{"id":1220422,"date":"2026-06-30T08:42:08","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T06:42:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T08:42:08","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T06:42:08","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00206"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-laffirmation-du-pouvoir-souverain-du-juge-des-referes-dans-lappreciation-du-mo\">I. L\u2019affirmation du pouvoir souverain du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s dans l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation du motif l\u00e9gitime<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-une-application-rigoureuse-des-conditions-de-larticle-145-du-code-de-procedure\">A. Une application rigoureuse des conditions de l\u2019article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-relativisation-de-lexigence-probatoire-au-stade-du-refere\">B. La relativisation de l\u2019exigence probatoire au stade du r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-la-portee-de-lordonnance-une-decision-pragmatique-aux-implications-mesurees\">II. La port\u00e9e de l\u2019ordonnance : une d\u00e9cision pragmatique aux implications mesur\u00e9es<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-une-decision-conforme-a-la-jurisprudence-recente-sur-larticle-145\">A. Une d\u00e9cision conforme \u00e0 la jurisprudence r\u00e9cente sur l\u2019article 145<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-les-consequences-procedurales-et-financieres-pour-les-parties\">B. Les cons\u00e9quences proc\u00e9durales et financi\u00e8res pour les parties<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a ordonn\u00e9 une expertise judiciaire \u00e0 la demande d\u2019un acqu\u00e9reur de v\u00e9hicule d\u2019occasion, sur le fondement de l\u2019article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. Le demandeur avait achet\u00e9 le 25 mars 2025 un v\u00e9hicule BMW 118i aupr\u00e8s d\u2019un vendeur professionnel. Peu apr\u00e8s la vente, il s\u2019est plaint de d\u00e9sordres m\u00e9caniques, dont le remplacement de joints et du joint de culasse, estim\u00e9s \u00e0 5 397,03 euros selon un devis du 28 mars 2025.<\/p>\n<p>L\u2019acqu\u00e9reur a assign\u00e9 le vendeur en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 pour obtenir une mesure d\u2019instruction avant tout proc\u00e8s. Le vendeur, bien que r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement assign\u00e9, n\u2019a pas constitu\u00e9 avocat. Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s a accueilli la demande, ordonnant une expertise au contradictoire du vendeur et mettant les d\u00e9pens \u00e0 la charge du demandeur. La question de droit portait sur les conditions d\u2019application de l\u2019article 145 : l\u2019acqu\u00e9reur justifiait-il d\u2019un motif l\u00e9gitime de conserver ou d\u2019\u00e9tablir la preuve des faits dont pourrait d\u00e9pendre un litige potentiel, alors qu\u2019il ne produisait ni le prix d\u2019achat ni le dernier contr\u00f4le technique ?<\/p>\n<p>Le juge a r\u00e9pondu par l\u2019affirmative, consid\u00e9rant que le devis rendait vraisemblables les d\u00e9sordres et que l\u2019\u00e9ventuelle action au fond n\u2019\u00e9tait pas manifestement vou\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9chec. Il a ainsi ordonn\u00e9 l\u2019expertise. Cette d\u00e9cision illustre l\u2019office du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s face \u00e0 une demande probatoire in futurum.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-laffirmation-du-pouvoir-souverain-du-juge-des-referes-dans-lappreciation-du-mo\">I. L\u2019affirmation du pouvoir souverain du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s dans l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation du motif l\u00e9gitime<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-une-application-rigoureuse-des-conditions-de-larticle-145-du-code-de-procedure\">A. Une application rigoureuse des conditions de l\u2019article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s rappelle en pr\u00e9ambule les conditions de l\u2019article 145 : <em>&#8221; peuvent \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9es en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, toutes mesures l\u00e9galement admissibles chaque fois qu\u2019il existe un motif l\u00e9gitime de conserver ou d\u2019\u00e9tablir avant tout proc\u00e8s la preuve des faits dont pourrait d\u00e9pendre la solution d\u2019un litige &#8220;<\/em>. Il pr\u00e9cise que le motif l\u00e9gitime est un <em>&#8221; fait cr\u00e9dible et plausible, ne relevant pas de la simple hypoth\u00e8se et qui pr\u00e9sente un lien utile avec un litige potentiel futur &#8220;<\/em>. Cette d\u00e9finition reprend la jurisprudence constante selon laquelle le juge doit s\u2019assurer que l\u2019action au fond n\u2019est pas manifestement vou\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9chec. La Cour d\u2019appel de Paris a jug\u00e9 \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard que <em>&#8221; pour ordonner une expertise en application de ce texte, le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s doit \u2018seulement\u2019 constater l\u2019existence d\u2019un proc\u00e8s \u00ab en germe &#8220;<\/em>, possible et non manifestement vou\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9chec \u00bb <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67932fe79097fd849ae8ac46\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Paris, 23 janvier 2025, n\u00b024\/08373)<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le juge applique cette grille avec rigueur. Il rel\u00e8ve que les pi\u00e8ces produites, notamment le devis, <em>&#8221; rendent vraisemblables les d\u00e9sordres all\u00e9gu\u00e9s &#8220;<\/em>. Il souligne \u00e9galement que l\u2019acqu\u00e9reur s\u2019en est plaint <em>&#8221; peu de temps apr\u00e8s la vente &#8220;<\/em>, ce qui ancre la demande dans un litige plausible et non hypoth\u00e9tique. Il \u00e9carte ainsi l\u2019absence de justificatif du prix d\u2019achat et du dernier contr\u00f4le technique en estimant que ces lacunes n\u2019\u00f4tent pas tout cr\u00e9dit aux all\u00e9gations. Le juge fait preuve de souplesse dans l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation de la vraisemblance, confirmant que la mesure probatoire ne pr\u00e9juge pas du fond.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-relativisation-de-lexigence-probatoire-au-stade-du-refere\">B. La relativisation de l\u2019exigence probatoire au stade du r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge rappelle que l\u2019article 145 n\u2019implique <em>&#8221; aucun pr\u00e9jug\u00e9 sur la responsabilit\u00e9 des parties [\u2026] ni sur les chances de succ\u00e8s du proc\u00e8s susceptible d\u2019\u00eatre ult\u00e9rieurement engag\u00e9 &#8220;<\/em>. Cette formule classique permet d\u2019all\u00e9ger la charge probatoire du demandeur. La Cour d\u2019appel de Rouen a pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 que <em>&#8221; le motif l\u00e9gitime existe d\u00e8s lors que l\u2019\u00e9ventuelle action au fond n\u2019est pas manifestement vou\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9chec, que la mesure demand\u00e9e est l\u00e9galement admissible, qu\u2019elle est utile et am\u00e9liore la situation probatoire des parties &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67e4e9b0310ca50852f74015\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Rouen, 26 mars 2025, n\u00b024\/02480)<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le juge applique ce standard de mani\u00e8re pragmatique. Il admet que l\u2019acqu\u00e9reur n\u2019a pas \u00e0 d\u00e9montrer l\u2019existence des faits, mais seulement \u00e0 justifier d\u2019<em>&#8221; \u00e9l\u00e9ments rendant cr\u00e9dibles ses suppositions &#8220;<\/em>. Le devis constitue un commencement de preuve suffisant. Le juge \u00e9carte implicitement l\u2019argument selon lequel l\u2019absence de contr\u00f4le technique rendrait le litige hypoth\u00e9tique. Il consid\u00e8re que la mesure d\u2019expertise am\u00e9liorera la situation probatoire de l\u2019acqu\u00e9reur, ce qui justifie son utilit\u00e9. Cette approche est conforme \u00e0 la jurisprudence qui retient une conception large du motif l\u00e9gitime, d\u00e8s lors que la mesure n\u2019est pas frustratoire.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-la-portee-de-lordonnance-une-decision-pragmatique-aux-implications-mesurees\">II. La port\u00e9e de l\u2019ordonnance : une d\u00e9cision pragmatique aux implications mesur\u00e9es<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-une-decision-conforme-a-la-jurisprudence-recente-sur-larticle-145\">A. Une d\u00e9cision conforme \u00e0 la jurisprudence r\u00e9cente sur l\u2019article 145<\/h3>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision s\u2019inscrit dans le courant jurisprudentiel qui favorise l\u2019acc\u00e8s \u00e0 la preuve en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9. La Cour d\u2019appel de Paris insiste sur le fait que le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s ne doit pas <em>&#8221; statuer sur le bien-fond\u00e9 de l\u2019action au fond &#8220;<\/em> et que <em>&#8221; ni l\u2019urgence ni l\u2019absence de contestation s\u00e9rieuse ne sont des conditions d\u2019application de ce texte &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67932fe79097fd849ae8ac46\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Paris, 23 janvier 2025, n\u00b024\/08373)<\/a><\/strong>. Le juge toulousain suit cette ligne en ordonnant l\u2019expertise malgr\u00e9 l\u2019absence de certaines pi\u00e8ces essentielles, comme le prix d\u2019achat. Il se montre pragmatique : le litige est cr\u00e9dible, la mesure est utile, et le vendeur pourra contradictoirement discuter les conclusions de l\u2019expert.<\/p>\n<p>Cette d\u00e9cision confirme que le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s dispose d\u2019un large pouvoir d\u2019appr\u00e9ciation pour \u00e9carter les d\u00e9fauts de preuve mineurs. Elle s\u00e9curise la position de l\u2019acqu\u00e9reur qui, sans expertise, aurait eu des difficult\u00e9s \u00e0 \u00e9tablir l\u2019ant\u00e9riorit\u00e9 des d\u00e9sordres. Elle est \u00e9galement coh\u00e9rente avec la mission confi\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019expert, qui devra notamment d\u00e9terminer si les vices \u00e9taient ant\u00e9rieurs \u00e0 la vente et s\u2019ils \u00e9taient d\u00e9celables. Le juge \u00e9vite ainsi un d\u00e9ni de justice tout en respectant le principe de la contradiction.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-les-consequences-procedurales-et-financieres-pour-les-parties\">B. Les cons\u00e9quences proc\u00e9durales et financi\u00e8res pour les parties<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge met les d\u00e9pens \u00e0 la charge du demandeur, <em>&#8221; d\u00e8s lors que le fondement de l\u2019action s\u2019analyse comme une recherche probatoire au b\u00e9n\u00e9fice de la partie qui en prend l\u2019initiative &#8220;<\/em>. Cette solution est usuelle : celui qui sollicite une mesure d\u2019instruction avance les frais, sans pr\u00e9juger de la charge d\u00e9finitive apr\u00e8s le proc\u00e8s au fond. Le juge rappelle \u00e9galement que la consignation initiale de 1 800 euros est \u00e0 la charge de l\u2019acqu\u00e9reur, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article 271 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, sous peine de caducit\u00e9 de la d\u00e9signation de l\u2019expert.<\/p>\n<p>Cette r\u00e9partition des frais est classique en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 probatoire. Elle incite les demandeurs \u00e0 ne solliciter une expertise que lorsqu\u2019ils disposent d\u2019\u00e9l\u00e9ments s\u00e9rieux. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le juge a estim\u00e9 que l\u2019acqu\u00e9reur justifiait d\u2019un motif l\u00e9gitime, mais il a choisi de ne pas r\u00e9server les d\u00e9pens, se conformant \u00e0 l\u2019article 491 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile qui impose au juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s de statuer sur leur sort. Cette solution est conforme \u00e0 la pratique des juges du fond, qui mettent les d\u00e9pens \u00e0 la charge du demandeur au r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, sauf circonstances particuli\u00e8res. Elle ne pr\u00e9juge pas de la charge finale des frais d\u2019expertise, qui pourra \u00eatre imput\u00e9e au vendeur si sa responsabilit\u00e9 est retenue ult\u00e9rieurement.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67932fe79097fd849ae8ac46\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Paris, le 23 janvier 2025, n\u00b024\/08373<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67e4e9b0310ca50852f74015\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Rouen, le 26 mars 2025, n\u00b024\/02480<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000051869339\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 145 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>S&#8217;il existe un motif l\u00e9gitime de conserver ou d&#8217;\u00e9tablir avant tout proc\u00e8s la preuve de faits dont pourrait d\u00e9pendre la solution d&#8217;un litige, les mesures d&#8217;instruction l\u00e9galement admissibles peuvent \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9es \u00e0 la demande de tout int\u00e9ress\u00e9, sur requ\u00eate ou en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>La juridiction territorialement comp\u00e9tente pour statuer sur une demande form\u00e9e en application du premier alin\u00e9a est, au choix du demandeur, celle susceptible de conna\u00eetre de l&#8217;affaire au fond ou, s&#8217;il y a lieu, celle dans le ressort de laquelle la mesure d&#8217;instruction doit \u00eatre ex\u00e9cut\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<p>Par d\u00e9rogation au deuxi\u00e8me alin\u00e9a, lorsque la mesure d&#8217;instruction porte sur un immeuble, la juridiction du lieu o\u00f9 est situ\u00e9 l&#8217;immeuble est seule comp\u00e9tente.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410407\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 271 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   A d\u00e9faut de consignation dans le d\u00e9lai et selon les modalit\u00e9s impartis, la d\u00e9signation de l&#8217;expert est caduque \u00e0 moins que le juge, \u00e0 la demande d&#8217;une des parties se pr\u00e9valant d&#8217;un motif l\u00e9gitime, ne d\u00e9cide une prorogation du d\u00e9lai ou un relev\u00e9 de la caducit\u00e9. L&#8217;instance est poursuivie sauf \u00e0 ce qu&#8217;il soit tir\u00e9 toute cons\u00e9quence de l&#8217;abstention ou du refus de consigner.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000034747112\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 491 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s qui assortit sa d\u00e9cision d&#8217;une astreinte peut s&#8217;en r\u00e9server la liquidation.<\/p>\n<p>Il statue sur les d\u00e9pens.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a ordonn\u00e9 une expertise judiciaire \u00e0 la demande d\u2019un acqu\u00e9reur de v\u00e9hicule&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9429,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cefdf6cdc6046d47eb1c37","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cefdf6cdc6046d47eb1c37","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cefdf6cdc6046d47eb1c37","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Toulouse","_kj_chambre":"R\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s","_kj_rg":"26\/00206","_kj_date":"2026-03-27","_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1220422","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00206 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a ordonn\u00e9 une expertise judiciaire \u00e0 la demande d\u2019un acqu\u00e9reur de v\u00e9hicule...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"pt_PT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00206\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a ordonn\u00e9 une expertise judiciaire \u00e0 la demande d\u2019un acqu\u00e9reur de v\u00e9hicule...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-30T06:42:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-xfwU5HPZmGw-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"8192\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"4320\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Escrito por\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tempo estimado de leitura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutos\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00206\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T06:42:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1724,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/alex-shuper-xfwU5HPZmGw-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00206\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-30T06:42:08+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00206 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/alex-shuper-xfwU5HPZmGw-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T06:42:08+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a ordonn\u00e9 une expertise judiciaire \u00e0 la demande d\u2019un acqu\u00e9reur de v\u00e9hicule...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/alex-shuper-xfwU5HPZmGw-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/alex-shuper-xfwU5HPZmGw-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":8192,\"height\":4320},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00206\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00206 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a ordonn\u00e9 une expertise judiciaire \u00e0 la demande d\u2019un acqu\u00e9reur de v\u00e9hicule...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\/","og_locale":"pt_PT","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00206","og_description":"Le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a ordonn\u00e9 une expertise judiciaire \u00e0 la demande d\u2019un acqu\u00e9reur de v\u00e9hicule...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-06-30T06:42:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":8192,"height":4320,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-xfwU5HPZmGw-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Escrito por":"Kohen","Tempo estimado de leitura":"8 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00206","datePublished":"2026-06-30T06:42:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\/"},"wordCount":1724,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-xfwU5HPZmGw-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"pt-PT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00206","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-06-30T06:42:08+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00206 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-xfwU5HPZmGw-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-30T06:42:08+00:00","description":"Le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a ordonn\u00e9 une expertise judiciaire \u00e0 la demande d\u2019un acqu\u00e9reur de v\u00e9hicule...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"pt-PT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-PT","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-xfwU5HPZmGw-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-xfwU5HPZmGw-unsplash.webp","width":8192,"height":4320},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00206\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00206"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"pt-PT"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-PT","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-PT","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-xfwU5HPZmGw-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-57ue","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":456885,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/caa-caa-de-toulouse-27-01-2026-n-25tl01037\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220422,"position":0},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de TOULOUSE \u2013 27\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25TL01037","author":"Kohen","date":"7 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La pr\u00e9sente ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, rendue par une cour administrative d\u2019appel, statue sur un appel form\u00e9 contre le rejet d\u2019une demande de provision. Le...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456888,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/caa-caa-de-toulouse-27-01-2026-n-25tl01039\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220422,"position":1},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de TOULOUSE \u2013 27\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25TL01039","author":"Kohen","date":"7 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La pr\u00e9sente ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, rendue par une cour administrative d\u2019appel, statue sur un appel dirig\u00e9 contre le rejet d\u2019une demande de provision....","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":457061,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/ce-conseil-detat-22-01-2026-n-511666\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220422,"position":2},"title":"CE \u2013 Conseil d&#8217;\u00c9tat \u2013 22\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 511666","author":"Kohen","date":"7 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat a rendu, le 22 janvier 2026, une ordonnance relative au droit fondamental \u00e0 l\u2019h\u00e9bergement d\u2019urgence. Les requ\u00e9rants,...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rosilaine-alves-674oH-T1wNo-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rosilaine-alves-674oH-T1wNo-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rosilaine-alves-674oH-T1wNo-unsplash-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rosilaine-alves-674oH-T1wNo-unsplash-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rosilaine-alves-674oH-T1wNo-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rosilaine-alves-674oH-T1wNo-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1207386,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-bordeaux-le-27-mars-2026-n25-01502\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220422,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Bordeaux, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/01502","author":"Kohen","date":"28 de Junho, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"I. La r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de l'homologation d'un accord transactionnel en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 A. Les conditions de validit\u00e9 de la transaction soumise \u00e0 l'homologation La...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":493843,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-4-novembre-2025-n25-01241\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220422,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 4 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/01241","author":"Kohen","date":"8 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 4 novembre 2025, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande de restitution d\u2019un v\u00e9hicule et de diverses mesures...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rafael-garcin-DnyhSrgrrNc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rafael-garcin-DnyhSrgrrNc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rafael-garcin-DnyhSrgrrNc-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rafael-garcin-DnyhSrgrrNc-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rafael-garcin-DnyhSrgrrNc-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rafael-garcin-DnyhSrgrrNc-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1201576,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-3-avril-2026-n2026r00028\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220422,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Chamb\u00e9ry, le 3 avril 2026, n\u00b02026R00028","author":"Kohen","date":"27 de Junho, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"I. L\u2019AFFIRMATION D\u2019UN POUVOIR DISCR\u00c9TIONNAIRE DU JUGE DES R\u00c9F\u00c9R\u00c9S EN MATI\u00c8RE DE JONCTION D\u2019INSTANCES A. Le constat d\u2019un lien objectif entre les litiges Le...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1220422","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1220422"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1220422\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9429"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1220422"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1220422"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1220422"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}