{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","title":"TT 2017:84 - Kanteen tutkiminen","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"2SQeffJkqr\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-201784-kanteen-tutkiminen\/\">TT 2017:84 &#8212; Kanteen tutkiminen<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-201784-kanteen-tutkiminen\/embed\/#?secret=2SQeffJkqr\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abTT 2017:84 &#8212; Kanteen tutkiminen\u00bb &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"2SQeffJkqr\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Kysymys tuomiossa TT 2016:48 todetun ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen tieten rikkomista koskevan menettelyn jatkamisesta. Kanne j\u00e4tetty tutkimatta. (\u00c4\u00e4n.) KANTAJA Ammattiliitto Pro ry VASTAAJAT Autoalan Keskusliitto ry Delta Auto Oy ASIA Palkkaus K\u00c4SITTELY TY\u00d6TUOMIOISTUIMESSA Suullinen valmistelu 15.2.2017 TY\u00d6EHTOSOPIMUKSEN M\u00c4\u00c4R\u00c4YKSET Autoalan Keskusliitto ry:n ja Ammattiliitto Pro ry:n v\u00e4lisess\u00e4 4.11.2013 allekirjoitetussa Autoalan toimihenkil\u00f6it\u00e4 koskevassa ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksessa 1.11.2013 \u2013 31.10.2016 on muun muassa..."}