{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","title":"TT 2017:129 - Palkkaus","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"MQ1iDCnhP8\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-2017129-palkkaus\/\">TT 2017:129 &#8212; Palkkaus<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-2017129-palkkaus\/embed\/#?secret=MQ1iDCnhP8\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abTT 2017:129 &#8212; Palkkaus\u00bb &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"MQ1iDCnhP8\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Ty\u00f6nantaja oli tarjonnut ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4lle lakis\u00e4\u00e4teisen velvollisuutensa mukaisesti uutta ty\u00f6t\u00e4 irtisanomisen vaihtoehtona. Ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4 hyv\u00e4ksyi uuden ty\u00f6suhteen ehdot alempaa palkkaa lukuunottamatta. Uusi ty\u00f6 alkoi ty\u00f6suhteen katkeamatta alkuper\u00e4isen irtisanomisajan j\u00e4lkeen, mist\u00e4 lukien ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4lle my\u00f6s maksettiin alempaa palkkaa. Ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksessa oli m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4ys my\u00f6s ty\u00f6suhteen ehtojen muuttamisesta irtisanomisperusteella ja irtisanomisaikaa noudattaen. Kanteen mukaan ty\u00f6nantajan olisi tullut noudattaa irtisanomisaikaa ennen palkan alentamista...."}