<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Ma&#xEE;tre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p&#xE9;nal &#xE0; Paris</provider_name><provider_url>https://kohenavocats.com/ru/</provider_url><author_name>Ma&#xEE;tre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p&#xE9;nal &#xE0; Paris</author_name><author_url>https://kohenavocats.com/ru/</author_url><title>A E Madu v Loughborough College</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="rY1tkFQ3ch"&gt;&lt;a href="https://kohenavocats.com/ru/jurisprudences/a-e-madu-v-loughborough-college/"&gt;A E Madu v Loughborough College&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://kohenavocats.com/ru/jurisprudences/a-e-madu-v-loughborough-college/embed/#?secret=rY1tkFQ3ch" width="600" height="338" title="&#xAB;A E Madu v Loughborough College&#xBB; &#x2014; Ma&#xEE;tre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p&#xE9;nal &#xE0; Paris" data-secret="rY1tkFQ3ch" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script&gt;
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://kohenavocats.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>HIS HONOUR JUDGE JAMES TAYLER The issue 1. Should costs applications in discrimination complaints be treated differently to costs applications in other types of complaint? In one sense, obviously no, but in another sense, the answer will often be yes. Let me explain. The legal test for an award of costs is the same whatever the complaint. But there are...</description></oembed>
