1.0Maître Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit pénal à Parishttps://kohenavocats.com/ru/Maître Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit pénal à Parishttps://kohenavocats.com/ru/D Gibbons v K Chinambu & Anorrich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="xErfZfMITK"><a href="https://kohenavocats.com/ru/jurisprudences/d-gibbons-v-k-chinambu-anor/">D Gibbons v K Chinambu & Anor</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://kohenavocats.com/ru/jurisprudences/d-gibbons-v-k-chinambu-anor/embed/#?secret=xErfZfMITK" width="600" height="338" title="«D Gibbons v K Chinambu & Anor» — Maître Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit pénal à Paris" data-secret="xErfZfMITK" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script>
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://kohenavocats.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
</script>
SUMMARY DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION The claimant complained that she was unfairly dismissed and that her dismissal was both conduct because of something arising in consequence of her disability (section 15 Equality Act 2010) and harassment related to disability (section 26). On a correct reading of its decision the tribunal had found as a fact that there were two operative or contributing...