{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","title":"TT 2017:36 - Ty\u00f6sopimuksen irtisanominen","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"gvzeveznt2\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-201736-tyosopimuksen-irtisanominen\/\">TT 2017:36 &#8212; Ty\u00f6sopimuksen irtisanominen<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-201736-tyosopimuksen-irtisanominen\/embed\/#?secret=gvzeveznt2\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abTT 2017:36 &#8212; Ty\u00f6sopimuksen irtisanominen\u00bb &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"gvzeveznt2\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Energiayhti\u00f6n asiakasneuvojan ty\u00f6sopimuksen irtisanomisperusteeksi oli esitetty kaksi yksil\u00f6ity\u00e4 laiminly\u00f6nti\u00e4 sek\u00e4 useista varoituksista ja huomautuksista huolimatta jatkunut muunlainen ty\u00f6teht\u00e4vien laiminly\u00f6nti. Asiassa esitetyn selvityksen mukaan ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4 ei ollut jatkanut menettely\u00e4, jonka johdosta h\u00e4nt\u00e4 oli varoitettu vajaat kaksi kuukautta ennen irtisanomista. Muut varoitukset ja huomautukset olivat eri syist\u00e4 aiheettomia tai niill\u00e4 ei ollut ajallista tai asiallista yhteytt\u00e4 irtisanomisen..."}