<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Ma&#xEE;tre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p&#xE9;nal &#xE0; Paris</provider_name><provider_url>https://kohenavocats.com/ru/</provider_url><author_name>Ma&#xEE;tre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p&#xE9;nal &#xE0; Paris</author_name><author_url>https://kohenavocats.com/ru/</author_url><title>Jennifer Benjamin v The Markfield Project</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="v9vMMOiyn8"&gt;&lt;a href="https://kohenavocats.com/ru/jurisprudences/jennifer-benjamin-v-the-markfield-project/"&gt;Jennifer Benjamin v The Markfield Project&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://kohenavocats.com/ru/jurisprudences/jennifer-benjamin-v-the-markfield-project/embed/#?secret=v9vMMOiyn8" width="600" height="338" title="&#xAB;Jennifer Benjamin v The Markfield Project&#xBB; &#x2014; Ma&#xEE;tre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p&#xE9;nal &#xE0; Paris" data-secret="v9vMMOiyn8" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script&gt;
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://kohenavocats.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>SUMMARY Practice and procedure &#x2013; appeal and cross-appeal against reconsideration decision Unfair dismissal &#x2013; compensation &#x2013; mitigation and re-training In her application to the Employment Tribunal (&#x201C;ET&#x201D;) to reconsider its decision on remedy, the claimant sought to rely on further documentation relating to mitigation and said that her evidence on injury to feelings had been adversely impacted by her disability....</description></oembed>
