{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","title":"KHO:2018:72 - L\u00e4\u00e4kevalmiste","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BGrq1UVa9v\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho201872-laakevalmiste\/\">KHO:2018:72 &#8212; L\u00e4\u00e4kevalmiste<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho201872-laakevalmiste\/embed\/#?secret=BGrq1UVa9v\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abKHO:2018:72 &#8212; L\u00e4\u00e4kevalmiste\u00bb &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"BGrq1UVa9v\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"L\u00e4kemedelsprisn\u00e4mnden hade i sitt beslut, med vilket den avslagit en ans\u00f6kan om fastst\u00e4llande av begr\u00e4nsad grunders\u00e4ttning och sk\u00e4ligt partipris f\u00f6r ett l\u00e4kemedel som beviljats f\u00f6rs\u00e4ljningstillst\u00e5nd f\u00f6r s\u00e4rl\u00e4kemedel, konstaterat att l\u00e4kemedlet uppfyllde kriterierna f\u00f6r begr\u00e4nsad grunders\u00e4ttning men att de f\u00f6r preparatet f\u00f6reslagna partipriserna inte kunde anses vara sk\u00e4liga. H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen upph\u00e4vde prisn\u00e4mndens beslut och \u00e5tervisade \u00e4rendet..."}