{"id":902808,"date":"2026-05-16T03:37:46","date_gmt":"2026-05-16T01:37:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\/"},"modified":"2026-05-16T03:37:46","modified_gmt":"2026-05-16T01:37:46","slug":"cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour administrative d&#8217;appel de Nancy, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b024NC01492"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le contentieux des autorisations d&#8217;urbanisme impose au juge administratif un examen rigoureux de la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure suivie en premi\u00e8re instance et de la recevabilit\u00e9 des recours form\u00e9s par les tiers. L&#8217;arr\u00eat rendu par la cour administrative d&#8217;appel de Nancy le 30 avril 2026 illustre cette double exigence en sanctionnant un manquement au contradictoire avant de rejeter, sur le fond, la demande pour d\u00e9faut d&#8217;int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 agir.<\/p>\n<p>Une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 exploitant un stand de tir a d\u00e9pos\u00e9, le 7 juin 2022, une d\u00e9claration pr\u00e9alable portant sur l&#8217;exhaussement des buttes de protection du pas de tir. Par un arr\u00eat\u00e9 du 4 ao\u00fbt 2022, le maire de la commune ne s&#8217;est pas oppos\u00e9 \u00e0 cette d\u00e9claration. Un voisin, exploitant agricole et propri\u00e9taire de plusieurs parcelles situ\u00e9es \u00e0 proximit\u00e9, a sollicit\u00e9 l&#8217;annulation de cet arr\u00eat\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>Le tribunal administratif de Besan\u00e7on, par un jugement du 11 avril 2024, a rejet\u00e9 sa demande. Les premiers juges ont notamment consid\u00e9r\u00e9 que le requ\u00e9rant ne justifiait pas que les travaux entra\u00eeneraient une modification particuli\u00e8re des armes utilis\u00e9es ou une augmentation significative du nombre de personnes accueillies sur le pas de tir. Le m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9plique du requ\u00e9rant, re\u00e7u le 29 septembre 2023, soit la veille de la cl\u00f4ture de l&#8217;instruction, a \u00e9t\u00e9 vis\u00e9 sans \u00eatre analys\u00e9, le tribunal l&#8217;ayant regard\u00e9 comme tardif.<\/p>\n<p>Le requ\u00e9rant a relev\u00e9 appel. Il soutenait, \u00e0 titre principal, que le jugement \u00e9tait irr\u00e9gulier faute pour le tribunal d&#8217;avoir pris en compte son dernier m\u00e9moire, lequel apportait notamment des t\u00e9moignages relatifs \u00e0 la fr\u00e9quence et \u00e0 l&#8217;intensit\u00e9 des coups de feu. Au fond, il invoquait sa qualit\u00e9 d&#8217;exploitant des parcelles contig\u00fces et de propri\u00e9taire de plusieurs terrains voisins du stand de tir.<\/p>\n<p>Deux questions de droit se trouvaient ainsi soumises \u00e0 la cour. D&#8217;une part, le juge de premi\u00e8re instance peut-il, sans m\u00e9conna\u00eetre les exigences du contradictoire, \u00e9carter sans communication ni r\u00e9ponse un m\u00e9moire enregistr\u00e9 avant la cl\u00f4ture de l&#8217;instruction et apportant des \u00e9l\u00e9ments nouveaux ? D&#8217;autre part, un propri\u00e9taire de terres agricoles non construites, s\u00e9par\u00e9es du terrain d&#8217;assiette par un bois et un cours d&#8217;eau, peut-il \u00eatre regard\u00e9 comme voisin imm\u00e9diat et, \u00e0 d\u00e9faut, justifier d&#8217;un int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 agir au sens de l&#8217;article L. 600-1-2 du code de l&#8217;urbanisme ?<\/p>\n<p>La cour administrative d&#8217;appel de Nancy annule le jugement, \u00e9voque le litige et rejette la demande comme irrecevable. Elle juge qu&#8217;<em>&#8221; en jugeant que le requ\u00e9rant ne justifiait pas de ce que ces travaux auraient pour effet d&#8217;entrainer une modification particuli\u00e8re des armes utilis\u00e9es ni une modification significative du nombre de personnes accueillies sur le pas de tir, sans communiquer et r\u00e9pondre aux \u00e9l\u00e9ments nouveaux apport\u00e9s par M&#8230; dans son m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9plique, le tribunal a entach\u00e9 son jugement d&#8217;irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9 &#8220;<\/em>. Statuant apr\u00e8s \u00e9vocation, elle estime que le requ\u00e9rant <em>&#8221; ne peut \u00eatre regard\u00e9 comme voisin imm\u00e9diat &#8220;<\/em> et qu&#8217;il <em>&#8221; ne justifie pas d&#8217;un int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 agir contre l&#8217;arr\u00eat\u00e9 litigieux &#8220;<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>I. L&#8217;annulation du jugement pour m\u00e9connaissance des exigences du contradictoire<\/p>\n<p>A. La sanction du d\u00e9faut de prise en compte d&#8217;un m\u00e9moire utile<\/p>\n<p>La cour rel\u00e8ve d&#8217;abord une erreur mat\u00e9rielle dans le visa du jugement attaqu\u00e9. Le tribunal a mentionn\u00e9 que le m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9plique avait \u00e9t\u00e9 enregistr\u00e9 le 3 octobre 2023, post\u00e9rieurement \u00e0 la cl\u00f4ture de l&#8217;instruction, alors que les pi\u00e8ces de la proc\u00e9dure \u00e9tablissaient qu&#8217;il avait \u00e9t\u00e9 re\u00e7u le 29 septembre 2023, soit avant la cl\u00f4ture du 30 septembre suivant. Cette constatation factuelle commande la suite du raisonnement.<\/p>\n<p>L&#8217;office du juge administratif lui impose, d\u00e8s lors qu&#8217;un m\u00e9moire est produit avant la cl\u00f4ture, de l&#8217;examiner et, si celui-ci contient des \u00e9l\u00e9ments nouveaux, d&#8217;en assurer la communication aux autres parties. Cette exigence proc\u00e8de du principe du caract\u00e8re contradictoire de la proc\u00e9dure consacr\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 5 du code de justice administrative. La cour fait ici application de cette grille classique sans \u00e9noncer de r\u00e8gle in\u00e9dite.<\/p>\n<p>Le caract\u00e8re utile du m\u00e9moire \u00e9cart\u00e9 ressort des constatations de l&#8217;arr\u00eat. La cour souligne que ce m\u00e9moire <em>&#8221; apportait des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de preuve nouveaux et, notamment, des t\u00e9moignages tendant \u00e0 justifier que les travaux litigieux \u00e9taient de nature \u00e0 entra\u00eener une augmentation de la fr\u00e9quence et de l&#8217;intensit\u00e9 des coups de feu &#8220;<\/em>. Ces t\u00e9moignages portaient pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment sur la question d\u00e9battue devant les premiers juges, \u00e0 savoir l&#8217;intensification des nuisances g\u00e9n\u00e9r\u00e9es par l&#8217;activit\u00e9 de tir. L&#8217;omission n&#8217;\u00e9tait donc pas anodine.<\/p>\n<p>B. L&#8217;\u00e9vocation comme cons\u00e9quence proc\u00e9durale de l&#8217;irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9<\/p>\n<p>L&#8217;irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9 ainsi caract\u00e9ris\u00e9e entra\u00eene n\u00e9cessairement l&#8217;annulation du jugement. La cour use ensuite de la facult\u00e9 d&#8217;\u00e9vocation et statue imm\u00e9diatement sur la demande de premi\u00e8re instance. Cette technique permet d&#8217;\u00e9viter un renvoi \u00e0 la juridiction du premier degr\u00e9 et r\u00e9pond \u00e0 un objectif de bonne administration de la justice. Elle suppose toutefois que le litige soit en \u00e9tat d&#8217;\u00eatre jug\u00e9 au fond.<\/p>\n<p>L&#8217;\u00e9vocation n&#8217;est jamais automatique. Le juge d&#8217;appel appr\u00e9cie l&#8217;opportunit\u00e9 de statuer lui-m\u00eame au regard de l&#8217;\u00e9tat du dossier et des \u00e9critures produites devant lui. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, les \u00e9l\u00e9ments vers\u00e9s par les parties, y compris les t\u00e9moignages litigieux, permettaient \u00e0 la cour de se prononcer en toute connaissance de cause. L&#8217;option retenue assure ainsi une \u00e9conomie de proc\u00e9dure.<\/p>\n<p>Cette articulation conduit la cour \u00e0 examiner, dans la m\u00eame d\u00e9cision, la recevabilit\u00e9 de la demande et sa port\u00e9e. L&#8217;annulation du jugement ne pr\u00e9juge pas du sort de la requ\u00eate au fond. La suite de l&#8217;arr\u00eat illustre, \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard, qu&#8217;une victoire proc\u00e9durale ne garantit pas le succ\u00e8s au fond.<\/p>\n<p>II. Le rejet de la demande pour d\u00e9faut d&#8217;int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 agir du tiers<\/p>\n<p>A. La qualit\u00e9 de voisin imm\u00e9diat refus\u00e9e au propri\u00e9taire de terrains \u00e9loign\u00e9s<\/p>\n<p>L&#8217;article L. 600-1-2 du code de l&#8217;urbanisme conditionne la recevabilit\u00e9 du recours du tiers contre une autorisation d&#8217;urbanisme \u00e0 l&#8217;all\u00e9gation d&#8217;une atteinte directe \u00e0 ses conditions d&#8217;occupation, d&#8217;utilisation ou de jouissance. La cour rappelle, en des termes emprunt\u00e9s \u00e0 la jurisprudence administrative, le cadre d&#8217;analyse applicable. Le voisin imm\u00e9diat b\u00e9n\u00e9ficie, \u00e0 ce titre, d&#8217;une pr\u00e9somption simple d&#8217;int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 agir.<\/p>\n<p>La cour refuse toutefois cette qualit\u00e9 au requ\u00e9rant. Elle observe que ses parcelles sont <em>&#8221; s\u00e9par\u00e9es de la parcelle litigieuse par un bois et un cours d&#8217;eau &#8220;<\/em>, et que, malgr\u00e9 la proximit\u00e9 d&#8217;une portion de parcelle situ\u00e9e \u00e0 <em>&#8221; une quarantaine de m\u00e8tres &#8220;<\/em> du terrain d&#8217;assiette, la configuration des lieux exclut la qualification de voisin imm\u00e9diat. Le crit\u00e8re ne repose donc pas sur la seule distance m\u00e9trique, mais sur l&#8217;ensemble des \u00e9l\u00e9ments topographiques.<\/p>\n<p>Cette approche concr\u00e8te m\u00e9rite l&#8217;approbation. Elle \u00e9vite une lecture purement g\u00e9om\u00e9trique de la notion de voisinage. Une distance mod\u00e9r\u00e9e peut \u00eatre neutralis\u00e9e par la pr\u00e9sence d&#8217;obstacles visuels et physiques rendant peu plausible toute atteinte directe. La m\u00e9thode retenue privil\u00e9gie la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 mat\u00e9rielle sur les apparences cadastrales.<\/p>\n<p>La cour \u00e9carte \u00e9galement l&#8217;argument tir\u00e9 de la qualit\u00e9 d&#8217;exploitant. Le requ\u00e9rant se pr\u00e9valait de l&#8217;exploitation des parcelles contig\u00fces et d&#8217;un centre \u00e9questre voisin. La cour constate que les d\u00e9clarations <em>&#8221; telepac &#8220;<\/em> ne suffisent pas \u00e0 \u00e9tablir une exploitation effective et que le centre \u00e9questre rel\u00e8ve d&#8217;une association distincte, non partie \u00e0 l&#8217;instance. La qualit\u00e9 invoqu\u00e9e est ainsi priv\u00e9e d&#8217;assise probatoire.<\/p>\n<p>B. L&#8217;exigence d&#8217;\u00e9l\u00e9ments pr\u00e9cis sur l&#8217;atteinte aux conditions de jouissance<\/p>\n<p>Le rejet de la qualit\u00e9 de voisin imm\u00e9diat n&#8217;\u00e9puise pas le d\u00e9bat. La cour applique alors la r\u00e8gle compl\u00e9mentaire selon laquelle le propri\u00e9taire d&#8217;un terrain non construit peut justifier d&#8217;un int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 agir si la construction projet\u00e9e est, <em>&#8221; eu \u00e9gard \u00e0 ses caract\u00e9ristiques et \u00e0 la configuration des lieux en cause, de nature \u00e0 affecter directement les conditions de jouissance de son bien &#8220;<\/em>. Cette ouverture prot\u00e8ge le propri\u00e9taire foncier sans permettre l&#8217;actio popularis.<\/p>\n<p>L&#8217;examen demeure exigeant. La cour rel\u00e8ve que le requ\u00e9rant <em>&#8221; n&#8217;apporte par ailleurs aucun \u00e9l\u00e9ment relatif aux conditions d&#8217;occupation, d&#8217;utilisation ou de jouissance de ces terrains non construits qui pr\u00e9sentent les caract\u00e9ristiques de terres agricoles &#8220;<\/em>. La nature agricole du fonds n&#8217;interdit pas l&#8217;int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 agir, mais commande au requ\u00e9rant d&#8217;expliciter en quoi le projet affecterait l&#8217;usage de la parcelle.<\/p>\n<p>Les t\u00e9moignages produits, qui devaient pourtant emporter l&#8217;annulation du jugement, se r\u00e9v\u00e8lent insuffisants au stade du fond. La cour consid\u00e8re qu&#8217;ils n&#8217;\u00e9tablissent pas que les travaux, lesquels <em>&#8221; visent \u00e0 am\u00e9liorer la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 du centre de tir &#8220;<\/em>, <em>&#8221; seraient de nature \u00e0 entra\u00eener une augmentation de sa fr\u00e9quentation et des nuisances aff\u00e9rentes &#8220;<\/em>. Elle souligne, en outre, qu&#8217;<em>&#8221; il n&#8217;est pas contest\u00e9 que le tir en ext\u00e9rieur \u00e9tait pratiqu\u00e9 ant\u00e9rieurement \u00e0 ces travaux &#8220;<\/em>. L&#8217;existence pr\u00e9alable de l&#8217;activit\u00e9 prive l&#8217;all\u00e9gation de nuisance d&#8217;un v\u00e9ritable lien de causalit\u00e9 avec l&#8217;autorisation litigieuse.<\/p>\n<p>Cette appr\u00e9ciation traduit une vigilance accrue du juge administratif \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9gard des recours form\u00e9s contre les autorisations d&#8217;urbanisme. L&#8217;article L. 600-1-2 vise pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment \u00e0 endiguer les recours abusifs en imposant au requ\u00e9rant une d\u00e9monstration argument\u00e9e de l&#8217;atteinte invoqu\u00e9e. La solution s&#8217;inscrit dans la lign\u00e9e des d\u00e9cisions post\u00e9rieures \u00e0 l&#8217;ordonnance du 18 juillet 2013 ayant resserr\u00e9 la recevabilit\u00e9 de tels recours.<\/p>\n<p>La port\u00e9e de l&#8217;arr\u00eat demeure mesur\u00e9e. Il ne r\u00e9v\u00e8le aucune innovation jurisprudentielle, mais offre une illustration utile de la m\u00e9thode du juge administratif. Il rappelle, d&#8217;une part, que l&#8217;irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9 proc\u00e9durale ne profite pas n\u00e9cessairement au requ\u00e9rant sur le fond. Il confirme, d&#8217;autre part, que la qualit\u00e9 de voisin et l&#8217;int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 agir rel\u00e8vent d&#8217;une appr\u00e9ciation concr\u00e8te, attentive \u00e0 la configuration des lieux et \u00e0 la consistance probatoire des \u00e9critures produites.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000037667999\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 600-1-2 du Code de l&#8217;urbanisme<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Une personne autre que l&#8217;Etat, les collectivit\u00e9s territoriales ou leurs groupements ou une association n&#8217;est recevable \u00e0 former un recours pour exc\u00e8s de pouvoir contre une d\u00e9cision relative \u00e0 l&#8217;occupation ou \u00e0 l&#8217;utilisation du sol r\u00e9gie par le pr\u00e9sent code que si la construction, l&#8217;am\u00e9nagement ou le projet autoris\u00e9 sont de nature \u00e0 affecter directement les conditions d&#8217;occupation, d&#8217;utilisation ou de jouissance du bien qu&#8217;elle d\u00e9tient ou occupe r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement ou pour lequel elle b\u00e9n\u00e9ficie d&#8217;une promesse de vente, de bail, ou d&#8217;un contrat pr\u00e9liminaire mentionn\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 261-15 du code de la construction et de l&#8217;habitation.<\/p>\n<p>Le pr\u00e9sent article n&#8217;est pas applicable aux d\u00e9cisions contest\u00e9es par le p\u00e9titionnaire.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000034114651\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 5 du Code de justice administrative<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>L&#8217;instruction des affaires est contradictoire. Les exigences de la contradiction sont adapt\u00e9es \u00e0 celles de l&#8217;urgence, du secret de la d\u00e9fense nationale et de la protection de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 des personnes.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le contentieux des autorisations d&#8217;urbanisme impose au juge administratif un examen rigoureux de la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure suivie en premi\u00e8re instance&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9627,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"","_kj_official_id":"","_kj_official_url":"","_kj_judilibre_id":"","_kj_jur":"","_kj_lieu":"","_kj_chambre":"","_kj_rg":"","_kj_date":"","_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[40877,6454],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-902808","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-caa-de-nancy","category-decisions-juridiques"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour administrative d&#039;appel de Nancy, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b024NC01492 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le contentieux des autorisations d&#039;urbanisme impose au juge administratif un examen rigoureux de la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure suivie en premi\u00e8re instance...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour administrative d&#039;appel de Nancy, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b024NC01492\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le contentieux des autorisations d&#039;urbanisme impose au juge administratif un examen rigoureux de la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure suivie en premi\u00e8re instance...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-05-16T01:37:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-QO3j7qdSKv8-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"4016\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2657\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Cour administrative d&#8217;appel de Nancy, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b024NC01492\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-16T01:37:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1994,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-QO3j7qdSKv8-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"CAA de NANCY\",\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Cour administrative d&#8217;appel de Nancy, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b024NC01492\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"CAA de NANCY\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-16T01:37:46+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour administrative d'appel de Nancy, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b024NC01492 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-QO3j7qdSKv8-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-16T01:37:46+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le contentieux des autorisations d'urbanisme impose au juge administratif un examen rigoureux de la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure suivie en premi\u00e8re instance...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-QO3j7qdSKv8-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-QO3j7qdSKv8-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":4016,\"height\":2657},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Cour administrative d&rsquo;appel de Nancy, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b024NC01492\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour administrative d'appel de Nancy, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b024NC01492 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le contentieux des autorisations d'urbanisme impose au juge administratif un examen rigoureux de la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure suivie en premi\u00e8re instance...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour administrative d'appel de Nancy, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b024NC01492","og_description":"Le contentieux des autorisations d'urbanisme impose au juge administratif un examen rigoureux de la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure suivie en premi\u00e8re instance...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-05-16T01:37:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":4016,"height":2657,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-QO3j7qdSKv8-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Cour administrative d&#8217;appel de Nancy, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b024NC01492","datePublished":"2026-05-16T01:37:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\/"},"wordCount":1994,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-QO3j7qdSKv8-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["CAA de NANCY","D\u00e9cisions juridiques"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Cour administrative d&#8217;appel de Nancy, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b024NC01492","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"CAA de NANCY"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"}],"dateModified":"2026-05-16T01:37:46+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\/","name":"Cour administrative d'appel de Nancy, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b024NC01492 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-QO3j7qdSKv8-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-05-16T01:37:46+00:00","description":"Le contentieux des autorisations d'urbanisme impose au juge administratif un examen rigoureux de la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure suivie en premi\u00e8re instance...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-QO3j7qdSKv8-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-QO3j7qdSKv8-unsplash.webp","width":4016,"height":2657},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-30-avril-2026-n24nc01492\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cour administrative d&rsquo;appel de Nancy, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b024NC01492"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-QO3j7qdSKv8-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-3MRq","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":491238,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nancy-le-18-novembre-2025-n25-00449\/","url_meta":{"origin":902808,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Nancy, le 18 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/00449","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La cour d'appel de Nancy, statuant par ordonnance le 25 juillet 2025, se prononce sur une demande d'extension d'une expertise. Le litige oppose une...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-lFdweM584mQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-lFdweM584mQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-lFdweM584mQ-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-lFdweM584mQ-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-lFdweM584mQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-lFdweM584mQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456740,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-nancy-27-01-2026-n-23nc02842\/","url_meta":{"origin":902808,"position":1},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de NANCY \u2013 27\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 23NC02842","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La d\u00e9cision statuant sur le recours d\u2019un fonctionnaire suspendu proc\u00e8de \u00e0 un contr\u00f4le de l\u00e9galit\u00e9 approfondi de la mesure contest\u00e9e. Elle confirme le...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stephanie-leblanc-5dZBzZxISXE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stephanie-leblanc-5dZBzZxISXE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stephanie-leblanc-5dZBzZxISXE-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stephanie-leblanc-5dZBzZxISXE-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stephanie-leblanc-5dZBzZxISXE-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stephanie-leblanc-5dZBzZxISXE-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456782,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-nancy-28-01-2026-n-25nc02625\/","url_meta":{"origin":902808,"position":2},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de NANCY \u2013 28\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25NC02625","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"L\u2019ordonnance rendue par la cour administrative d\u2019appel statue sur un recours dirig\u00e9 contre une mesure d\u2019expertise ordonn\u00e9e en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9. Un incendie ayant...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-qhFXS18P2OQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-qhFXS18P2OQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-qhFXS18P2OQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-qhFXS18P2OQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-qhFXS18P2OQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-qhFXS18P2OQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":494048,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nancy-le-4-novembre-2025-n2025008513\/","url_meta":{"origin":902808,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nancy, le 4 novembre 2025, n\u00b02025008513","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal des Activit\u00e9s Economiques de Nancy, le 4 novembre 2025, ouvre une liquidation judiciaire simplifi\u00e9e. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9, en cessation des paiements, a...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mediamodifier-En1_jJx6UDU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mediamodifier-En1_jJx6UDU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mediamodifier-En1_jJx6UDU-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mediamodifier-En1_jJx6UDU-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mediamodifier-En1_jJx6UDU-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mediamodifier-En1_jJx6UDU-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":458436,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-nancy-18-12-2025-n-24nc02473\/","url_meta":{"origin":902808,"position":4},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de NANCY \u2013 18\/12\/2025 \u2013 n\u00b0 24NC02473","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La Cour administrative d'appel de Nancy, dans son arr\u00eat du 18 d\u00e9cembre 2025, se prononce sur la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 d'un jugement rendu par un magistrat unique. Un...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luca-trassini-OhaRmr5mJYA-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luca-trassini-OhaRmr5mJYA-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luca-trassini-OhaRmr5mJYA-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luca-trassini-OhaRmr5mJYA-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luca-trassini-OhaRmr5mJYA-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luca-trassini-OhaRmr5mJYA-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":457757,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-nancy-30-12-2025-n-22nc02918\/","url_meta":{"origin":902808,"position":5},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de NANCY \u2013 30\/12\/2025 \u2013 n\u00b0 22NC02918","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La cour administrative d\u2019appel de Nancy a rendu, le 30 d\u00e9cembre 2025, une d\u00e9cision pr\u00e9cisant les conditions de suspension d\u2019un ma\u00eetre de conf\u00e9rences. Un...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-3UfkjHxVch0-unsplash-2.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-3UfkjHxVch0-unsplash-2.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-3UfkjHxVch0-unsplash-2.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-3UfkjHxVch0-unsplash-2.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-3UfkjHxVch0-unsplash-2.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-3UfkjHxVch0-unsplash-2.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/902808","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=902808"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/902808\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9627"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=902808"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=902808"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=902808"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}