{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","title":"TT 2016:120 - Irtisanomissuoja","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"m4btjV1zyO\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-2016120-irtisanomissuoja\/\">TT 2016:120 &#8212; Irtisanomissuoja<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-2016120-irtisanomissuoja\/embed\/#?secret=m4btjV1zyO\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abTT 2016:120 &#8212; Irtisanomissuoja\u00bb &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"m4btjV1zyO\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Ty\u00f6nantaja oli irtisanonut varap\u00e4\u00e4luottamusmiehen\u00e4 toimineen ilmailuhuollon ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4n ty\u00f6sopimuksen tuotannollisilla ja taloudellisilla syill\u00e4. Ty\u00f6nantaja oli palkannut uuden ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4n m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4aikaiseen ty\u00f6suhteeseen irtisanotun varap\u00e4\u00e4luottamusmiehen irtisanomisaikana, eik\u00e4 ollut tarjonnut irtisanotulle varap\u00e4\u00e4luottamusmiehelle ty\u00f6t\u00e4 t\u00e4m\u00e4n irtisanomisaikana tai kohtuullisessa ajassa irtisanomisajan p\u00e4\u00e4ttymisen j\u00e4lkeen. Ty\u00f6nantajalla tarjolla oleva ty\u00f6 ei ollut v\u00e4hentynyt olennaisesti ja pitk\u00e4aikaisesti, eik\u00e4 sill\u00e4 n\u00e4in ollen ollut asiallista ja painavaa syyt\u00e4..."}