1.0Maître Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit pénal à Parishttps://kohenavocats.com/ru/Maître Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit pénal à Parishttps://kohenavocats.com/ru/R v Feige Yurich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="OSWYQDlx0w"><a href="https://kohenavocats.com/ru/jurisprudences/r-v-feige-yu/">R v Feige Yu</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://kohenavocats.com/ru/jurisprudences/r-v-feige-yu/embed/#?secret=OSWYQDlx0w" width="600" height="338" title="«R v Feige Yu» — Maître Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit pénal à Paris" data-secret="OSWYQDlx0w" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script>
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://kohenavocats.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
</script>
(Approved) LORD JUSTICE DINGEMANS: Introduction 1. This is the hearing of an application for an extension of time of 129 days and for leave to appeal against conviction which has been referred to the full court by the single judge. 2. The single judge referred two grounds of appeal to the court. There was a third ground, which the court...