1.0Maître Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit pénal à Parishttps://kohenavocats.com/ru/Maître Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit pénal à Parishttps://kohenavocats.com/ru/Frederick Lyndon Wangler v Information Commissionerrich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="1RaoZ5YXit"><a href="https://kohenavocats.com/ru/jurisprudences/frederick-lyndon-wangler-v-information-commissioner/">Frederick Lyndon Wangler v Information Commissioner</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://kohenavocats.com/ru/jurisprudences/frederick-lyndon-wangler-v-information-commissioner/embed/#?secret=1RaoZ5YXit" width="600" height="338" title="«Frederick Lyndon Wangler v Information Commissioner» — Maître Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit pénal à Paris" data-secret="1RaoZ5YXit" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script>
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://kohenavocats.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
</script>
1. The appeal is dismissed. REASONS Mode of hearing 2. The parties and the Tribunal agreed that this matter was suitable for determination on the papers in accordance with rule 32 Chamber’s Procedure Rules. 3. The Tribunal considered an agreed open bundle of evidence comprising 116 PDF pages, the Case Management Directions dated 05 September 2022 and a Closed Bundle...