{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","title":"KKO 239\/2018 - Asiavaltuus","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"UZHflpjb7A\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kko-239-2018-asiavaltuus\/\">KKO 239\/2018 &#8212; Asiavaltuus<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kko-239-2018-asiavaltuus\/embed\/#?secret=UZHflpjb7A\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abKKO 239\/2018 &#8212; Asiavaltuus\u00bb &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"UZHflpjb7A\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4liitto vaati kanteessaan, ett\u00e4 ty\u00f6nantaja velvoitetaan suorittamaan ty\u00f6ntekij\u00f6ille n\u00e4iden liitolle peritt\u00e4v\u00e4ksi siirt\u00e4m\u00e4t ty\u00f6palkkasaamiset. Hovioikeus katsoi, ettei liitolla ollut oikeutta omissa nimiss\u00e4\u00e4n ajaa kannetta ja j\u00e4tti kanteen tutkimatta. Korkein oikeus kumoten hovioikeuden p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksen katsoi, ett\u00e4 siirronsaajalla on perimissiirron perusteella oikeus omissa nimiss\u00e4\u00e4n ajaa t\u00e4llaista kannetta saatavan perimiseksi huolimatta siit\u00e4, ett\u00e4 suorituksia oli vaadittu maksettavaksi kullekin ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4lle."}