{"id":1220423,"date":"2026-06-30T08:42:16","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T06:42:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T08:42:16","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T06:42:16","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00828"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-laffirmation-du-principe-de-lobligation-aux-charges-de-copropriete\">I. L\u2019affirmation du principe de l\u2019obligation aux charges de copropri\u00e9t\u00e9<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-confirmation-du-caractere-certain-de-la-creance-en-labsence-de-contestation\">A. La confirmation du caract\u00e8re certain de la cr\u00e9ance en l\u2019absence de contestation<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-lextension-de-la-condamnation-aux-frais-necessaires-de-recouvrement\">B. L\u2019extension de la condamnation aux frais n\u00e9cessaires de recouvrement<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-la-reconnaissance-dun-prejudice-distinct-du-simple-retard-de-paiement\">II. La reconnaissance d\u2019un pr\u00e9judice distinct du simple retard de paiement<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-ladmission-dun-prejudice-moral-pour-le-syndicat-des-coproprietaires\">A. L\u2019admission d\u2019un pr\u00e9judice moral pour le syndicat des copropri\u00e9taires<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-limitation-des-pretentions-accessoires-par-un-controle-judiciaire-strict\">B. La limitation des pr\u00e9tentions accessoires par un contr\u00f4le judiciaire strict<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Par un jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire rendu le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse (1\u00e8re Chambre civile, n\u00b025\/00828) a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande en paiement de charges de copropri\u00e9t\u00e9 form\u00e9e par un syndicat des copropri\u00e9taires \u00e0 l\u2019encontre d\u2019une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 copropri\u00e9taire d\u00e9faillante. Le syndicat demandeur r\u00e9clamait le principal des charges, des frais de recouvrement, des dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats pour pr\u00e9judice moral, ainsi que les d\u00e9pens. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9fenderesse, bien que r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement assign\u00e9e, n\u2019a pas constitu\u00e9 avocat. Le juge a partiellement accueilli ces demandes, retenant le principe de l\u2019obligation aux charges tout en op\u00e9rant un contr\u00f4le rigoureux sur les frais accessoires et en allouant une somme limit\u00e9e au titre du pr\u00e9judice moral. La question centrale \u00e9tait de savoir si un copropri\u00e9taire non comparant pouvait \u00eatre condamn\u00e9 au paiement de charges de copropri\u00e9t\u00e9, de frais de recouvrement et de dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats distincts, et dans quelle mesure le juge devait v\u00e9rifier le bien-fond\u00e9 de ces pr\u00e9tentions non contest\u00e9es. Le tribunal a r\u00e9pondu par l\u2019affirmative sur le principe, tout en r\u00e9duisant certaines demandes accessoires faute de justification suffisante.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-laffirmation-du-principe-de-lobligation-aux-charges-de-copropriete\">I. L\u2019affirmation du principe de l\u2019obligation aux charges de copropri\u00e9t\u00e9<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-confirmation-du-caractere-certain-de-la-creance-en-labsence-de-contestation\">A. La confirmation du caract\u00e8re certain de la cr\u00e9ance en l\u2019absence de contestation<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal rappelle d\u2019abord, \u00e0 titre liminaire, que le d\u00e9faut de comparution du d\u00e9fendeur n\u2019exon\u00e8re pas le juge de v\u00e9rifier le bien-fond\u00e9 de la demande, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article 472 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. Le juge ne peut d\u00e9duire l\u2019existence de la cr\u00e9ance de la seule abstention proc\u00e9durale ; il doit l\u2019\u00e9tablir par l\u2019analyse des pi\u00e8ces produites. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le syndicat demandeur a vers\u00e9 aux d\u00e9bats le contrat de syndic, les proc\u00e8s-verbaux d\u2019assembl\u00e9es g\u00e9n\u00e9rales approuvant les comptes de 2022 \u00e0 2025, les appels de fonds correspondants, les mises en demeure et un d\u00e9compte d\u00e9taill\u00e9. Le tribunal se fonde sur l\u2019article 10 de la loi du 10 juillet 1965, qui impose aux copropri\u00e9taires de participer aux charges selon les r\u00e8gles l\u00e9gales, et sur l\u2019article 35 du d\u00e9cret du 17 mars 1967, qui conf\u00e8re aux appels provisionnels du syndic un caract\u00e8re certain, liquide et exigible. Il retient que <em>&#8221; l\u2019obligation \u00e0 la dette existe d\u00e8s lors que l\u2019assembl\u00e9e g\u00e9n\u00e9rale des copropri\u00e9taires a approuv\u00e9 les comptes pr\u00e9sent\u00e9s par le syndic et qu\u2019aucun recours n\u2019a \u00e9t\u00e9 form\u00e9 dans le d\u00e9lai l\u00e9gal &#8220;<\/em>. Cette solution est conforme \u00e0 la jurisprudence constante, qui consid\u00e8re que les d\u00e9cisions d\u2019assembl\u00e9e g\u00e9n\u00e9rale non contest\u00e9es dans le d\u00e9lai de l\u2019article 42 de la loi de 1965 ne peuvent plus \u00eatre remises en cause <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6799c935d742d0b11d26bda3\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Grenoble, 28 janvier 2025, n\u00b024\/01511)<\/a><\/strong>. Le tribunal admet ainsi que la cr\u00e9ance de charges est certaine \u00e0 hauteur de 8.753,17 euros, et condamne la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9fenderesse \u00e0 la payer avec int\u00e9r\u00eats au taux l\u00e9gal \u00e0 compter de la premi\u00e8re mise en demeure.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-lextension-de-la-condamnation-aux-frais-necessaires-de-recouvrement\">B. L\u2019extension de la condamnation aux frais n\u00e9cessaires de recouvrement<\/h3>\n<p>Le syndicat demandeur sollicitait \u00e9galement le remboursement de frais de recouvrement, qu\u2019il qualifiait de dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats. Le tribunal op\u00e8re une requalification : la demande s\u2019analyse en r\u00e9alit\u00e9 sur le fondement de l\u2019article 10-1 a) de la loi du 10 juillet 1965, qui permet d\u2019imputer au seul copropri\u00e9taire concern\u00e9 <em>&#8221; les frais n\u00e9cessaires expos\u00e9s par le syndicat, notamment les frais de mise en demeure, de relance et de prise d\u2019hypoth\u00e8que &#8220;<\/em>. Il v\u00e9rifie la justification de ces frais. Il retient la somme de 108 euros pour les deux mises en demeure par lettre recommand\u00e9e avec accus\u00e9 de r\u00e9ception, dont les justificatifs sont produits. En revanche, il \u00e9carte la somme de 399 euros r\u00e9clam\u00e9e au titre de la constitution du dossier transmis \u00e0 l\u2019auxiliaire de justice, au motif que le contrat de syndic ne pr\u00e9voit cette indemnit\u00e9 qu\u2019en cas de <em>&#8221; diligences exceptionnelles &#8220;<\/em>, et qu\u2019aucune pi\u00e8ce ne d\u00e9montre la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 de telles diligences. Le tribunal rappelle ainsi que la qualification de <em>&#8221; frais n\u00e9cessaires &#8220;<\/em> au sens de l\u2019article 10-1 ne saurait \u00eatre une simple clause de style ; elle exige une d\u00e9monstration concr\u00e8te par le syndicat. La condamnation partielle \u00e0 108 euros illustre un contr\u00f4le judiciaire rigoureux des frais accessoires, \u00e9vitant que le copropri\u00e9taire d\u00e9faillant ne soit syst\u00e9matiquement tenu de rembourser des honoraires forfaitaires non justifi\u00e9s.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-la-reconnaissance-dun-prejudice-distinct-du-simple-retard-de-paiement\">II. La reconnaissance d\u2019un pr\u00e9judice distinct du simple retard de paiement<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-ladmission-dun-prejudice-moral-pour-le-syndicat-des-coproprietaires\">A. L\u2019admission d\u2019un pr\u00e9judice moral pour le syndicat des copropri\u00e9taires<\/h3>\n<p>Sur le fondement de l\u2019article 1231-6 du code civil, le syndicat demandeur sollicitait 300 euros de dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats pour pr\u00e9judice moral. Le tribunal accueille cette demande en consid\u00e9rant que <em>&#8221; la d\u00e9faillance du d\u00e9fendeur dans le paiement de sa quote-part de charges, malgr\u00e9 mises en demeure, est de nature \u00e0 causer un pr\u00e9judice au syndicat des copropri\u00e9taires qui doit faire l\u2019avance des sommes dues et cr\u00e9e \u00e9galement une d\u00e9sorganisation de la tr\u00e9sorerie, pr\u00e9judice distinct de celui r\u00e9par\u00e9 par l\u2019allocation des int\u00e9r\u00eats moratoires &#8220;<\/em>. Cette solution n\u2019est pas nouvelle en jurisprudence : les juridictions du fond reconnaissent r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement que la carence prolong\u00e9e d\u2019un copropri\u00e9taire cause un trouble de gestion au syndicat, qui doit avancer les fonds et peut subir des tensions de tr\u00e9sorerie. Le tribunal fait ici une application souple de l\u2019article 1231-6, qui exige un pr\u00e9judice ind\u00e9pendant du retard et une mauvaise foi. La mauvaise foi est implicitement d\u00e9duite de la persistance de l\u2019impay\u00e9 malgr\u00e9 les mises en demeure. La somme allou\u00e9e de 300 euros reste modeste et proportionn\u00e9e, \u00e9vitant une double indemnisation avec les int\u00e9r\u00eats moratoires d\u00e9j\u00e0 octroy\u00e9s. Cette d\u00e9cision confirme que le pr\u00e9judice moral est un instrument utile pour sanctionner les comportements dilatoires, m\u00eame si son quantum reste discr\u00e9tionnaire.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-limitation-des-pretentions-accessoires-par-un-controle-judiciaire-strict\">B. La limitation des pr\u00e9tentions accessoires par un contr\u00f4le judiciaire strict<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal statue \u00e9galement sur les autres demandes accessoires : il condamne la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9fenderesse aux d\u00e9pens, incluant les frais de sommation de payer (160,92 euros), et \u00e0 800 euros sur le fondement de l\u2019article 700 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. Il constate l\u2019ex\u00e9cution provisoire de plein droit. Ce faisant, le juge exerce un contr\u00f4le pr\u00e9cis de chaque poste de d\u00e9penses. Il \u00e9carte notamment la demande de doublement des frais de constitution de dossier (2 x 399 euros), faute de justification des <em>&#8221; diligences exceptionnelles &#8220;<\/em> contractuellement requises. Cette rigueur est salutaire : elle \u00e9vite que le syndicat ne r\u00e9percute syst\u00e9matiquement sur le copropri\u00e9taire d\u00e9faillant des frais de gestion interne qui rel\u00e8vent de ses charges ordinaires. Elle incite les syndics \u00e0 mieux documenter leurs interventions contentieuses. Le jugement illustre ainsi un \u00e9quilibre entre la protection du syndicat cr\u00e9ancier, l\u00e9gitimement fond\u00e9 \u00e0 r\u00e9clamer les sommes dues, et la protection du copropri\u00e9taire d\u00e9biteur contre des frais arbitraires ou insuffisamment justifi\u00e9s. La port\u00e9e de cette d\u00e9cision est double : elle rappelle le principe de l\u2019obligation aux charges en cas d\u2019absence de contestation, et elle pr\u00e9cise les conditions strictes de remboursement des frais de recouvrement et d\u2019indemnisation du pr\u00e9judice moral.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67c000ee26e434f8e04c5fe6\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Basse-Terre, le 20 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b023\/00166<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6799c935d742d0b11d26bda3\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Grenoble, le 28 janvier 2025, n\u00b024\/01511<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410732\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 472 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">   Si le d\u00e9fendeur ne compara\u00eet pas, il est n\u00e9anmoins statu\u00e9 sur le fond.<\/p>\n<p>    Le juge ne fait droit \u00e0 la demande que dans la mesure o\u00f9 il l&#8217;estime r\u00e9guli\u00e8re, recevable et bien fond\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000032010133\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 1231-6 du Code civil<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Les dommages et int\u00e9r\u00eats dus \u00e0 raison du retard dans le paiement d&#8217;une obligation de somme d&#8217;argent consistent dans l&#8217;int\u00e9r\u00eat au taux l\u00e9gal, \u00e0 compter de la mise en demeure.<\/p>\n<p>Ces dommages et int\u00e9r\u00eats sont dus sans que le cr\u00e9ancier soit tenu de justifier d&#8217;aucune perte.<\/p>\n<p>Le cr\u00e9ancier auquel son d\u00e9biteur en retard a caus\u00e9, par sa mauvaise foi, un pr\u00e9judice ind\u00e9pendant de ce retard, peut obtenir des dommages et int\u00e9r\u00eats distincts de l&#8217;int\u00e9r\u00eat moratoire.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000045268436\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 700 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Le juge condamne la partie tenue aux d\u00e9pens ou qui perd son proc\u00e8s \u00e0 payer :<\/p>\n<p>1\u00b0 A l&#8217;autre partie la somme qu&#8217;il d\u00e9termine, au titre des frais expos\u00e9s et non compris dans les d\u00e9pens ;<\/p>\n<p>2\u00b0 Et, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, \u00e0 l&#8217;avocat du b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de l&#8217;aide juridictionnelle partielle ou totale une somme au titre des honoraires et frais, non compris dans les d\u00e9pens, que le b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de l&#8217;aide aurait expos\u00e9s s&#8217;il n&#8217;avait pas eu cette aide. Dans ce cas, il est proc\u00e9d\u00e9 comme il est dit aux  alin\u00e9as 3 et 4 de l&#8217;article 37 de la loi n\u00b0 91-647 du 10 juillet 1991 .<\/p>\n<p>Dans tous les cas, le juge tient compte de l&#8217;\u00e9quit\u00e9 ou de la situation \u00e9conomique de la partie condamn\u00e9e. Il peut, m\u00eame d&#8217;office, pour des raisons tir\u00e9es des m\u00eames consid\u00e9rations, dire qu&#8217;il n&#8217;y a pas lieu \u00e0 ces condamnations.<\/p>\n<p>Les parties peuvent produire les justificatifs des sommes qu&#8217;elles demandent.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> La somme allou\u00e9e au titre du 2\u00b0 ne peut \u00eatre inf\u00e9rieure \u00e0 la part contributive de l&#8217;Etat major\u00e9e de 50 %.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Par un jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire rendu le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse (1\u00e8re Chambre civile, n\u00b025\/00828) a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":4764,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cef0fccdc6046d47ea4666","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cef0fccdc6046d47ea4666","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cef0fccdc6046d47ea4666","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Mulhouse","_kj_chambre":"1\u00e8re Chambre civile","_kj_rg":"25\/00828","_kj_date":"2026-03-27","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1220423","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00828 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Par un jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire rendu le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse (1\u00e8re Chambre civile, n\u00b025\/00828) a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"pt_PT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00828\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Par un jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire rendu le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse (1\u00e8re Chambre civile, n\u00b025\/00828) a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-30T06:42:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"4592\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3056\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Escrito por\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tempo estimado de leitura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutos\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/00828\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T06:42:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1739,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/00828\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-30T06:42:16+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/00828 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T06:42:16+00:00\",\"description\":\"Par un jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire rendu le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse (1\u00e8re Chambre civile, n\u00b025\\\/00828) a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":4592,\"height\":3056},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/00828\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00828 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Par un jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire rendu le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse (1\u00e8re Chambre civile, n\u00b025\/00828) a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\/","og_locale":"pt_PT","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00828","og_description":"Par un jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire rendu le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse (1\u00e8re Chambre civile, n\u00b025\/00828) a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-06-30T06:42:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":4592,"height":3056,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Escrito por":"Kohen","Tempo estimado de leitura":"8 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00828","datePublished":"2026-06-30T06:42:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\/"},"wordCount":1739,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"pt-PT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00828","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-06-30T06:42:16+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00828 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-30T06:42:16+00:00","description":"Par un jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire rendu le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse (1\u00e8re Chambre civile, n\u00b025\/00828) a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"pt-PT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-PT","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp","width":4592,"height":3056},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00828\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00828"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"pt-PT"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-PT","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-PT","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-57uf","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":491228,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-18-novembre-2025-n25-00178\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220423,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse, le 18 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/00178","author":"Kohen","date":"8 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse, statuant en mati\u00e8re sociale le 18 novembre 2025, a examin\u00e9 un recours form\u00e9 par un employeur. Cet employeur contestait...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-6QR1fxoLiDQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-6QR1fxoLiDQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-6QR1fxoLiDQ-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-6QR1fxoLiDQ-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-6QR1fxoLiDQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-6QR1fxoLiDQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":488901,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-25-novembre-2025-n25-00442\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220423,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse, le 25 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/00442","author":"Kohen","date":"8 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse, statuant par ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 9 septembre 2025, se prononce sur une demande d'expulsion et de provision. Un...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-0ITfUIWxi9k-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-0ITfUIWxi9k-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-0ITfUIWxi9k-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-0ITfUIWxi9k-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-0ITfUIWxi9k-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-0ITfUIWxi9k-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":494624,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-28-octobre-2025-n25-00159\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220423,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse, le 28 octobre 2025, n\u00b025\/00159","author":"Kohen","date":"8 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse, le 28 octobre 2025, se prononce sur une opposition \u00e0 contrainte \u00e9mise par un organisme de recouvrement. L\u2019opposante...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-YCdjFYsEk9Q-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-YCdjFYsEk9Q-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-YCdjFYsEk9Q-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-YCdjFYsEk9Q-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-YCdjFYsEk9Q-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-YCdjFYsEk9Q-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":494668,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-28-octobre-2025-n25-00105\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220423,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse, le 28 octobre 2025, n\u00b025\/00105","author":"Kohen","date":"8 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse, statuant le 28 octobre 2025, a examin\u00e9 un litige relatif \u00e0 la reconnaissance d\u2019une maladie professionnelle. Le...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pierre-blache-uMKBGyH8hCk-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pierre-blache-uMKBGyH8hCk-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pierre-blache-uMKBGyH8hCk-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pierre-blache-uMKBGyH8hCk-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pierre-blache-uMKBGyH8hCk-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pierre-blache-uMKBGyH8hCk-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":499728,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-26-novembre-2025-n23-00599\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220423,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse, le 26 novembre 2025, n\u00b023\/00599","author":"Kohen","date":"8 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse, statuant en mati\u00e8re sociale, a rendu un jugement le 26 novembre 2025. Une personne contestait un indu de revenu de...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-mIT9kEQBC6Q-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-mIT9kEQBC6Q-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-mIT9kEQBC6Q-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-mIT9kEQBC6Q-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-mIT9kEQBC6Q-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-mIT9kEQBC6Q-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":699747,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-mulhouse-le-9-decembre-2025-n25-00146\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220423,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse, le 9 d\u00e9cembre 2025, n\u00b025\/00146","author":"Kohen","date":"27 de Abril, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Mulhouse, par une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 du pr\u00e9sident du 28 janvier 2025, a constat\u00e9 la r\u00e9siliation d\u2019un contrat de sous-location...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-KfphgU3nUqQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-KfphgU3nUqQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-KfphgU3nUqQ-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-KfphgU3nUqQ-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-KfphgU3nUqQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-KfphgU3nUqQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1220423","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1220423"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1220423\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4764"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1220423"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1220423"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1220423"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}