{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","title":"KHO 20.7.2020\/3233 - Kansalaisuus","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"lxZm4xoV5V\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-20-7-2020-3233-kansalaisuus\/\">KHO 20.7.2020\/3233 &#8212; Kansalaisuus<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-20-7-2020-3233-kansalaisuus\/embed\/#?secret=lxZm4xoV5V\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abKHO 20.7.2020\/3233 &#8212; Kansalaisuus\u00bb &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"lxZm4xoV5V\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Maahanmuuttovirasto oli hyl\u00e4nnyt Nigerian kansalaisen kansalaisuushakemuksen, koska t\u00e4m\u00e4n ei katsottu osoittaneen kielitaitoaan kansalaisuuslain 17 \u00a7:ss\u00e4 edellytell\u00e4 tavalla. Muutoksenhakija oli kyll\u00e4 suorittanut pyk\u00e4l\u00e4n 7 kohdassa mainitun ammatillisesta aikuiskoulutuksesta annetussa laissa (631\/1998) tarkoitetun ammattitutkinnon, mutta Maahanmuuttovirasto katsoi hankkimansa selvityksen perusteella, ett\u00e4 tutkintoa ei ollut suoritettu suomen kielell\u00e4. Maahanmuuttovirasto perusteli p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6st\u00e4\u00e4n ammattitutkinnon my\u00f6nt\u00e4neen oppilaitoksen antamalla selvityksell\u00e4, jossa oli..."}