{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","title":"TT 2018:42 - Asian palauttaminen","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"h5kJwtRQki\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-201842-asian-palauttaminen\/\">TT 2018:42 &#8212; Asian palauttaminen<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-201842-asian-palauttaminen\/embed\/#?secret=h5kJwtRQki\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abTT 2018:42 &#8212; Asian palauttaminen\u00bb &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"h5kJwtRQki\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Ty\u00f6tuomioistuimessa esitetty lis\u00e4selvitys kuvanvalmistamoita koskevan ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen yleissitovuuden arvioinnin perusteista antoi aiheen arvioida uudelleen ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen yleissitovuutta. T\u00e4m\u00e4n vuoksi ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen yleissitovuuden vahvistamislautakunnan p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6s kumottiin ja asia palautettiin vahvistamislautakunnan uudelleen k\u00e4sitelt\u00e4v\u00e4ksi. ASIA Valitus ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen yleissitovuuden vahvistamislautakunnan p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksest\u00e4 kuvanvalmistamoiden ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen yleissitovuutta koskevassa asiassa VALITTAJA Palvelualojen ammattiliitto PAM ry P\u00c4\u00c4T\u00d6S, JOSTA VALITETAAN Ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen yleissitovuuden vahvistamislautakunnan 13.11.2017 asiassa 11811 antama p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6s..."}