{"id":1216864,"date":"2026-06-29T16:15:58","date_gmt":"2026-06-29T14:15:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\/"},"modified":"2026-06-29T16:26:07","modified_gmt":"2026-06-29T14:26:07","slug":"cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour d&#8217;appel de Bordeaux, le 27 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/04107"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-la-confirmation-de-lexigence-dun-motif-legitime-subordonne-a-la-viabilite-de-l\">I. La confirmation de l&#8217;exigence d&#8217;un motif l\u00e9gitime subordonn\u00e9 \u00e0 la viabilit\u00e9 de l&#8217;action au fond<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-labsence-de-perspective-serieuse-dune-action-au-fond-en-raison-de-la-prescript\">A. L&#8217;absence de perspective s\u00e9rieuse d&#8217;une action au fond en raison de la prescription<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-lexclusion-dune-action-en-dol-faute-de-demonstration-dune-intention-frauduleus\">B. L&#8217;exclusion d&#8217;une action en dol faute de d\u00e9monstration d&#8217;une intention frauduleuse<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-la-portee-de-lappreciation-du-motif-legitime-dans-le-cadre-du-refere-expertis\">II. La port\u00e9e de l&#8217;appr\u00e9ciation du motif l\u00e9gitime dans le cadre du r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 expertise<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-loffice-du-juge-des-referes-un-controle-necessaire-mais-limite-de-laction-au-f\">A. L&#8217;office du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s : un contr\u00f4le n\u00e9cessaire mais limit\u00e9 de l&#8217;action au fond<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-leclairage-sur-la-charge-de-la-preuve-et-les-limites-de-lexpertise-preventive\">B. L&#8217;\u00e9clairage sur la charge de la preuve et les limites de l&#8217;expertise pr\u00e9ventive<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat, rendu par la Cour d&#8217;appel de Bordeaux le 27 avril 2026, porte sur les conditions d&#8217;octroi d&#8217;une mesure d&#8217;expertise in futurum. Le litige oppose des acqu\u00e9reurs \u00e0 leurs vendeurs et \u00e0 leur assureur, au sujet de d\u00e9sordres affectant un immeuble d&#8217;habitation. Le 18 mai 2021, les acqu\u00e9reurs ont acquis un bien immobilier. \u00c0 l&#8217;\u00e9t\u00e9 2022, ils ont constat\u00e9 des fissures sur les fa\u00e7ades et \u00e0 l&#8217;int\u00e9rieur. Un rapport d&#8217;expertise amiable du 10 f\u00e9vrier 2025, compl\u00e9t\u00e9 par un courrier du 11 f\u00e9vrier 2025, a attribu\u00e9 ces d\u00e9sordres \u00e0 une insuffisance de portance du sol. Par acte du 31 mars 2025, les acqu\u00e9reurs ont assign\u00e9 les vendeurs et leur assureur devant le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s afin d&#8217;obtenir une expertise judiciaire sur le fondement de l&#8217;article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. Par ordonnance du 29 juillet 2025, le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s du tribunal judiciaire de Libourne a rejet\u00e9 cette demande. Les acqu\u00e9reurs ont relev\u00e9 appel de cette d\u00e9cision. La question de droit soumise \u00e0 la cour est de savoir si une mesure d&#8217;expertise pr\u00e9ventive peut \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9e lorsque l&#8217;action au fond envisag\u00e9e, notamment pour vice cach\u00e9 ou dol, appara\u00eet manifestement vou\u00e9e \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9chec en raison de la prescription ou de l&#8217;absence d&#8217;\u00e9l\u00e9ments probants. La cour confirme la d\u00e9cision de premi\u00e8re instance en retenant que le motif l\u00e9gitime exig\u00e9 par l&#8217;article 145 fait d\u00e9faut, car l&#8217;action en garantie des vices cach\u00e9s est prescrite et l&#8217;action en dol n&#8217;est pas s\u00e9rieusement \u00e9tay\u00e9e. L&#8217;arr\u00eat invite \u00e0 s&#8217;interroger sur les crit\u00e8res d&#8217;appr\u00e9ciation du motif l\u00e9gitime en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 expertise.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-la-confirmation-de-lexigence-dun-motif-legitime-subordonne-a-la-viabilite-de-l\">I. La confirmation de l&#8217;exigence d&#8217;un motif l\u00e9gitime subordonn\u00e9 \u00e0 la viabilit\u00e9 de l&#8217;action au fond<\/h2>\n<p>La cour rappelle que l&#8217;article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile conditionne toute mesure d&#8217;instruction avant proc\u00e8s \u00e0 l&#8217;existence d&#8217;un motif l\u00e9gitime. Elle \u00e9carte en l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce le motif l\u00e9gitime en constatant que les actions potentielles des acqu\u00e9reurs sont vou\u00e9es \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9chec, tant pour la prescription de l&#8217;action en vice cach\u00e9 que pour l&#8217;absence de preuve du dol.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-labsence-de-perspective-serieuse-dune-action-au-fond-en-raison-de-la-prescript\">A. L&#8217;absence de perspective s\u00e9rieuse d&#8217;une action au fond en raison de la prescription<\/h3>\n<p>La cour examine d&#8217;abord le fondement de la garantie des vices cach\u00e9s. Elle rel\u00e8ve que les acqu\u00e9reurs ont d\u00e9couvert les fissures d\u00e8s l&#8217;\u00e9t\u00e9 2022, soit plus de deux ans avant l&#8217;assignation en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 du 31 mars 2025. L&#8217;article 1648 du code civil dispose que <em>&#8220;l&#8217;action r\u00e9sultant des vices r\u00e9dhibitoires doit \u00eatre intent\u00e9e par l&#8217;acqu\u00e9reur dans un d\u00e9lai de deux ans \u00e0 compter de la d\u00e9couverte du vice&#8221;<\/em>. Or le rapport d&#8217;expertise amiable du 10 f\u00e9vrier 2025 <em>&#8220;ne donne aucune indication quant \u00e0 leur cause ou date d&#8217;apparition, ne faisant que reprendre les d\u00e9clarations des int\u00e9ress\u00e9s&#8221;<\/em> <strong>(Cour d&#8217;appel de Bordeaux, 27 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/04107)<\/strong>. Seul le courrier du 11 f\u00e9vrier 2025 r\u00e9v\u00e8le l&#8217;origine technique des d\u00e9sordres, mais la cour estime que la connaissance des fissures elles-m\u00eames, acquise en 2022, d\u00e9clenche le d\u00e9lai. D\u00e8s lors, l&#8217;action en vice cach\u00e9 est prescrite et l&#8217;expertise ne saurait la faire rena\u00eetre. Cette position s&#8217;inscrit dans la droite ligne de la jurisprudence qui exige que le motif l\u00e9gitime ne soit pas artificiel. La Cour d&#8217;appel de Montpellier a ainsi jug\u00e9 qu&#8217;<em>&#8220;il est constant que le motif vis\u00e9 par les dispositions pr\u00e9cit\u00e9es n&#8217;est l\u00e9gitime que si la mesure sollicit\u00e9e peut \u00eatre utile dans le cadre de l&#8217;action future au fond et une mesure d&#8217;instruction ne peut ainsi \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9e qu&#8217;\u00e0 la condition que l&#8217;action au fond ne soit pas manifestement vou\u00e9e \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9chec&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67f8aaa03b6868ad1f9837e8\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel de Montpellier, le 10 avril 2025, n\u00b024\/02508)<\/a><\/strong>. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, l&#8217;action est non seulement prescrite mais d\u00e9pourvue de toute chance de succ\u00e8s, ce qui prive la mesure d&#8217;expertise de toute utilit\u00e9 et donc de motif l\u00e9gitime.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-lexclusion-dune-action-en-dol-faute-de-demonstration-dune-intention-frauduleus\">B. L&#8217;exclusion d&#8217;une action en dol faute de d\u00e9monstration d&#8217;une intention frauduleuse<\/h3>\n<p>La cour examine ensuite le fondement du dol, que les acqu\u00e9reurs invoquent comme alternative. Elle constate que l&#8217;acte de vente mentionnait d\u00e9j\u00e0 l&#8217;existence de fissures consolid\u00e9es et de travaux de cha\u00eenage, ce qui exclut toute dissimulation intentionnelle. La cour souligne qu&#8217;<em>&#8220;il n&#8217;est pas \u00e9tabli de dol ou d&#8217;intention de dissimuler des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de la part des consorts [vendeurs] en l&#8217;absence d&#8217;\u00e9l\u00e9ments d\u00e9montrant qu&#8217;ils aient eu connaissance, notamment du fait de ces m\u00eames travaux de portance qu&#8217;ils pouvaient estimer suffisants, de l&#8217;\u00e9volution structurelle du b\u00e2timent&#8221;<\/em> <strong>(Cour d&#8217;appel de Bordeaux, 27 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/04107)<\/strong>. Les acqu\u00e9reurs n&#8217;apportent aucun commencement de preuve d&#8217;une manoeuvre dolosive. L&#8217;action en dol appara\u00eet d\u00e8s lors d\u00e9pourvue de toute perspective s\u00e9rieuse. La cour confirme ainsi que le motif l\u00e9gitime ne peut \u00eatre constitu\u00e9 par une simple all\u00e9gation non \u00e9tay\u00e9e. Cette appr\u00e9ciation est conforme \u00e0 la jurisprudence constante qui exige un fondement juridique suffisamment d\u00e9termin\u00e9 pour justifier une expertise pr\u00e9ventive. La Cour d&#8217;appel de Paris a pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 que le motif l\u00e9gitime suppose <em>&#8220;l&#8217;existence d&#8217;un proc\u00e8s potentiel \u00e0 venir entre les parties, plausible et non manifestement vou\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9chec, sur la base d&#8217;un fondement juridique suffisamment d\u00e9termin\u00e9&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/681304f5e66d7f6b7b71ecad\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel de Paris, le 30 avril 2025, n\u00b024\/11529)<\/a><\/strong>. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, la simple invocation d&#8217;un dol non d\u00e9montr\u00e9 ne satisfait pas \u00e0 cette exigence, ce qui justifie le rejet de la demande d&#8217;expertise.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-la-portee-de-lappreciation-du-motif-legitime-dans-le-cadre-du-refere-expertis\">II. La port\u00e9e de l&#8217;appr\u00e9ciation du motif l\u00e9gitime dans le cadre du r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 expertise<\/h2>\n<p>L&#8217;arr\u00eat pr\u00e9cise les contours de l&#8217;office du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s lorsqu&#8217;il est saisi d&#8217;une demande d&#8217;expertise in futurum. Il \u00e9carte l&#8217;id\u00e9e d&#8217;une appr\u00e9ciation superficielle du motif l\u00e9gitime et impose un contr\u00f4le effectif de la viabilit\u00e9 de l&#8217;action au fond, tout en clarifiant la charge de la preuve.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-loffice-du-juge-des-referes-un-controle-necessaire-mais-limite-de-laction-au-f\">A. L&#8217;office du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s : un contr\u00f4le n\u00e9cessaire mais limit\u00e9 de l&#8217;action au fond<\/h3>\n<p>La cour rappelle, sans s&#8217;y arr\u00eater explicitement, que le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s doit v\u00e9rifier l&#8217;existence d&#8217;un motif l\u00e9gitime sans pour autant pr\u00e9juger du fond du litige. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, le premier juge a estim\u00e9 que les actions fond\u00e9es sur les vices cach\u00e9s et le dol <em>&#8220;seraient soient manifestement prescrite et\/ou insusceptible de prosp\u00e9rer&#8221;<\/em> <strong>(Cour d&#8217;appel de Bordeaux, 27 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/04107)<\/strong>. La cour approuve cette d\u00e9marche. Elle ne se prononce pas sur le bien-fond\u00e9 des actions elles-m\u00eames, mais constate leur caract\u00e8re manifestement vou\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9chec. Ce faisant, elle d\u00e9limite pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment l&#8217;office du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s : il peut et doit \u00e9carter une demande d&#8217;expertise lorsque les \u00e9l\u00e9ments produits par le demandeur r\u00e9v\u00e8lent que toute action au fond est irr\u00e9m\u00e9diablement compromise, que ce soit par la prescription ou par l&#8217;absence de fondement juridique s\u00e9rieux. Cette position est coh\u00e9rente avec la jurisprudence de la Cour d&#8217;appel de Paris qui exige que le proc\u00e8s potentiel soit <em>&#8220;plausible et non manifestement vou\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9chec&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/681304f5e66d7f6b7b71ecad\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel de Paris, le 30 avril 2025, n\u00b024\/11529)<\/a><\/strong>. Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s ne peut donc se contenter de renvoyer au fond ; il doit appr\u00e9cier la vraisemblance de l&#8217;action future, sans pour autant trancher le litige principal.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-leclairage-sur-la-charge-de-la-preuve-et-les-limites-de-lexpertise-preventive\">B. L&#8217;\u00e9clairage sur la charge de la preuve et les limites de l&#8217;expertise pr\u00e9ventive<\/h3>\n<p>L&#8217;arr\u00eat met en lumi\u00e8re la r\u00e9partition de la charge probatoire dans le cadre de l&#8217;article 145. C&#8217;est au demandeur \u00e0 la mesure d&#8217;instruction qu&#8217;il incombe de d\u00e9montrer l&#8217;existence d&#8217;un motif l\u00e9gitime. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, les acqu\u00e9reurs n&#8217;ont pas rapport\u00e9 cette preuve. La cour rel\u00e8ve que le rapport d&#8217;expertise amiable ne fournit aucune indication sur la cause ou la date d&#8217;apparition des d\u00e9sordres, se bornant \u00e0 reprendre les d\u00e9clarations des int\u00e9ress\u00e9s. De plus, l&#8217;acte de vente mentionnait d\u00e9j\u00e0 des fissures et des travaux de consolidation, ce qui affaiblit la th\u00e8se du vice cach\u00e9 et du dol. La cour en d\u00e9duit que les acqu\u00e9reurs ne justifient d&#8217;aucun \u00e9l\u00e9ment permettant de consid\u00e9rer que leur action au fond pourrait prosp\u00e9rer. L&#8217;expertise sollicit\u00e9e appara\u00eet ainsi comme une mesure exploratoire destin\u00e9e \u00e0 pallier leur carence probatoire, ce que le droit ne permet pas. La Cour d&#8217;appel de Montpellier avait d\u00e9j\u00e0 soulign\u00e9 que <em>&#8220;la mesure sollicit\u00e9e peut \u00eatre utile dans le cadre de l&#8217;action future au fond&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67f8aaa03b6868ad1f9837e8\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel de Montpellier, le 10 avril 2025, n\u00b024\/02508)<\/a><\/strong>, ce qui implique une utilit\u00e9 r\u00e9elle et non un simple espoir de d\u00e9couvrir un fondement. L&#8217;arr\u00eat de Bordeaux rappelle donc que l&#8217;expertise pr\u00e9ventive n&#8217;est pas un instrument de prospection : elle suppose que le demandeur \u00e9tablisse, au moins sommairement, la plausibilit\u00e9 de son action au fond.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/681304f5e66d7f6b7b71ecad\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Paris, le 30 avril 2025, n\u00b024\/11529<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67f8aaa03b6868ad1f9837e8\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Montpellier, le 10 avril 2025, n\u00b024\/02508<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000051869339\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 145 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>S&#8217;il existe un motif l\u00e9gitime de conserver ou d&#8217;\u00e9tablir avant tout proc\u00e8s la preuve de faits dont pourrait d\u00e9pendre la solution d&#8217;un litige, les mesures d&#8217;instruction l\u00e9galement admissibles peuvent \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9es \u00e0 la demande de tout int\u00e9ress\u00e9, sur requ\u00eate ou en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>La juridiction territorialement comp\u00e9tente pour statuer sur une demande form\u00e9e en application du premier alin\u00e9a est, au choix du demandeur, celle susceptible de conna\u00eetre de l&#8217;affaire au fond ou, s&#8217;il y a lieu, celle dans le ressort de laquelle la mesure d&#8217;instruction doit \u00eatre ex\u00e9cut\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<p>Par d\u00e9rogation au deuxi\u00e8me alin\u00e9a, lorsque la mesure d&#8217;instruction porte sur un immeuble, la juridiction du lieu o\u00f9 est situ\u00e9 l&#8217;immeuble est seule comp\u00e9tente.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000020466328\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 1648 du Code civil<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>L&#8217;action r\u00e9sultant des vices r\u00e9dhibitoires doit \u00eatre intent\u00e9e par l&#8217;acqu\u00e9reur dans un d\u00e9lai de deux ans \u00e0 compter de la d\u00e9couverte du vice. <\/p>\n<p>Dans le cas pr\u00e9vu par l&#8217;article 1642-1, l&#8217;action doit \u00eatre introduite, \u00e0 peine de forclusion, dans l&#8217;ann\u00e9e qui suit la date \u00e0 laquelle le vendeur peut \u00eatre d\u00e9charg\u00e9 des vices ou des d\u00e9fauts de conformit\u00e9 apparents.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"closing\" id=\"envoyer-pieces\" style=\"margin:48px 0 36px;padding:48px 36px;text-align:center;border-radius:24px;background:radial-gradient(circle at 50% 0%,rgba(0,0,204,0.08) 0%,transparent 60%),rgba(255,255,255,0.72);border:1px solid rgba(10,10,10,0.08);\">\n<div class=\"closing-heading\" role=\"heading\" aria-level=\"2\" style=\"font-size:clamp(30px,4vw,44px);line-height:1.18;font-weight:700;margin:0 0 18px;letter-spacing:-0.022em;color:#1B1B1B;font-family:Lato,sans-serif;\">Envoyez vos pi\u00e8ces. Recevez une <span class=\"nowrap\" style=\"white-space:nowrap;\"><span class=\"tag\" style=\"display:inline-block;background:#0000CC;color:#fff;padding:2px 14px 5px;border-radius:10px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:-0.005em;box-shadow:0 6px 20px rgba(0,0,204,.10);\">strat\u00e9gie<\/span>.<\/span><\/div>\n<p>Transmettez les pi\u00e8ces de votre dossier au cabinet. Ma\u00eetre Hassan KOHEN vous r\u00e9pond personnellement sous 24 heures avec une premi\u00e8re analyse strat\u00e9gique.<\/p>\n<div class=\"cta-row\" style=\"display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:12px;justify-content:center;margin:24px 0;\"><a class=\"cta cta-primary\" href=\"tel:+33689113445\" style=\"display:inline-block;padding:14px 26px;background:#0000CC;color:#ffffff;border-radius:10px;text-decoration:none;font-weight:700;box-shadow:0 10px 30px rgba(0,0,204,0.18);\">Appeler maintenant \u2192<\/a><a class=\"cta cta-secondary\" href=\"mailto:contact@kohenavocats.com?subject=Demande%20d%27analyse\" style=\"display:inline-block;padding:14px 26px;background:rgba(255,255,255,0.95);color:#1B1B1B;border:1px solid rgba(10,10,10,0.12);border-radius:10px;text-decoration:none;font-weight:700;\">\u00c9crire au cabinet<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"promises\" style=\"display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(4,1fr);gap:14px;max-width:880px;margin:30px auto 12px;font-size:14px;color:#4A4A4A;font-weight:700;\">\n<div class=\"promise\">Premi\u00e8re analyse offerte<\/div>\n<div class=\"promise\">R\u00e9ponse personnelle sous 24 h<\/div>\n<div class=\"promise\">100 % confidentiel<\/div>\n<div class=\"promise\">Jusqu&#8217;\u00e0 1 Go de pi\u00e8ces<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat, rendu par la Cour d&#8217;appel de Bordeaux le 27 avril 2026, porte sur les conditions d&#8217;octroi d&#8217;une mesure d&#8217;expertise in futurum. Le litige&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9459,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69f04510cdc6046d47cd0135","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69f04510cdc6046d47cd0135","_kj_judilibre_id":"69f04510cdc6046d47cd0135","_kj_jur":"Cour d'appel","_kj_lieu":"Bordeaux","_kj_chambre":"1\u00e8re CHAMBRE CIVILE","_kj_rg":"25\/04107","_kj_date":"2026-04-27","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6455,6454,35583],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1216864","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cour-dappel","category-decisions-juridiques","category-immobilier"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour d&#039;appel de Bordeaux, le 27 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/04107 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat, rendu par la Cour d&#039;appel de Bordeaux le 27 avril 2026, porte sur les conditions d&#039;octroi d&#039;une mesure d&#039;expertise in futurum. Le litige...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"pt_PT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour d&#039;appel de Bordeaux, le 27 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/04107\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat, rendu par la Cour d&#039;appel de Bordeaux le 27 avril 2026, porte sur les conditions d&#039;octroi d&#039;une mesure d&#039;expertise in futurum. Le litige...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-29T14:15:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-06-29T14:26:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-3RB8kCN90q8-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Escrito por\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tempo estimado de leitura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutos\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Cour d&#8217;appel de Bordeaux, le 27 avril 2026, n\u00b025\\\/04107\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-29T14:15:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-29T14:26:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2031,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/planet-volumes-3RB8kCN90q8-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"Cour d'appel\",\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Immobilier\"],\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Cour d&#8217;appel de Bordeaux, le 27 avril 2026, n\u00b025\\\/04107\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Cour d'appel\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Immobilier\"}],\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour d'appel de Bordeaux, le 27 avril 2026, n\u00b025\\\/04107 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/planet-volumes-3RB8kCN90q8-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-29T14:15:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-29T14:26:07+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat, rendu par la Cour d'appel de Bordeaux le 27 avril 2026, porte sur les conditions d'octroi d'une mesure d'expertise in futurum. Le litige...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/planet-volumes-3RB8kCN90q8-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/planet-volumes-3RB8kCN90q8-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":2200,\"height\":3500},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Cour d&rsquo;appel de Bordeaux, le 27 avril 2026, n\u00b025\\\/04107\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour d'appel de Bordeaux, le 27 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/04107 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat, rendu par la Cour d'appel de Bordeaux le 27 avril 2026, porte sur les conditions d'octroi d'une mesure d'expertise in futurum. Le litige...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\/","og_locale":"pt_PT","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour d'appel de Bordeaux, le 27 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/04107","og_description":"Le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat, rendu par la Cour d'appel de Bordeaux le 27 avril 2026, porte sur les conditions d'octroi d'une mesure d'expertise in futurum. Le litige...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-06-29T14:15:58+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-06-29T14:26:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2200,"height":3500,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-3RB8kCN90q8-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Escrito por":"Kohen","Tempo estimado de leitura":"9 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Cour d&#8217;appel de Bordeaux, le 27 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/04107","datePublished":"2026-06-29T14:15:58+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-29T14:26:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\/"},"wordCount":2031,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-3RB8kCN90q8-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["Cour d'appel","D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Immobilier"],"inLanguage":"pt-PT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Cour d&#8217;appel de Bordeaux, le 27 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/04107","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"Cour d'appel"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Immobilier"}],"speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\/","name":"Cour d'appel de Bordeaux, le 27 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/04107 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-3RB8kCN90q8-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-29T14:15:58+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-29T14:26:07+00:00","description":"Le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat, rendu par la Cour d'appel de Bordeaux le 27 avril 2026, porte sur les conditions d'octroi d'une mesure d'expertise in futurum. Le litige...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"pt-PT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-PT","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-3RB8kCN90q8-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-3RB8kCN90q8-unsplash.webp","width":2200,"height":3500},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-27-avril-2026-n25-04107\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cour d&rsquo;appel de Bordeaux, le 27 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/04107"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"pt-PT"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-PT","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-PT","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-3RB8kCN90q8-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-56yQ","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1220161,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/cour-dappel-de-bordeaux-le-28-avril-2026-n24-05607\/","url_meta":{"origin":1216864,"position":0},"title":"Cour d&#8217;appel de Bordeaux, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b024\/05607","author":"Kohen","date":"30 de Junho, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le 28 avril 2026, la juridiction de la Premi\u00e8re Pr\u00e9sidente de la Cour d\u2019appel de Bordeaux a rendu une d\u00e9cision relative \u00e0 la contestation d\u2019honoraires...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour d'appel&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour d'appel","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-dappel\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-d0LTrcpOS6w-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-d0LTrcpOS6w-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-d0LTrcpOS6w-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-d0LTrcpOS6w-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-d0LTrcpOS6w-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-d0LTrcpOS6w-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":457646,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/caa-caa-de-bordeaux-08-01-2026-n-23bx02907\/","url_meta":{"origin":1216864,"position":1},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de BORDEAUX \u2013 08\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 23BX02907","author":"Kohen","date":"7 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Par un arr\u00eat du huit janvier deux mille vingt-six, la Cour administrative d\u2019appel de Bordeaux pr\u00e9cise le r\u00e9gime de prescription applicable aux indus de...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/filtergrade-TZ63XfVx_uE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/filtergrade-TZ63XfVx_uE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/filtergrade-TZ63XfVx_uE-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/filtergrade-TZ63XfVx_uE-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/filtergrade-TZ63XfVx_uE-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/filtergrade-TZ63XfVx_uE-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":491261,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-bordeaux-le-18-novembre-2025-n25-01958\/","url_meta":{"origin":1216864,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Bordeaux, le 18 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/01958","author":"Kohen","date":"8 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Bordeaux, statuant le 9 avril 2025, a examin\u00e9 une action en recouvrement de charges de copropri\u00e9t\u00e9. Le syndicat demandeur...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/peter-bucks-cDueGDswXy8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/peter-bucks-cDueGDswXy8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/peter-bucks-cDueGDswXy8-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/peter-bucks-cDueGDswXy8-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/peter-bucks-cDueGDswXy8-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/peter-bucks-cDueGDswXy8-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1211434,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cusset-le-7-avril-2026-n2025001675\/","url_meta":{"origin":1216864,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Cusset, le 7 avril 2026, n\u00b02025001675","author":"Kohen","date":"28 de Junho, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le d\u00e9sistement d'instance et d'action constitue un mode d'extinction du proc\u00e8s par la volont\u00e9 du demandeur. Le tribunal de commerce de Cusset, dans un...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/frank-van-hulst-DNYn_v6WVJo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/frank-van-hulst-DNYn_v6WVJo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/frank-van-hulst-DNYn_v6WVJo-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/frank-van-hulst-DNYn_v6WVJo-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/frank-van-hulst-DNYn_v6WVJo-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/frank-van-hulst-DNYn_v6WVJo-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1217061,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-bordeaux-le-8-avril-2026-n2023r00951\/","url_meta":{"origin":1216864,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Bordeaux, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02023R00951","author":"Kohen","date":"29 de Junho, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal de commerce de Bordeaux, dans une ordonnance rendue le 8 avril 2026 (n\u00b0 RG 2023R00951), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une situation in\u00e9dite : le d\u00e9c\u00e8s de...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/dmitrii-eliuseev-VJCxWJ3XZCM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/dmitrii-eliuseev-VJCxWJ3XZCM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/dmitrii-eliuseev-VJCxWJ3XZCM-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/dmitrii-eliuseev-VJCxWJ3XZCM-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/dmitrii-eliuseev-VJCxWJ3XZCM-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/dmitrii-eliuseev-VJCxWJ3XZCM-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456835,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/caa-caa-de-bordeaux-28-01-2026-n-25bx02697\/","url_meta":{"origin":1216864,"position":5},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de BORDEAUX \u2013 28\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25BX02697","author":"Kohen","date":"7 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La pr\u00e9sente ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 provision rendue par une cour administrative d\u2019appel intervient dans un contentieux contractuel complexe. Elle statue sur...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/valentin-kremer-zqipptjLLJc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/valentin-kremer-zqipptjLLJc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/valentin-kremer-zqipptjLLJc-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/valentin-kremer-zqipptjLLJc-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/valentin-kremer-zqipptjLLJc-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/valentin-kremer-zqipptjLLJc-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1216864","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1216864"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1216864\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1216931,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1216864\/revisions\/1216931"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9459"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1216864"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1216864"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1216864"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}