{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","title":"Helsingin HO 20.2.2023 268 - Rangaistusm\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4ys","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"gAtF4bcVnW\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/helsingin-ho-20-2-2023-268-rangaistusmaarays\/\">Helsingin HO 20.2.2023 268 &#8212; Rangaistusm\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4ys<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/helsingin-ho-20-2-2023-268-rangaistusmaarays\/embed\/#?secret=gAtF4bcVnW\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abHelsingin HO 20.2.2023 268 &#8212; Rangaistusm\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4ys\u00bb &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"gAtF4bcVnW\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Rangaistusm\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4ysasian valittajan asiamies oli yhdeks\u00e4n p\u00e4iv\u00e4\u00e4 ennen k\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeuden p\u00e4\u00e4k\u00e4sittely\u00e4 ilmoittanut s\u00e4hk\u00f6postitse k\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeudelle, etteiv\u00e4t h\u00e4n tai p\u00e4\u00e4mies osallistu istuntok\u00e4sittelyyn. H\u00e4n oli pyyt\u00e4nyt ottamaan ennakkovastaukseksi otsikoimansa asiakirjan huomioon asiaa k\u00e4sitelt\u00e4ess\u00e4 ja ratkaistaessa. Valittaja tai asiamies eiv\u00e4t olleet saapuneet k\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeuden p\u00e4\u00e4k\u00e4sittelyyn. Hovioikeus katsoi ratkaisustaan ilmenevin perustein, ett\u00e4 k\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeus oli menetellyt virheellisesti ja laiminly\u00f6nyt prosessinjohtovelvollisuuttaan, kun se oli j\u00e4tt\u00e4nyt..."}