{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","title":"KHO:2022:115 - Milj\u00f6skyddslagen","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"VIkXXdkOaO\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho2022115-miljoskyddslagen\/\">KHO:2022:115 &#8212; Milj\u00f6skyddslagen<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho2022115-miljoskyddslagen\/embed\/#?secret=VIkXXdkOaO\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abKHO:2022:115 &#8212; Milj\u00f6skyddslagen\u00bb &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"VIkXXdkOaO\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen hade att p\u00e5 verksamhetsidkarnas besv\u00e4r avg\u00f6ra om ett \u00e4rende som g\u00e4llde utvidgning av ett djurstall kunde avg\u00f6ras med anm\u00e4lningsf\u00f6rfarande eller om projektet f\u00f6rutsatte milj\u00f6tillst\u00e5nd. Utg\u00e5ende fr\u00e5n verksamhetens omfattning och antalet djur g\u00e4llde \u00e4rendet en v\u00e4sentlig \u00e4ndring av verksamheten i ett anm\u00e4lningspliktigt djurstall. I \u00e4rendet skulle f\u00f6rst avg\u00f6ras om verksamheten efter \u00e4ndringen orsakar osk\u00e4ligt..."}