{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","title":"TT 2018:118 - Palkkaus","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"KIcH6eSGMB\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-2018118-palkkaus-2\/\">TT 2018:118 &#8212; Palkkaus<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-2018118-palkkaus-2\/embed\/#?secret=KIcH6eSGMB\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abTT 2018:118 &#8212; Palkkaus\u00bb &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"KIcH6eSGMB\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Elintarvikealojen ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksessa on m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4ys, jonka mukaan palkkiopalkkaty\u00f6ss\u00e4 ty\u00f6 on hinnoiteltava siten, ett\u00e4 ansio on v\u00e4hint\u00e4\u00e4n 15 prosenttia korkeampi kuin ohjetuntipalkka. Tuomiossa katsottiin, ett\u00e4 m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4yksess\u00e4 tarkoitettua 15 prosentin ehtoa ei ole perusteltua pit\u00e4\u00e4 sellaisena takuupalkkaehtona, jonka nojalla ty\u00f6nantajan tulisi taata ty\u00f6ntekij\u00f6ille tuo v\u00e4himm\u00e4isansio jokaisella tarkasteluajanjaksolla riippumatta siit\u00e4, onko hinnoittelussa m\u00e4\u00e4ritelty tavoite saavutettu vai ei. (Ks. my\u00f6s..."}