{"id":1220416,"date":"2026-06-30T08:41:09","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T06:41:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T08:41:09","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T06:41:09","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/02251"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-lexigence-dun-motif-legitime-pour-lexpertise-in-futurum\">I. L\u2019EXIGENCE D\u2019UN MOTIF L\u00c9GITIME POUR L\u2019EXPERTISE IN FUTURUM<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-caracterisation-dun-motif-legitime-par-des-elements-credibles-et-plausibles\">A. La caract\u00e9risation d\u2019un motif l\u00e9gitime par des \u00e9l\u00e9ments cr\u00e9dibles et plausibles<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-mise-hors-de-cause-du-mandataire-faute-de-motif-legitime-a-son-egard\">B. La mise hors de cause du mandataire faute de motif l\u00e9gitime \u00e0 son \u00e9gard<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-le-rejet-de-la-provision-et-la-portee-de-la-solution\">II. LE REJET DE LA PROVISION ET LA PORT\u00c9E DE LA SOLUTION<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-linsuffisance-de-lexpertise-amiable-face-a-lexigence-de-lobligation-non-serieu\">A. L\u2019insuffisance de l\u2019expertise amiable face \u00e0 l\u2019exigence de l\u2019obligation non s\u00e9rieusement contestable<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-portee-de-la-decision-conciliation-entre-mesure-probatoire-et-protection-de\">B. La port\u00e9e de la d\u00e9cision : conciliation entre mesure probatoire et protection des parties non impliqu\u00e9es<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 27 mars 2026, \u00e9tait saisi d\u2019une demande d\u2019expertise et de provision pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par un acqu\u00e9reur de v\u00e9hicule. La demanderesse avait r\u00e9serv\u00e9 un v\u00e9hicule d\u2019occasion aupr\u00e8s d\u2019un point de vente, mandataire du propri\u00e9taire vendeur, puis avait acquis ce v\u00e9hicule le 19 mars 2025. Peu apr\u00e8s la vente, un grave dysfonctionnement du moteur est survenu, n\u00e9cessitant son remplacement. Une expertise amiable a conclu \u00e0 un d\u00e9faut de fabrication de la bielle, ind\u00e9tectable lors de la vente. Par acte d\u2019assignation, la demanderesse a sollicit\u00e9 une expertise judiciaire et une provision \u00e0 valoir sur ses pr\u00e9judices, \u00e0 l\u2019encontre du constructeur automobile et du mandataire interm\u00e9diaire. Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s a ordonn\u00e9 l\u2019expertise au contradictoire du seul constructeur, rejet\u00e9 la demande de provision et mis hors de cause le mandataire. La question de droit centrale portait sur l\u2019application de l\u2019article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile : le motif l\u00e9gitime justifiant une mesure d\u2019instruction in futurum est-il caract\u00e9ris\u00e9 lorsqu\u2019un interm\u00e9diaire de vente n\u2019a commis aucune faute apparente, et l\u2019expertise amiable suffit-elle \u00e0 rendre l\u2019obligation du constructeur non s\u00e9rieusement contestable au sens de l\u2019article 835 alin\u00e9a 2 ? Le juge a r\u00e9pondu par la positive pour l\u2019expertise contre le constructeur, mais par la n\u00e9gative pour le mandataire et pour la provision.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-lexigence-dun-motif-legitime-pour-lexpertise-in-futurum\">I. L\u2019EXIGENCE D\u2019UN MOTIF L\u00c9GITIME POUR L\u2019EXPERTISE IN FUTURUM<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-caracterisation-dun-motif-legitime-par-des-elements-credibles-et-plausibles\">A. La caract\u00e9risation d\u2019un motif l\u00e9gitime par des \u00e9l\u00e9ments cr\u00e9dibles et plausibles<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s rappelle le cadre de l\u2019article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, qui permet d\u2019ordonner toute mesure d\u2019instruction l\u00e9galement admissible s\u2019il existe un motif l\u00e9gitime de conserver ou d\u2019\u00e9tablir avant tout proc\u00e8s la preuve de faits dont pourrait d\u00e9pendre la solution d\u2019un litige. Il pr\u00e9cise que le motif l\u00e9gitime exige un fait cr\u00e9dible et plausible, non une simple hypoth\u00e8se, et que le litige potentiel doit \u00eatre suffisamment d\u00e9termin\u00e9 dans son objet et son fondement juridique. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, les pi\u00e8ces produites, notamment les proc\u00e8s-verbaux d\u2019examen contradictoire et le rapport d\u2019expertise amiable, rendent vraisemblables les d\u00e9sordres all\u00e9gu\u00e9s, en particulier la casse du moteur due \u00e0 un d\u00e9faut de fabrication ind\u00e9tectable lors de la vente. Comme l\u2019\u00e9nonce la Cour d\u2019appel de Colmar, <em>&#8221; s\u2019il existe un motif l\u00e9gitime de conserver ou d\u2019\u00e9tablir avant tout proc\u00e8s la preuve de faits dont pourrait d\u00e9pendre la solution d\u2019un litige, les mesures d\u2019instruction l\u00e9galement admissibles peuvent \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9es &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67ef6fb87985d82da296f777\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Colmar, 3 avril 2025, n\u00b024\/02272)<\/a><\/strong>. Le juge en d\u00e9duit que l\u2019ensemble de ces \u00e9l\u00e9ments justifie l\u2019existence d\u2019un motif l\u00e9gitime pour ordonner une expertise judiciaire au contradictoire du constructeur, seul susceptible de voir sa responsabilit\u00e9 engag\u00e9e sur le fondement du vice cach\u00e9 ou du d\u00e9faut de fabrication. La d\u00e9cision applique ainsi strictement les conditions de l\u2019article 145 : le demandeur n\u2019a pas \u00e0 prouver les faits, mais doit en \u00e9tablir la cr\u00e9dibilit\u00e9.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-mise-hors-de-cause-du-mandataire-faute-de-motif-legitime-a-son-egard\">B. La mise hors de cause du mandataire faute de motif l\u00e9gitime \u00e0 son \u00e9gard<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge \u00e9carte la demande d\u2019expertise \u00e0 l\u2019encontre du mandataire interm\u00e9diaire. Il rel\u00e8ve que ce dernier n\u2019est pas le vendeur, mais un simple interm\u00e9diaire qui n\u2019a pas cach\u00e9 sa qualit\u00e9 et ne s\u2019est pas comport\u00e9 comme vendeur. En cons\u00e9quence, il ne r\u00e9pond pas de la garantie l\u00e9gale des vices cach\u00e9s. S\u2019il peut engager sa responsabilit\u00e9 contractuelle sur le fondement de l\u2019article 1992 du code civil pour faute de gestion, le demandeur ne justifie d\u2019aucun \u00e9l\u00e9ment rendant vraisemblable un d\u00e9faut de conseil ou d\u2019information. Le juge pr\u00e9cise que la facult\u00e9 pr\u00e9vue \u00e0 l\u2019article 145 ne saurait \u00eatre exerc\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019encontre d\u2019un d\u00e9fendeur qui, manifestement et en dehors de toute discussion au fond, ne pourrait voir sa responsabilit\u00e9 retenue dans une action principale. Cette appr\u00e9ciation s\u2019inscrit dans la jurisprudence constante selon laquelle le motif l\u00e9gitime doit \u00eatre appr\u00e9ci\u00e9 in concreto, et la mesure doit \u00eatre utile pour le litige potentiel. La Cour d\u2019appel de Grenoble rappelle que <em>&#8221; les mesures d\u2019instruction l\u00e9galement admissibles peuvent \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9es \u00e0 la demande de tout int\u00e9ress\u00e9, sur requ\u00eate ou en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, s\u2019il existe un motif l\u00e9gitime de conserver ou d\u2019\u00e9tablir avant tout proc\u00e8s la preuve de faits dont pourrait d\u00e9pendre la solution du litige &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6793332a32b173f45a7c8dbf\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Grenoble, 21 janvier 2025, n\u00b024\/02132)<\/a><\/strong>. Ici, faute d\u2019\u00e9l\u00e9ment rendant plausible une faute du mandataire, l\u2019expertise \u00e0 son encontre est pr\u00e9matur\u00e9e. Le juge op\u00e8re ainsi un contr\u00f4le rigoureux de la pertinence de la mesure \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9gard de chaque d\u00e9fendeur.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-le-rejet-de-la-provision-et-la-portee-de-la-solution\">II. LE REJET DE LA PROVISION ET LA PORT\u00c9E DE LA SOLUTION<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-linsuffisance-de-lexpertise-amiable-face-a-lexigence-de-lobligation-non-serieu\">A. L\u2019insuffisance de l\u2019expertise amiable face \u00e0 l\u2019exigence de l\u2019obligation non s\u00e9rieusement contestable<\/h3>\n<p>S\u2019agissant de la demande de provision form\u00e9e sur le fondement de l\u2019article 835 alin\u00e9a 2 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, le juge rappelle que l\u2019octroi d\u2019une provision suppose que l\u2019obligation ne soit pas s\u00e9rieusement contestable. Or, en l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, la seule expertise amiable est jug\u00e9e insuffisante pour consid\u00e9rer comme non s\u00e9rieusement contestable l\u2019obligation \u00e0 paiement du constructeur. Le juge estime qu\u2019une telle expertise, pour avoir une pleine force probante, doit \u00eatre corrobor\u00e9e par d\u2019autres \u00e9l\u00e9ments. Il souligne que seule la mesure d\u2019expertise judiciaire ordonn\u00e9e apportera les \u00e9l\u00e9ments techniques permettant de d\u00e9terminer les responsabilit\u00e9s. Cette solution est classique : le r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 provision ne peut anticiper le fond du litige lorsque la contestation est s\u00e9rieuse, et l\u2019expertise amiable, m\u00eame non contradictoire, ne suffit pas \u00e0 \u00e9carter tout doute raisonnable. Le juge rejette donc la demande de provision, tant \u00e0 l\u2019encontre du constructeur qu\u2019\u00e0 l\u2019encontre du mandataire, dont l\u2019obligation est \u00e9galement jug\u00e9e s\u00e9rieusement contestable. Il rappelle que l\u2019application de l\u2019article 145 n\u2019implique aucun pr\u00e9jug\u00e9 sur la responsabilit\u00e9 des parties, ce qui confirme la sp\u00e9cificit\u00e9 de la mesure probatoire par rapport \u00e0 une demande en paiement.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-portee-de-la-decision-conciliation-entre-mesure-probatoire-et-protection-de\">B. La port\u00e9e de la d\u00e9cision : conciliation entre mesure probatoire et protection des parties non impliqu\u00e9es<\/h3>\n<p>Cette ordonnance s\u2019inscrit dans une logique de conciliation entre la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 probatoire du demandeur et la protection des parties dont la responsabilit\u00e9 n\u2019est pas vraisemblable. En ordonnant l\u2019expertise uniquement au contradictoire du constructeur, le juge \u00e9vite d\u2019imposer une mesure co\u00fbteuse et intrusive \u00e0 un interm\u00e9diaire qui n\u2019a commis aucun acte fautif apparent. Il rappelle par ailleurs que les <em>&#8221; protestations et r\u00e9serves &#8220;<\/em> des d\u00e9fendeurs autres que les assureurs ne constituent pas une pr\u00e9tention au sens de l\u2019article 4 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, ce qui \u00e9carte toute ambigu\u00eft\u00e9 proc\u00e9durale. La port\u00e9e de cette d\u00e9cision est double : d\u2019une part, elle confirme que le motif l\u00e9gitime de l\u2019article 145 s\u2019appr\u00e9cie strictement pour chaque d\u00e9fendeur, en fonction de sa qualit\u00e9 et des \u00e9l\u00e9ments concrets invoqu\u00e9s ; d\u2019autre part, elle souligne que l\u2019expertise amiable, bien qu\u2019utile, ne saurait suffire \u00e0 \u00e9tablir une obligation non s\u00e9rieusement contestable dans le cadre d\u2019une demande de provision. En rejetant les demandes fond\u00e9es sur l\u2019article 700 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, le juge applique le principe selon lequel la partie qui sollicite une mesure probatoire supporte ses frais, sans pr\u00e9judice de la charge finale de l\u2019expertise. La solution est conforme \u00e0 la finalit\u00e9 de l\u2019article 145, qui n\u2019est pas un pr\u00e9jug\u00e9 sur le fond mais un outil destin\u00e9 \u00e0 pr\u00e9parer un \u00e9ventuel proc\u00e8s.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67ef6fb87985d82da296f777\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Colmar, le 3 avril 2025, n\u00b024\/02272<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6793332a32b173f45a7c8dbf\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Grenoble, le 21 janvier 2025, n\u00b024\/02132<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000051869339\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 145 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>S&#8217;il existe un motif l\u00e9gitime de conserver ou d&#8217;\u00e9tablir avant tout proc\u00e8s la preuve de faits dont pourrait d\u00e9pendre la solution d&#8217;un litige, les mesures d&#8217;instruction l\u00e9galement admissibles peuvent \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9es \u00e0 la demande de tout int\u00e9ress\u00e9, sur requ\u00eate ou en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>La juridiction territorialement comp\u00e9tente pour statuer sur une demande form\u00e9e en application du premier alin\u00e9a est, au choix du demandeur, celle susceptible de conna\u00eetre de l&#8217;affaire au fond ou, s&#8217;il y a lieu, celle dans le ressort de laquelle la mesure d&#8217;instruction doit \u00eatre ex\u00e9cut\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<p>Par d\u00e9rogation au deuxi\u00e8me alin\u00e9a, lorsque la mesure d&#8217;instruction porte sur un immeuble, la juridiction du lieu o\u00f9 est situ\u00e9 l&#8217;immeuble est seule comp\u00e9tente.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006445285\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 1992 du Code civil<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   Le mandataire r\u00e9pond non seulement du dol, mais encore des fautes qu&#8217;il commet dans sa gestion.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>   N\u00e9anmoins, la responsabilit\u00e9 relative aux fautes est appliqu\u00e9e moins rigoureusement \u00e0 celui dont le mandat est gratuit qu&#8217;\u00e0 celui qui re\u00e7oit un salaire.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410097\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 4 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   L&#8217;objet du litige est d\u00e9termin\u00e9 par les pr\u00e9tentions respectives des parties.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>   Ces pr\u00e9tentions sont fix\u00e9es par l&#8217;acte introductif d&#8217;instance et par les conclusions en d\u00e9fense. Toutefois l&#8217;objet du litige peut \u00eatre modifi\u00e9 par des demandes incidentes lorsque celles-ci se rattachent aux pr\u00e9tentions originaires par un lien suffisant.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000045268436\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 700 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Le juge condamne la partie tenue aux d\u00e9pens ou qui perd son proc\u00e8s \u00e0 payer :<\/p>\n<p>1\u00b0 A l&#8217;autre partie la somme qu&#8217;il d\u00e9termine, au titre des frais expos\u00e9s et non compris dans les d\u00e9pens ;<\/p>\n<p>2\u00b0 Et, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, \u00e0 l&#8217;avocat du b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de l&#8217;aide juridictionnelle partielle ou totale une somme au titre des honoraires et frais, non compris dans les d\u00e9pens, que le b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de l&#8217;aide aurait expos\u00e9s s&#8217;il n&#8217;avait pas eu cette aide. Dans ce cas, il est proc\u00e9d\u00e9 comme il est dit aux  alin\u00e9as 3 et 4 de l&#8217;article 37 de la loi n\u00b0 91-647 du 10 juillet 1991 .<\/p>\n<p>Dans tous les cas, le juge tient compte de l&#8217;\u00e9quit\u00e9 ou de la situation \u00e9conomique de la partie condamn\u00e9e. Il peut, m\u00eame d&#8217;office, pour des raisons tir\u00e9es des m\u00eames consid\u00e9rations, dire qu&#8217;il n&#8217;y a pas lieu \u00e0 ces condamnations.<\/p>\n<p>Les parties peuvent produire les justificatifs des sommes qu&#8217;elles demandent.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> La somme allou\u00e9e au titre du 2\u00b0 ne peut \u00eatre inf\u00e9rieure \u00e0 la part contributive de l&#8217;Etat major\u00e9e de 50 %.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 27 mars 2026, \u00e9tait saisi d\u2019une demande d\u2019expertise et de provision pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par un acqu\u00e9reur&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":4766,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cefe13cdc6046d47eb1e58","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cefe13cdc6046d47eb1e58","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cefe13cdc6046d47eb1e58","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Toulouse","_kj_chambre":"R\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s","_kj_rg":"25\/02251","_kj_date":"2026-03-27","_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1220416","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/02251 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 27 mars 2026, \u00e9tait saisi d\u2019une demande d\u2019expertise et de provision pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par un acqu\u00e9reur...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"pt_PT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/02251\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 27 mars 2026, \u00e9tait saisi d\u2019une demande d\u2019expertise et de provision pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par un acqu\u00e9reur...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-30T06:41:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pavan-trikutam-poNsj-vya34-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"4504\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3003\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Escrito por\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tempo estimado de leitura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutos\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/02251\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T06:41:09+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1952,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/pavan-trikutam-poNsj-vya34-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/02251\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-30T06:41:09+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/02251 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/pavan-trikutam-poNsj-vya34-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T06:41:09+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 27 mars 2026, \u00e9tait saisi d\u2019une demande d\u2019expertise et de provision pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par un acqu\u00e9reur...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/pavan-trikutam-poNsj-vya34-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/pavan-trikutam-poNsj-vya34-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":4504,\"height\":3003},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/02251\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/02251 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 27 mars 2026, \u00e9tait saisi d\u2019une demande d\u2019expertise et de provision pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par un acqu\u00e9reur...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\/","og_locale":"pt_PT","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/02251","og_description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 27 mars 2026, \u00e9tait saisi d\u2019une demande d\u2019expertise et de provision pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par un acqu\u00e9reur...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-06-30T06:41:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":4504,"height":3003,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pavan-trikutam-poNsj-vya34-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Escrito por":"Kohen","Tempo estimado de leitura":"10 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/02251","datePublished":"2026-06-30T06:41:09+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\/"},"wordCount":1952,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pavan-trikutam-poNsj-vya34-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"pt-PT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/02251","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-06-30T06:41:09+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/02251 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pavan-trikutam-poNsj-vya34-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-30T06:41:09+00:00","description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 27 mars 2026, \u00e9tait saisi d\u2019une demande d\u2019expertise et de provision pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par un acqu\u00e9reur...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"pt-PT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-PT","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pavan-trikutam-poNsj-vya34-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pavan-trikutam-poNsj-vya34-unsplash.webp","width":4504,"height":3003},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02251\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/02251"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"pt-PT"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-PT","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-PT","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pavan-trikutam-poNsj-vya34-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-57u8","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1207496,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-26-mars-2026-n25-03690\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220416,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 26 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/03690","author":"Kohen","date":"28 de Junho, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le 26 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse a rendu une d\u00e9cision de d\u00e9sistement dans une instance opposant une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 demanderesse \u00e0 une personne...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/wesley-tingey-KJgkqQcdynQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/wesley-tingey-KJgkqQcdynQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/wesley-tingey-KJgkqQcdynQ-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/wesley-tingey-KJgkqQcdynQ-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/wesley-tingey-KJgkqQcdynQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/wesley-tingey-KJgkqQcdynQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":457216,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/caa-caa-de-toulouse-20-01-2026-n-24tl02095\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220416,"position":1},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de TOULOUSE \u2013 20\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 24TL02095","author":"Kohen","date":"7 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La Cour administrative d'appel de Toulouse, dans sa d\u00e9cision du 20 janvier 2026, examine la validit\u00e9 d'une mesure d'\u00e9loignement frappant un citoyen...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/daniele-d-andreti-ud9u7beav2s-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/daniele-d-andreti-ud9u7beav2s-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/daniele-d-andreti-ud9u7beav2s-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/daniele-d-andreti-ud9u7beav2s-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/daniele-d-andreti-ud9u7beav2s-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/daniele-d-andreti-ud9u7beav2s-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1207386,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-bordeaux-le-27-mars-2026-n25-01502\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220416,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Bordeaux, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/01502","author":"Kohen","date":"28 de Junho, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"I. La r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de l'homologation d'un accord transactionnel en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 A. Les conditions de validit\u00e9 de la transaction soumise \u00e0 l'homologation La...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1076587,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-paris-le-8-juin-2026-n25pa04910\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220416,"position":3},"title":"Cour administrative d&#8217;appel de Paris, le 8 juin 2026, n\u00b025PA04910","author":"Kohen","date":"12 de Junho, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"I. L'affirmation d'une appr\u00e9ciation restrictive du motif l\u00e9gitime de tardivet\u00e9 de la demande d'asile A. La confirmation de l'absence de motif l\u00e9gitime...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;CEDH&quot;","block_context":{"text":"CEDH","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cedh\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/wei-hunag-0qGqvY7BA2g-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/wei-hunag-0qGqvY7BA2g-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/wei-hunag-0qGqvY7BA2g-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/wei-hunag-0qGqvY7BA2g-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/wei-hunag-0qGqvY7BA2g-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/wei-hunag-0qGqvY7BA2g-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":457687,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/caa-caa-de-toulouse-06-01-2026-n-25tl01858\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220416,"position":4},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de TOULOUSE \u2013 06\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25TL01858","author":"Kohen","date":"7 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La Cour administrative d'appel de Toulouse a rendu, le 6 janvier 2026, une d\u00e9cision relative au sursis \u00e0 ex\u00e9cution d'un jugement d'annulation. Un maire...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pascal-bernardon-UDzwFLM50Ac-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pascal-bernardon-UDzwFLM50Ac-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pascal-bernardon-UDzwFLM50Ac-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pascal-bernardon-UDzwFLM50Ac-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pascal-bernardon-UDzwFLM50Ac-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pascal-bernardon-UDzwFLM50Ac-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1091704,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00855\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220416,"position":5},"title":"Cour d&#8217;appel de La R\u00e9union, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/00855","author":"Kohen","date":"13 de Junho, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"I. LE DROIT D\u2019AGIR DU POSSESSEUR AFFRANCHI DE LA PREUVE DU DROIT DE PROPRI\u00c9T\u00c9 A. La cons\u00e9cration de la qualit\u00e9 \u00e0 agir fond\u00e9e sur la seule possession Par...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour d'appel&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour d'appel","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-dappel\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-gy0ATtkEcZs-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-gy0ATtkEcZs-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-gy0ATtkEcZs-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-gy0ATtkEcZs-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-gy0ATtkEcZs-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-gy0ATtkEcZs-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1220416","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1220416"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1220416\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4766"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1220416"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1220416"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1220416"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}