{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","title":"KHO 21.12.2018\/6061 - Ulkomaalaisasia","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"DXq3d6sVGS\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-21-12-2018-6061-ulkomaalaisasia\/\">KHO 21.12.2018\/6061 &#8212; Ulkomaalaisasia<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-21-12-2018-6061-ulkomaalaisasia\/embed\/#?secret=DXq3d6sVGS\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abKHO 21.12.2018\/6061 &#8212; Ulkomaalaisasia\u00bb &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"DXq3d6sVGS\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Irakin kansalainen A oli avioitunut Irakin kansalaisen perheenkokoajan B:n kanssa. Maahanmuuttovirasto hylk\u00e4si A:n perhesideperusteisen oleskelulupahakemuksen ja katsoi muun ohessa, ett\u00e4 toimeentuloedellytyksest\u00e4 poikkeamiselle ei ollut perustetta. Toimeentuloedellytyksest\u00e4 voidaan yksitt\u00e4isess\u00e4 tapauksessa poiketa, jos siihen on poikkeuksellisen painava syy tai lapsen etu sit\u00e4 vaatii. Maahanmuuttovirasto viittasi p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksess\u00e4\u00e4n viel\u00e4 ulkomaalaislain 114 \u00a7:n 3 momenttiin ja katsoi, ettei yhteisen perhe-el\u00e4m\u00e4n..."}