{"id":1196758,"date":"2026-06-26T00:24:18","date_gmt":"2026-06-25T22:24:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\/"},"modified":"2026-06-26T00:24:18","modified_gmt":"2026-06-25T22:24:18","slug":"tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 2 avril 2026, n\u00b02026016161"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-lapplication-souple-des-conditions-legales-de-prorogation-du-delai-de-cloture\">I. L\u2019application souple des conditions l\u00e9gales de prorogation du d\u00e9lai de cl\u00f4ture<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-caracterisation-dune-necessite-fondee-sur-les-motifs-exposes\">A. La caract\u00e9risation d\u2019une n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 fond\u00e9e sur les motifs expos\u00e9s<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-labsence-de-verification-contradictoire-des-conditions-de-fond\">B. L\u2019absence de v\u00e9rification contradictoire des conditions de fond<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-la-portee-ambivalente-du-jugement-sur-loffice-du-juge-et-lequilibre-procedura\">II. La port\u00e9e ambivalente du jugement sur l\u2019office du juge et l\u2019\u00e9quilibre proc\u00e9dural<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-laffirmation-dun-pouvoir-discretionnaire-du-juge-dans-la-prorogation\">A. L\u2019affirmation d\u2019un pouvoir discr\u00e9tionnaire du juge dans la prorogation<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-lequilibre-entre-celerite-de-la-procedure-et-protection-du-debiteur\">B. L\u2019\u00e9quilibre entre c\u00e9l\u00e9rit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure et protection du d\u00e9biteur<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le 2 avril 2026, le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Paris, statuant en mati\u00e8re de proc\u00e9dure collective, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par le mandataire judiciaire liquidateur d\u2019une requ\u00eate tendant \u00e0 la prorogation du d\u00e9lai de cl\u00f4ture de la liquidation judiciaire ouverte \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9gard d\u2019une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 commerciale. Le repr\u00e9sentant l\u00e9gal de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9, r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement convoqu\u00e9, \u00e9tait absent \u00e0 l\u2019audience. Le mandataire liquidateur sollicitait le b\u00e9n\u00e9fice des dispositions de l\u2019article L.643-9 du code de commerce pour obtenir un report d\u2019un an du terme auquel la cl\u00f4ture de la proc\u00e9dure devait \u00eatre examin\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<p>La proc\u00e9dure a \u00e9t\u00e9 marqu\u00e9e par le d\u00e9p\u00f4t de la requ\u00eate au greffe le 16 f\u00e9vrier 2026, l\u2019avis donn\u00e9 au d\u00e9biteur et la production d\u2019un rapport favorable du juge-commissaire. Les motifs expos\u00e9s \u00e0 l\u2019appui de la demande ont \u00e9t\u00e9 jug\u00e9s suffisants par le tribunal pour justifier l\u2019accueil de la requ\u00eate. Le liquidateur soutenait que la poursuite des op\u00e9rations de liquidation justifiait ce report, tandis que le d\u00e9biteur, bien que convoqu\u00e9, n\u2019a pas comparu ni formul\u00e9 d\u2019opposition. La question de droit pos\u00e9e au tribunal \u00e9tait de d\u00e9terminer si les conditions l\u00e9gales de prorogation du d\u00e9lai de cl\u00f4ture de la liquidation judiciaire, telles que pr\u00e9vues \u00e0 l\u2019article L.643-9 du code de commerce, \u00e9taient r\u00e9unies en l\u2019esp\u00e8ce.<\/p>\n<p>Le tribunal a fait droit \u00e0 la demande en prorogeant le d\u00e9lai de cl\u00f4ture d\u2019un an, fixant au 2 avril 2027 le terme auquel la cl\u00f4ture devra \u00eatre examin\u00e9e. Il a maintenu le juge-commissaire et le mandataire liquidateur dans leurs fonctions, et a dit que les d\u00e9pens seraient port\u00e9s en frais privil\u00e9gi\u00e9s de proc\u00e9dure collective. La d\u00e9cision interroge tant sur les conditions de mise en \u0153uvre du texte que sur la port\u00e9e du contr\u00f4le du juge en la mati\u00e8re.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-lapplication-souple-des-conditions-legales-de-prorogation-du-delai-de-cloture\">I. L\u2019application souple des conditions l\u00e9gales de prorogation du d\u00e9lai de cl\u00f4ture<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-caracterisation-dune-necessite-fondee-sur-les-motifs-exposes\">A. La caract\u00e9risation d\u2019une n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 fond\u00e9e sur les motifs expos\u00e9s<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal a accueilli la requ\u00eate en relevant que <em>&#8221; les motifs y expos\u00e9s justifiant son accueil &#8220;<\/em>, sans autre pr\u00e9cision sur la nature de ces motifs. L\u2019article L.643-9 du code de commerce dispose que <em>&#8221; lorsque la cl\u00f4ture ne peut \u00eatre prononc\u00e9e au terme de ce d\u00e9lai, le tribunal peut proroger le terme par une d\u00e9cision motiv\u00e9e &#8220;<\/em>. La motivation retenue par le tribunal est particuli\u00e8rement succincte puisqu\u2019elle se limite \u00e0 renvoyer aux motifs contenus dans la requ\u00eate du liquidateur. Cette \u00e9conomie de moyens contraste avec l\u2019exigence de motivation impos\u00e9e par le texte, qui requiert une d\u00e9cision motiv\u00e9e du tribunal lui-m\u00eame, non un simple renvoi aux \u00e9critures d\u2019une partie. La Cour d\u2019appel de Toulouse a rappel\u00e9 que <em>&#8221; le tribunal peut proroger le terme par une d\u00e9cision motiv\u00e9e &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67b574f5726087b909f99c43\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Toulouse, 18 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b024\/00690)<\/a><\/strong>, soulignant ainsi que la motivation doit \u00e9maner du juge et non du requ\u00e9rant. Le tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques semble avoir estim\u00e9 que la seule existence d\u2019une requ\u00eate appuy\u00e9e par le rapport favorable du juge-commissaire suffisait \u00e0 caract\u00e9riser le bien-fond\u00e9 de la demande.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-labsence-de-verification-contradictoire-des-conditions-de-fond\">B. L\u2019absence de v\u00e9rification contradictoire des conditions de fond<\/h3>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision a \u00e9t\u00e9 rendue par jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire, le d\u00e9biteur \u00e9tant absent bien que convoqu\u00e9. L\u2019article L.643-9 exige que le d\u00e9biteur soit <em>&#8221; entendu ou d\u00fbment appel\u00e9 &#8220;<\/em>. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, la convocation a \u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement effectu\u00e9e, et l\u2019absence du d\u00e9biteur a \u00e9t\u00e9 constat\u00e9e. Toutefois, le tribunal n\u2019a pas proc\u00e9d\u00e9 \u00e0 une v\u00e9rification contradictoire des conditions de fond de la prorogation. Il n\u2019a pas examin\u00e9 si la poursuite des op\u00e9rations de liquidation \u00e9tait effectivement rendue n\u00e9cessaire par l\u2019\u00e9tat de l\u2019actif ou du passif. La d\u00e9cision s\u2019appuie exclusivement sur le rapport du juge-commissaire et la requ\u00eate du liquidateur. Ce faisant, le tribunal a fait pr\u00e9valoir une approche pragmatique sur un contr\u00f4le contentieux approfondi, s\u2019en remettant \u00e0 l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation des organes de la proc\u00e9dure. La question se pose de savoir si un tel contr\u00f4le all\u00e9g\u00e9 est compatible avec l\u2019office du juge, qui doit s\u2019assurer que les conditions l\u00e9gales sont remplies avant de proroger un d\u00e9lai dont l\u2019\u00e9ch\u00e9ance conditionne la sortie du d\u00e9biteur de la proc\u00e9dure collective.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-la-portee-ambivalente-du-jugement-sur-loffice-du-juge-et-lequilibre-procedura\">II. La port\u00e9e ambivalente du jugement sur l\u2019office du juge et l\u2019\u00e9quilibre proc\u00e9dural<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-laffirmation-dun-pouvoir-discretionnaire-du-juge-dans-la-prorogation\">A. L\u2019affirmation d\u2019un pouvoir discr\u00e9tionnaire du juge dans la prorogation<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal a exerc\u00e9 la facult\u00e9 que lui conf\u00e8re l\u2019article L.643-9 de proroger le d\u00e9lai de cl\u00f4ture, sans s\u2019estimer tenu par un motif imp\u00e9rieux ou une d\u00e9monstration pr\u00e9alable. La d\u00e9cision traduit une conception large du pouvoir du juge en mati\u00e8re de prorogation, con\u00e7u comme une mesure de gestion de la proc\u00e9dure collective. Le rapport favorable du juge-commissaire a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9terminant, mais le tribunal n\u2019a pas explicit\u00e9 en quoi les motifs expos\u00e9s par le liquidateur \u00e9taient juridiquement ou factuellement pertinents. Cette approche conf\u00e8re au juge un pouvoir discr\u00e9tionnaire qui, bien que pr\u00e9vu par la lettre du texte, peut susciter des interrogations quant \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9tendue du contr\u00f4le juridictionnel. En effet, le texte \u00e9nonce une facult\u00e9 (<em>&#8221; peut proroger &#8220;<\/em>), mais il ne dispense pas le juge de v\u00e9rifier la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 de l\u2019impossibilit\u00e9 de clore la proc\u00e9dure. La d\u00e9cision comment\u00e9e s\u2019inscrit dans une tendance jurisprudentielle qui privil\u00e9gie la souplesse de gestion des proc\u00e9dures collectives, au risque de r\u00e9duire le contr\u00f4le au seul visa du rapport.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-lequilibre-entre-celerite-de-la-procedure-et-protection-du-debiteur\">B. L\u2019\u00e9quilibre entre c\u00e9l\u00e9rit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure et protection du d\u00e9biteur<\/h3>\n<p>Le jugement a \u00e9t\u00e9 rendu sans que le d\u00e9biteur, pourtant convoqu\u00e9, ne comparaisse. La proc\u00e9dure r\u00e9put\u00e9e contradictoire a permis au tribunal de statuer en son absence. Si l\u2019article 659 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile encadre la signification des actes en cas de domicile inconnu, la convocation r\u00e9guli\u00e8re vaut respect du contradictoire, comme l\u2019a rappel\u00e9 la Cour d\u2019appel d\u2019Aix-en-Provence pour qui <em>&#8221; la signification du jugement effectu\u00e9e le 8 f\u00e9vrier 2023 est irr\u00e9guli\u00e8re et l\u2019appel sera d\u00e9clar\u00e9 recevable &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6789fa590c7dc206c9eb7f6b\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel d\u2019Aix-en-Provence, 16 janvier 2025, n\u00b024\/01887)<\/a><\/strong>. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, la convocation n\u2019a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 critiqu\u00e9e, et le tribunal a pu statuer valablement. Cependant, la c\u00e9l\u00e9rit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure ne doit pas occulter la protection du d\u00e9biteur, qui peut voir sa situation prolong\u00e9e sans pouvoir contester utilement les motifs de la prorogation. L\u2019absence de motivation d\u00e9taill\u00e9e du jugement prive le d\u00e9biteur d\u2019une base pour exercer un recours \u00e9clair\u00e9. La d\u00e9cision illustre la tension constante entre l\u2019efficacit\u00e9 des proc\u00e9dures collectives et les droits de la d\u00e9fense, tension que le juge doit concilier au cas par cas. Le choix du tribunal de proroger le d\u00e9lai sans explication plus circonstanci\u00e9e r\u00e9v\u00e8le une confiance accord\u00e9e aux organes de la proc\u00e9dure, mais laisse planer un doute sur la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 du contr\u00f4le juridictionnel exerc\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67b574f5726087b909f99c43\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Toulouse, le 18 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b024\/00690<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6789fa590c7dc206c9eb7f6b\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel d\u2019Aix-en-Provence, le 16 janvier 2025, n\u00b024\/01887<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000028724265\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 643-9 du Code de commerce<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Dans le jugement qui ouvre ou prononce la liquidation judiciaire, le tribunal fixe le d\u00e9lai au terme duquel la cl\u00f4ture de la proc\u00e9dure devra \u00eatre examin\u00e9e. Si la cl\u00f4ture ne peut \u00eatre prononc\u00e9e au terme de ce d\u00e9lai, le tribunal peut proroger le terme par une d\u00e9cision motiv\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<p>Lorsqu&#8217;il n&#8217;existe plus de passif exigible ou que le liquidateur dispose de sommes suffisantes pour d\u00e9sint\u00e9resser les cr\u00e9anciers, ou lorsque la poursuite des op\u00e9rations de liquidation judiciaire est rendue impossible en raison de l&#8217;insuffisance de l&#8217;actif, ou encore lorsque l&#8217;int\u00e9r\u00eat de cette poursuite est disproportionn\u00e9 par rapport aux difficult\u00e9s de r\u00e9alisation des actifs r\u00e9siduels la cl\u00f4ture de la liquidation judiciaire est prononc\u00e9e par le tribunal, le d\u00e9biteur entendu ou d\u00fbment appel\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>Le tribunal peut \u00e9galement prononcer la cl\u00f4ture de la proc\u00e9dure en d\u00e9signant un mandataire ayant pour mission de poursuivre les instances en cours et de r\u00e9partir, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, les sommes per\u00e7ues \u00e0 l&#8217;issue de celles-ci lorsque cette cl\u00f4ture n&#8217;appara\u00eet pas pouvoir \u00eatre prononc\u00e9e pour extinction du passif. <\/p>\n<p>Le tribunal est saisi \u00e0 tout moment par le liquidateur, le d\u00e9biteur ou le minist\u00e8re public. Il peut se saisir d&#8217;office. A l&#8217;expiration d&#8217;un d\u00e9lai de deux ans \u00e0 compter du jugement de liquidation judiciaire, tout cr\u00e9ancier peut \u00e9galement saisir le tribunal aux fins de cl\u00f4ture de la proc\u00e9dure.<\/p>\n<p>En cas de plan de cession, le tribunal ne prononce la cl\u00f4ture de la proc\u00e9dure qu&#8217;apr\u00e8s avoir constat\u00e9 le respect de ses obligations par le cessionnaire.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006411032\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 659 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Lorsque la personne \u00e0 qui l&#8217;acte doit \u00eatre signifi\u00e9 n&#8217;a ni domicile, ni r\u00e9sidence, ni lieu de travail connus, l&#8217;huissier de justice dresse un proc\u00e8s-verbal o\u00f9 il relate avec pr\u00e9cision les diligences qu&#8217;il a accomplies pour rechercher le destinataire de l&#8217;acte.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Le m\u00eame jour ou, au plus tard, le premier jour ouvrable suivant, \u00e0 peine de nullit\u00e9, l&#8217;huissier de justice envoie au destinataire, \u00e0 la derni\u00e8re adresse connue, par lettre recommand\u00e9e avec demande d&#8217;avis de r\u00e9ception, une copie du proc\u00e8s-verbal, \u00e0 laquelle est jointe une copie de l&#8217;acte objet de la signification.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Le jour m\u00eame, l&#8217;huissier de justice avise le destinataire, par lettre simple, de l&#8217;accomplissement de cette formalit\u00e9.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Les dispositions du pr\u00e9sent article sont applicables \u00e0 la signification d&#8217;un acte concernant une personne morale qui n&#8217;a plus d&#8217;\u00e9tablissement connu au lieu indiqu\u00e9 comme si\u00e8ge social par le registre du commerce et des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le 2 avril 2026, le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Paris, statuant en mati\u00e8re de proc\u00e9dure collective, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par le mandataire judiciaire&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":4775,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"6a0ead87cdc6046d47679922","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6a0ead87cdc6046d47679922","_kj_judilibre_id":"6a0ead87cdc6046d47679922","_kj_jur":"Tribunal de commerce","_kj_lieu":"Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Paris","_kj_chambre":"Chambre 2-5","_kj_rg":"2026016161","_kj_date":"2026-04-02","_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,7207],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1196758","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-de-commerce"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 2 avril 2026, n\u00b02026016161 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le 2 avril 2026, le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Paris, statuant en mati\u00e8re de proc\u00e9dure collective, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par le mandataire judiciaire...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"pt_PT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 2 avril 2026, n\u00b02026016161\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le 2 avril 2026, le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Paris, statuant en mati\u00e8re de proc\u00e9dure collective, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par le mandataire judiciaire...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-25T22:24:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"5700\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Escrito por\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tempo estimado de leitura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutos\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 2 avril 2026, n\u00b02026016161\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-25T22:24:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1867,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal de commerce\"],\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 2 avril 2026, n\u00b02026016161\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-25T22:24:18+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 2 avril 2026, n\u00b02026016161 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-25T22:24:18+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le 2 avril 2026, le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Paris, statuant en mati\u00e8re de proc\u00e9dure collective, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par le mandataire judiciaire...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":5700,\"height\":3800},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 2 avril 2026, n\u00b02026016161\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 2 avril 2026, n\u00b02026016161 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le 2 avril 2026, le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Paris, statuant en mati\u00e8re de proc\u00e9dure collective, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par le mandataire judiciaire...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\/","og_locale":"pt_PT","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 2 avril 2026, n\u00b02026016161","og_description":"Le 2 avril 2026, le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Paris, statuant en mati\u00e8re de proc\u00e9dure collective, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par le mandataire judiciaire...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-06-25T22:24:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":5700,"height":3800,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Escrito por":"Kohen","Tempo estimado de leitura":"9 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 2 avril 2026, n\u00b02026016161","datePublished":"2026-06-25T22:24:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\/"},"wordCount":1867,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal de commerce"],"inLanguage":"pt-PT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 2 avril 2026, n\u00b02026016161","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal de commerce"}],"dateModified":"2026-06-25T22:24:18+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\/","name":"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 2 avril 2026, n\u00b02026016161 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-25T22:24:18+00:00","description":"Le 2 avril 2026, le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Paris, statuant en mati\u00e8re de proc\u00e9dure collective, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par le mandataire judiciaire...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"pt-PT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-PT","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp","width":5700,"height":3800},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-2-avril-2026-n2026016161\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 2 avril 2026, n\u00b02026016161"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"pt-PT"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-PT","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-PT","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-51ky","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1201511,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-3-avril-2026-n2025061315\/","url_meta":{"origin":1196758,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 3 avril 2026, n\u00b02025061315","author":"Kohen","date":"27 de Junho, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le 3 avril 2026, le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Paris, statuant en formation coll\u00e9giale, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande d\u2019homologation d\u2019un accord...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1201516,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-3-avril-2026-n2025063036\/","url_meta":{"origin":1196758,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 3 avril 2026, n\u00b02025063036","author":"Kohen","date":"27 de Junho, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le jugement rendu par le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Paris, chambre 1-14, le 3 avril 2026, soul\u00e8ve une question singuli\u00e8re relative \u00e0 l'office...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pierre-axel-cotteret-ZxtssYV12S4-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pierre-axel-cotteret-ZxtssYV12S4-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pierre-axel-cotteret-ZxtssYV12S4-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pierre-axel-cotteret-ZxtssYV12S4-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pierre-axel-cotteret-ZxtssYV12S4-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pierre-axel-cotteret-ZxtssYV12S4-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1201508,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-3-avril-2026-n2025028503\/","url_meta":{"origin":1196758,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 3 avril 2026, n\u00b02025028503","author":"Kohen","date":"27 de Junho, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Cette d\u00e9cision invite \u00e0 examiner, d'une part, le contr\u00f4le exerc\u00e9 par le juge lors de l'homologation d'une transaction et, d'autre part, les effets...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-qhFXS18P2OQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-qhFXS18P2OQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-qhFXS18P2OQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-qhFXS18P2OQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-qhFXS18P2OQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-qhFXS18P2OQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":495658,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-reims-le-2-decembre-2025-n2025f05111\/","url_meta":{"origin":1196758,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Reims, le 2 d\u00e9cembre 2025, n\u00b02025F05111","author":"Kohen","date":"8 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal de commerce de Reims, statuant le 13 janvier 2026, est saisi d\u2019une demande d\u2019ouverture d\u2019une proc\u00e9dure collective. Face \u00e0 la carence du...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-XLYXqcKQm48-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-XLYXqcKQm48-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-XLYXqcKQm48-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-XLYXqcKQm48-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-XLYXqcKQm48-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-XLYXqcKQm48-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":496840,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-mont-de-marsan-le-28-novembre-2025-n2025002676\/","url_meta":{"origin":1196758,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Mont-de-Marsan, le 28 novembre 2025, n\u00b02025002676","author":"Kohen","date":"8 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Mont-de-Marsan, statuant le 29 avril 2026, ouvre une liquidation judiciaire simplifi\u00e9e \u00e0 l'encontre d'une soci\u00e9t\u00e9. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9,...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/viktor-forgacs-uWfXBePbvnw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/viktor-forgacs-uWfXBePbvnw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/viktor-forgacs-uWfXBePbvnw-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/viktor-forgacs-uWfXBePbvnw-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/viktor-forgacs-uWfXBePbvnw-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/viktor-forgacs-uWfXBePbvnw-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1203375,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-3-avril-2026-n2022f00550\/","url_meta":{"origin":1196758,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Marseille, le 3 avril 2026, n\u00b02022F00550","author":"Kohen","date":"27 de Junho, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Marseille, chambre 16, a rendu le 3 avril 2026 une d\u00e9cision (n\u00b02022F00550) relative aux effets d\u2019un d\u00e9sistement...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1196758","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1196758"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1196758\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4775"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1196758"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1196758"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1196758"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}