1.0Maître Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit pénal à Parishttps://kohenavocats.com/ru/Maître Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit pénal à Parishttps://kohenavocats.com/ru/Peter Webb v Information Commissionerrich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="oFWBSAMMYe"><a href="https://kohenavocats.com/ru/jurisprudences/peter-webb-v-information-commissioner-2/">Peter Webb v Information Commissioner</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://kohenavocats.com/ru/jurisprudences/peter-webb-v-information-commissioner-2/embed/#?secret=oFWBSAMMYe" width="600" height="338" title="«Peter Webb v Information Commissioner» — Maître Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit pénal à Paris" data-secret="oFWBSAMMYe" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script>
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://kohenavocats.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
</script>
1. The appeal is dismissed. REASONS Mode of hearing 2. The parties and the Tribunal agreed that this matter was suitable for determination on the papers in accordance with rule 32 Chamber’s Procedure Rules. 3. The Tribunal considered an agreed open bundle of evidence comprising 176 pages and additional documents provided by the Appellant as submissions – 10 documents in...