{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","title":"KHO:2020:75 - Toimeentulotuki","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"VvL5tdLz4E\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho202075-toimeentulotuki\/\">KHO:2020:75 &#8212; Toimeentulotuki<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho202075-toimeentulotuki\/embed\/#?secret=VvL5tdLz4E\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abKHO:2020:75 &#8212; Toimeentulotuki\u00bb &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"VvL5tdLz4E\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Lastenvalvojan vahvistamassa lapsen huollosta ja tapaamisoikeudesta tehdyss\u00e4 sopimuksessa oli sovittu, ett\u00e4 l\u00e4hivanhempi maksaa lapsen kulut, jotka aiheutuivat et\u00e4vanhemman tapaamisesta. Kansanel\u00e4kelaitos ei ollut my\u00f6nt\u00e4nyt l\u00e4hivanhemmalle perustoimeentulotukea lapsen matkakuluihin, koska lapsen tapaamisesta aiheutuneita menoja ei toimeentulotuesta annetun lain 7 b \u00a7:n 1 momentin 6 kohdan mukaan huomioida l\u00e4hivanhemmalle. Muilta osin matkakulut olivat p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksen mukaan perusosalla katettavia menoja,..."}