1.0Maître Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit pénal à Parishttps://kohenavocats.com/ru/Maître Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit pénal à Parishttps://kohenavocats.com/ru/K Cook v Gentoo Group Limitedrich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="UnuBoK3nqx"><a href="https://kohenavocats.com/ru/jurisprudences/k-cook-v-gentoo-group-limited/">K Cook v Gentoo Group Limited</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://kohenavocats.com/ru/jurisprudences/k-cook-v-gentoo-group-limited/embed/#?secret=UnuBoK3nqx" width="600" height="338" title="«K Cook v Gentoo Group Limited» — Maître Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit pénal à Paris" data-secret="UnuBoK3nqx" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script>
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://kohenavocats.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
</script>
SUMMARY AGE DISCRIMINATION The respondent dismissed the claimant by reason of redundancy. The respondent failed to comply with its usual policies and hurried through the claimant’s dismissal to avoid him obtaining an enhanced redundancy payment should his dismissal occur after he reached 55 years of age. The employment tribunal held that the actual comparators identified by the claimant were inappropriate...