{"id":564420,"date":"2026-04-15T03:59:02","date_gmt":"2026-04-15T01:59:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2026594-hoge-raad-10-04-2026-25-02682\/"},"modified":"2026-04-15T03:59:02","modified_gmt":"2026-04-15T01:59:02","slug":"eclinlhr2026594-hoge-raad-10-04-2026-25-02682","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2026594-hoge-raad-10-04-2026-25-02682\/","title":{"rendered":"ECLI:NL:HR:2026:594 Hoge Raad , 10-04-2026 \/ 25\/02682"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Inhoudsindicatie.<\/strong> Art. 81 lid 1 RO. Arbeidsrecht. Ontslagrecht. Ontbinding arbeidsovereenkomst (art. 7:671b BW jo. art. 7:669 lid 3 BW), i-grond (cumulatiegrond), stelplicht werkgever, motivering, passeren bewijsaanbod.<\/p>\n

HOGE RAAD DER NEDERLANDEN<\/p>\n

CIVIELE KAMER<\/p>\n

Nummer 25\/02682<\/p>\n

Datum 10 april 2026<\/p>\n

BESCHIKKING<\/p>\n

In de zaak van<\/p>\n

[verzoeker],<\/p>\n

wonende te [woonplaats],<\/p>\n

VERZOEKER tot cassatie,<\/p>\n

hierna: [verzoeker],<\/p>\n

advocaat: M.J. van Basten Batenburg,<\/p>\n

tegen<\/p>\n

STICHTING MAASWONEN,<\/p>\n

gevestigd te Rotterdam,<\/p>\n

VERWEERSTER in cassatie,<\/p>\n

hierna: MaasWonen,<\/p>\n

advocaat: S.F. Sagel.<\/p>\n

1Procesverloop<\/h3>\n

Voor het verloop van het geding in feitelijke instanties verwijst de Hoge Raad naar:<\/p>\n

a. de beschikkingen in de zaak 10922639 VZ VERZ 24-1047 van de rechtbank Rotterdam van 8 mei 2024 en 2 oktober 2024;<\/p>\n

b. de beschikking in de zaak 200.349.323\/01 van het gerechtshof Den Haag van 20 mei 2025.<\/p>\n

[verzoeker] heeft tegen de beschikking van het hof beroep in cassatie ingesteld.<\/p>\n

MaasWonen heeft een verweerschrift tot verwerping ingediend.<\/p>\n

De conclusie van de Advocaat-Generaal B.J. Drijber strekt tot verwerping van het cassatieberoep.<\/p>\n

De advocaat van [verzoeker] heeft schriftelijk op die conclusie gereageerd.<\/p>\n

2Beoordeling van het middel<\/h3>\n

De Hoge Raad heeft de klachten over de beschikking van het hof beoordeeld. De uitkomst hiervan is dat deze klachten niet kunnen leiden tot vernietiging van die beschikking. De Hoge Raad hoeft niet te motiveren waarom hij tot dit oordeel is gekomen. Bij de beoordeling van deze klachten is het namelijk niet nodig om antwoord te geven op vragen die van belang zijn voor de eenheid of de ontwikkeling van het recht (zie artikel 81 lid 1 van de Wet op de rechterlijke organisatie).<\/p>\n

3Beslissing<\/h3>\n

De Hoge Raad:<\/p>\n

– verwerpt het beroep;<\/p>\n

– veroordeelt [verzoeker] in de kosten van het geding in cassatie, tot op deze uitspraak aan de zijde van MaasWonen begroot op \u20ac 905,– aan verschotten en \u20ac 1.800,– voor salaris, vermeerderd met de wettelijke rente over deze kosten indien [verzoeker] deze niet binnen veertien dagen na heden heeft voldaan.<\/p>\n

Deze beschikking is gegeven door de vicepresident M.V. Polak als voorzitter en de raadsheren C.E. du Perron, A.E.B. ter Heide, S.J. Schaafsma en F.R. Salomons, en in het openbaar uitgesproken door de raadsheer A.E.B. ter Heide op 10 april 2026.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Rechtspraak.nl open data, Creative Commons Zero. Volume cible 1.8M decisions.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Art. 81 lid 1 RO. Arbeidsrecht. Ontslagrecht. Ontbinding arbeidsovereenkomst (art. 7:671b BW jo. art. 7:669 lid 3 BW), i-grond (cumulatiegrond), stelplicht werkgever, motivering, passeren bewijsaanbod.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7669],"kji_court":[7834],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[7610],"kji_subject":[7712],"kji_keyword":[8660,11069,11151,8009,11150],"kji_language":[7671],"class_list":["post-564420","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-pays-bas","kji_court-hoge-raad","kji_year-7610","kji_subject-social","kji_keyword-arbeidsovereenkomst","kji_keyword-arbeidsrecht","kji_keyword-i-grond","kji_keyword-ontbinding","kji_keyword-ontslagrecht","kji_language-nl"],"yoast_head":"\nECLI:NL:HR:2026:594 Hoge Raad , 10-04-2026 \/ 25\/02682 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2026594-hoge-raad-10-04-2026-25-02682\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"pt_PT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ECLI:NL:HR:2026:594 Hoge Raad , 10-04-2026 \/ 25\/02682\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Art. 81 lid 1 RO. Arbeidsrecht. Ontslagrecht. Ontbinding arbeidsovereenkomst (art. 7:671b BW jo. art. 7:669 lid 3 BW), i-grond (cumulatiegrond), stelplicht werkgever, motivering, passeren bewijsaanbod.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2026594-hoge-raad-10-04-2026-25-02682\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Tempo estimado de leitura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 minutos\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlhr2026594-hoge-raad-10-04-2026-25-02682\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlhr2026594-hoge-raad-10-04-2026-25-02682\\\/\",\"name\":\"ECLI:NL:HR:2026:594 Hoge Raad , 10-04-2026 \\\/ 25\\\/02682 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-15T01:59:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlhr2026594-hoge-raad-10-04-2026-25-02682\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlhr2026594-hoge-raad-10-04-2026-25-02682\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlhr2026594-hoge-raad-10-04-2026-25-02682\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"ECLI:NL:HR:2026:594 Hoge Raad , 10-04-2026 \\\/ 25\\\/02682\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ECLI:NL:HR:2026:594 Hoge Raad , 10-04-2026 \/ 25\/02682 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2026594-hoge-raad-10-04-2026-25-02682\/","og_locale":"pt_PT","og_type":"article","og_title":"ECLI:NL:HR:2026:594 Hoge Raad , 10-04-2026 \/ 25\/02682","og_description":"Art. 81 lid 1 RO. Arbeidsrecht. Ontslagrecht. Ontbinding arbeidsovereenkomst (art. 7:671b BW jo. art. 7:669 lid 3 BW), i-grond (cumulatiegrond), stelplicht werkgever, motivering, passeren bewijsaanbod.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2026594-hoge-raad-10-04-2026-25-02682\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Tempo estimado de leitura":"2 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2026594-hoge-raad-10-04-2026-25-02682\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2026594-hoge-raad-10-04-2026-25-02682\/","name":"ECLI:NL:HR:2026:594 Hoge Raad , 10-04-2026 \/ 25\/02682 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-15T01:59:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2026594-hoge-raad-10-04-2026-25-02682\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"pt-PT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2026594-hoge-raad-10-04-2026-25-02682\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2026594-hoge-raad-10-04-2026-25-02682\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ECLI:NL:HR:2026:594 Hoge Raad , 10-04-2026 \/ 25\/02682"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"pt-PT"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-PT","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/564420","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=564420"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=564420"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=564420"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=564420"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=564420"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=564420"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=564420"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=564420"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}