{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","title":"Helsingin HO 3.7.2019 870 - Asumisoikeus","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"6jVSl7CbRe\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/helsingin-ho-3-7-2019-870-asumisoikeus\/\">Helsingin HO 3.7.2019 870 &#8212; Asumisoikeus<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/helsingin-ho-3-7-2019-870-asumisoikeus\/embed\/#?secret=6jVSl7CbRe\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abHelsingin HO 3.7.2019 870 &#8212; Asumisoikeus\u00bb &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"6jVSl7CbRe\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Kysymys asumisoikeuslain 16 \u00a7:n 4 momentin mukaisen asumisoikeushuoneiston k\u00e4ytt\u00f6vastikkeen enimm\u00e4istason m\u00e4\u00e4rittelyst\u00e4 sek\u00e4 siit\u00e4, oliko kantajalta peritty k\u00e4ytt\u00f6vastike ylitt\u00e4nyt t\u00e4m\u00e4n tason. Kysymys my\u00f6s k\u00e4ytt\u00f6vastikkeen enimm\u00e4istason vahvistamista koskevien vaatimusten tutkimisesta. ESPOON K\u00c4R\u00c4J\u00c4OIKEUDEN TUOMIO 21.12.2017 HELSINGIN HOVIOIKEUDEN TUOMIO 3.7.2019 Tuomiolauselma Muutokset k\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeuden tuomioon: Kanne j\u00e4tet\u00e4\u00e4n tutkimatta silt\u00e4 osin kuin A on kohdissa 1 ja 2 vaatinut vahvistettavaksi k\u00e4ytt\u00f6vastikkeen..."}