{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","title":"KHO:2022:126 - Ymp\u00e4rist\u00f6lupa","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"8j47tJfNl4\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho2022126-ymparistolupa\/\">KHO:2022:126 &#8212; Ymp\u00e4rist\u00f6lupa<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho2022126-ymparistolupa\/embed\/#?secret=8j47tJfNl4\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abKHO:2022:126 &#8212; Ymp\u00e4rist\u00f6lupa\u00bb &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"8j47tJfNl4\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"I sitt genm\u00e4le \u00f6ver regionf\u00f6rvaltningsverkets besv\u00e4r f\u00e4ste bolaget uppm\u00e4rksamhet vid att regionf\u00f6rvaltningsverkets besv\u00e4rsr\u00e4tt enligt lagens f\u00f6rarbeten skulle ha varit begr\u00e4nsad till endast vissa situationer, och att ifr\u00e5gavarande \u00e4rende inte h\u00f6rde till dem. P\u00e5 grund av detta tog h\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen f\u00f6rst st\u00e4llning till regionf\u00f6rvaltningsverkets besv\u00e4rsr\u00e4tt i \u00e4rendet innan huvudsaken avgjordes. En specialbest\u00e4mmelse om en myndighets besv\u00e4rsr\u00e4tt..."}