{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","title":"TT 2018:29 - Irtisanomissuojasopimus","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"G7PvIAAYHx\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-201829-irtisanomissuojasopimus\/\">TT 2018:29 &#8212; Irtisanomissuojasopimus<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-201829-irtisanomissuojasopimus\/embed\/#?secret=G7PvIAAYHx\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abTT 2018:29 &#8212; Irtisanomissuojasopimus\u00bb &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"G7PvIAAYHx\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Asiassa oli kysymys siit\u00e4, oliko taloudellisilla ja tuotannollisilla syill\u00e4 irtisanotulle ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4lle tarjolla ollut ty\u00f6 v\u00e4hentynyt olennaisesti ja pysyv\u00e4sti ja olisiko h\u00e4nelle tullut tarjota projektip\u00e4\u00e4llik\u00f6iden teht\u00e4vi\u00e4, joihin ty\u00f6nantaja palkkasi kolme uutta ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4\u00e4. Tuomiossa katsottiin, ett\u00e4 koska uusien projektip\u00e4\u00e4llik\u00f6iden selvitettiin tehneen ty\u00f6suhteensa alusta l\u00e4htien irtisanottua ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4n ty\u00f6teht\u00e4vi\u00e4 vaativampia teht\u00e4vi\u00e4, heit\u00e4 ei ollut palkattu samaan tai samankaltaiseen teht\u00e4v\u00e4\u00e4n..."}