{"id":1220418,"date":"2026-06-30T08:41:27","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T06:41:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T08:41:27","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T06:41:27","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00180"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-ladmission-mesuree-du-motif-legitime-pour-lexpertise-judiciaire\">I. L\u2019admission mesur\u00e9e du motif l\u00e9gitime pour l\u2019expertise judiciaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-caracterisation-du-motif-legitime-par-des-elements-credibles\">A. La caract\u00e9risation du motif l\u00e9gitime par des \u00e9l\u00e9ments cr\u00e9dibles<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-les-limites-apportees-au-contradictoire-et-a-lextension-de-la-mesure\">B. Les limites apport\u00e9es au contradictoire et \u00e0 l\u2019extension de la mesure<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-le-refus-de-la-provision-face-a-lexigence-de-labsence-de-contestation-serieus\">II. Le refus de la provision face \u00e0 l\u2019exigence de l\u2019absence de contestation s\u00e9rieuse<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-linsuffisance-des-preuves-pour-etablir-une-obligation-non-serieusement-contest\">A. L\u2019insuffisance des preuves pour \u00e9tablir une obligation non s\u00e9rieusement contestable<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-lappreciation-de-la-charge-de-la-preuve-et-la-distinction-avec-le-fond\">B. L\u2019appr\u00e9ciation de la charge de la preuve et la distinction avec le fond<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le 27 mars 2026, le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s du Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse a rendu une ordonnance (n\u00b026\/00180) statuant sur une demande d\u2019expertise judiciaire et une demande de provision form\u00e9e par des ma\u00eetres d\u2019ouvrage \u00e0 l\u2019encontre de leur ma\u00eetre d\u2019\u0153uvre, dans le cadre d\u2019un litige relatif \u00e0 des travaux de r\u00e9novation et d\u2019extension d\u2019un immeuble. Les demandeurs ont fait r\u00e9aliser ces travaux par l\u2019EURL HBO HABITAT BOIS OCCITANIE en vertu d\u2019un contrat de ma\u00eetrise d\u2019\u0153uvre du 20 juin 2022, sans qu\u2019une r\u00e9ception n\u2019ait \u00e9t\u00e9 prononc\u00e9e. Se plaignant de d\u00e9sordres (malfa\u00e7ons affectant les ouvertures, la ventilation, la superficie du garage), ils ont produit un rapport d\u2019expertise amiable du 12 septembre 2023 et ont saisi le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s sur le fondement des articles 145 et 835 alin\u00e9a 2 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile.<\/p>\n<p>En premi\u00e8re instance, les demandeurs sollicitaient une expertise judiciaire au contradictoire du ma\u00eetre d\u2019\u0153uvre et de l\u2019EURL MSO MULTI SERVICES OCCITAN, ainsi qu\u2019une provision de 14 710 euros correspondant au co\u00fbt estim\u00e9 des travaux de reprise. Le ma\u00eetre d\u2019\u0153uvre n\u2019a pas comparu. Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s a fait droit \u00e0 la demande d\u2019expertise, mais seulement au contradictoire des demandeurs et de l\u2019EURL HBO HABITAT BOIS OCCITANIE, rejetant l\u2019extension \u00e0 l\u2019EURL MSO faute de justificatifs. Il a en revanche d\u00e9bout\u00e9 les demandeurs de leur demande de provision, aux motifs que l\u2019expertise amiable ne suffisait pas \u00e0 \u00e9tablir une obligation non s\u00e9rieusement contestable et que la nature des fautes n\u2019\u00e9tait pas d\u00e9termin\u00e9e. Il a mis les d\u00e9pens \u00e0 la charge des demandeurs et rejet\u00e9 leur demande fond\u00e9e sur l\u2019article 700 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile.<\/p>\n<p>La question de droit ainsi tranch\u00e9e porte sur les conditions de mise en \u0153uvre de l\u2019article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile lorsque des d\u00e9sordres sont all\u00e9gu\u00e9s en l\u2019absence de r\u00e9ception, et sur celles de l\u2019article 835 alin\u00e9a 2 du m\u00eame code lorsqu\u2019une provision est demand\u00e9e sur la seule base d\u2019une expertise amiable. La solution retenue distingue nettement le domaine de la mesure d\u2019instruction in futurum, caract\u00e9ris\u00e9e par un motif l\u00e9gitime, de celui de la provision, soumise \u00e0 l\u2019exigence d\u2019une obligation non s\u00e9rieusement contestable.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-ladmission-mesuree-du-motif-legitime-pour-lexpertise-judiciaire\">I. L\u2019admission mesur\u00e9e du motif l\u00e9gitime pour l\u2019expertise judiciaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-caracterisation-du-motif-legitime-par-des-elements-credibles\">A. La caract\u00e9risation du motif l\u00e9gitime par des \u00e9l\u00e9ments cr\u00e9dibles<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s a rappel\u00e9 que, selon l\u2019article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, une mesure d\u2019instruction peut \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9e d\u00e8s lors qu\u2019il existe un motif l\u00e9gitime de conserver ou \u00e9tablir la preuve de faits dont pourrait d\u00e9pendre la solution d\u2019un litige potentiel. Il a \u00e9nonc\u00e9 que ce motif l\u00e9gitime implique un fait cr\u00e9dible et plausible, ne relevant pas de la simple hypoth\u00e8se, et pr\u00e9sentant un lien utile avec un litige futur dont l\u2019objet et le fondement juridique sont suffisamment d\u00e9termin\u00e9s. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, les demandeurs ont produit un rapport d\u2019expertise amiable du 12 septembre 2023 faisant \u00e9tat de d\u00e9sordres pr\u00e9cis : mauvaise r\u00e9alisation des appuis fen\u00eatres, non-conformit\u00e9 des linteaux, absence de grilles de ventilation, d\u00e9fauts affectant les ouvertures et compromettant la destination et la p\u00e9rennit\u00e9 de l\u2019ouvrage. L\u2019expert amiable a estim\u00e9 le co\u00fbt des reprises \u00e0 14 710 euros. Le juge en a d\u00e9duit que ces \u00e9l\u00e9ments rendaient vraisemblables les d\u00e9sordres all\u00e9gu\u00e9s et justifiaient l\u2019existence d\u2019un motif l\u00e9gitime pour ordonner une expertise judiciaire. Cette approche est conforme \u00e0 la jurisprudence constante selon laquelle la seule production d\u2019un rapport d\u2019expertise amiable peut suffire \u00e0 \u00e9tablir un motif l\u00e9gitime, d\u00e8s lors qu\u2019il pr\u00e9sente des constatations pr\u00e9cises et non hypoth\u00e9tiques. Dans une esp\u00e8ce similaire, la Cour d\u2019appel de Poitiers a jug\u00e9 qu\u2019un rapport d\u2019expertise amiable, m\u00eame non contradictoire, constitue un \u00e9l\u00e9ment rendant possible qu\u2019une action ne soit pas forclose et justifie l\u2019expertise sollicit\u00e9e <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6799c43d5331f58c9ee86fc6\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Poitiers, 28 janvier 2025, n\u00b024\/01487)<\/a><\/strong>. Ici, le juge toulousain s\u2019inscrit dans cette ligne en retenant que les d\u00e9sordres peuvent proc\u00e9der de fautes d\u2019ex\u00e9cution, de conception ou de direction, justifiant ainsi une mesure destin\u00e9e \u00e0 pr\u00e9ciser les causes.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-les-limites-apportees-au-contradictoire-et-a-lextension-de-la-mesure\">B. Les limites apport\u00e9es au contradictoire et \u00e0 l\u2019extension de la mesure<\/h3>\n<p>Cependant, le juge a circonscrit strictement le p\u00e9rim\u00e8tre de l\u2019expertise en la limitant au contradictoire des seuls demandeurs et du ma\u00eetre d\u2019\u0153uvre, l\u2019EURL HBO HABITAT BOIS OCCITANIE. Il a \u00e9cart\u00e9 l\u2019extension \u00e0 l\u2019EURL MSO MULTI SERVICES OCCITAN, au motif que les demandeurs n\u2019avaient produit aucun justificatif de l\u2019intervention de cette soci\u00e9t\u00e9, ni march\u00e9 de travaux, ni facture, ni \u00e9changes \u00e9crits. Ils relevaient eux-m\u00eames une ind\u00e9termination du num\u00e9ro RCS sur les factures non produites. Le juge a pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 qu\u2019il appartiendrait aux demandeurs d\u2019apporter de plus amples \u00e9l\u00e9ments et, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, de solliciter l\u2019extension des op\u00e9rations apr\u00e8s avis de l\u2019expert. Cette d\u00e9cision illustre le pouvoir souverain du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s d\u2019appr\u00e9cier l\u2019utilit\u00e9 de la mesure au contradictoire de chaque partie. L\u2019article 145 exige en effet que la mesure soit l\u00e9galement admissible, ce qui suppose que la personne mise en cause soit identifi\u00e9e avec suffisamment de vraisemblance. En l\u2019absence d\u2019\u00e9l\u00e9ment objectif liant l\u2019EURL MSO aux d\u00e9sordres, le juge a l\u00e9gitimement refus\u00e9 de l\u2019appeler \u00e0 la proc\u00e9dure. Cette solution pr\u00e9serve l\u2019efficacit\u00e9 de l\u2019expertise tout en \u00e9vitant une mise en cause abusive.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-le-refus-de-la-provision-face-a-lexigence-de-labsence-de-contestation-serieus\">II. Le refus de la provision face \u00e0 l\u2019exigence de l\u2019absence de contestation s\u00e9rieuse<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-linsuffisance-des-preuves-pour-etablir-une-obligation-non-serieusement-contest\">A. L\u2019insuffisance des preuves pour \u00e9tablir une obligation non s\u00e9rieusement contestable<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge a rejet\u00e9 la demande de provision form\u00e9e sur le fondement de l\u2019article 835 alin\u00e9a 2 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, lequel permet d\u2019accorder une provision lorsque l\u2019obligation n\u2019est pas s\u00e9rieusement contestable. Il a rappel\u00e9 qu\u2019il appartient au demandeur de prouver l\u2019existence de l\u2019obligation, puis au d\u00e9fendeur de d\u00e9montrer une contestation s\u00e9rieuse. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, la mat\u00e9rialit\u00e9 des d\u00e9sordres n\u2019\u00e9tait \u00e9tablie que par une expertise amiable. Or, le juge a estim\u00e9 que ce seul rapport ne pouvait servir de fondement \u00e0 une condamnation, car il n\u00e9cessitait d\u2019\u00eatre corrobor\u00e9 par d\u2019autres \u00e9l\u00e9ments \u2013 ce qui justifiait d\u2019ailleurs le recours \u00e0 l\u2019expertise judiciaire. En outre, le type de faute (ex\u00e9cution, conception ou suivi de chantier) n\u2019\u00e9tait pas d\u00e9termin\u00e9 avec certitude. D\u00e8s lors, l\u2019obligation de r\u00e9paration ne pr\u00e9sentait pas le caract\u00e8re non s\u00e9rieusement contestable requis. Cette position est prudente et conforme \u00e0 la jurisprudence de la Cour de cassation, qui exige que le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s ne puisse allouer une provision que si l\u2019obligation est certaine dans son principe et dans son montant. La Cour d\u2019appel de Montpellier a consid\u00e9r\u00e9 que l\u2019accord des parties sur le principe d\u2019une garantie contractuelle ne suffit pas \u00e0 \u00e9carter toute contestation s\u00e9rieuse lorsque l\u2019\u00e9tendue de l\u2019indemnisation reste discut\u00e9e <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67e641b6391a7e1509473ae5\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Montpellier, 27 mars 2025, n\u00b024\/02622)<\/a><\/strong>. Ici, l\u2019incertitude sur l\u2019imputabilit\u00e9 des d\u00e9sordres rendait la contestation s\u00e9rieuse.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-lappreciation-de-la-charge-de-la-preuve-et-la-distinction-avec-le-fond\">B. L\u2019appr\u00e9ciation de la charge de la preuve et la distinction avec le fond<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge a \u00e9galement soulign\u00e9 que l\u2019octroi d\u2019une provision suppose que l\u2019existence de l\u2019obligation ne soit pas s\u00e9rieusement contestable, ce qui implique une appr\u00e9ciation plus rigoureuse que celle du motif l\u00e9gitime requis pour l\u2019expertise. En l\u2019\u00e9tat du dossier, les demandeurs n\u2019avaient pas apport\u00e9 la preuve suffisante d\u2019une faute imputable au ma\u00eetre d\u2019\u0153uvre. L\u2019expertise amiable ne constituait qu\u2019un indice, non une preuve d\u00e9finitive. Le juge a ainsi refus\u00e9 de se prononcer sur le fond du litige, renvoyant les parties \u00e0 se pourvoir au principal. Cette solution est conforme \u00e0 la nature sp\u00e9cifique du r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 provision, qui ne saurait anticiper le jugement au fond. En mettant les d\u00e9pens \u00e0 la charge des demandeurs, le juge a rappel\u00e9 que l\u2019action en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 fond\u00e9e sur l\u2019article 145 est une mesure probatoire qui incombe \u00e0 celui qui la sollicite. Ce refus de provision ne pr\u00e9juge pas de l\u2019issue du proc\u00e8s au fond, mais il souligne la rigueur avec laquelle le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s appr\u00e9cie le caract\u00e8re non s\u00e9rieusement contestable de l\u2019obligation, en particulier lorsque les preuves sont encore \u00e0 consolider.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67e641b6391a7e1509473ae5\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Montpellier, le 27 mars 2025, n\u00b024\/02622<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6799c43d5331f58c9ee86fc6\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Poitiers, le 28 janvier 2025, n\u00b024\/01487<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000045268436\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 700 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Le juge condamne la partie tenue aux d\u00e9pens ou qui perd son proc\u00e8s \u00e0 payer :<\/p>\n<p>1\u00b0 A l&#8217;autre partie la somme qu&#8217;il d\u00e9termine, au titre des frais expos\u00e9s et non compris dans les d\u00e9pens ;<\/p>\n<p>2\u00b0 Et, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, \u00e0 l&#8217;avocat du b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de l&#8217;aide juridictionnelle partielle ou totale une somme au titre des honoraires et frais, non compris dans les d\u00e9pens, que le b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de l&#8217;aide aurait expos\u00e9s s&#8217;il n&#8217;avait pas eu cette aide. Dans ce cas, il est proc\u00e9d\u00e9 comme il est dit aux  alin\u00e9as 3 et 4 de l&#8217;article 37 de la loi n\u00b0 91-647 du 10 juillet 1991 .<\/p>\n<p>Dans tous les cas, le juge tient compte de l&#8217;\u00e9quit\u00e9 ou de la situation \u00e9conomique de la partie condamn\u00e9e. Il peut, m\u00eame d&#8217;office, pour des raisons tir\u00e9es des m\u00eames consid\u00e9rations, dire qu&#8217;il n&#8217;y a pas lieu \u00e0 ces condamnations.<\/p>\n<p>Les parties peuvent produire les justificatifs des sommes qu&#8217;elles demandent.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> La somme allou\u00e9e au titre du 2\u00b0 ne peut \u00eatre inf\u00e9rieure \u00e0 la part contributive de l&#8217;Etat major\u00e9e de 50 %.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000051869339\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 145 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>S&#8217;il existe un motif l\u00e9gitime de conserver ou d&#8217;\u00e9tablir avant tout proc\u00e8s la preuve de faits dont pourrait d\u00e9pendre la solution d&#8217;un litige, les mesures d&#8217;instruction l\u00e9galement admissibles peuvent \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9es \u00e0 la demande de tout int\u00e9ress\u00e9, sur requ\u00eate ou en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>La juridiction territorialement comp\u00e9tente pour statuer sur une demande form\u00e9e en application du premier alin\u00e9a est, au choix du demandeur, celle susceptible de conna\u00eetre de l&#8217;affaire au fond ou, s&#8217;il y a lieu, celle dans le ressort de laquelle la mesure d&#8217;instruction doit \u00eatre ex\u00e9cut\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<p>Par d\u00e9rogation au deuxi\u00e8me alin\u00e9a, lorsque la mesure d&#8217;instruction porte sur un immeuble, la juridiction du lieu o\u00f9 est situ\u00e9 l&#8217;immeuble est seule comp\u00e9tente.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le 27 mars 2026, le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s du Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse a rendu une ordonnance (n\u00b026\/00180) statuant sur une demande d\u2019expertise&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9730,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cefd8fcdc6046d47eb1514","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cefd8fcdc6046d47eb1514","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cefd8fcdc6046d47eb1514","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Toulouse","_kj_chambre":"R\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s","_kj_rg":"26\/00180","_kj_date":"2026-03-27","_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1220418","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00180 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le 27 mars 2026, le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s du Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse a rendu une ordonnance (n\u00b026\/00180) statuant sur une demande d\u2019expertise...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"pt_PT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00180\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le 27 mars 2026, le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s du Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse a rendu une ordonnance (n\u00b026\/00180) statuant sur une demande d\u2019expertise...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-30T06:41:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-CUq6KAqzzNY-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"6048\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"4024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Escrito por\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tempo estimado de leitura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutos\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00180\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T06:41:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1976,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/virginia-marinova-CUq6KAqzzNY-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00180\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-30T06:41:27+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00180 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/virginia-marinova-CUq6KAqzzNY-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T06:41:27+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le 27 mars 2026, le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s du Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse a rendu une ordonnance (n\u00b026\\\/00180) statuant sur une demande d\u2019expertise...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/virginia-marinova-CUq6KAqzzNY-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/virginia-marinova-CUq6KAqzzNY-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":6048,\"height\":4024},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00180\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00180 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le 27 mars 2026, le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s du Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse a rendu une ordonnance (n\u00b026\/00180) statuant sur une demande d\u2019expertise...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\/","og_locale":"pt_PT","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00180","og_description":"Le 27 mars 2026, le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s du Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse a rendu une ordonnance (n\u00b026\/00180) statuant sur une demande d\u2019expertise...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-06-30T06:41:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":6048,"height":4024,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-CUq6KAqzzNY-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Escrito por":"Kohen","Tempo estimado de leitura":"10 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00180","datePublished":"2026-06-30T06:41:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\/"},"wordCount":1976,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-CUq6KAqzzNY-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"pt-PT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00180","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-06-30T06:41:27+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00180 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-CUq6KAqzzNY-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-30T06:41:27+00:00","description":"Le 27 mars 2026, le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s du Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse a rendu une ordonnance (n\u00b026\/00180) statuant sur une demande d\u2019expertise...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"pt-PT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-PT","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-CUq6KAqzzNY-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-CUq6KAqzzNY-unsplash.webp","width":6048,"height":4024},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00180\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00180"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"pt-PT"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-PT","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-PT","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-CUq6KAqzzNY-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-57ua","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":447243,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-le-14-aout-2025-n25-00180\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220418,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire, le 14 ao\u00fbt 2025, n\u00b025\/00180","author":"","date":"5 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La Cour d\u2019appel de Grasse, statuant selon la proc\u00e9dure acc\u00e9l\u00e9r\u00e9e au fond le 14 ao\u00fbt 2025, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisie d\u2019une demande d\u2019autorisation de vente de biens...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/andrej-lisakov-fLyCZtHPWjA-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/andrej-lisakov-fLyCZtHPWjA-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/andrej-lisakov-fLyCZtHPWjA-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/andrej-lisakov-fLyCZtHPWjA-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/andrej-lisakov-fLyCZtHPWjA-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/andrej-lisakov-fLyCZtHPWjA-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":442299,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/cour-dappel-le-5-novembre-2025-n25-00180\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220418,"position":1},"title":"Cour d&#8217;appel, le 5 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/00180","author":"","date":"4 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"L\u2019ordonnance du juge de la mise en \u00e9tat du tribunal judiciaire de Besan\u00e7on du 16 janvier 2025 avait accord\u00e9 une provision de 27 530 euros \u00e0 un associ\u00e9...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour d'appel&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour d'appel","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-dappel\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-UacA8X7HWwg-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-UacA8X7HWwg-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-UacA8X7HWwg-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-UacA8X7HWwg-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-UacA8X7HWwg-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-UacA8X7HWwg-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":447622,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-le-12-aout-2025-n25-00180\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220418,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire, le 12 ao\u00fbt 2025, n\u00b025\/00180","author":"","date":"5 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal judiciaire d\u2019\u00c9vry, statuant en la formation des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s, a rendu une ordonnance le 12 ao\u00fbt 2025 dans un litige opposant une bailleuse...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-m4kXI_iQmsE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-m4kXI_iQmsE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-m4kXI_iQmsE-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-m4kXI_iQmsE-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-m4kXI_iQmsE-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-m4kXI_iQmsE-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1201680,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/cour-dappel-de-montpellier-le-21-avril-2026-n26-00180\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220418,"position":3},"title":"Cour d&#8217;appel de Montpellier, le 21 avril 2026, n\u00b026\/00180","author":"Kohen","date":"27 de Junho, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Par une ordonnance rendue le 21 avril 2026, la cour d'appel de Montpellier, statuant sans audience, a rejet\u00e9 la d\u00e9claration d'appel form\u00e9e par un...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour d'appel&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour d'appel","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-dappel\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nathan-cima-y5aFdoCjB5U-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nathan-cima-y5aFdoCjB5U-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nathan-cima-y5aFdoCjB5U-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nathan-cima-y5aFdoCjB5U-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nathan-cima-y5aFdoCjB5U-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nathan-cima-y5aFdoCjB5U-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1076712,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-paris-le-8-juin-2026-n25pa05580\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220418,"position":4},"title":"Cour administrative d&#8217;appel de Paris, le 8 juin 2026, n\u00b025PA05580","author":"Kohen","date":"12 de Junho, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Par un arr\u00eat du 8 juin 2026, la cour administrative d'appel de Paris (8\u00e8me chambre B, n\u00b025PA05580) a annul\u00e9 un refus de titre de s\u00e9jour assorti d'une...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Droit du travail&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Droit du travail","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/droit-du-travail\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-KfxfnO7EWX4-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-KfxfnO7EWX4-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-KfxfnO7EWX4-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-KfxfnO7EWX4-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-KfxfnO7EWX4-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-KfxfnO7EWX4-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1207496,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-26-mars-2026-n25-03690\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220418,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 26 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/03690","author":"Kohen","date":"28 de Junho, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le 26 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse a rendu une d\u00e9cision de d\u00e9sistement dans une instance opposant une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 demanderesse \u00e0 une personne...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/wesley-tingey-KJgkqQcdynQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/wesley-tingey-KJgkqQcdynQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/wesley-tingey-KJgkqQcdynQ-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/wesley-tingey-KJgkqQcdynQ-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/wesley-tingey-KJgkqQcdynQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/wesley-tingey-KJgkqQcdynQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1220418","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1220418"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1220418\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9730"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1220418"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1220418"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1220418"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}