{"id":734382,"date":"2026-04-28T17:26:24","date_gmt":"2026-04-28T15:26:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\/"},"modified":"2026-04-28T17:26:24","modified_gmt":"2026-04-28T15:26:24","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 29 janvier 2026, n\u00b024\/01381"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, dans un jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire du 29 janvier 2026, a d\u00e9bout\u00e9 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 exploitante d\u2019autoroute de ses demandes indemnitaires. La demanderesse recherchait la garantie de l\u2019assureur du v\u00e9hicule impliqu\u00e9 dans un accident survenu le 23 janvier 2019. La question de droit centrale portait sur la charge de la preuve de la mat\u00e9rialit\u00e9 de l\u2019accident et du lien de causalit\u00e9. Le juge a estim\u00e9 que les \u00e9l\u00e9ments produits \u00e9taient insuffisants pour \u00e9tablir ces faits.<\/p>\n<p>I. L\u2019exigence d\u2019une preuve compl\u00e8te de l\u2019implication du v\u00e9hicule<\/p>\n<p>Le tribunal rappelle que l\u2019implication d\u2019un v\u00e9hicule dans un accident de la circulation est une condition essentielle du droit \u00e0 indemnisation. Il appartient \u00e0 la victime de d\u00e9montrer cette implication par des \u00e9l\u00e9ments objectifs et concordants. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, la demanderesse ne verse aux d\u00e9bats que des photographies non dat\u00e9es. Le juge consid\u00e8re que ces seuls clich\u00e9s sont insuffisants pour prouver la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 de l\u2019accident et son lien avec le pr\u00e9judice all\u00e9gu\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>A. La rigueur probatoire face \u00e0 l\u2019absence de pi\u00e8ces officielles<\/p>\n<p>Le jugement souligne l\u2019absence de tout constat amiable ou de proc\u00e8s-verbal de gendarmerie. Ces documents constituent des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de preuve privil\u00e9gi\u00e9s pour \u00e9tablir les circonstances d\u2019un sinistre routier. Leur absence prive le juge de toute certitude sur la date et le lieu de l\u2019accident. La d\u00e9cision affirme que les photographies produites sont insuffisantes pour d\u00e9montrer la mat\u00e9rialit\u00e9 de l\u2019accident et le dommage qui en r\u00e9sulterait (Motifs). Cette solution est d\u2019une grande rigueur, imposant \u00e0 la partie demanderesse de rassembler un faisceau d\u2019indices probants.<\/p>\n<p>B. La port\u00e9e de l\u2019article 1353 du code civil en mati\u00e8re de responsabilit\u00e9<\/p>\n<p>Le tribunal applique strictement la r\u00e8gle de la charge de la preuve issue de l\u2019article 1353 du code civil. Il incombe \u00e0 celui qui r\u00e9clame l\u2019ex\u00e9cution d\u2019une obligation de la prouver. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, la demanderesse \u00e9choue \u00e0 rapporter la preuve des faits n\u00e9cessaires au succ\u00e8s de sa pr\u00e9tention. Cette d\u00e9cision rappelle que le simple fait d\u2019invoquer un accident ne suffit pas \u00e0 engager la responsabilit\u00e9 de l\u2019assureur.<\/p>\n<p>II. Le rejet des demandes accessoires et la condamnation aux d\u00e9pens<\/p>\n<p>La demande de dommages et int\u00e9r\u00eats pour r\u00e9sistance abusive est \u00e9galement rejet\u00e9e par le tribunal. Cette demande \u00e9tait fond\u00e9e sur l\u2019article 1240 du code civil et le refus de l\u2019assureur d\u2019indemniser. Le juge estime que ce refus n\u2019\u00e9tait pas abusif, la demanderesse ne d\u00e9montrant pas le bien-fond\u00e9 de sa r\u00e9clamation principale.<\/p>\n<p>A. La qualification de la r\u00e9sistance abusive comme faute non \u00e9tablie<\/p>\n<p>L\u2019exercice d\u2019un droit de ne pas payer, m\u00eame s\u2019il s\u2019av\u00e8re infond\u00e9, ne constitue pas n\u00e9cessairement une faute. La r\u00e9sistance abusive suppose une mauvaise foi ou une l\u00e9g\u00e8ret\u00e9 bl\u00e2mable du d\u00e9biteur. En l\u2019absence de preuve de l\u2019obligation principale, le refus de l\u2019assureur ne peut \u00eatre qualifi\u00e9 d\u2019abusif. Le tribunal \u00e9carte donc logiquement cette demande accessoire, faute de fondement.<\/p>\n<p>B. L\u2019application de la r\u00e8gle de la succombance aux frais du proc\u00e8s<\/p>\n<p>La demanderesse, qui succombe int\u00e9gralement dans ses pr\u00e9tentions, est condamn\u00e9e aux d\u00e9pens de l\u2019instance. Cette condamnation est fond\u00e9e sur l\u2019article 696 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. Elle est \u00e9galement d\u00e9bout\u00e9e de sa demande au titre de l\u2019article 700 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. Cette solution est la cons\u00e9quence directe de l\u2019\u00e9chec de son action en justice.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000035651060\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 2314-23 du Code du travail<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Pour les salari\u00e9s mis \u00e0 disposition qui remplissent les conditions mentionn\u00e9es au 2\u00b0 de l&#8217;article L. 1111-2, la condition de pr\u00e9sence dans l&#8217;entreprise utilisatrice est de douze mois continus pour y \u00eatre \u00e9lecteur. Les salari\u00e9s mis \u00e0 disposition ne sont pas \u00e9ligibles dans l&#8217;entreprise utilisatrice. <\/p>\n<p>Les salari\u00e9s mis \u00e0 disposition qui remplissent les conditions mentionn\u00e9es au premier alin\u00e9a choisissent s&#8217;ils exercent leur droit de vote dans l&#8217;entreprise qui les emploie ou l&#8217;entreprise utilisatrice.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000032042341\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 1353 du Code civil<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">Celui qui r\u00e9clame l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution d&#8217;une obligation doit la prouver.<\/p>\n<p> R\u00e9ciproquement, celui qui se pr\u00e9tend lib\u00e9r\u00e9 doit justifier le paiement ou le fait qui a produit l&#8217;extinction de son obligation.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000032041571\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 1240 du Code civil<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">Tout fait quelconque de l&#8217;homme, qui cause \u00e0 autrui un dommage, oblige celui par la faute duquel il est arriv\u00e9 \u00e0 le r\u00e9parer. <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000042941174\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 696 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>La partie perdante est condamn\u00e9e aux d\u00e9pens, \u00e0 moins que le juge, par d\u00e9cision motiv\u00e9e, n&#8217;en mette la totalit\u00e9 ou une fraction \u00e0 la charge d&#8217;une autre partie.<\/p>\n<p>Les conditions dans lesquelles il peut \u00eatre mis \u00e0 la charge d&#8217;une partie qui b\u00e9n\u00e9ficie de l&#8217;aide juridictionnelle tout ou partie des d\u00e9pens de l&#8217;instance sont fix\u00e9es par les dispositions de la loi n\u00b0 91-647 du 10 juillet 1991 et du d\u00e9cret n\u00b0 2020-1717 du 28 d\u00e9cembre 2020.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000045268436\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 700 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Le juge condamne la partie tenue aux d\u00e9pens ou qui perd son proc\u00e8s \u00e0 payer :<\/p>\n<p>1\u00b0 A l&#8217;autre partie la somme qu&#8217;il d\u00e9termine, au titre des frais expos\u00e9s et non compris dans les d\u00e9pens ;<\/p>\n<p>2\u00b0 Et, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, \u00e0 l&#8217;avocat du b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de l&#8217;aide juridictionnelle partielle ou totale une somme au titre des honoraires et frais, non compris dans les d\u00e9pens, que le b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de l&#8217;aide aurait expos\u00e9s s&#8217;il n&#8217;avait pas eu cette aide. Dans ce cas, il est proc\u00e9d\u00e9 comme il est dit aux  alin\u00e9as 3 et 4 de l&#8217;article 37 de la loi n\u00b0 91-647 du 10 juillet 1991 .<\/p>\n<p>Dans tous les cas, le juge tient compte de l&#8217;\u00e9quit\u00e9 ou de la situation \u00e9conomique de la partie condamn\u00e9e. Il peut, m\u00eame d&#8217;office, pour des raisons tir\u00e9es des m\u00eames consid\u00e9rations, dire qu&#8217;il n&#8217;y a pas lieu \u00e0 ces condamnations.<\/p>\n<p>Les parties peuvent produire les justificatifs des sommes qu&#8217;elles demandent.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> La somme allou\u00e9e au titre du 2\u00b0 ne peut \u00eatre inf\u00e9rieure \u00e0 la part contributive de l&#8217;Etat major\u00e9e de 50 %.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, dans un jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire du 29 janvier 2026, a d\u00e9bout\u00e9 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 exploitante d\u2019autoroute de ses&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9577,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crdt_document":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"6984ed40cdc6046d47180eea","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6984ed40cdc6046d47180eea","_kj_judilibre_id":"6984ed40cdc6046d47180eea","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Nanterre","_kj_chambre":"2\u00e8me Chambre","_kj_rg":"24\/01381","_kj_date":"2026-01-29","_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-734382","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.6 (Yoast SEO v27.6) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 29 janvier 2026, n\u00b024\/01381 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, dans un jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire du 29 janvier 2026, a d\u00e9bout\u00e9 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 exploitante d\u2019autoroute de ses...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 29 janvier 2026, n\u00b024\/01381\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, dans un jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire du 29 janvier 2026, a d\u00e9bout\u00e9 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 exploitante d\u2019autoroute de ses...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-28T15:26:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"7000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"5000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 29 janvier 2026, n\u00b024\\\/01381\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-28T15:26:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1092,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 29 janvier 2026, n\u00b024\\\/01381\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-28T15:26:24+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 29 janvier 2026, n\u00b024\\\/01381 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-28T15:26:24+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, dans un jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire du 29 janvier 2026, a d\u00e9bout\u00e9 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 exploitante d\u2019autoroute de ses...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":7000,\"height\":5000},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 29 janvier 2026, n\u00b024\\\/01381\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 29 janvier 2026, n\u00b024\/01381 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, dans un jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire du 29 janvier 2026, a d\u00e9bout\u00e9 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 exploitante d\u2019autoroute de ses...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 29 janvier 2026, n\u00b024\/01381","og_description":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, dans un jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire du 29 janvier 2026, a d\u00e9bout\u00e9 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 exploitante d\u2019autoroute de ses...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-04-28T15:26:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":7000,"height":5000,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 29 janvier 2026, n\u00b024\/01381","datePublished":"2026-04-28T15:26:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\/"},"wordCount":1092,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 29 janvier 2026, n\u00b024\/01381","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-04-28T15:26:24+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 29 janvier 2026, n\u00b024\/01381 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-04-28T15:26:24+00:00","description":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, dans un jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire du 29 janvier 2026, a d\u00e9bout\u00e9 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 exploitante d\u2019autoroute de ses...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp","width":7000,"height":5000},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-01381\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 29 janvier 2026, n\u00b024\/01381"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-352S","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":496689,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-1-decembre-2025-n24-01702\/","url_meta":{"origin":734382,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 1 d\u00e9cembre 2025, n\u00b024\/01702","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire, statuant le 14 novembre 2024, examine une action en paiement de charges de copropri\u00e9t\u00e9. Le syndicat poursuit une copropri\u00e9taire...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/jessi-pena-N3mFhJ6cZPI-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/jessi-pena-N3mFhJ6cZPI-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/jessi-pena-N3mFhJ6cZPI-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/jessi-pena-N3mFhJ6cZPI-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/jessi-pena-N3mFhJ6cZPI-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/jessi-pena-N3mFhJ6cZPI-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":491837,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-17-novembre-2025-n24-01424\/","url_meta":{"origin":734382,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 17 novembre 2025, n\u00b024\/01424","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Paris, dans un jugement du 12 mars 2026, statue sur une opposition \u00e0 contrainte form\u00e9e par un d\u00e9biteur contre l'organisme de...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/leonard-cotte-R5scocnOOdM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/leonard-cotte-R5scocnOOdM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/leonard-cotte-R5scocnOOdM-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/leonard-cotte-R5scocnOOdM-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/leonard-cotte-R5scocnOOdM-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/leonard-cotte-R5scocnOOdM-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":496394,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-1-decembre-2025-n25-01553\/","url_meta":{"origin":734382,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 1 d\u00e9cembre 2025, n\u00b025\/01553","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le premier d\u00e9cembre 2025, examine une demande de d\u00e9placement d\u2019installations \u00e9lectriques....","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/xavier-s-7HJR2NQrBWw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/xavier-s-7HJR2NQrBWw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/xavier-s-7HJR2NQrBWw-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/xavier-s-7HJR2NQrBWw-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/xavier-s-7HJR2NQrBWw-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/xavier-s-7HJR2NQrBWw-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":495137,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-3-decembre-2025-n19-02852\/","url_meta":{"origin":734382,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 3 d\u00e9cembre 2025, n\u00b019\/02852","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, statuant en mati\u00e8re sociale, a rendu un jugement le 22 avril 2025. Une salari\u00e9e avait sollicit\u00e9 la reconnaissance du...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-KP0uq0vIgI4-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-KP0uq0vIgI4-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-KP0uq0vIgI4-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-KP0uq0vIgI4-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-KP0uq0vIgI4-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-KP0uq0vIgI4-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":494077,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-29-octobre-2025-n25-00458\/","url_meta":{"origin":734382,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 29 octobre 2025, n\u00b025\/00458","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 29 octobre 2025, examine une demande relative \u00e0 des d\u00e9sordres dans une copropri\u00e9t\u00e9. Une...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/steve-johnson-Zc8yTDRagWY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/steve-johnson-Zc8yTDRagWY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/steve-johnson-Zc8yTDRagWY-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/steve-johnson-Zc8yTDRagWY-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/steve-johnson-Zc8yTDRagWY-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/steve-johnson-Zc8yTDRagWY-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":494446,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-27-octobre-2025-n2025r00819\/","url_meta":{"origin":734382,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 27 octobre 2025, n\u00b02025R00819","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 27 octobre 2025, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d'une demande de provision. La requ\u00e9rante,...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tomas-williams-0i38SCsSxJc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tomas-williams-0i38SCsSxJc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tomas-williams-0i38SCsSxJc-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tomas-williams-0i38SCsSxJc-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tomas-williams-0i38SCsSxJc-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tomas-williams-0i38SCsSxJc-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/734382","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=734382"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/734382\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9577"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=734382"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=734382"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=734382"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}