{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","title":"TT 2018:28 - Luvaton poissaolo ty\u00f6st\u00e4","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"YkbqvZdXsf\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-201828-luvaton-poissaolo-tyosta\/\">TT 2018:28 &#8212; Luvaton poissaolo ty\u00f6st\u00e4<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-201828-luvaton-poissaolo-tyosta\/embed\/#?secret=YkbqvZdXsf\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abTT 2018:28 &#8212; Luvaton poissaolo ty\u00f6st\u00e4\u00bb &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"YkbqvZdXsf\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Ty\u00f6nantaja irtisanoi ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4n ty\u00f6sopimuksen sen j\u00e4lkeen, kun ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4 oli ollut luvatta poissa ty\u00f6st\u00e4 yhden p\u00e4iv\u00e4n. Ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4lle oli alle vuosi ennen ty\u00f6sopimuksen irtisanomista annettu kaksi irtisanomisuhan sis\u00e4lt\u00e4nytt\u00e4 varoitusta ty\u00f6st\u00e4 my\u00f6h\u00e4stymisten johdosta. Varoituksilla katsottiin olevan ajallinen yhteys irtisanomisperusteeseen. Varoitukset ja ty\u00f6sopimuksen irtisanominen johtuivat samasta perusteesta eli ty\u00f6aikojen laiminly\u00f6nnist\u00e4, joten varoituksilla katsottiin olevan my\u00f6s asiallinen yhteys irtisanomisperusteeseen. Kun..."}