{"id":1218473,"date":"2026-06-30T00:05:20","date_gmt":"2026-06-29T22:05:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T00:05:20","modified_gmt":"2026-06-29T22:05:20","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b023\/01644"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-la-consecration-de-la-responsabilite-de-lemployeur-pour-faute-inexcusable\">I. La cons\u00e9cration de la responsabilit\u00e9 de l&#8217;employeur pour faute inexcusable<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-laffirmation-de-lexposition-au-risque-et-de-la-conscience-du-danger\">A. L&#8217;affirmation de l&#8217;exposition au risque et de la conscience du danger<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-caracterisation-du-manquement-a-lobligation-de-securite\">B. La caract\u00e9risation du manquement \u00e0 l&#8217;obligation de s\u00e9curit\u00e9<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-la-reparation-integrale-des-prejudices-consecutifs-a-la-faute-inexcusable\">II. La r\u00e9paration int\u00e9grale des pr\u00e9judices cons\u00e9cutifs \u00e0 la faute inexcusable<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-lindemnisation-automatique-par-la-majoration-de-lindemnite-en-capital\">A. L&#8217;indemnisation automatique par la majoration de l&#8217;indemnit\u00e9 en capital<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-louverture-a-la-reparation-des-prejudices-personnels-non-couverts\">B. L&#8217;ouverture \u00e0 la r\u00e9paration des pr\u00e9judices personnels non couverts<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Par un jugement rendu le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Metz (p\u00f4le social) a eu \u00e0 conna\u00eetre d&#8217;une action en reconnaissance de la faute inexcusable de l&#8217;employeur \u00e0 l&#8217;origine d&#8217;une maladie professionnelle. Le demandeur, ancien salari\u00e9 des mines de fer, avait contract\u00e9 une asbestose (tableau 30A) apr\u00e8s plus de trente-trois ann\u00e9es pass\u00e9es au fond. Sa pathologie avait \u00e9t\u00e9 prise en charge par la caisse le 9 novembre 2021 et une indemnit\u00e9 en capital lui avait \u00e9t\u00e9 vers\u00e9e pour un taux d&#8217;incapacit\u00e9 permanente de 5 %. Le 4 d\u00e9cembre 2023, il a saisi la juridiction pour voir reconna\u00eetre la faute inexcusable de l&#8217;employeur, aux droits duquel vient l&#8217;Agent judiciaire de l&#8217;\u00c9tat, et obtenir la majoration de son indemnit\u00e9 ainsi que la r\u00e9paration de ses pr\u00e9judices personnels. L&#8217;Agent judiciaire de l&#8217;\u00c9tat contestait tant l&#8217;exposition au risque que la conscience du danger par l&#8217;employeur et l&#8217;absence de mesures de protection.<\/p>\n<p>La question de droit centrale \u00e9tait de savoir si les trois conditions cumulatives de la faute inexcusable \u2013 exposition au risque, conscience du danger par l&#8217;employeur et absence de mesures de protection \u2013 \u00e9taient r\u00e9unies en l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce. Le tribunal a r\u00e9pondu par l&#8217;affirmative. Il a retenu que le salari\u00e9 avait \u00e9t\u00e9 expos\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;inhalation de poussi\u00e8res d&#8217;amiante du fait de la pr\u00e9sence de cette substance dans les freins et les joints des engins utilis\u00e9s au fond. Il a consid\u00e9r\u00e9 que l&#8217;employeur, compte tenu de sa taille, de ses moyens techniques et de l&#8217;\u00e9tat des connaissances, ne pouvait ignorer le danger. Il a enfin jug\u00e9 que les mesures collectives et individuelles mises en \u0153uvre \u00e9taient inefficaces et que l&#8217;absence d&#8217;information et de formation caract\u00e9risait un manquement \u00e0 l&#8217;obligation de s\u00e9curit\u00e9. En cons\u00e9quence, il a ordonn\u00e9 la majoration maximale de l&#8217;indemnit\u00e9 en capital et allou\u00e9 21 000 euros au titre des pr\u00e9judices personnels.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-la-consecration-de-la-responsabilite-de-lemployeur-pour-faute-inexcusable\">I. La cons\u00e9cration de la responsabilit\u00e9 de l&#8217;employeur pour faute inexcusable<\/h2>\n<p>Le tribunal a minutieusement v\u00e9rifi\u00e9 la r\u00e9union des trois conditions n\u00e9cessaires \u00e0 la reconnaissance de la faute inexcusable. Il a d&#8217;abord \u00e9tabli l&#8217;exposition au risque en s&#8217;appuyant sur des attestations circonstanci\u00e9es de coll\u00e8gues de travail, avant de retenir que l&#8217;employeur avait ou aurait d\u00fb avoir conscience du danger, pour enfin constater l&#8217;absence de mesures de protection efficaces.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-laffirmation-de-lexposition-au-risque-et-de-la-conscience-du-danger\">A. L&#8217;affirmation de l&#8217;exposition au risque et de la conscience du danger<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal a rappel\u00e9 que le tableau 30A des maladies professionnelles ne fournit qu&#8217;une liste indicative des travaux susceptibles d&#8217;entra\u00eener l&#8217;affection. Il a soulign\u00e9 que <em>&#8220;le tableau 30A des maladies professionnelles pr\u00e9voit une liste simplement indicative des travaux susceptibles d\u2019entra\u00eener les affections qui y sont d\u00e9sign\u00e9es, de sorte qu\u2019il n\u2019impose pas que le salari\u00e9 ait directement manipul\u00e9 des produits amiant\u00e9s&#8221;<\/em>. Cette pr\u00e9cision permettait d&#8217;\u00e9carter l&#8217;argument de l&#8217;Agent judiciaire de l&#8217;\u00c9tat selon lequel le salari\u00e9 n&#8217;avait pas manipul\u00e9 directement de l&#8217;amiante. Pour caract\u00e9riser l&#8217;exposition, le tribunal s&#8217;est fond\u00e9 sur trois attestations particuli\u00e8res, jug\u00e9es <em>&#8220;suffisamment d\u00e9taill\u00e9es et circonstanci\u00e9es&#8221;<\/em>, \u00e9tablissant une exposition quotidienne aux poussi\u00e8res d&#8217;amiante contenues dans les freins et les joints des engins. La seule attestation de non-exposition \u00e9tablie par l&#8217;employeur lui-m\u00eame a \u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e9cart\u00e9e comme d\u00e9pourvue de force probante.<\/p>\n<p>S&#8217;agissant de la conscience du danger, le tribunal a adopt\u00e9 une approche in abstracto. Il a retenu que cette conscience s&#8217;appr\u00e9cie au moment de l&#8217;exposition et qu&#8217;il suffit de constater que l&#8217;employeur <em>&#8220;ne pouvait ignorer&#8221;<\/em> le risque. L&#8217;employeur, un \u00e9tablissement public \u00e0 caract\u00e8re industriel et commercial dot\u00e9 de moyens consid\u00e9rables, disposait d&#8217;un centre d&#8217;\u00e9tudes reconnu et de services m\u00e9dicaux performants. Les juges ont soulign\u00e9 le paradoxe de l&#8217;Agent judiciaire de l&#8217;\u00c9tat qui <em>&#8220;ne saurait soutenir ne pas avoir eu conscience du risque amiante, tout en affirmant, paradoxalement, avoir mis en place diff\u00e9rentes mesures face \u00e0 ce risque&#8221;<\/em>. La connaissance des dangers de l&#8217;amiante depuis le d\u00e9but du XXe si\u00e8cle et l&#8217;inscription de l&#8217;asbestose au tableau des maladies professionnelles d\u00e8s 1950 ont \u00e9t\u00e9 des \u00e9l\u00e9ments d\u00e9terminants. Cette position s&#8217;inscrit dans la lign\u00e9e d&#8217;une jurisprudence constante qui appr\u00e9cie la conscience du danger de mani\u00e8re objective, en fonction des connaissances scientifiques et techniques accessibles \u00e0 l&#8217;employeur \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9poque des faits.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-caracterisation-du-manquement-a-lobligation-de-securite\">B. La caract\u00e9risation du manquement \u00e0 l&#8217;obligation de s\u00e9curit\u00e9<\/h3>\n<p>Apr\u00e8s avoir \u00e9tabli l&#8217;exposition et la conscience du danger, le tribunal a examin\u00e9 si l&#8217;employeur avait pris les mesures n\u00e9cessaires pour pr\u00e9server la sant\u00e9 du salari\u00e9. Il a rappel\u00e9 que la charge de la preuve de la faute inexcusable incombe au salari\u00e9, ce qui implique \u00e9galement de d\u00e9montrer l&#8217;absence de mesures ad\u00e9quates. L&#8217;Agent judiciaire de l&#8217;\u00c9tat invoquait l&#8217;existence de mesures collectives (arrosage, ventilation) et individuelles (masques, surveillance m\u00e9dicale). Le tribunal a toutefois relev\u00e9 que <em>&#8220;l&#8217;AJE ne d\u00e9montre pas que le nombre de masques \u00e9tait suffisant pour que ces derniers puissent \u00eatre r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement chang\u00e9s, ni que les masques \u00e9taient adapt\u00e9s contre l&#8217;inhalation de poussi\u00e8res d&#8217;amiante&#8221;<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Le juge a \u00e9galement constat\u00e9 l&#8217;absence d&#8217;information et de formation sp\u00e9cifiques sur les dangers de l&#8217;amiante. Il a estim\u00e9 que cette carence <em>&#8220;a n\u00e9cessairement emp\u00each\u00e9 les salari\u00e9s, dont le demandeur, de se prot\u00e9ger efficacement contre l\u2019inhalation de poussi\u00e8res d\u2019amiante&#8221;<\/em>. La mise en place d&#8217;une surveillance m\u00e9dicale, m\u00eame sp\u00e9cialis\u00e9e, ne saurait pallier l&#8217;absence de mesures de protection en amont. Les t\u00e9moignages produits par le salari\u00e9, d\u00e9crivant l&#8217;inefficacit\u00e9 des syst\u00e8mes d&#8217;arrosage obstru\u00e9s par le calcaire et le caract\u00e8re non obligatoire du port du masque, ont \u00e9t\u00e9 retenus comme probants. En d\u00e9finitive, le tribunal a consid\u00e9r\u00e9 que <em>&#8220;le demandeur rapporte la preuve de la d\u00e9faillance de l\u2019employeur \u00e0 mettre en \u0153uvre \u00e0 son \u00e9gard toutes les mesures de protection collective et\/ou individuelle alors existantes&#8221;<\/em>. La faute inexcusable a ainsi \u00e9t\u00e9 pleinement caract\u00e9ris\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-la-reparation-integrale-des-prejudices-consecutifs-a-la-faute-inexcusable\">II. La r\u00e9paration int\u00e9grale des pr\u00e9judices cons\u00e9cutifs \u00e0 la faute inexcusable<\/h2>\n<p>La reconnaissance de la faute inexcusable ouvre droit pour la victime \u00e0 une r\u00e9paration major\u00e9e et \u00e9largie. Le tribunal a distingu\u00e9 deux cat\u00e9gories d&#8217;indemnisation : d&#8217;une part, l&#8217;indemnit\u00e9 en capital major\u00e9e automatiquement, et d&#8217;autre part, la r\u00e9paration des pr\u00e9judices personnels non couverts par le livre IV du code de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-lindemnisation-automatique-par-la-majoration-de-lindemnite-en-capital\">A. L&#8217;indemnisation automatique par la majoration de l&#8217;indemnit\u00e9 en capital<\/h3>\n<p>En application de l&#8217;article L. 452-2 du code de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale, la faute inexcusable de l&#8217;employeur emporte de plein droit la majoration de l&#8217;indemnit\u00e9 en capital ou de la rente vers\u00e9e \u00e0 la victime. Le tribunal a relev\u00e9 qu&#8217;aucune faute inexcusable n&#8217;\u00e9tait imputable au salari\u00e9, de sorte que la majoration devait \u00eatre maximale. Il a donc ordonn\u00e9 que l&#8217;indemnit\u00e9 en capital de 1 991,62 euros, correspondant au taux d&#8217;incapacit\u00e9 permanente de 5 %, soit major\u00e9e \u00e0 due concurrence. Cette majoration suivra l&#8217;\u00e9volution du taux d&#8217;incapacit\u00e9 en cas d&#8217;aggravation de l&#8217;\u00e9tat de sant\u00e9 de la victime. En cas de d\u00e9c\u00e8s r\u00e9sultant de la maladie professionnelle, le principe de la majoration restera acquis pour le calcul de la rente du conjoint survivant.<\/p>\n<p>Cette solution est parfaitement conforme au droit positif. La majoration automatique de l&#8217;indemnit\u00e9 en capital constitue une sanction directe de la faute inexcusable, ind\u00e9pendante de l&#8217;\u00e9valuation des pr\u00e9judices subis. Le tribunal a \u00e9galement rappel\u00e9 le m\u00e9canisme de r\u00e9cup\u00e9ration par la caisse des sommes avanc\u00e9es, conform\u00e9ment aux articles L. 452-2 et D. 452-1 du code de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale. La caisse, qui verse la majoration au salari\u00e9, peut ensuite se retourner contre l&#8217;employeur pour obtenir le remboursement du capital repr\u00e9sentatif. Ce dispositif garantit une indemnisation rapide de la victime tout en faisant supporter le co\u00fbt final \u00e0 l&#8217;employeur fautif.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-louverture-a-la-reparation-des-prejudices-personnels-non-couverts\">B. L&#8217;ouverture \u00e0 la r\u00e9paration des pr\u00e9judices personnels non couverts<\/h3>\n<p>L&#8217;article L. 452-3 du code de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale \u00e9num\u00e8re les pr\u00e9judices que la victime d&#8217;une faute inexcusable peut obtenir en compl\u00e9ment de la majoration de rente : souffrances physiques et morales, pr\u00e9judices esth\u00e9tique et d&#8217;agr\u00e9ment, et perte de possibilit\u00e9s de promotion professionnelle. Le tribunal a rappel\u00e9 que la rente ne r\u00e9pare pas le d\u00e9ficit fonctionnel permanent, lequel peut \u00eatre indemnis\u00e9 de mani\u00e8re compl\u00e9mentaire selon les r\u00e8gles de droit commun. Le demandeur sollicitait 15 000 euros pour le pr\u00e9judice physique, 20 000 euros pour le pr\u00e9judice moral et 3 000 euros pour le pr\u00e9judice sexuel.<\/p>\n<p>Concernant les souffrances physiques, le tribunal a constat\u00e9 l&#8217;absence de pi\u00e8ces m\u00e9dicales pour la p\u00e9riode ant\u00e9rieure \u00e0 la consolidation. Il s&#8217;est donc concentr\u00e9 sur la p\u00e9riode post\u00e9rieure, retenant que le certificat m\u00e9dical et les t\u00e9moignages de proches \u00e9tablissaient une dyspn\u00e9e d&#8217;effort et des essoufflements. Il a fix\u00e9 l&#8217;indemnisation \u00e0 5 000 euros. Pour le pr\u00e9judice moral, le tribunal a soulign\u00e9 l&#8217;anxi\u00e9t\u00e9 li\u00e9e \u00e0 la connaissance d&#8217;une maladie \u00e9volutive et irr\u00e9versible. La somme de 15 000 euros a \u00e9t\u00e9 allou\u00e9e, eu \u00e9gard \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e2ge de la victime (74 ans) et \u00e0 la nature de la pathologie. Enfin, le pr\u00e9judice sexuel a \u00e9t\u00e9 reconnu sur la base du t\u00e9moignage de l&#8217;\u00e9pouse d\u00e9crivant l&#8217;alt\u00e9ration des rapports intimes en raison de l&#8217;essoufflement. Une indemnisation de 1 000 euros a \u00e9t\u00e9 accord\u00e9e. Ces \u00e9valuations, mod\u00e9r\u00e9es mais coh\u00e9rentes avec les \u00e9l\u00e9ments produits, t\u00e9moignent d&#8217;une appr\u00e9ciation au cas par cas des souffrances endur\u00e9es, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la jurisprudence qui exige une caract\u00e9risation pr\u00e9cise de chaque pr\u00e9judice <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67ef68c66b85edc07d3454d2\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel de Bastia, 19 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b023\/00135 ; Cour d&#8217;appel de Riom, 1er avril 2025, n\u00b023\/00135)<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67b6c873def6bf6eb41d7132\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Bastia, le 19 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b023\/00135<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67ef68c66b85edc07d3454d2\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Riom, le 1 avril 2025, n\u00b023\/00135<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000028452256\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article D. 452-1 du Code de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<div align=\"left\">En cas de reconnaissance de la faute inexcusable de l&#8217;employeur, le capital repr\u00e9sentatif des d\u00e9penses engag\u00e9es par la caisse primaire d&#8217;assurance maladie au titre de la majoration mentionn\u00e9e \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 452-2 est \u00e9valu\u00e9 dans les conditions pr\u00e9vues \u00e0 l&#8217;article R. 454-1 et r\u00e9cup\u00e9r\u00e9 dans les m\u00eames conditions et en m\u00eame temps que les sommes allou\u00e9es au titre de la r\u00e9paration des pr\u00e9judices mentionn\u00e9s \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 452-3.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Par un jugement rendu le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Metz (p\u00f4le social) a eu \u00e0 conna\u00eetre d&#8217;une action en reconnaissance de la faute&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":4861,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cae67ccdc6046d478d8e49","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cae67ccdc6046d478d8e49","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cae67ccdc6046d478d8e49","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Metz","_kj_chambre":"CTX PROTECTION SOCIALE","_kj_rg":"23\/01644","_kj_date":"2026-03-27","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1218473","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b023\/01644 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Par un jugement rendu le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Metz (p\u00f4le social) a eu \u00e0 conna\u00eetre d&#039;une action en reconnaissance de la faute...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"pt_PT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b023\/01644\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Par un jugement rendu le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Metz (p\u00f4le social) a eu \u00e0 conna\u00eetre d&#039;une action en reconnaissance de la faute...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-29T22:05:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nils-kaEhf0eZme8-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"3856\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2592\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Escrito por\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tempo estimado de leitura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutos\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b023\\\/01644\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-29T22:05:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1927,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/nils-kaEhf0eZme8-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b023\\\/01644\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-29T22:05:20+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b023\\\/01644 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/nils-kaEhf0eZme8-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-29T22:05:20+00:00\",\"description\":\"Par un jugement rendu le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Metz (p\u00f4le social) a eu \u00e0 conna\u00eetre d'une action en reconnaissance de la faute...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/nils-kaEhf0eZme8-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/nils-kaEhf0eZme8-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":3856,\"height\":2592},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b023\\\/01644\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b023\/01644 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Par un jugement rendu le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Metz (p\u00f4le social) a eu \u00e0 conna\u00eetre d'une action en reconnaissance de la faute...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\/","og_locale":"pt_PT","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b023\/01644","og_description":"Par un jugement rendu le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Metz (p\u00f4le social) a eu \u00e0 conna\u00eetre d'une action en reconnaissance de la faute...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-06-29T22:05:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":3856,"height":2592,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nils-kaEhf0eZme8-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Escrito por":"Kohen","Tempo estimado de leitura":"9 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b023\/01644","datePublished":"2026-06-29T22:05:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\/"},"wordCount":1927,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nils-kaEhf0eZme8-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"pt-PT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b023\/01644","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-06-29T22:05:20+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b023\/01644 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nils-kaEhf0eZme8-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-29T22:05:20+00:00","description":"Par un jugement rendu le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Metz (p\u00f4le social) a eu \u00e0 conna\u00eetre d'une action en reconnaissance de la faute...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"pt-PT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-PT","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nils-kaEhf0eZme8-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nils-kaEhf0eZme8-unsplash.webp","width":3856,"height":2592},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n23-01644\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b023\/01644"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"pt-PT"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-PT","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-PT","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nils-kaEhf0eZme8-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-56YN","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":493529,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-7-novembre-2025-n24-00966\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218473,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 7 novembre 2025, n\u00b024\/00966","author":"Kohen","date":"8 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Metz, p\u00f4le social, statuant le 11 juin 2026, se prononce sur un recours contentieux relatif \u00e0 un trop-per\u00e7u d\u2019allocation aux...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-HoeAHyJKj6o-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-HoeAHyJKj6o-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-HoeAHyJKj6o-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-HoeAHyJKj6o-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-HoeAHyJKj6o-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-HoeAHyJKj6o-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":494878,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-octobre-2025-n21-01121\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218473,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 octobre 2025, n\u00b021\/01121","author":"Kohen","date":"8 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire, p\u00f4le social de Metz, statuant le 21 mai 2026, se prononce sur une demande en reconnaissance de faute inexcusable de l'employeur....","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/robin-ooode-A5hD0BMzsbo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/robin-ooode-A5hD0BMzsbo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/robin-ooode-A5hD0BMzsbo-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/robin-ooode-A5hD0BMzsbo-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/robin-ooode-A5hD0BMzsbo-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/robin-ooode-A5hD0BMzsbo-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1097059,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-bobigny-le-20-mars-2026-n2026l00867\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218473,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Bobigny, le 20 mars 2026, n\u00b02026L00867","author":"Kohen","date":"14 de Junho, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal de commerce de Bobigny, dans un jugement du 20 mars 2026, a prononc\u00e9 la jonction de deux instances pendantes. Cette d\u00e9cision s'inscrit dans le...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/louis-paulin-SYJrwRyI51E-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/louis-paulin-SYJrwRyI51E-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/louis-paulin-SYJrwRyI51E-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/louis-paulin-SYJrwRyI51E-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/louis-paulin-SYJrwRyI51E-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/louis-paulin-SYJrwRyI51E-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":494899,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-24-octobre-2025-n22-00597\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218473,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 24 octobre 2025, n\u00b022\/00597","author":"Kohen","date":"8 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire, p\u00f4le social, a statu\u00e9 le 12 mai 2026 sur un litige relatif \u00e0 un accident du travail. L\u2019affaire concernait la recevabilit\u00e9 d\u2019un...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-QMJsqsUvCmA-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-QMJsqsUvCmA-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-QMJsqsUvCmA-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-QMJsqsUvCmA-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-QMJsqsUvCmA-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-QMJsqsUvCmA-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":498891,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-novembre-2025-n24-01942\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218473,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 novembre 2025, n\u00b024\/01942","author":"Kohen","date":"8 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal administratif de Strasbourg, statuant le 27 novembre 2025, a examin\u00e9 un recours contre le refus de reconnaissance d'une maladie...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-Qi-Qyp5vc3o-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-Qi-Qyp5vc3o-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-Qi-Qyp5vc3o-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-Qi-Qyp5vc3o-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-Qi-Qyp5vc3o-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-Qi-Qyp5vc3o-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":494897,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-24-octobre-2025-n22-00861\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218473,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 24 octobre 2025, n\u00b022\/00861","author":"Kohen","date":"8 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Metz, statuant en mati\u00e8re sociale le 9 janvier 2024, a examin\u00e9 un recours contre une d\u00e9cision de commission de recours amiable....","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/samuel-pujades-3y1FUf7mjFw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/samuel-pujades-3y1FUf7mjFw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/samuel-pujades-3y1FUf7mjFw-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/samuel-pujades-3y1FUf7mjFw-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/samuel-pujades-3y1FUf7mjFw-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/samuel-pujades-3y1FUf7mjFw-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1218473","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1218473"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1218473\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4861"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1218473"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1218473"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1218473"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}