{"id":1218471,"date":"2026-06-30T00:05:11","date_gmt":"2026-06-29T22:05:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T00:05:11","modified_gmt":"2026-06-29T22:05:11","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00392"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-la-confirmation-de-la-regularite-procedurale-des-mesures-de-soins-contraints\">I. La confirmation de la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 proc\u00e9durale des mesures de soins contraints<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-motivation-suffisante-du-certificat-medical-dadmission\">A. La motivation suffisante du certificat m\u00e9dical d\u2019admission<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-labsence-de-grief-tire-dune-irregularite-de-notification\">B. L\u2019absence de grief tir\u00e9 d\u2019une irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de notification<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-le-controle-du-bien-fonde-de-la-mesure-et-son-maintien\">II. Le contr\u00f4le du bien-fond\u00e9 de la mesure et son maintien<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-verification-des-conditions-legales-de-fond\">A. La v\u00e9rification des conditions l\u00e9gales de fond<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-lexigence-de-proportionnalite-appliquee-a-lespece\">B. L\u2019exigence de proportionnalit\u00e9 appliqu\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019esp\u00e8ce<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le 27 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg a rendu une ordonnance statuant sur le contr\u00f4le syst\u00e9matique d\u2019une mesure de soins psychiatriques sans consentement. La patiente, n\u00e9e en 1951, avait \u00e9t\u00e9 admise en hospitalisation compl\u00e8te le 17 mars 2026 sur d\u00e9cision du directeur de l\u2019\u00e9tablissement de soins, dans le cadre d\u2019une hospitalisation \u00e0 la demande d\u2019un tiers en urgence. \u00c0 l\u2019audience, la patiente a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 ne pas comprendre les motifs de son hospitalisation et a sollicit\u00e9 la mainlev\u00e9e de la mesure. Son conseil a soulev\u00e9 deux moyens de proc\u00e9dure : l\u2019insuffisante motivation du certificat m\u00e9dical d\u2019admission s\u2019agissant de l\u2019urgence ou du risque grave, et l\u2019irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9 tenant \u00e0 la diff\u00e9rence de signature entre la notification de la d\u00e9cision d\u2019admission et celle de la d\u00e9cision de maintien. Le juge a rejet\u00e9 ces deux moyens, a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 la proc\u00e9dure r\u00e9guli\u00e8re, et a ordonn\u00e9 le maintien de l\u2019hospitalisation compl\u00e8te, consid\u00e9rant que la mesure \u00e9tait proportionn\u00e9e et n\u00e9cessaire au regard de l\u2019\u00e9tat de la patiente. La question de droit centrale consiste \u00e0 d\u00e9terminer comment le juge contr\u00f4le la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 des d\u00e9cisions administratives en mati\u00e8re de soins psychiatriques, et dans quelle mesure une irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9 proc\u00e9durale peut entra\u00eener la mainlev\u00e9e de la mesure. La solution retenue est que les \u00e9l\u00e9ments du certificat m\u00e9dical caract\u00e9risaient suffisamment l\u2019urgence et le risque grave, et que la diff\u00e9rence de signature ne constituait pas une atteinte aux droits de la patiente.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-la-confirmation-de-la-regularite-procedurale-des-mesures-de-soins-contraints\">I. La confirmation de la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 proc\u00e9durale des mesures de soins contraints<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-motivation-suffisante-du-certificat-medical-dadmission\">A. La motivation suffisante du certificat m\u00e9dical d\u2019admission<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention rappelle que, selon l\u2019article L.3216-1 du code de la sant\u00e9 publique, une irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9 affectant une d\u00e9cision administrative n\u2019entra\u00eene la mainlev\u00e9e que s\u2019il en est r\u00e9sult\u00e9 une atteinte aux droits de la personne. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le conseil de la patiente soutenait que le certificat m\u00e9dical d\u2019admission n\u2019\u00e9tait pas assez motiv\u00e9 sur l\u2019urgence ou le risque grave pour l\u2019int\u00e9grit\u00e9 du malade. Le juge observe toutefois que le certificat litigieux mentionne une agitation psychomotrice, une m\u00e9fiance, une fuite des id\u00e9es, des id\u00e9es d\u00e9lirantes, un d\u00e9lire de pers\u00e9cution, une irritabilit\u00e9, un discours incoh\u00e9rent, des \u00e9motions inadapt\u00e9es, le tout dans un contexte de deuil r\u00e9cent. Il en d\u00e9duit que ces \u00e9l\u00e9ments caract\u00e9risent les exigences l\u00e9gales, car la symptomatologie laissait craindre une d\u00e9compensation psychique avec une mise en danger possible. Cette appr\u00e9ciation du juge s\u2019inscrit dans une jurisprudence constante qui admet une motivation concise d\u00e8s lors qu\u2019elle permet de v\u00e9rifier la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 des crit\u00e8res d\u2019urgence. La Cour d\u2019appel de Douai a ainsi eu l\u2019occasion de pr\u00e9ciser que le m\u00e9decin peut \u00e9tablir un avis motiv\u00e9 m\u00eame en l\u2019absence d\u2019examen direct du patient, \u00e0 condition de se r\u00e9f\u00e9rer aux \u00e9l\u00e9ments cliniques du dossier. En l\u2019occurrence, le certificat m\u00e9dical d\u2019admission r\u00e9pond \u00e0 cette exigence.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-labsence-de-grief-tire-dune-irregularite-de-notification\">B. L\u2019absence de grief tir\u00e9 d\u2019une irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de notification<\/h3>\n<p>Le second moyen portait sur la diff\u00e9rence de signature de la patiente entre le document de notification de la d\u00e9cision d\u2019admission et celui de la d\u00e9cision de maintien. Le juge \u00e9carte ce moyen en relevant que, sur le premier document, la patiente a \u00e9crit son nom et pr\u00e9nom en majuscules, tandis qu\u2019elle a appos\u00e9 sa signature habituelle sur le second. Il consid\u00e8re qu\u2019il ne saurait \u00eatre impos\u00e9 \u00e0 la patiente une forme particuli\u00e8re de signature, celle-ci \u00e9tant libre d\u2019accuser r\u00e9ception selon la forme qu\u2019elle souhaite, et que rien ne permet de douter qu\u2019elle est bien la signataire. Cette position rejoint celle de la Cour d\u2019appel de Versailles, qui a jug\u00e9 que le refus de signer vaut notification et que l\u2019omission des patronymes des agents n\u2019est pas de nature \u00e0 caract\u00e9riser un grief d\u00e8s lors que le patient a eu connaissance de ses droits. Ici, la patiente n\u2019a pas contest\u00e9 avoir re\u00e7u les documents, et la diff\u00e9rence de signature ne r\u00e9v\u00e8le aucune atteinte \u00e0 ses droits. Le juge valide donc la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la notification.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-le-controle-du-bien-fonde-de-la-mesure-et-son-maintien\">II. Le contr\u00f4le du bien-fond\u00e9 de la mesure et son maintien<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-verification-des-conditions-legales-de-fond\">A. La v\u00e9rification des conditions l\u00e9gales de fond<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge rappelle les conditions de l\u2019article L.3212-1 du code de la sant\u00e9 publique : les troubles mentaux doivent rendre impossible le consentement, et l\u2019\u00e9tat du patient doit imposer des soins imm\u00e9diats assortis d\u2019une surveillance m\u00e9dicale constante justifiant une hospitalisation compl\u00e8te. Il examine les certificats m\u00e9dicaux des 24 et 72 heures, ainsi que l\u2019avis motiv\u00e9. Ceux-ci d\u00e9crivent une d\u00e9compensation psychiatrique li\u00e9e \u00e0 un deuil r\u00e9cent, avec agitation psychomotrice, id\u00e9es d\u00e9lirantes, bizarrerie de contact, troubles du jugement et forte charge anxieuse. Le juge se garde de se substituer \u00e0 l\u2019autorit\u00e9 m\u00e9dicale sur le diagnostic, mais il v\u00e9rifie que les \u00e9l\u00e9ments objectifs fournis par les m\u00e9decins \u00e9tablissent l\u2019impossibilit\u00e9 de consentir. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, les certificats \u00e9tablissent que l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9e se trouve dans l\u2019incapacit\u00e9 de consentir pleinement aux soins en raison des troubles d\u00e9crits. Le juge conclut que les conditions l\u00e9gales sont remplies.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-lexigence-de-proportionnalite-appliquee-a-lespece\">B. L\u2019exigence de proportionnalit\u00e9 appliqu\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019esp\u00e8ce<\/h3>\n<p>En application de l\u2019article L.3211-3 du code de la sant\u00e9 publique, le juge doit veiller \u00e0 ce que les restrictions aux libert\u00e9s individuelles soient adapt\u00e9es, n\u00e9cessaires et proportionn\u00e9es. Il rel\u00e8ve que l\u2019atteinte port\u00e9e aux libert\u00e9s de la patiente est proportionn\u00e9e aux objectifs poursuivis, eu \u00e9gard \u00e0 son \u00e9tat mental et \u00e0 la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 des soins. La mesure d\u2019hospitalisation compl\u00e8te constitue une r\u00e9ponse m\u00e9dicale n\u00e9cessaire et proportionn\u00e9e, conform\u00e9ment aux pr\u00e9conisations du corps m\u00e9dical. Le juge ordonne donc le maintien. Cette d\u00e9cision illustre la conciliation entre la protection de la sant\u00e9 publique et le respect des droits fondamentaux. Le contr\u00f4le de proportionnalit\u00e9, bien que d\u00e9l\u00e9gu\u00e9 au juge, ne lui permet pas de remettre en cause le diagnostic, mais il assure une protection effective contre les d\u00e9tentions arbitraires. En maintenant la mesure, le juge valide la d\u00e9cision administrative tout en ayant v\u00e9rifi\u00e9 l\u2019absence d\u2019alternative moins restrictive.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67c15288be6ca631b7224919\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Versailles, le 27 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b025\/01082<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67fde8409b68debe44f7e943\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Douai, le 9 avril 2025, n\u00b025\/00027<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000018156615\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article R. 15-33-71 du Code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Toute demande de mise \u00e0 disposition fait l&#8217;objet de la part de l&#8217;officier de police judiciaire d&#8217;un proc\u00e8s-verbal indiquant le destinataire de la demande et la nature des informations demand\u00e9es. <\/p>\n<p>Dans le cas pr\u00e9vu par l&#8217;article 77-1-2, le proc\u00e8s-verbal mentionne l&#8217;accord pr\u00e9alable du procureur de la R\u00e9publique qui peut \u00eatre donn\u00e9 par tout moyen.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000048447053\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 3216-1 du Code de la sant\u00e9 publique<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>La r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 des d\u00e9cisions administratives prises en application des chapitres II \u00e0 IV du pr\u00e9sent titre ne peut \u00eatre contest\u00e9e que devant le juge judiciaire.<\/p>\n<p>Le juge conna\u00eet des contestations mentionn\u00e9es au premier alin\u00e9a du pr\u00e9sent article dans le cadre des instances introduites en application des articles L. 3211-12 et L. 3211-12-1. Dans ce cas, l&#8217;irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9 affectant une d\u00e9cision administrative mentionn\u00e9e au premier alin\u00e9a du pr\u00e9sent article n&#8217;entra\u00eene la mainlev\u00e9e de la mesure que s&#8217;il en est r\u00e9sult\u00e9 une atteinte aux droits de la personne qui en faisait l&#8217;objet.<\/p>\n<p>Lorsque le tribunal judiciaire statue sur les demandes en r\u00e9paration des cons\u00e9quences dommageables r\u00e9sultant pour l&#8217;int\u00e9ress\u00e9 des d\u00e9cisions administratives mentionn\u00e9es au premier alin\u00e9a, il peut, \u00e0 cette fin, conna\u00eetre des irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9s dont ces derni\u00e8res seraient entach\u00e9es.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000041721196\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 3212-1 du Code de la sant\u00e9 publique<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>I.-Une personne atteinte de troubles mentaux ne peut faire l&#8217;objet de soins psychiatriques sur la d\u00e9cision du directeur d&#8217;un \u00e9tablissement mentionn\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 3222-1 que lorsque les deux conditions suivantes sont r\u00e9unies :<\/p>\n<p>1\u00b0 Ses troubles mentaux rendent impossible son consentement ;<\/p>\n<p>2\u00b0 Son \u00e9tat mental impose des soins imm\u00e9diats assortis soit d&#8217;une surveillance m\u00e9dicale constante justifiant une hospitalisation compl\u00e8te, soit d&#8217;une surveillance m\u00e9dicale r\u00e9guli\u00e8re justifiant une prise en charge sous la forme mentionn\u00e9e au 2\u00b0 du I de l&#8217;article L. 3211-2-1. <\/p>\n<p>II.-Le directeur de l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement prononce la d\u00e9cision d&#8217;admission :<\/p>\n<p>1\u00b0 Soit lorsqu&#8217;il a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d&#8217;une demande pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par un membre de la famille du malade ou par une personne justifiant de l&#8217;existence de relations avec le malade ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 la demande de soins et lui donnant qualit\u00e9 pour agir dans l&#8217;int\u00e9r\u00eat de celui-ci, \u00e0 l&#8217;exclusion des personnels soignants exer\u00e7ant dans l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement prenant en charge la personne malade. Lorsqu&#8217;elle remplit les conditions pr\u00e9vues au pr\u00e9sent alin\u00e9a, la personne charg\u00e9e, \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9gard d&#8217;un majeur prot\u00e9g\u00e9, d&#8217;une mesure de protection juridique \u00e0 la personne peut faire une demande de soins pour celui-ci.<\/p>\n<p>La forme et le contenu de cette demande sont fix\u00e9s par d\u00e9cret en Conseil d&#8217;Etat.<\/p>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision d&#8217;admission est accompagn\u00e9e de deux certificats m\u00e9dicaux circonstanci\u00e9s datant de moins de quinze jours, attestant que les conditions pr\u00e9vues aux 1\u00b0 et 2\u00b0 du I du pr\u00e9sent article sont r\u00e9unies.<\/p>\n<p>Le premier certificat m\u00e9dical ne peut \u00eatre \u00e9tabli que par un m\u00e9decin n&#8217;exer\u00e7ant pas dans l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement accueillant le malade ; il constate l&#8217;\u00e9tat mental de la personne malade, indique les caract\u00e9ristiques de sa maladie et la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de recevoir des soins. Il doit \u00eatre confirm\u00e9 par un certificat d&#8217;un second m\u00e9decin qui peut exercer dans l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement accueillant le malade. Les deux m\u00e9decins ne peuvent \u00eatre parents ou alli\u00e9s, au quatri\u00e8me degr\u00e9 inclusivement, ni entre eux, ni du directeur de l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement mentionn\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 3222-1 qui prononce la d\u00e9cision d&#8217;admission, ni de la personne ayant demand\u00e9 les soins ou de la personne faisant l&#8217;objet de ces soins ;<\/p>\n<p>2\u00b0 Soit lorsqu&#8217;il s&#8217;av\u00e8re impossible d&#8217;obtenir une demande dans les conditions pr\u00e9vues au 1\u00b0 du pr\u00e9sent II et qu&#8217;il existe, \u00e0 la date d&#8217;admission, un p\u00e9ril imminent pour la sant\u00e9 de la personne, d\u00fbment constat\u00e9 par un certificat m\u00e9dical \u00e9tabli dans les conditions pr\u00e9vues au troisi\u00e8me alin\u00e9a du m\u00eame 1\u00b0. Ce certificat constate l&#8217;\u00e9tat mental de la personne malade, indique les caract\u00e9ristiques de sa maladie et la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de recevoir des soins. Le m\u00e9decin qui \u00e9tablit ce certificat ne peut exercer dans l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement accueillant la personne malade ; il ne peut en outre \u00eatre parent ou alli\u00e9, jusqu&#8217;au quatri\u00e8me degr\u00e9 inclusivement, ni avec le directeur de cet \u00e9tablissement ni avec la personne malade.<\/p>\n<p>Dans ce cas, le directeur de l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement d&#8217;accueil informe, dans un d\u00e9lai de vingt-quatre heures sauf difficult\u00e9s particuli\u00e8res, la famille de la personne qui fait l&#8217;objet de soins et, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, la personne charg\u00e9e de la protection juridique de l&#8217;int\u00e9ress\u00e9 ou, \u00e0 d\u00e9faut, toute personne justifiant de l&#8217;existence de relations avec la personne malade ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 l&#8217;admission en soins et lui donnant qualit\u00e9 pour agir dans l&#8217;int\u00e9r\u00eat de celle-ci.<\/p>\n<p>Lorsque l&#8217;admission a \u00e9t\u00e9 prononc\u00e9e en application du pr\u00e9sent 2\u00b0, les certificats m\u00e9dicaux mentionn\u00e9s aux deuxi\u00e8me et troisi\u00e8me alin\u00e9as de l&#8217;article L. 3211-2-2 sont \u00e9tablis par deux psychiatres distincts.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le 27 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg a rendu une ordonnance statuant sur le contr\u00f4le syst\u00e9matique&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9511,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69caed52cdc6046d478e1129","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69caed52cdc6046d478e1129","_kj_judilibre_id":"69caed52cdc6046d478e1129","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Strasbourg","_kj_chambre":"J.L.D.","_kj_rg":"26\/00392","_kj_date":"2026-03-27","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1218471","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00392 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le 27 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg a rendu une ordonnance statuant sur le contr\u00f4le syst\u00e9matique...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"pt_PT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00392\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le 27 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg a rendu une ordonnance statuant sur le contr\u00f4le syst\u00e9matique...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-29T22:05:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2F-9_XQYhP8-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"6657\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"4636\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Escrito por\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tempo estimado de leitura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutos\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00392\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-29T22:05:11+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2145,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-2F-9_XQYhP8-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00392\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-29T22:05:11+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00392 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-2F-9_XQYhP8-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-29T22:05:11+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le 27 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg a rendu une ordonnance statuant sur le contr\u00f4le syst\u00e9matique...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-2F-9_XQYhP8-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-2F-9_XQYhP8-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":6657,\"height\":4636},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00392\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00392 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le 27 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg a rendu une ordonnance statuant sur le contr\u00f4le syst\u00e9matique...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\/","og_locale":"pt_PT","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00392","og_description":"Le 27 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg a rendu une ordonnance statuant sur le contr\u00f4le syst\u00e9matique...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-06-29T22:05:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":6657,"height":4636,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2F-9_XQYhP8-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Escrito por":"Kohen","Tempo estimado de leitura":"10 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00392","datePublished":"2026-06-29T22:05:11+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\/"},"wordCount":2145,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2F-9_XQYhP8-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"pt-PT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00392","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-06-29T22:05:11+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00392 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2F-9_XQYhP8-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-29T22:05:11+00:00","description":"Le 27 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg a rendu une ordonnance statuant sur le contr\u00f4le syst\u00e9matique...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"pt-PT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-PT","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2F-9_XQYhP8-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2F-9_XQYhP8-unsplash.webp","width":6657,"height":4636},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00392\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00392"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"pt-PT"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-PT","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-PT","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2F-9_XQYhP8-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-56YL","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1205136,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n25-09273\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218471,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/09273","author":"Kohen","date":"27 de Junho, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg (11\u00e8me civ. S1) a rendu une d\u00e9cision sur une demande en paiement form\u00e9e par une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 de location...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/lisa-IfngoxB5ORA-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/lisa-IfngoxB5ORA-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/lisa-IfngoxB5ORA-unsplash-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/lisa-IfngoxB5ORA-unsplash-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/lisa-IfngoxB5ORA-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/lisa-IfngoxB5ORA-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":492271,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-14-novembre-2025-n24-06193\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218471,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg, le 14 novembre 2025, n\u00b024\/06193","author":"Kohen","date":"8 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg, statuant en dernier ressort par jugement du 13 f\u00e9vrier 2026, se prononce sur une opposition \u00e0 une injonction de...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-KfphgU3nUqQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-KfphgU3nUqQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-KfphgU3nUqQ-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-KfphgU3nUqQ-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-KfphgU3nUqQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-KfphgU3nUqQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":495320,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-3-decembre-2025-n24-00728\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218471,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg, le 3 d\u00e9cembre 2025, n\u00b024\/00728","author":"Kohen","date":"8 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le p\u00f4le social du tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg, le 3 d\u00e9cembre 2025, statue sur un recours en remboursement de prestations vieillesse. L'organisme de...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":492280,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-14-novembre-2025-n23-10019\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218471,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg, le 14 novembre 2025, n\u00b023\/10019","author":"Kohen","date":"8 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le juge de l'ex\u00e9cution pr\u00e8s le tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg, statuant le 8 septembre 2025, se prononce sur une contestation de saisie-attribution. Le...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-1zAPNbJuDPI-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-1zAPNbJuDPI-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-1zAPNbJuDPI-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-1zAPNbJuDPI-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-1zAPNbJuDPI-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-1zAPNbJuDPI-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":495135,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-3-decembre-2025-n24-01060\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218471,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg, le 3 d\u00e9cembre 2025, n\u00b024\/01060","author":"Kohen","date":"8 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le P\u00f4le social du tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg, par jugement du 3 d\u00e9cembre 2025, a statu\u00e9 sur un recours form\u00e9 contre une d\u00e9cision de reconnaissance...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-lFdweM584mQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-lFdweM584mQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-lFdweM584mQ-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-lFdweM584mQ-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-lFdweM584mQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-lFdweM584mQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":493705,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-6-novembre-2025-n25-00138\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218471,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg, le 6 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/00138","author":"Kohen","date":"8 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal Judiciaire, dans une d\u00e9cision du 9 janvier 2025, a examin\u00e9 un litige relatif au paiement d'une facture de maintenance. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 prestataire...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-OHE90W2rQF4-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-OHE90W2rQF4-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-OHE90W2rQF4-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-OHE90W2rQF4-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-OHE90W2rQF4-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-OHE90W2rQF4-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1218471","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1218471"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1218471\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9511"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1218471"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1218471"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1218471"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}