pour \u00e9valuer la dangerosit\u00e9 potentielle, d\u00e8s lors que les certificats sont concordants et r\u00e9cents. Elle s\u2019inscrit dans une tendance jurisprudentielle \u00e0 la fois protectrice des libert\u00e9s et pragmatique face aux r\u00e9alit\u00e9s cliniques.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67cbe2698eed828b9952e79f\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel d\u2019Aix-en-Provence, le 6 mars 2025, n\u00b025\/00021<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67a5a4ea16ab82b8b724057b\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Reims, le 6 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b025\/00006<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006411192\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 749 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   Les dispositions du pr\u00e9sent livre s&#8217;appliquent devant toutes les juridictions de l&#8217;ordre judiciaire statuant en mati\u00e8re civile, commerciale, sociale, rurale ou prud&#8217;homale, sous r\u00e9serve des r\u00e8gles sp\u00e9ciales \u00e0 chaque mati\u00e8re et des dispositions particuli\u00e8res \u00e0 chaque juridiction.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000028016871\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 3213-1 du Code de la sant\u00e9 publique<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>I.-Le repr\u00e9sentant de l&#8217;Etat dans le d\u00e9partement prononce par arr\u00eat\u00e9, au vu d&#8217;un certificat m\u00e9dical circonstanci\u00e9 ne pouvant \u00e9maner d&#8217;un psychiatre exer\u00e7ant dans l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement d&#8217;accueil, l&#8217;admission en soins psychiatriques des personnes dont les troubles mentaux n\u00e9cessitent des soins et compromettent la s\u00fbret\u00e9 des personnes ou portent atteinte, de fa\u00e7on grave, \u00e0 l&#8217;ordre public. Les arr\u00eat\u00e9s pr\u00e9fectoraux sont motiv\u00e9s et \u00e9noncent avec pr\u00e9cision les circonstances qui ont rendu l&#8217;admission en soins n\u00e9cessaire. Ils d\u00e9signent l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement mentionn\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 3222-1 qui assure la prise en charge de la personne malade. <\/p>\n<p>Le directeur de l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement d&#8217;accueil transmet sans d\u00e9lai au repr\u00e9sentant de l&#8217;Etat dans le d\u00e9partement et \u00e0 la commission d\u00e9partementale des soins psychiatriques mentionn\u00e9e \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 3222-5 : <\/p>\n<p>1\u00b0 Le certificat m\u00e9dical mentionn\u00e9 au deuxi\u00e8me alin\u00e9a de l&#8217;article L. 3211-2-2 ; <\/p>\n<p>2\u00b0 Le certificat m\u00e9dical et, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, la proposition mentionn\u00e9s aux deux derniers alin\u00e9as du m\u00eame article L. 3211-2-2. <\/p>\n<p>II.-Dans un d\u00e9lai de trois jours francs suivant la r\u00e9ception du certificat m\u00e9dical mentionn\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;avant-dernier alin\u00e9a de l&#8217;article L. 3211-2-2, le repr\u00e9sentant de l&#8217;Etat dans le d\u00e9partement d\u00e9cide de la forme de prise en charge pr\u00e9vue \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 3211-2-1, en tenant compte de la proposition \u00e9tablie, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, par le psychiatre en application du dernier alin\u00e9a de l&#8217;article L. 3211-2-2 et des exigences li\u00e9es \u00e0 la s\u00fbret\u00e9 des personnes et \u00e0 l&#8217;ordre public. Il joint \u00e0 sa d\u00e9cision, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, le programme de soins \u00e9tabli par le psychiatre. <\/p>\n<p>Dans l&#8217;attente de la d\u00e9cision du repr\u00e9sentant de l&#8217;Etat, la personne malade est prise en charge sous la forme d&#8217;une hospitalisation compl\u00e8te. <\/p>\n<p>III.-Lorsque la proposition \u00e9tablie par le psychiatre en application de l&#8217;article L. 3211-2-2 recommande une prise en charge sous une autre forme que l&#8217;hospitalisation compl\u00e8te, le repr\u00e9sentant de l&#8217;Etat ne peut modifier la forme de prise en charge des personnes mentionn\u00e9es au II de l&#8217;article L. 3211-12 qu&#8217;apr\u00e8s avoir recueilli l&#8217;avis du coll\u00e8ge mentionn\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 3211-9. <\/p>\n<p>IV.-Les mesures provisoires, les d\u00e9cisions, les avis et les certificats m\u00e9dicaux mentionn\u00e9s au pr\u00e9sent chapitre figurent sur le registre mentionn\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 3212-11.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise a rendu une ordonnance autorisant le maintien de&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":4782,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cadccacdc6046d478cd400","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cadccacdc6046d478cd400","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cadccacdc6046d478cd400","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Pontoise","_kj_chambre":"JLD","_kj_rg":"26\/00559","_kj_date":"2026-03-30","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1236292","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00559 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise a rendu une ordonnance autorisant le maintien de...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00559\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise a rendu une ordonnance autorisant le maintien de...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-03T06:05:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/patrick-robert-doyle-OvXht_wi5Ew-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"5938\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3711\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00559\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-03T06:05:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1586,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/patrick-robert-doyle-OvXht_wi5Ew-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00559\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-03T06:05:25+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00559 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/patrick-robert-doyle-OvXht_wi5Ew-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-03T06:05:25+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise a rendu une ordonnance autorisant le maintien de...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/patrick-robert-doyle-OvXht_wi5Ew-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/patrick-robert-doyle-OvXht_wi5Ew-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":5938,\"height\":3711},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00559\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00559 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise a rendu une ordonnance autorisant le maintien de...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00559","og_description":"Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise a rendu une ordonnance autorisant le maintien de...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-03T06:05:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":5938,"height":3711,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/patrick-robert-doyle-OvXht_wi5Ew-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00559","datePublished":"2026-07-03T06:05:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\/"},"wordCount":1586,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/patrick-robert-doyle-OvXht_wi5Ew-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00559","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-03T06:05:25+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00559 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/patrick-robert-doyle-OvXht_wi5Ew-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-03T06:05:25+00:00","description":"Le 30 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise a rendu une ordonnance autorisant le maintien de...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/patrick-robert-doyle-OvXht_wi5Ew-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/patrick-robert-doyle-OvXht_wi5Ew-unsplash.webp","width":5938,"height":3711},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00559\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00559"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/patrick-robert-doyle-OvXht_wi5Ew-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-5bCc","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":441271,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-de-cassation-le-28-janvier-2026-n24-17-532\/","url_meta":{"origin":1236292,"position":0},"title":"Cour de cassation, le 28 janvier 2026, n\u00b024-17.532","author":"","date":"4 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La d\u00e9cision du 28 janvier 2026 illustre le contr\u00f4le exerc\u00e9 par la Cour de cassation sur les d\u00e9cisions de rejet non sp\u00e9cialement motiv\u00e9. Elle rappelle les...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour de cassation&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour de cassation","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-de-cassation\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":441512,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-de-cassation-le-27-janvier-2026-n25-85-427\/","url_meta":{"origin":1236292,"position":1},"title":"Cour de cassation, le 27 janvier 2026, n\u00b025-85.427","author":"","date":"4 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La chambre criminelle se prononce sur une question prioritaire de constitutionnalit\u00e9 incidente. Elle estime qu\u2019il n\u2019y a pas lieu \u00e0 renvoi au Conseil...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour de cassation&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour de cassation","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-de-cassation\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":441665,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-de-cassation-le-28-janvier-2026-n24-17-267\/","url_meta":{"origin":1236292,"position":2},"title":"Cour de cassation, le 28 janvier 2026, n\u00b024-17.267","author":"","date":"4 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Un \u00e9tranger en situation irr\u00e9guli\u00e8re, plac\u00e9 en r\u00e9tention administrative, saisit le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention. Le premier pr\u00e9sident de la cour...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour de cassation&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour de cassation","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-de-cassation\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/jez-timms-vTKLujPJecw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/jez-timms-vTKLujPJecw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/jez-timms-vTKLujPJecw-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/jez-timms-vTKLujPJecw-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/jez-timms-vTKLujPJecw-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/jez-timms-vTKLujPJecw-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":441309,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-de-cassation-le-28-janvier-2026-n24-11-095\/","url_meta":{"origin":1236292,"position":3},"title":"Cour de cassation, le 28 janvier 2026, n\u00b024-11.095","author":"","date":"4 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La Cour de cassation op\u00e8re un contr\u00f4le de la qualification juridique des faits. Elle censure partiellement un arr\u00eat d'appel pour d\u00e9faut de base l\u00e9gale. La...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour de cassation&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour de cassation","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-de-cassation\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/wesley-tingey-kjXbfNTPMHY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/wesley-tingey-kjXbfNTPMHY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/wesley-tingey-kjXbfNTPMHY-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/wesley-tingey-kjXbfNTPMHY-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/wesley-tingey-kjXbfNTPMHY-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/wesley-tingey-kjXbfNTPMHY-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":441191,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-de-cassation-le-28-janvier-2026-n23-21-317\/","url_meta":{"origin":1236292,"position":4},"title":"Cour de cassation, le 28 janvier 2026, n\u00b023-21.317","author":"","date":"4 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La Cour de cassation rejette le pourvoi par une d\u00e9cision non sp\u00e9cialement motiv\u00e9e. Elle applique l\u2019article 1014 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. Le rejet sans...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour de cassation&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour de cassation","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-de-cassation\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-WVPJ3ISFRZs-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-WVPJ3ISFRZs-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-WVPJ3ISFRZs-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-WVPJ3ISFRZs-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-WVPJ3ISFRZs-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-WVPJ3ISFRZs-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456773,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-nantes-29-01-2026-n-25nt03225\/","url_meta":{"origin":1236292,"position":5},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de NANTES \u2013 29\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25NT03225","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La pr\u00e9sente ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9-suspension intervient dans le cadre d\u2019un contentieux fiscal relatif \u00e0 des compl\u00e9ments d\u2019imposition sur le revenu. Le...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ruben-minguer-ohq49pdlt9w-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1236292","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1236292"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1236292\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4782"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1236292"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1236292"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1236292"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}